Video: Trump vs. Fed
2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55
Donald Trump during the election campaign began attacks on the fed, in which last year, as a result of a defective audit, catastrophic violations … If you remember, then the last, who attacked the fed of American presidents was shot John F. Kennedy … Is waiting Trump's fate Kennedy? The Economist has included the eventual presidency of Donald Trump in the Top 10 Global Risks. Is Trump so dangerous? And if dangerous, then for whom?
These questions are answered Valentin Yurievich Katasonov.
I have already spoken in the press with an assessment of some of Trump's statements, and these statements (we are talking about a block of financial and economic issues) indicate that this is a figure who has not been "approved" by the main "owners of money." He acts out of his personal motives, personal interests, but his statements resonate with millions of Americans who are tired of the status quo of the ruling Democratic Party, whose economic policy leads to the permanent degradation of America.
It is no longer news that Trump's statements have caused quite a stir and shock at the headquarters of the Republican Party. But I would like to touch only on the topic of the Fed. Trump raised this topic, and at the end of last year, he personally criticized the head of the Fed, Mrs. Janet Yellen, saying that they are keeping the interest rate at an unacceptably low level.
Well, during the election campaign, in late February - early March, he suddenly started talking about the need to audit the Federal Reserve - thus, he picked up the topic started by the "veteran" of the American Congress Ron Paul: in 2009, Ron Paul pushed through the decision on a partial Fed audit. The results of that, even a very partial audit, revealed terrible violations. Including the US Constitution (indeed, like our Central Bank, violating Article 75 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation). And now Trump says that in a hundred years, the Fed has not had a single normal listening session. It is noteworthy that Democrat Sanders (the Democratic nominee) also sounded this topic - it's hard for me to even say who started first - and he said that the Fed really requires listening. Moreover, Sanders stated that this listening should be done every year. This topic has greatly excited some of the leaders of the Fed and the Treasury.
Once again, I want to emphasize that Trump, apparently, is not such an eccentric politician - he takes into account the balance of power and expresses the interests of certain groups. These are roughly the same constituencies that sparked the OccupyWallStreet movement a few years ago, which suddenly appeared and just as suddenly disappeared. It is known that this movement was sponsored by George Soros, and Soros is a protege of the Rothschild group. So Trump, in a sense, is playing along with the minority shareholders of the Fed, which at the moment in history are the Rothschilds. And the Rockefellers are majority owners and are seeking the status quo with respect to the Fed. The Republican Party is, first of all, representatives of the interests of the Rockefeller group, and the fact that Trump so unexpectedly and unplannedly opposes the Fed is clearly contrary to the tasks of the Republican Party.
As for other elements of Trump's economic platform: he undoubtedly belongs to the group of "isolationists" - that is, he requires, first of all, to restore order within the country, in the economy of the United States itself. He is very restrained about the position of previous presidents on the globalization of the American economy. Trump is very skillful at treading on the "calluses" of the Democrats. It is known that the national debt more than doubled during Obama's tenure in the White House. This is really dangerous for America. Trump straddled the topic of debt and huge US budget deficits. Trump also talks about the deindustrialization of America and the fact that America is a rapidly impoverished country.
He does not open any Americas. But presidential contenders have not said anything like that for decades. Whether Trump will win or not, I don’t know. But in any case, his participation in the election campaign made many in America wake up.
Recommended:
How and what they fed the captured Germans in the USSR
War is a terrible period of tragedy, hardship and destruction. And one of its unsightly pages are prisoners of war. The Great Patriotic War was no exception: the Wehrmacht took prisoners of the Red Army, and the Red Army took German soldiers. At the same time, the Soviet side did not turn the existence of its captured opponents into a catastrophe, they tried, whenever possible, to adequately feed them
Who fed whom in the USSR and who lost more from its collapse
A quarter of a century after the collapse of the USSR, we still cannot understand why this happened? Indeed, in the spring of 1991, 77.7% of its citizens voted for the preservation of a single country in a referendum. And by the end of the same year, taking advantage of the defeat of the State Emergency Committee, many union republics instantly concocted their own small-town votes, in which people already demanded independence. For example, in Ukraine, those who wanted to live separately from the rest of the Union accounted for 90%! And in Armenia - even 99%
US Fed and Bank of England financed Hitler for World War
70 years ago, the greatest massacre in history was launched, funded by the US Federal Reserve and the Bank of England
The battle for the Fed has begun
The topic of the rate of the US Federal Reserve System seems irrelevant only to a completely narrow-minded person. We live in the Bretton Woods financial and economic system, the US dollar is a single measure of value in the modern economy, all our life activity is tied to this system
Fed shock therapy: how the United States is approaching a large-scale crisis
October will be remembered as a Shocktober - the shares of the largest companies collapsed, by the beginning of November, the key US indices had lost all their achievements since the fall of 2017. Many economists put all the blame on the Fed's policy. Malek Dudakov tells what it is and whether it can cause a cascade of bankruptcies and defaults around the world