Temporal deviation of the Apennine colossus

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

The writers of history, as they were the custom, age everything that is in sight. So the colossus was dispatched to the 16th century. And if someone asks unnecessary questions, they will point him to such a monument that denies the catastrophe.

- See ?!

- Oh, you - Piranesi, Piranesi!

Material taken from rodline magazine.

When I read under the photograph of the Apennine Colossus that it had been sculpted in 1580, the first impression was a sense of deception. And I will show you in this post that the impression was correct.

1. It is impossible for such a refined structure to survive the pole shift without damage, even though this is Florence, where the catastrophe took place even as a percentage of Tartar destruction. The fact that at this longitude there were destruction is evidenced by his paintings of Piranesi.

He has enough such images. He painted them after the flood, fifty years later.

If not the colossus itself, then all these curls, mustaches, hair were obliged to fly off from the mudflow emery masses. They didn't fly off. Because no mudslide ground them.

So, you won't give a colossus 430 years.

In 1580 it was not sculpted.

2. Maybe 300 years old? - Consider this possibility. In climates with more or less winters, with evening-morning frosts, in spring and autumn, several hundred, if not thousands, cycles of "dry-wet-frost-defrost-crack-ice-kirdyk-flew off" will accumulate over 100 years.

In Russia, such a mustache will "dry out" in 108 years, as they say, to fittings. If you exaggerate, correct it.

Let's go back to Florence. Florence has a Mediterranean climate.

But, as can be seen from the table, there are frosts here. And in Rome, which is 2.5 degrees to the south (250 km), snow and cold are also not uncommon (the Colosseum in Rome is destroyed by frosts - video). Let not in 108 years, but in 302 years, but the mustache should have disappeared. And they still hold on.

So, you won't give 302 to a colossus.

In 1710, it was not sculpted either.

3. Maybe 200 years can be given? - This point would not have been if an old photograph of the Apennine Colossus had not been dangling on the net. I found a modern one shot from the same angle and placed them side by side. Compare:

It doesn't seem to me. It doesn't exactly seem like it. The old man seemed to be "younger", as it happens after a haircut.

The hair has decreased. The mustache also diminished. There were also fewer rags, wool, on the shoulders.

What year is the photo? And here a surprise awaits us!

Signature on the right.

8/9/911.

What does it mean?

September 8, 1911?

DONNA helped with translation

The signature on the postcard is "cordiali saluti ore 8 pom" - "heartily greet 8 o'clock in the afternoon" with the date "1000 years ago." Someone who is in the subject, as it is fashionable to say now, greeted the same knowledgeable person with emphasized pleasure, indicating on the postcard the actual date of its departure.

At the beginning of the 20th century, someone, "in the old fashioned way", writes a date without adding a newfangled one to it? I have no experience, I ask - could this be a 1000-year shift? For the sake of truth, in the comments, the magazine noted that this is most likely a generally accepted abbreviation for dates.

It turns out that in 1911, the old colossus had rich vegetation. The 100-year-old photograph shows the sharp ends of the hanging strands, which are not visible in the modern photograph.

For a hundred years we have seen serious destruction of the sculpture. And in 1911 it was like new. You can add another 60 years for the age. It will turn out to be 160. But this is the maximum.

So, you won't give a colossus 200 years.

In 1810 it was not sculpted either.

Demidovs will not mind? Demidov bought a villa with a sculpture in 1860.