Well, you have saints, Russia

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

On the opening of a monument to Prince Vladimir in Moscow.

On November 4, on the dubious holiday of non-existent "Russian" unity, a monument to Prince Vladimir, the Baptist, was unveiled in Moscow. If the prince was a popular favorite, the square would be filled with crowds of happy people praying for their idol. But the authorities, mindful of the protest rallies against the monument on Vorobyovy Gory, cleaned out the entire center, removed people and transport from Pashkov's house, from the Stone Bridge. The people at this action were dangerous. The "people" were represented exclusively by the verified top officials of the state - there is no trust in other citizens.

The monument is aesthetically ridiculous. A black 25-meter block hangs ominously over the bright Kremlin, covers the bright Pashkov house with its shadow, as if it blocks the light of knowledge of the Main Library of Russia with a huge black cross. The monument does not at all fit into the architectural ensemble of Borovitskaya Square, it seems to gnaw through, cuts the familiar picture. Vladimir is depicted as extremely aggressive, with a piercing animal gaze. The sculpture radiates cruelty and malice. What do the cross and sword symbolize in the hands of the prince? On the one hand - onslaught and violence, on the other - protection, he seems to be covered with a staff and a sword. The sculpture really is, to some extent, a symbol of Christianity, which burst into the ancient Russian world, which the baptists destroyed, destroyed the values, shrines of the ancient Slavs, took their lives from them, deleted the past. At the same time, Christianization has always met with resistance, it went on for a long time and painfully. Today is no exception, but rather the result of millennial Christianity - fewer and fewer people show interest in it, and more and more criticize the church and religion.

Moscow architects objected to such a tall statue in the center - it breaks the historical harmonious ensemble of the square. The architects did not give a damn about the opinion. The authorities need a "brace".

The current government of the Russian Federation with "braces" is very bad, since such a disgusting figure was chosen as such. Christianity is forcibly hammered in as a spiritual "bond" of the Russian people, which allegedly gave the foundations of morality and ethics.

At the opening of the monument, the presenter F. Bondarchuk broadcast something different: only from 988 we are counting our nation, our country, and even our culture. Oh, Skobtsev's mother did not teach the boy Fedya that lying is not good. And she did not teach history at all.

Despite attempts to present baptism as the beginning of the Russian state, despite attempts to hide the pre-Christian past, more and more evidence appears that before the adoption of Christianity in Russia there was a written language and culture, there were high traditions and customs.

We honor historians: “For a long time we, Greeks, have called these heroes Rossichi, or Rus. Russian men are valiant warriors. During the raids, it is possible to take a few slaves from these Slavs, and they all prefer death to captivity."

Zacharius, rhetorician (5th century AD)

"They (Scythians, Alans) had no idea about slavery, being all of the same noble origin, and they still choose people who had been distinguished by military exploits for a long time as judges."

Ammianus Marcellinus, ancient Roman historian

“The tribes of the Sklavs and Antes (Slavs) are the same both in their way of life and in their morals; free, they are in no way inclined to become slaves or obey, especially in their own land. They are numerous and hardy, easily endure heat, cold, rain, nakedness of the body, and lack of food. They are kind and friendly to the foreigners who come to them … They do not keep them in captivity indefinitely, like the rest of the tribes, but, having determined the exact time for them, they provide them at their discretion: either they wish to return home for a ransom, or they will remain there as free people and friends. They have a wide variety of livestock and grains stacked in stacks. Their wives are chaste beyond any human nature, so that many of them regard the death of their husbands as their own death and voluntarily strangle themselves, not counting life in widowhood."

Mauritius, Byzantine emperor (VI century)

But, even admitting that Christianity made the Slavs more respectable, compassionate, pious, as the churchmen say, was it necessary to introduce enlightenment by murder and violence? Is it really, in order to help the people become more spiritual and moral, it is necessary to chop off their history, exterminate innocent people, burn monuments and shrines, disfigure the language, prohibit customs, traditions, eradicate native names from everyday life? Christianization completely cut off a multi-thousand-year stratum of history and made the great Russian civilization a kind of Byzantium appendage, establishing a new crowd-elite pyramidal system of government based on slavery, previously unknown to the Slavs.

Let's listen to what President Putin said at the unveiling of the monument.

"The new monument is a tribute to our outstanding ancestor, especially revered saint, statesman and warrior, the spiritual founder of the Russian state."

"He laid the moral, value foundations that define our life to this day."

"Russian society must confront modern challenges and threats, following the spiritual precepts of Prince Vladimir."

The people rushed to find out what kind of spiritual covenants the President recommended to follow. And then it turned out bad: the prince had 7 wives, and besides, "The prince was insatiable in fornication, bringing married wives and corrupting girls to him," - this is how the monk-chronicler wrote about the baptist in the 11th century.

You can read about the “spiritual covenants” of the “great baptist” at Nevzorov. And don't be fooled that the author is a liberal. Power structures lie so much that the liberals have entered a golden age - it has become profitable for them to tell the truth.

“All monuments to Vladimir of Kiev always depict the“Baptist of Rus”in solemn static, although a completely different pose would suit the prince. The fact is that he was the greatest master of sexual violence … 12-year-old Rogneda was raped by Vladimir in the presence of her parents and relatives. Of course, tightly bound. Probably, at some point the situation seemed to the prince not enough piquant, and he ordered right there, in front of the raped girl's eyes, to slaughter her father and brothers. Which was done.

The rape of the pregnant wife of his brother Yaropolk was no less picturesquely furnished by the Baptist of Rus. It was also performed in front of her husband and was also accompanied by the stabbing of an observer. Roughly on the same principle, the prince formed his "lustful courts". There "wives and girls" were driven there by force and beatings from the surrounding towns and villages. According to the estimates of the chroniclers, in Vyshgorod, Belgorod and Berestovo alone, at least 800 females were simultaneously held in sexual slavery by the baptist. Of course, in the "lustful courtyards" Vladimir had the opportunity to rape other people's wives and daughters thoughtfully and almost "without any hindrance", since humiliated and beaten husbands and fathers sobbed "behind the tynom", that is, behind the fence … The current legal system of the Russian Federation could offer Vladimir Svyatoslavich only life imprisonment, as well as the title of a particularly dangerous repeat offender, sexual maniac and serial killer, whose place is next to Gacy, Chikatilo and Jack the Ripper."

This effective quote wanders from article to article.

One could continue to depict the pathological sexual predilections of the "holy" baptist of Russia, but they do not reflect the full completeness of his "highly moral" spiritual foundations. The stingy and thoroughly ripped off from contemporaries information about Prince Vladimir, which has hardly survived to this day, sheds true light on the mystery of his origin and cynical crimes, as a result of which Vladimir, the "Red Sun", illegally usurped the princely throne in Kievan Rus through the substitution of an ancient Slavic family of the Rurik dynasty by a clan of aliens of dubious origin. This had significant geopolitical consequences for the subsequent history of Russia.

The real apotheosis of the moral and moral decay of the impostor Vladimir was the mass genocide of the indigenous Russian population that he unleashed, as a result of which more than 9 million Russians, supporters of the traditional Vedic worldview of Russia, were brutally tortured or killed.

It is worth recalling that in accordance with the current international legal norms, genocide has no statute of limitations - see "Convention on the Inapplicability of the Statute of Limitation to War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity" - Adopted by Resolution 2391 (XXIII) of the UN General Assembly of November 26, 1968. Therefore, for the "Red Sun" it would be more appropriate not a monument, but a tribunal.

Baptism brought extinction, impoverishment and degradation to Russia. This can be seen from a comparison of the description of Russia and its influence on Byzantium by Byzantine authors in the 10th and 12th centuries, from customs documents on trade with Russia by the Arabs in the 10th and 12th centuries, from the words of an Arab historian about a hundred Russian cities in the 10th century (moreover, according to him, there were only 3 settlements in Byzantium that could be called a city). The Scandinavian name of Russia - Gardarika (country of cities) is also indicative, while the Mongols found in the 13th century a fragmented, depopulated land ravaged by constant civil strife. Moreover, during that period there were no external enemies in Russia, only baptism was the tragedy of the arrival of a foreign faith in Russia.

See the works of L. Prozorov “Pagans of Baptized Rus. Tale of Black Years.

And today Russia, for a thousand years holding on to the "value foundations" of Christianity as a bearer of morality, culture, a source of strength, power, etc., has turned into a dilapidated state with a domination of poverty, alcoholism, drug addiction and the highest degree of moral degradation. Today's Russia is a laughing stock, which in the age of high technologies falls into medieval obscurantism, it is a country from which young qualified people simply flee.

In total, the spiritual covenant of the prince, which the President proposes to follow - to kill, rape, break the age-old way of life of the people? In total, the moral, value foundations that determine our life were laid by the murderer, rapist, sadist - he is our outstanding ancestor. It’s somehow uncomfortable to live in a state with such “foundations”.

Who wrote the speech to the President? His personal enemy? Enemy of Russia, who is preparing the Maidan? Naturally, the crowd of liberals grabbed hold of the absurdity of the presidential speech. For them, the whole story with this monument is just a klondike.

Why do not the functionaries of the Russian Orthodox Church refute Nevzorov and other authors who tell about the prince's arts? They have nothing to argue, except for the stupidest phrase that the miracle of the baptism of the prince transformed? So, if you baptize a criminal, he will automatically be transformed into a saint? The clergy claim that the miracle of baptism caused the prince's spiritual rebirth, his enlightenment, and he changed his way of life. Such an idea is false and harmful in its essence, because it believes that the criminal, rapist, murderer, tyrant atone for his guilt by repentance, and not by actions. And the repentant can be forgiven for all sorts of atrocities. This is how the idea of evading responsibility through the sacraments of the Church is instilled. Not a bad idea, today's bandits will love it.

In general, you can understand the love of the ROC workers for the prince - he created a business in Russia that feeds them so satisfyingly. Cyril exalted the prince to heaven.

"He was always wholehearted and sincere."

“Vladimir in the popular mind was the Red Sun - this is the name given only to those who are very much loved. He was not afraid to drastically change the direction of development of society, because he loved the people and believed that they would understand him and follow him."

And the main pearl: "A monument to the father can be wherever his children live."

In total, Cyril recorded all Russians as children of a rapist and a murderer, without asking if they would like to have such a dad?

The widow of the Russophobe Solzhenitsyn offered to be photographed at the monument in order to appreciate how we look against the prince's background? In other words, a dubious historical character is slipped into today's "Russians" as a standard, although the Russian people do not need idols with a dubious reputation imposed on them from above, they do not need to perpetuate the memory of immoral personalities who have stained themselves with crimes against humanity.

Who initiated the creation of a monument to such a disgusting character, while declaring him a saint? Definitely - the worst enemies of Russia, because the monument to the murderer to the sadist, rapist, and even opened by the top officials of the state is an insult to every Russian person who knows and respects his history, this is a blow to the international reputation of the country. What kind of Russia is it in the eyes of the whole world, if it is ready to trample itself upon itself, to drown its people in the blood of baptism? Russia appears to the world as a barbaric country that honors the tyrants of its own long-suffering people. The monument creates such a repulsive image of Russia, venerating a criminal as a saint, that one might think that the idea for this monument was born in the CIA. The country, which has such apostles, many will want to destroy, bomb … A sea of lies usually turns into a sea of blood.

Are you not ashamed, Russia, to have such saints? Aren't you creepy?

N. Belozerova

A. Bugrov

L. Fionova