Video: Prekrasa Sobakina
2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55
It is known that in Church Slavonic and Old Russian the word "already" (in a soft pronunciation "yuzhe") meant "chain, rope", and "uzhika, uzhik" (in a soft pronunciation "yuzhika, yuzhik") meant "relative ".
Today these words are half-forgotten by many and only a persistent researcher will be able to read the texts of the ancestors as they sounded and perceived in ancient times. And it is not possible for the majority of the world's population to define the word DOG in the adjective SAVSKAYA. I involuntarily recall an episode from the film "Ivan Vasilyevich changes his profession", where the false sovereign Bunsha, having drunk a fair amount at a banquet, asks:
- What kind of dog? I will not allow such things to be said about the sovereign!
So my reader, like Bunshe, has the right to say something like that, they say, come on, Commissioner, lay out what kind of dog you dug from our ancestors.
Dug, dug, dug some more. Soon you will know where the dog is buried !!!
But first, let me tell you about one noble family, which has roots in the Russian-Horde time of our Russia. A wonderful family, today forgotten and persecuted by the Romanovs, who, as you know, hated everything Russian and rewrote the epic of Russia at their own discretion, imposing a Jewish history on it, which never existed in Russia.
So, Sobakin's boyars.
The Tishkovo estate appeared in the 16th century, when the village was named after the name of its first owner Stepan Tishkov. But since the 17th century. the village is listed for a certain Sobakin. This family has owned it for over two centuries. The Sobakin family, according to the legends of ancient genealogists, comes from the "Danish native" or "German", Olgerd Prega, who supposedly left for Tver in 1294. His great-grandson, boyar Danilo Grigorievich Sobaka, who moved from Tver to Moscow in 1495, is the ancestor of the Sobakin family. His grandson, Ivan Vasilyevich Sobakin, was a boyar under Grand Duke Vasily Ivanovich. Of the sons and nephews of the latter, three were boyars, and two were devious. The Sobakins gained the greatest fame after Martha Sobakina became the third wife of Ivan IV the Terrible, chosen from two thousand brides brought to the royal review.
This meant that her father, Vasily Bolshoy Sobakin, became a boyar, and after that the three brothers of the royal bride were declared devious. The wedding took place on October 28, 1571, but already at the feast Martha felt unwell, and on November 13 the new queen died. These events served as a plot for the opera "The Tsar's Bride" by N. A. Rimsky-Korsakov. Despite the fact that the poisoning of the tsarina by the opponents of the Sobakins was evident, as a result of the "search" for Martha's death, her father was forcibly tonsured a monk in 1572, and three cousins were executed for "sorcery", with which they allegedly wanted to "exterminate" the tsar. The Sobakin family took many persecutions during the reign of the Romanovs, and there was a reason for that. Stopped in 1837 after the death of the chamberlain Alexander Petrovich Sobakin, who left no offspring in marriage with the Viscountess Polignac, a representative of one of the most ancient families of France. This is what the reference book says. I decided to check it out.
The reader will remember that the author traces his genealogy to the Qatari bishop-count, whose son gave rise to the Russian noble family of princes-boyars, who came to Russia after the defeat of the Cathars in France. Therefore, I became interested in the marriage of Sobakin and the Viscountess, whose title now belongs to Prince Albert of Monaco, with whom the author of the miniature is in correspondence. True, Grimaldi's title is not a viscount, but a duke, since he became such by the decree of Louis the Sixteenth and was passed on by right of male birthright, and at first it was not hereditary.
Duke de Polignac is a title created by King Louis XVI of France on September 20, 1780, for Armand-Jules-Francois Viscount de Polignac. The last Duke of Polignac is the grandfather of the modern prince of Monaco. That is, at the time of Sobakin's marriage in 1837, no Viscountess de Polignac existed, since the title and viscountry were abolished in the direction of raising the status to a duchy. And the same lands can never have two titles. A county is just an area, a viscountry is a modern area, that is, the old territorial divisions of Europe. The duchy was the name of the territory that had the right to representation in the kingdom, and the duke was the governor of the king, who ruled over several counties and viscountries, that is, the peer or today's senator.
I admit that Sobakin's wife was from the de Polignac family, and most likely it was so. But the heirs of Auguste Jules Armand (1780-1847) do not have the title of Viscount, and they bear the title of Princes de Polignac, the younger representatives of the surname are Counts de Polignac. From the words of Prince Albert Grimaldi, it became clear to me that there was a mistake in the Sobakins' genealogy, but I was in no hurry to draw conclusions, knowing how oddly titles are inherited. For example, Grimaldi himself is also Polignac, since this is the name of his grandfather, who married the illegitimate daughter of the Prince of Monaco, whom he recognized. So the primogeniture in the male line should not be sought in Europe.
The reader will ask why you are the Commissioner so clung to these Viscounts. Well, they were and swam, what do you want? Don't be in a hurry, I pored over this work for many months and only the appeal of my reader to tell about Princess Olga made me accelerate.
Listen further.
In Russia in the 19th century there is another genus of the Sobakins, completely unknown but leading its roots from the same Olgerd Pregi. He left Russia long ago, back in Peter's times and according to legend of a family that does not have supporting documents (and who has them from royal families?), They are the Viscounts Polignacs, the youngest branch of dukes, whose ancestors went to Russia and became Sobakins there. That is, there are two families of the Sobakins who united in the marriage of Alexander Petrovich Sobakin and the Viscountess de Polignac-Sobakina. This wedding simply brought together two branches - the elder and the younger boyars of the Sobakins. As it is known, there were no successors of the family.
I became interested in Olgierd Prega and found something that is now dramatically changing my story. Meet the reader, the Prophetic Oleg is in front of you. Olgerd is Oleg, but I dealt with Prega longer.
Preguillac is a commune in France, located in the Poitou-Charente region. Department of the commune - Charente Primorskaya. And this is exactly the location of the castle of the Viscounts Polignac. And the very word Prega is nothing more than Prague or the threshold of the river, but also the heir.
And Pregillac is what is beyond the THRESHOLD, that is, ZAPORIZHIA. Or HERITAGE. We can say FORBIDDEN.
Preguillac is part of the Cathar country, ruled by the Dukes of Aquitaine and the Counts of Poitiers.
What is Aquitaine? Aqua is water and horse. It was from this confusion that the legend of the Trojan horse, which did not exist in nature, appeared. In fact, they entered Troy (and this is Byzantium) through an aqueduct, that is, an abandoned water supply system. The Aquitanian is the heir to the horse. For example, the title of my daughter-heiress vidam TENESSA, where ten or tan means heiress of vidam. But why a horse? And again, everything is simple: the Cathars lead their faith from Mary Magdalene, the wife and apostle of Christ, the mother of his children, whose blood was in the kings of the Franks Mirovings, who became related to the descendants of the Comnenus. Andronicus Comnenus, the emperor of Byzantium (1153-1185), is the prototype of Christ. A room or a lump, from which the surname Komnenos came in Old Russian means a HORSE, and a Komnenus is simply a horseman.
By the way, the appearance in the Bible of the specialty of the husband of Mary the Theotokos, Joseph Plotnik, is also not accidental. The churchmen, in order to conceal the truth, translated Komnenos as a carpenter, because the Slavs have a Komyanin or a Komnik who is a carpenter, but not a simple one, but who made a SKATE on the roof of the hut. To this day they call carpenters in the Russian outback
So, the Viscounts of Polignac are Cathars who retreated after the defeat of their kingdoms Aragon and Navarre to Russia.
In general, the name Paul, which can be traced in the surname Polignac, is nothing more than the descendants of Paul, since Paul is Paul.
The name Paul means little, baby, younger brother.
The title of viscount was just given to the younger brothers. That is, Polignacs are the younger brothers of someone whom the reader and I will look for together and will definitely find. We already know the name of the founder of the clan - Paul-Paul.
However, let's leave them for a while and move on to Olgert-Oleg Prege. As you remember, I said that he was the Prophetic Oleg from Pushkin's fairy tale, who received death from Comnenus (from his horse).
Attention reader, Pushkin knew what I was about to say. According to his work, it is clear that Oleg stood on the head of a horse (Komnenos) and "uzhik-uzhik" (see the beginning of the miniature), that is, a relative, bit the governor. That is, Prophetic Oleg accepted death from his relative, the head of the Komnin family. Well, it's not for nothing that the head (chapter) is spelled out here !!!
Having gained power over the Novgorod lands (the city of the Golden Ring of Russia) after the death of Rurik, as regent of his young son Igor, Oleg captured Kiev and moved the capital there, thereby uniting the two main centers of the Slavs. Therefore, it is often he, and not Rurik, who is regarded as the founder of the Old Russian state.
If the reader remembers, then Kiev is one of the names of Byzantium, where Oleg went on campaigns. That is, the regent conquered and subjugated Byzantium to the Slavs, where he began to rule himself. That is, in Byzantine or Kievan Rus, while ruling at the same time the lands of the Lord of Novgorod the Great, that is, Tsarist Rome on the Volga and the Second Rome - the Roman Empire in Byzantium.
Why Oleg the Prophet. Historians explain this as knowing the future. That's right, he really was predicted to die from a relative, some kind of "inspired magician", a sorcerer.
Well, everything is clear with the sorcerer. This is not a sorcerer, but simply a VOLGV, that is, a Volzhan or a Volgar. Apparently a priest from Royal Rome.
The circumstances of the death of Prophetic Oleg are contradictory. "The Tale of Bygone Years" reports that the death of Oleg was preceded by a heavenly sign - the appearance of "a great star in the west in a spear fashion." According to the Kiev version, reflected in the "Tale of Bygone Years", his grave is located in Kiev on Mount Schekovice. The first Novgorod chronicle places his grave in Ladoga, but at the same time says that he went “overseas”.
In both versions, there is a legend about death from a snakebite. According to legend, the wise men predicted to the prince that he would die from his beloved horse. Oleg ordered the horse to be taken away and remembered the prediction only four years later, when the horse had long since died. Oleg laughed at the Magi and wanted to look at the horse's bones, put his foot on the skull and said: "Should I be afraid of him?" However, a poisonous snake lived in the horse's skull, mortally stinging the prince.
This legend finds parallels in the Icelandic saga about the Viking Orvar Odda, who was also mortally stung on the grave of his beloved horse. Orvar Odd in the Icelandic saga is the Barbarian Odin (the god of the Vikings) or the Russian God - Jesus Christ.
Pushkin's allegory is simply wonderful. He wrote an epic, not a fairy tale. However, a fairy tale is a tale about KA, and KA is a designation of the king's soul.
The reader, probably, begins to understand that we have before us the most common Christian legend about the death of Andronicus Comnenus (1185) at the hands of his relative - the Angel of Isaac Satan, who crucified the emperor of Byzantium, the son of the Novgorod princess Mary of the Virgin and the sevastokor of Byzantium Isaac Comnenus, whose image was transformed into Jesus Christ.
And now to the reign of the emperor Andronicus, who ruled in Byzantium for 4 years. He was indeed predicted that he would be overthrown by his own relative, that is, a member of the ruling dynasty.
During his stormy life, similar to an adventure novel, Andronicus managed to change many guises: an enemy of the empire, a prisoner, a political emigrant, a favorite of the capital's population, an enemy of the "Latins", a scientist, a seer and a supporter of the common people.
The tense situation in the empire by the fall of 1185 gave Andronicus a reason to strengthen his power, and he appointed his son John as co-ruler. In addition, he decided to use the services of the oracle Sef, who was blinded for his craft by order of the emperor Manuel. Stephen Agiachristophoritus turned to the prophet and asked him: "Who will reign after the death of Andronicus, or who will steal the power from him?" Sef named only the name of the future ruler of Byzantium - Isaac, as well as the fact that he would receive power on the day of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross (September 14). The prophecy amused Andronicus: he considered the despot of Cyprus Isaac Comnenus to be his rival, and in a few days he could not have reached the capital. The assumption that Seth pointed to Andronicus' cousin, Isaac Angel, was rejected by the ruler himself. He considered his relative incapable of any important business. But in vain! The poisonous "uzhik-uzhik" warmed up near the throne.
So, get acquainted, before you is the oracle Sef or the sorcerer from the Song of the Prophetic Oleg, who predicted the death of Andronicus at the hands of his relative - also Comnenus. That same inspired magician, an old man obedient to Perun, alone, the behest of the coming messenger.
The Apostle Paul (née Saul; Saul (here he is the oracle Saf appeared); Latin Paulus or Paullus, - transl. "Small") - the Jewish "apostle of the Gentiles" (Rom. 11:13), who is not one of the twelve apostles and seventy apostles of Christ. The younger brother of Isus-Andronicus, who warned his older brother about a conspiracy against him. And his name is SAVA (SABA SOBA) that is, soba-KA. Hence the owl hooting at night, like a barking dog. In the outback in Russia, an owl is still called a night dog. That is, Sava the king, a member of the royal family of the emperor Andronicus Komnenos, a native of the Volga, like Mary the Mother of God.
However, his icons depict him as old and bald, so I think that he is Paul (that is, the youngest) not by age, but rather by title. This is one of the relatives of Comnenus, (most likely a cousin), who stood in the hierarchical ladder below the emperor. Sheba was a praetor.
Today, almost no one has heard of Praetorian law. In a nutshell, this is the right to conduct affairs of specific ownership on behalf of its owner, that is, these are the rights of the MANAGER.
From time immemorial, there has been this position delegated by a father to his son. In Latin, it sounds like vice dominance or vice master, and if very briefly, then VIDAM. I remind the reader that species is the noble title of the author of this miniature, which has roots in the Albigensian Montsegur.
Vidam is the steward of the bishop-count (marquis, duke, etc.)
A cardinal is a steward of a king (Catholic monarch) or a pope (formerly called a coadjutor, which means cardinal in French). Under a minor ruler, the regent ruled.
Advocate (avo) is the steward of the abbot in the monastic community and the lands of the monastery (the kings of France are simultaneously abbot de Saint-Denis)
Vogt is the manager of the count in Germany and neighboring countries, or rather the burg-graph.
A viscount is a vice-commander or vice-graph.
The Doge is the Governor of the Republic of Venice
The president is a manager in modern countries that are not monarchies.
That is, the Apostle Paul is Viscount Polignac or Viscount Sobakin.
I see the reader swell from such a statement. I'll calm you down now.
After the overthrow and execution in Byzantium of the prototype of Isus Andronicus Comnenus, part of his family and Mother Mary fled to Russia, crossing the Bosphorus. There they founded the powerful state of Great Tartary.
Andronicus' wife Maria Magdalena, with two children (a boy and a girl) could not follow them, and therefore landed in Europe, which was by that time conquered by the troops of Russia-Horde. Stepping on land in Marseille, Maria Magdalena and her children found protection from the Cathar garrisons (read Tatars, Tartars or Rus). Here she founded the Semeiskaya Church of Love, now known as the Qatari Church, to which the author identifies herself. The Cathars of Languedoc Roussillon are the most common Bogomils of the Volga or Kulugurs, Old Believers, which are abundant in the Saratov region.
Mary's children grow up, marry the descendants of Prince Mirove, who conquered this part of Europe and become the first Merovingian kings of France. My ancestor of the species de Montsegur Languedoc Roussillon is one of the commanders of the army of Prince Mirowey, who was given to feed a fiefdom within the county of Foix (Thomas) and the kingdom of Aragon, a castle named Androver, which still belongs to my family.
Here is the oracle of Safa-Paul and the Prophetic Oleg known as Olgerd Prega or Oleg the Heir, in which, although the blood of Jesus Christ, Andronicus Komnenos does not flow, but he comes from a relative of the Savior.
It was not for nothing that Pushkin combined in this man the legend of Christ's death at the hands of a relative with Viscount Oleg, who was obviously the heir to the Apostle Paul. This is a direct hint to good fellows who want to understand the past. After all, Pushkin lived during the time of the Romanovs, and under them it was not supposed to write the truth about Russia.
So. I am gradually approaching the goal of this miniature, to the story of who Princess Olga is, Igor's wife, the one who took revenge on his murderers and then ruled instead of her husband. The one who was the SECOND, after Andrew the First-Called, baptized Russia. Vladimir is already the third baptism.
There are many speculations about Olga's origin. I will not repeat them, but just tell you how it really was.
The typographic chronicle (end of the 15th century) and the later Piskarevsky chronicler report that Olga was the daughter of Prophetic Oleg, who began to rule Russia as the guardian of the young Igor, the son of Rurik: "Nezia is saying that Olga is Olga's daughter." It is true, she really is the daughter of the Prophetic Oleg, and the Viscount Oleg married Igor and Olga. Hence the legend about the not noble origin of the princess, since she is not of a princely (royal) family, although it occurs along the line of a relative of the Komnenos, the oracle Safa (Paul).
The so-called Joachim Chronicle informs about Olga's noble Slavic origin, but indicates that her family is different:
“When Igor matured, Oleg married him, gave him his wife from Izborsk, the Gostomyslov clan, which was called Prekrasa, and Oleg renamed her and named Olga in his name. Then Igor had other wives, but Olga, because of her wisdom, honored her more than others."
It turns out that Prince Oleg renamed Beauca in his own name (Olga is the female version of the name Oleg). Moreover, she was not the only wife of Igor. Well, everything is correct here, in ancient Russia there was polygamy, and here we are just a harem in which the mothers - the wives of the prince lived.
Historians have also put forward a version about the Bulgarian roots of Princess Olga, relying on the message of the "New Vladimir Chronicler" ("Igor will burn [; lg] in Balgarekh, give the princess for him; lg"). This version is correct, because the conversation is not about Bulgaria but about the Bulgarians, that is, the VOLGARS, the conquerors of Europe who came from the Volga or about the Cathars. The roots of their faith are still sought from the Bulgarian Bogomils. Bulgaria is just a part of the territory of Europe that has retained this name, the territory allocated to one of the kingdoms, vassals of Great Tartary.
The Romanovs and their Western allies diligently mixed place names. For example, on the coat of arms of the pre-Roman period of Russia, France is called Kabarda, Hungary is Ugra, Austria is Vyatka, Western Europe is Gaul (PortGallia), and Lord Veliky Novgorod is on the Volga, not on the Volkhov. By the way, the Volkhov river, by analogy with the sorcerer, is nothing more than the Volgov, that is, the right tributary of the great river, which is now called the Oka.
In the original Latin texts, the name of the deceased leader is written as Gestimus, Gestimulus, Gostomuizl. Apparently this is not a surname, but a foreign family. That is, not from the Russian land. All this fits perfectly if you understand that the Cathars are Russian people, only living in conquered Europe. Roughly like the recent groups of Soviet troops in the Warsaw Pact in Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Poland and Germany.
You see, reader, it so happened that the two royal bloods ended up in different ends of Eurasia (Although this is not Europe and Asia, but simply Asia or Rasia, that is, Russia). In France, there are modern Cathars with the descendants of Christ at the head, and in the metropolis of Russia - Christ's relatives by the mother of the Savior. There arose, as it were, two little differing Christianities: the family in France and the generic in Russia. They can be called by a common name - royal. But between them, the apostolic Christianity, known today, began to gain strength.
Of course, all this has been shifted into ancient times, and Olga and Oleg did not live in the time attributed to them by historians. But then, let's see, when are Olga's rules? As it turned out, finding her is not at all difficult.
I have said many times that the Torah and the Old Testament are not ancient books. They appeared along with the birth of Judaism, which emerged from Christianity (and not vice versa) in the 16th century, as a project of orgic Christianity, which today is passed off as Ancient Rome and Greece. The result was Judaism and Catholicism, both of which have roots in the Latin patriarchs of Byzantium, who were expelled from there in 1265. So these books describe the events not of deep antiquity, but of Medieval Russia and its dominion-colonies. No ancient Jewish people have ever existed, but biblical Israel and Judea, it is Russia and papist Europe, fighting among themselves. The Jewish project is less than 500 years old.
Now we read the Bible.
“The Queen of Sheba, hearing about the glory of Solomon … came to test him with riddles. And she came to Jerusalem with very great wealth … And she came to Solomon and talked with him about everything … And the Queen of Sheba saw all the wisdom of Solomon … And she gave the king one hundred and twenty talents of gold … And she went back to her land, she and all the servants her”(1 Kings 10: 1-2, 10: 4, 10:10, 10:13).
On the screensaver for the miniature, I publish a drawing depicting the meeting of the queen and Solomon. As you can see, this is the same serpent that Solomon's horse tramples on, and the rider himself stabs the cursed serpent with a spear. An engraving from the "Illustrated Florentine Chronicle" of Mazo Finigvere in 1267, that is, about 100 years after the real death of Andronicus in 1185. And since, before this date, there was no Christianity, it is quite clear that Olga could not baptize Russia in the 10th century, as it is attributed to her. Therefore, I will not torment the reader, but simply let me know that Princess Olga and Queen of Sheba are one person. And she did not meet with the Jewish king, but with Suleiman the Magnificent, the very one who built the temple of Solomon. There he stands to this day in the city of Istanbul and his name is Saint Sophia-al-Sophia. By the way, I do not exclude that the Sava is Sophia, but the version with Sava, the oracle Saf, Paul the lesser delights me more. Moreover, I still have many pieces of evidence confirming this. So, reader, now listen to the full name of Princess Olga: Prekrasa Sobakina, obviously a relative of Prophetic Oleg, possibly a niece.
As I understand it, Cathars (Tatars) in those days were called all who lived in the Lands conquered by Russia, immigrants from the metropolis.
In the 16th century, Tsar Solomon (Suleiman) ruled in Ottoman Atamania, and Sobakina (Sheba) was the queen of the UNION RELATED Ottoman Atamania state - Russia-Horde. And together they and a number of other kingdoms formed Great Tartary.
In some Russian chronicles, the Queen of Sheba was called Yuzhskaya, that is, Uzhskaya or RELATED. For example Uzhgorod is the city of a relative, not the Uzh river. By the way, the man is from here. It's just a relative on the mother's side. And on the father’s suzhik. Hence the betrothed, since it was the father who decided whom to marry his daughter to.
And we read the Bible again.
Describes the solemn reception of the Queen of Sheba-Yuzhskaya at the Jerusalem court of Solomon (1 Kings 10: 1-13).“King Solomon gave the Queen of Sheba everything she wanted and what she asked for, except for such things that she brought to the king” (II Chronicles 9:12), see also (I Kings 10:13).
Let's now see how Suleiman the Magnificent is displayed in other sources. And we will immediately find the answer that the biblical king is Constantine Porphyrogenic, that is, Constantine the Great (Porphyrogenitus). And Olga is Prekrasa Sobakina or the Queen of Sheba, who comes from Russia and Novgorod (in the annals Novgorod is often called the Sophia House). Old Russian texts agreed: everyone compares Olga to the Queen of Sheba. Most likely, these comparisons appeared during the rewriting of history under the Jesuit monks Scaliger and Petafius, who are the founders of the version of world history known today.
We take the Tale of Bygone Years, and read: “In the year 6463 Olga went to the Greek land and came to Constantinople. And then Tsar Constantine, the son of Leo, reigned, and Olga came to him … And in baptism she was given the name of Helen, as well as the ancient queen - the mother of Constantine the Great. And the patriarch blessed her, and she went in peace to her land and came to Kiev. It happened LIKE IN SOLOMON: THE QUEEN OF ETHIOPE came to Solomon, seeking to hear the wisdom of Solomon … THIS IS THIS BLESSED OLGA."
Well, that friends, in my opinion everything is clear. And don't repeat yourself. The chronicler directly indicates that Olga and the Queen of Sheba are one person. Does the word Ethiopian Queen surprise you? Don't strain yourself. The fact that Scythia-RUS in the Middle Ages was also called ETHIOPIA will be told to you by many chronicles and even the Tsar Book - the Observatory of the Chronicle of Ivan the Terrible.
By the way, Suleiman the Magnificent is also Komnenos. From a descendant of that Comnenus, who fled to the Seljuk Turks and founded his kingdom there. This is the elder brother of Isus-Andronicus, but from a different mother. That is, the Queen of Sheba is just a relative, since she descended from Paul-Sheba.
So, understanding who Constantine Porfirorodny is, we can establish in what century Prekras Sobakin lived and rules, she is Princess Olga, she is the Queen of Sheba and Ethiopia.
Suleiman I the Magnificent (Qanuni) November 6, 1494 - September 5/6, 1566) - the tenth sultan of the Ottoman Empire, who ruled from September 22, 1520, caliph from 1538.
Suleiman is considered the greatest sultan of the Ottoman dynasty; under him, the Ottoman Porta reached the apogee of its development. In Europe, Suleiman is most often called Suleiman the Magnificent, while in the Muslim world, Suleiman Qanuni (distorted by Komnenos).
The reader should not be surprised, because Islam, like all world religions, came out of Christianity and is practically indistinguishable from the Old Belief. It was during the Nikonian reform of the Apostolic Church that the main differences arose, since in Russia, under the Romanovs, the faith of Judaizing Lutherans was adopted for Christianity (the term is not mine, but from Old Believer books). So the ROC cannot be called the Russian Orthodox Church, rather the Russian Orthodox Greek-Kaph (t) olic church, because that was the name of the official church of the Russian Empire before the revolution of 1917. And the ROC is its abbreviated name. By the way, orthodoxy is not Orthodoxy, but RULE (ortho - right, doxia - faith). Look into the dictionary yourself and see how you have been deceived since the time of the Great Troubles.
Readers ask me many questions about the appearance in modern Russia of High Priestesses, who identify themselves as the descendants of Princess Olga. To begin with, according to Russian Law, we cannot have descendants along the female line, since in Russia there is a right by patronymic or paternal. The Jews have maternal rights. Therefore, no descendants of Princess Olga simply do not exist, there may be descendants of Prince Igor, after his son Svyatoslav. In addition, the word priest means SENSE or observer. In Latin, this is a bishop, which means overseer. Greece is Priesthood or the land of bishops. Therefore, under the high priestess can only be understood as the PATRIARCH or simply PAPU (the Pope stole this word from here). This means that the High Priestess of Russia should be a mother, but such a dignity for a woman is not known in world practice. In general, priestesses are confused with vestals. And the very modern concept of priestesses and priests is a tribute to the adventure literature of the 19th and 20th centuries and Hollywood. No priests existed before this, and the entire secular caste of priests was divided into the seers of the temple and the seers of God. The former are priests (changed Jews) and archpriests, and the latter are bishops, metropolitans and patriarchs. By the way, Jews here are not a nationality, but a designation of the belief in one God, which existed in pre-Christian times. It was later that Wallachian gypsies who were resettled to the Rhine and to Spain (Ashkenazi and Sephardic) would begin to call themselves Jews and for them they would invent Judaism. They are the most common Walachs. Another thing is that the Slavs also accepted Judaism. For example, in modern Ukraine, where, once there was a parasitic country of Khazaria - Cossackia. However, why was it? She is still there. In the sense of a parasitic country.
I have no right to teach the reader how to live. But you'd be more careful with these priestesses, buddy. They will not get it right. Some ladies have such an imagination that God forbid. I tell you this as old Casanova. The descendants of Svyatoslav are known and can be traced back to the Great Troubles. It is more difficult further, but I also followed this in other works.
There is such a book "The Last Path of the Holy Family". Authors A. T. Fomenko and G. V. Nosovsky. You yourself can read what happened to the ruling dynasty of Russia. In short, they went to India, then to Tibet, and then founded the ruling Manzhur dynasty in China. It existed until the end of the 19th century, when Empress Cixi came to power.
Are they alive? May the descendants of Christ-Andronicus live among us. Their mission is special. They will change the world. As I wrote earlier, on the very Christmas of 2016, a boy was born in Russia, who, having entered his age, will become the ruler of Russia and change it forever, returning it to the ancient faith and the name Russia. A. G. will come for Putin. Dyumin (he is now the governor of the Tula region), followed by Komnin, who is now a little over a year old. During his reign, the world will completely abandon bank interest and social inequality. This will be the real Russian Spring.
How do I know? So I am a cathar and types of cathars!
You see, reader, lying is an expensive pleasure. In order to maintain it, it takes great strength and many costs. Yes, it is profitable, but it requires constant investment and support. Truth exists just like that and it does not need priests and the gold of churches, intermediaries for communication between man and God. The world is simple and ingenious, it is lies that make it complex and confusing. I wrote a lot about how shamans of different times make money on human ignorance. What difference does it make what their names are: priest, dad, priest, xenz, mullah and other brethren of parasites? The main thing is that the lies they create lead people away from the truth, reducing them to a bestial state. They have one goal - to live happily ever after, not working, but only teaching. A kind of political officers in the army. The authorities are changing, the priests and their churches are changing, a new layer of lies begins. This means that working hands are required to serve all this lie. But, as soon as a person realizes that he is free, he unexpectedly for himself will discover Faith in the Most High God, who is completely alien to all this tinsel and vanity in the front of his kingdom. And is it in the hall? However, this is your choice, I made mine and follow the path of my ancestors.