Penguins - a challenge to Darwinism!?

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

If you tried to count the number of successful mutations for the evolution of a dinosaur (reptile) into an early bird and then for its evolution into an emperor penguin, what number would you come up with? An absolutely inconceivable, astronomical number.

After all, we are talking about a complete alteration of the organism, which has gone through billions of mutations, NONE OF WHICH PROVED LETHAL!

Cell biochemistry, penguin ability to work with oxygen in a special way, pressure protection and mechanism for diving, penguin diving "suit", lungs, bones, feeding devices, internal body heat, molting time, ability to waddle vertically, solid body and fins, the way the eggs are incubated, the penguin's strong legs, eyes adapted for diving and underwater vision, navigation abilities - these are just some of the changes that a dinosaur (reptile) would need.

These billions of genetic rearrangements (and all successful ones) took place during a period of time in which the cyst-finned fish or horseshoe crab invertebrate never changed!

It turns out that in the same water, some organisms mutated wildly, changing billions of times, at the same time when others avoided any mutations at all … Can you believe this ?!

Coming back to the penguins, I will note that there are also changes related to the behavior of penguins. How did the females learn to transfer the egg to the male's legs without breaking it?

And at what point in time did the male penguin decide that he should abstain from food for several months, keeping the egg on his paws? How did it happen that the males overcame their usual territorial instinct and decided to group tightly, 10 penguins per m2?

How did the females learn to know when the baby is hatching and come back on time with food, giving their mate a well-deserved rest? How do penguins find their mate when everyone looks the same?

How can birds know at what time it is necessary to molt once a year, and all at once (unlike other birds that molt gradually), so that re-fouling with feathers minimizes the time they stay out of the water? Finally, how do baby penguins learn all these skills so quickly?

Evolutionists put forward only empty speculations about all these amazing properties, arguing out of ignorance: "If all these mutations had not occurred, then the penguins would not be here."

But this is not an argument! The penguins were transported to similar conditions in the Arctic. Not a single penguin in the Arctic COULD FIT, everyone died. And this is in conditions that are indistinguishable similar, here and there frost and ice … But they could not adapt …

Darwinists assure us that a bird that first lived (as paleontology proves) in a warm climate at the equator (and reached 4 m in height there) moved to Antarctica and overcame all the problems of such an unthinkable migration with a complex chain of mutations!

This is from the category of questions - why do birches drop their foliage in winter: otherwise, they say, moisture in the foliage would freeze, tear all tissues, and the birch would not have survived … Therefore, the birch has adapted: green in summer, naked in winter … By itself! Without the intervention of Reason!

Okay, Darwinists, take a palm tree and transfer it to central Russia. The palm tree dies. The tree cannot adapt to the cold! It can't, do you understand? We take a thousand palms, millions of palms or cacti - all die in winter. With a guarantee. For millions of years, palms or cacti could slowly move to the North, slowly adapting to the cold, but they did not, remaining in their range. Conclusion: fairy tales about the adaptation of plants to the climate are a lie. If life forced plants to adapt to a different climate, the plants would not adapt, but perish. They would not exist, that's all.

But Darwinists take a fact and stretch it onto their dogma. Since birches or penguins are alive, it means that they have found a way to adapt. And if they had not found them, they would not have been …

This is akin to the theory that our stomach produces our food - because if food did not appear in it, we would die: therefore, the stomach "adapted" to produce food within itself!

Plants break the logic of macroevolution (I'm not talking about microevolution, adaptation within one species is quite observable. But selection ALWAYS goes between the READY variants existing in the gene pool of the species!).

This applies even more to animals and birds. The same penguins. If this were the only example of an animal with a whole series of thought-out to the smallest detail adaptations, functioning either together or not at all, this would already be a problem for evolution. But if we think about giraffes, bats, water striders, cheetahs, geckos, kangaroos, hummingbirds, people and so on …

The conclusion is obvious: Darwinism is speculative speculation without sufficient grounds.