MH-17 again

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

And again, great. Again under US political oppression, another investigation phase of the fall of MH-17, possibly hit by a missile SAM "BUK", made paradoxical conclusions about the launch of a rocket from the side of the Novorossiya militia. Now, By "moving" the conclusions of the experts by 15 degrees about the direction of the strike with the BUK's striking elements, they indicate that the missile was launched in Pervomaisky.

Quite convincingly these "planned" mistakes of the Dutch expert community were commented on by the adviser to the chief designer of the Almaz-Antey concern Mikhail MALYSHEVSKY at a press conference timed to coincide with the next stage of the accusation against Russia, which allegedly delivered BUKs to Novorossiya. He showed on illustrative material, having laid out on the shelves a mass of photographs and videos, based both on a computer simulation of the incident and on experimental data (although the IL-86 warhead was used instead of the Boeing), that the missile attack was not made at the MH-17 warhead, but to the left side, which makes us think about the source of the missile launch from the territory controlled by Ukraine.

The press conference continued with his speech by Viktor Meshcheryakov, Deputy Chief Designer of the Utyos-T route radar complex of the Lianozovsky Electromechanical Plant. He spoke about the discovered radar recordings made during the attack. The rocket flew for about 30 seconds, but was not detected by radar from the side of Novorossiya. Although smaller objects, such as the large bird Eagle, were perfectly detected in the radar range. This radar has not been discussed before due to secrecy or for some other reason.

The question remains unclear for me personally: Was the BUK air defense missile system detected by at least some radars? In addition to photographs of the movement of the Ukrainian "BUK" "yesterday-today", do the Russian special services and the intelligence services of other countries have accurate data?

Do you still think about the telephone conversation between Poroshenko and Obama, which supposedly took place on the topic of MH-17?

And the version with the aircraft of the Ukrainian Air Force, the SU-25 attack aircraft, also sounds quite convincing.

But most of all I like the comparison version of MH-370 and MH-17. After all, the plane shot down over Ukraine, according to irrefutable data, is just MH-370 (remember, which disappeared several months before the Ukrainian disaster and no debris was found anywhere), and not MH-17 at all. As you know, facts are stubborn things. Here is a photo of a Malaysian flag window that was not on MH-370 and the wreck in Ukraine, but which was in an old photo of MH-17. You don't need to prove anything else.

As in the previously committed provocations by the CIA and other American special services, starting with the first color revolutions, continuing with manned astronautics and the lunar program, and ending with 911 and today's Boeing 777s, the more implausible the lie sounds, the more brazenly it is supported by stupid explanations. As if we are all fools and we can hang and hang noodles on our ears …

Vladimir Matveev Source

Press conference video: