Where did the inhabitants of Tartaria disappear to?

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

How many people lived in Russia? Let's look at ancient statistics. 12th century - the first population census in Russia. Conducted by the Tatar-Mongols. 10 million people. 18th century - the population census was carried out by Peter. 15 million people. The end of the 19th century - the population census was carried out by Nicholas 2. The population of the state within the current borders is 67, 5 million people!

The entire Russian Empire - 125 million people! Population explosion! For two hundred years of serfdom, the population has increased exponentially!

Have you started to live better? Serfdom - complete prosperity for rural workers? Let's see the life span.

Average life expectancy. Official data has been collected since 1896. So:

1897 - 30.5 years. In the same period in Europe, life expectancy is not much greater.

A period earlier. Statistics only in Europe. For example: in Germany life expectancy in 1741 was 25.5 years, in Holland - 30.9 years.

In the same period, statistics are not kept in Russia. Historians refer to indirect data, such as fiction, and the average life expectancy is comparable to that of Europe. That is, 25-30 years.

Further on to the interesting.

Recruitment service. This is a way of completing the army of those times. Under Peter 1 - life. Since 1793, a period of 25 years has been set.

Does nothing bother you?

How can the service life be 25 years with a life expectancy of 30 years or less ?! A person is called up at the age of 16. At 30 he dies. Before that, he is still sick and decrepit for at least 5 years. Active life is only 9 years old.

Under the condition of 25 years of service, at least 16 years of life expectancy is not enough. In fact, more, because after the service they went to the reserve not decrepit.

And it is not necessary to say that they wrote 25 years from the bulldozer. Army regulations are written in blood.

That is, based on the army regulations, life expectancy in the Russian Empire in 1793 was at least 46 years. 25 years of service + 16 years before the army + 5 years of decrepitude.

Then, in the Russian Empire, the duration of the recruitment service was further reduced, and by 1874 the service life became 7 years.

And this begins to converge with the figures of the official statistics on life expectancy. 16 years before the army + 7 years of service + 5 years of decrepitude. In total, approximately 30 years of life.

Using this simple arithmetic, we get the following. Life expectancy in the Russian Empire is sharply decreasing, the quality of life is falling, and the population is growing sharply.

A perverse and illogical demographic explosion.

Oppressed and persecuted people cannot be forced to multiply. And the master is not a bull producer, one cannot cope. Population growth is a total objective indicator of positiveness in the state.

Something is wrong here.

The first thing that comes to mind: there was a massive population takeover during this period. And these are not the territories that officially became part of the Russian Empire. Their population is taken into account and included in the statistics. This is the unaccounted population. It is this that creates the perverse nature of the population explosion.

Where does the population come from? - Siberia and Tartary.

In 1775, the war with Pugachev ended. The defeat of the remnants of Tartaria is complete. The surviving population was turned into slaves.

In the 18-19th centuries, there was no terrible serfdom in the Russian Empire! In the 18-19 centuries, the genocide of the captive population of another country took place in the Russian Empire!

The same or more slaves were driven into the 15 million state. Enough for everyone: for the landlords, for the tsar, for the clergy. And according to official history, serfdom suddenly changed in the 18th century. Serfs were deprived of all human rights and found themselves in personal slavery to their landowners.

Actually, serfdom in the Russian state appeared from the Cathedral Code of 1649 under the second tsar from the Romanov family. Prior to that, peasants worked as free people who were obliged to pay in kind for renting land from the state or landowner. In 1649, the peasants were suddenly assigned to the site. Interestingly, after this blatant act of violence against democracy, there was no particular peasant unrest. Took for granted. It can be seen that life was not so bad.

Moreover, Ukraine has suddenly asked for a country that has just adopted the Cathedral Code and violated human rights. A romantic event happened - the reunification of Ukraine with Russia.

All this dragged on, not wobbly, not roll, until the 18th century. And there the landlords suddenly broke loose. All sources write that it became horror, how bad it is for the peasants. At the same time, I do not find any fundamental changes in legislation such as the Cathedral Code of 1649. All the landowners simply enraged en masse.

The so-called peasant wars led by Pugachev and Razin are not peasant wars, even according to official history. Both comrades are Don Cossacks. And both uprisings began where there was tension with the serfs.

Specifically, peasant mass uprisings in Russian history are not at all a lot. Potato riots in the 1840s. And that's it! Riots were always organized by townspeople and Cossacks.

It turns out that the peasants lived well in principle, since they did not particularly riot. And the mass of people that the landowners scoffed at were not serfs. They were prisoners of war and displaced persons of the defeated enemy.

Why were there no uprisings among the prisoners? I assume that men, old people and children were killed. The bulk of the driven slaves are women. Hence, the paradoxically disenfranchised and bestial position of women in the countryside in the Russian Empire is understandable. Indeed, in Slavic culture, women have always been treated with the greatest respect. And suddenly such a terrible change. Now inconsistencies converge. Women, and later their children of both sexes, were divided into two classes. Slaves and their children and indigenous people.

Estates of the Russian Empire: nobility, clergy, merchants, Cossacks, philistines, peasants.

The prisoners were pushed mainly into the class of the peasantry. Most likely, a system was formed that we know from Soviet propaganda. Wealthy peasants (kulaks) and the peasant poor. Fists, indigenous people, at the same time with the royal power, oppress the poor, the descendants of slaves.

Within the framework of the serfdom system of those times, trade and the donation of people was a legal procedure. In 1775, a provincial reform was carried out. The number of provinces has been increased from 20 to 50. Apparently, due to the influx of the captive population.

By the way, the language changed in the 18-19 centuries. Instead of inarticulate speech like Ivan the Terrible, from Shurik's adventures, there appears a light flowing literary Russian like Pushkin's. We learned from the prisoners, apparently. Alexander Sergeevich certainly did not manage without Arina Rodionovna.

The modern Russian language is a mixture of the language of the Russian kingdom and the language of Tartaria. The Ukrainian and Belarusian languages are, perhaps, closer to the Old Church Slavonic. Maybe the prisoners were not assigned to these regions.

If you look offhand the life expectancy of famous people in Russia and in the world in the 18-19 centuries, then for some reason everyone lived for a really long time, if they did not die a violent death. Usually 60-90 years old. I mean, the average life expectancy in a society with class stratification is like the average temperature in a hospital. If the elite lived for 60-90 years, then the serfs lived even less than the terrible 25-30 years.

Serfdom was abolished in 1861. Most likely, the authorities considered that the historical memory of the people was lost. The so-called Russians have forgotten who they are and where they are from. 56 years later, in 1917, the descendants of prisoners of war turned into slaves woke up.

It seems to me that it is necessary to fundamentally divide the Russian kingdom and the Russian empire. The time line is the 18th century.

The Russian kingdom is an independent mono-ethnic state. The Russian Empire is a puppet occupation quasi-state.

The Russian kingdom and the Russian Empire have no historical continuity. The cultures of the occupied peoples were completely destroyed. In the slave-owning state created by the genocide of the Slavic peoples by the 20th century, a new quasi-nationality was created and released into life - the Russians.

Previously, the experiment was carried out in Europe and Asia. The Great Migration of Peoples and the Formation of a Quasination - the Germans. Quasi-Chinese. A similar experiment took place in the Americas. There are now Americans, Canadians, Brazilians, etc. Subsequently, America and Europe were directed along different paths. The Germans began to be split into French, Germans, Dutch, etc. Russians began to be split into Ukrainians, Belarusians, etc. America and Asia were not heavily divided according to their ethnic composition. They are not dangerous anyway.

What's the point? - in controllability. A national group capable of generating an independent self-sufficient sound idea is split into smaller ones. To the point where the collective intelligence and culture are unable to resist the external influences of globalization.

Another interesting question: where are the bones and graves of millions of deceased compatriots? For every hundred years, there should be at least 300 million corpses and, accordingly, graves. One grave is 2 square meters. Total 600 square kilometers. Let's multiply by at least two for the tracks. 1200 square kilometers. Luxembourg's area is 2500 square kilometers.

Cremation is contrary to Christianity and spread in Russia only from the middle of the 20th century. And not to say that everywhere. There are currently twenty crematoria in seventeen cities in Russia.

To be honest, I'm afraid to answer this question. Too cynical versions.

After the fall of the USSR, a huge body of knowledge on Slavic culture suddenly appeared out of nowhere. All this is from the times of the pre-Petrine era. A huge amount of systematized information. A ready-made national idea.

Who kept it? Invaders or Guardian Magi? Or both? Who posted it for use and why? I have no answer yet.

There is no mass character in the neo-Slavic movement yet. Why? Is the ancestral memory interrupted in generations? Information is distorted and therefore there is no intuitive perception?

I will express my opinion. The culture and ideology of Tartary differed significantly from the Slavic one. Modern Russians are to a large extent the descendants of the inhabitants of Tartaria. They are still very different from Western Slavs such as Czechs, Poles, both externally and internally.

Information about the culture and ideology of Tartaria is known only from the preserved in a small number of notes of Western European travelers. It seems to me that the national idea of Tartary was similar to the idea of brotherhood and equality of Power of the Soviets of People's Deputies. It is not for nothing that the population massively picked it up in 1917. Gene memory worked.

I'll make a reservation, this is important: in my view, the Power of the Soviets and the Bolsheviks (as well as the CPSU, Mensheviks and other parties) are completely different things. The power of the Soviets is the power of the people. And the parties are different, but all this is politics. In 1991, the Power of the Soviets was destroyed. And the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (KPRF) remained and no one touches it. So much for the difference.

I hope someday the primary sources of the cultural heritage of Tartaria will appear. But in any case, conscience and intuition are the main guides.