Intentional explosion of Chernobyl

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

The tragedy at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant was deliberately provoked with the aim of the collapse of the USSR and the separation of Ukraine from Russia. These are the results of an independent physical and technical investigation carried out by nuclear physicist Nikolai Kravchuk (graduated from the Department of Theory of the Atomic Nucleus of the Physics Faculty of Lomonosov Moscow State University).

The results of the study were presented by him in the work "The Mystery of the Chernobyl Catastrophe", published in 2011 in Moscow, where it received a certain resonance. Even before the publication of the book, after the first leaks in the Ukrainian press, Kravchuk was immediately fired from his job at the Institute of Theoretical Physics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.

Kravchuk's conclusions were supported in the book review supported by Professor, Doctor of Technical Sciences. I. A. Kravets, and D. Sc. V. A. Vyshinsky. However, the results of the scientist's work did not reach the wide Ukrainian public.

Kravchuk turned to the representatives of the Kiev Russian club for support. The Kiev Russian Club considers it necessary to bring its results to the attention of the Ukrainian public.

The scientist claims that the explosion of the reactor was planned in advance and carried out under the leadership of the Gorbachev Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, and the blame was carefully dumped on the station personnel, who turned out to be a "scapegoat". Then the atomic lobbyists were forced to make excuses under conditions of mutual responsibility and pressure from "perestroika". This was indirectly recognized before the world community by the Gorbachev leadership, to which all the threads lead.

“In August 1986, the official version of the unfolding of events at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant was presented at the IAEA session, and here is its main conclusion:“the root cause of the accident is a very unlikely combination of violations of the order and operation regime, committed by the power unit personnel,”notes Nikolai Kravchuk. That is, the station personnel simply could not have blown up Chernobyl without a well-thought-out external intervention.

Neither the USSR Ministry of Energy, nor the Russian Ministry of Atomic Energy, nor the State Atomic Energy Agency of Ukraine, guided by corporate solidarity in the extremely closed nuclear power industry, were not interested in an objective investigation, and did everything to prevent it from taking place, in particular, manipulated the station's operational logs. As a result, it has not yet been possible to accept a substantiated official version.

From 1 to 23 April 1986 “the state of the reactor core changed significantly. Such changes did not happen by chance, but as a result of well-planned, pre-implemented actions,”writes Kravchuk. The fourth power unit contained the maximum amount of radioactive materials for 1,500 Mki. By the time of testing, the reactor was in an extremely unstable state with power drops. In addition, some cells of the reactor contained more highly enriched fuel from nuclear submarines (plutonium-239), which led to a sharp increase in power and temperature in the core. At the same time, the stock of graphite rods drowning the reactor was exhausted. The qualified specialists of the Chernobyl NPP (A. Chernyshev) were not allowed to work on the day of the tests, and those who were then at the station, "asked to convince the head of the tests A. Dyatlov IMMEDIATELY to stop the tests, to stop the reactor." Alas, in vain, since he received exactly the opposite instructions.

In addition, most of the reactor safety equipment was disabled. "The experiment was carried out with the turbine generator (TG-8) on which the bearing was broken, and not with the serviceable TG-7." Vibration tests on increased vibration were carried out simultaneously with idle operation of the turbine with a decrease in frequency and an increase in the amplitude and power of oscillations. After a steam explosion, which occurred due to a malfunction of technical systems (bearing), which could not withstand the overload from resonance during the tests, “the reaction of the transformation of water and steam into an explosive hydrogen-oxygen mixture (that is, the second stage of the explosive process) occurred,” the scientist claims.

After a hydrogen volumetric explosion in the confined space of the reactor, the nuclear fuel from "two or more polycells", which for some reason ended up in excess in the reactor, was compacted to the walls, and a local critical mass was reached, leading to a "quasi-nuclear" explosion. And only he could move by 90 degrees the "top cover" of the "pan" weighing more than 2000 tons, located above the core "," a plasma cloud with a temperature of 40 thousand degrees formed inside the block, "which was noted by external eyewitnesses of the accident. The presence of highly enriched uranium 238U hidden by the personnel “manifested itself in the presence of an excess of californium in the accident products” on the first day, - says Nikolai Kravchuk, - “it was he who gave 17% of gamma activity, again turning into plutonium-239 (with a half-life 2 days - which is essential for the next)! It is worth noting the seismic impact of an explosion of such force, of such a scale, which shook the building of a block weighing tens of thousands of tons - it, of course, could induce a local earthquake, "which was recorded. However, in spite of this clear evidence, the fact of a nuclear explosion, as well as its symptoms, were tried not to be recognized.

By itself, this explosion did not immediately lead to widespread radioactive contamination. The sharp increase in radiation in the next day was due to a gradual increase in the reaction of plutonium and a series of explosions, significantly intensified by improper quenching with water and sand in the expectation that the contents of the reactor are intact.

"If there was an immediate understanding of the essence of what happened, it would be clear what to do - no filling, except perhaps throwing bags of boric acid!" “It was then, from April 27, that the radiation pollution of the surroundings sharply increased - tenfold, so what happened on the evening of April 26 was inevitable, and no boric acid would have helped at that moment … And if it had been understood immediately, it would have become obvious that the most urgent task was to focus on the immediate evacuation of the population from the 50-kilometer zone. " However, this was not done either.

Remarkable is the fate of one of the direct culprits of the disaster, Anatoly Dyatlov, who gave criminal orders and was also aware of other tests on the unit, which, according to the plan of the leaders behind him, should have guaranteed “finish off” Chernobyl, even if it had not been possible to do it at the previous stage. (alas, it succeeded). What, according to Kravchuk, "makes it possible to understand both his actions and behavior after the accident - as if he had a guarantee against too heavy punishment?" Four years later, in October 1990, after official letters signed by Academician Sakharov, Elena Bonner, and other prominent liberal gravediggers of the USSR, he was released early due to illness. He was treated in a burn center in Munich. He died in 1995 from a heart attack.

And Dyatlov was given commands by Georgy Kopchinsky, then the head of the atomic energy sector of the Central Committee of the CPSU in the Heavy Industry and Energy Department of the Central Committee of the CPSU, who previously worked at the Chernobyl NPP, the former head of the Department of Atomic Energy and Industry of the USSR Council of Ministers, then the former Deputy Chairman of the State Committee of Ukraine for Nuclear and radiation safety, finally, in 2000 - the General Director of the State Atomic Energy Agency of Ukraine - and now giving advice in the field of nuclear safety!

Perhaps he is one of the initiators of the persecution and suppression of Nikolai Kravchuk. Both Dyatlov and Kopchinsky published their own descriptions of the Chernobyl disaster, which do not contain any clear versions of its causes.