The history of the dominance of allopathic medicine

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Winners write history. Winston Churchill At the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century, the following situation in medicine was created in America and Europe. Specialists of various profiles were equally involved in the treatment of patients: naturopaths, homeopaths, surgeons and many others who used the latest scientific achievements of that time, as well as the experience of generations in the treatment of various diseases and conditions with natural remedies. From the middle of the XIX century in medicine there was a pronounced division into "empires" and "allopaths".

Empires are homeopaths, herbalists (phytotherapists), in general, all those who treated with natural remedies and followed the concept that a sick body only needs to be helped to restore its natural balance, and it will cope with the disease itself.

Allopaths are those who have used strong mineral and chemical agents, surgery and bloodletting and followed the concept that the symptoms of the disease must be eliminated and then the patient will recover.

A serious war broke out between the two directions. Satirists in the newspapers portrayed this war as follows: among the empires, the sick die from the disease, and among the allopaths, from treatment. Many people were afraid of allopathic medicine. But behind it was a lot of money from bank tycoons and owners of the chemical industry (minerals, coal and then oil).

Allopathy was also greatly helped by the latest advances in science - the invention of anesthesia and the introduction of asepsis and antiseptics, which made it possible to use surgery much more widely as a therapeutic method, as well as the beginning of the synthesis of chemical preparations (Concern Bayer, 1897 - aspirin). In addition to the specialists who belonged to these two schools, at that time there were many charlatans of various stripes who easily obtained licenses to practice. There was no strict standard by which medical professionals could be qualified, and there was no organization to do this.

In 1913, with the help of America's leading oligarchs who control the oil and chemical industries (Rockefeller, Rothschild, Carnegie, Morgan), the Rockefeller Foundation was organized, which began to raise the standard of medical schools. In fact, oligarchs began to seize these medical schools and radically change their program in favor of the absolute dominance of allopathic medicine in the curriculum of medical schools and the complete elimination of all natural areas in it, such as dietetics, homeopathy, herbal medicine, etc.

For example, today, according to Edward Griffin, author of A Cancer-Free World, doctors' wives know more about healthy eating than doctors themselves, who spend only a few hours out of their 5-year program on nutrition. But even Hippocrates, whose oath doctors take, said that food should be your medicine, and medicine should be your food. And I would also add that our grandmothers and great-grandmothers know more about medicinal herbs and their correct use than doctors, despite the fact that more than 80% of all pharmaceutical preparations are based on the properties of various ingredients of natural plants that have been synthesized in the laboratory. only for the purpose of obtaining a patent and controlling the production of drugs.

American medical schools began to receive huge grants at that time (from $ 500 thousand to $ 1 million) in return for the appointment of 1-2 people from the Rockefeller Foundation to the board of directors. They, in turn, insisted on changing the medical curriculum, which now consisted exclusively of allopathy (pharmaceutical medicine). Medical students began to study under a new program, in which the treatment of patients consisted only in the use of synthesized chemicals and expensive procedures and operations.

Allopathic doctors began to call natural medicine unscientific, since at that time many successful natural methods could not be explained scientifically, while the effect of chemical drugs on the body could already be explained (only from the end of the 20th century, limited studies of the effect of natural methods began, many of which can be explained using quantum physics). From that moment on, the persecution of natural medicine began, which eventually began to be called alternative. Those schools that did not agree to change the curriculum so radically did not receive grants and could not compete with allopathic medical schools.

Further, the aforementioned oligarchs renamed part of their chemical industry to pharmaceutical, and then were able to infiltrate and completely control the American Medical Association - an organization that had by then become accredited medical schools. Thus, only schools that received grants from the Rockefeller Foundation and accepted allopathy were accredited in America.

For several decades, all of America and Europe adopted allopathy as the only form of official medicine. Large funds were used by these oligarchs to lobby the governments of Western countries for laws establishing the complete dominance of allopathic medicine. Thus, the circle closed: the chemical industry began to penetrate into all spheres of life, and, along with the deteriorating ecology thanks to it, began to lead to an ever-growing incidence of diseases of the population, the emergence of new diseases and the growth of those that were previously considered rare. So at the beginning of the twentieth century, only 10% of all patients had chronic diseases. Today this figure is over 90%. The same oligarchic families also own the largest pharmaceutical corporations that are engaged in the production of drugs. Few people know that in the list of the 500 richest corporations in the world, the first 10 are pharmaceuticals.

The huge capital that Big Pharma receives allows it to buy politicians, control the press and television, influence regulatory organizations (such as the FDA - Food and Drug Administration in America and the like in other countries), fund scientific research that guarantees the desired result and and finally, to avoid criminal liability for the sale of drugs that lead to mass death of people. So in the United States there is a law that protects pharmaceutical companies from lawsuits over the harm caused by the vaccines they sell. A government fund that uses taxpayer money is responsible for reimbursing such claims.

Today, when allopathic medicine has achieved almost complete control, and oncology even has legislative support (in America, Great Britain and many other countries, it is forbidden to practice alternative methods of oncology), cancer patients have no choice, and they have to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for mutilation treatment. which, at best, can only slightly prolong the patient's painful existence (and more often - significantly shortens it).

Several interesting facts that point to the methods of this domination and monopolization of medicine by allopathy.

An organization such as the American FDA, which permits certain drugs for use in the country, has rather stringent requirements and a multi-stage model for the passage of potential drugs to permit their use. This process costs $ 500-800 million today. Given that it is legally impossible to obtain a patent for a natural drug (natural, not synthetic), no pharmaceutical concern will be interested in paying such an amount, since it will not receive a patent that guarantees the monopoly production of this drug, and thereby guarantees profit … Small independent companies are simply not able to raise such an amount. In turn, the FDA strictly enforces that unauthorized natural products are not used, despite centuries of experience with many of them.

As such, many natural remedies and treatments are officially banned. Fighting honey. Establishment with natural remedies comes to something absurd. It is well known that many fruits, vegetables and spices (cherries, turmeric, garlic, carrots, ginger), as well as some minerals (selenium, iodine, magnesium, Himalayan salt, etc.) have a strong positive therapeutic effect. But neither the manufacturer of goods from these products, nor the seller has the right to mention their therapeutic effect in the treatment of specific diseases. This immediately raises this product (fruit, nut, dietary supplement) into the category of medicine. And since there is no formal approval from the FDA to use it as a medicine, it automatically becomes banned. For this reason, many small producers, farmers and shops have big problems, and the potential buyer is poorly aware of what diseases these natural products can help with. To maintain its financial interest, the medical establishment is doing its best to maintain the dominance of synthetic drugs in medicine and therefore spares no expense in discrediting all natural remedies as untenable, weak and often dangerous.

Also, the medical establishment has rewritten the history of medicine and its history of failure. In this version of history, old medicine appears to us as scientifically unfounded and ineffective. For example, we are told that before antibiotics were invented, humans could not cure infections. At the same time, it is not mentioned at all that before antibiotics in the West, a solution of colloidal silver was used with great success for many infectious diseases, as well as for prophylaxis. Colloidal silver has no side effects or overdose; it has been used as an antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal and antiparasitic agent. The role of other natural antibiotics is downplayed or hushed up (garlic, ginger, onion, echinacea, wild honey, black cumin oil, etc.). History rewritten to show vaccine success. For example, the establishment assures us that with the introduction of mass vaccination, it was possible to eradicate or significantly reduce (by more than 95%) the cases of such diseases as poliomyelitis, diphtheria, smallpox, whooping cough, etc. At the same time, the data from 1900 and the present day are usually compared, but the fact is hushed up that from 1900 until the start of mass vaccination in the late 50s - early 60s, the incidence rate from these diseases fell by itself by 90– 95%, which is explained by the improvement of social conditions of life and nutrition of people. At the same time, if vaccinations cause a massive outbreak of a disease among the vaccinated population, then such diseases are usually reclassified into other pathological conditions. Thus, hundreds of thousands of Americans who contracted polio as a result of vaccinations in the late 1950s were diagnosed as suffering from flaccid paralysis or encephalitis. As a result of this fraud, the statistics on the incidence of poliomyelitis has not changed. This "new" history of medicine was also well sprinkled with various myths, such as the fact that many diseases that are now easily curable were previously incurable and that people lived much less and died from mere trifles. These myths can be easily refuted. It is enough just to read from the classics about what a wide range of diseases doctors covered 100 years ago and how successful their methods of treatment were, to understand that the problem in those days was not the lack of synthetic drugs, but the lack of specialists and poor social conditions.

I remember one incident when, 10 years ago, I visited my friend Andrew in a small English village near the town of Mansfield. He invited me to the christening of his son, which took place in a local church. It was a beautiful old church and I decided to take a walk around it. Behind it was the old cemetery, where there were burials from the end of the 18th to the end of the 19th century. What surprised me then was that most of the people buried there lived for 80–90 years or more. From my meager knowledge of history and my understanding of the living conditions of those years that I then had, I did not expect such longevity from the old inhabitants of this village in the north of England.

An excerpt from the book by Boris Grinblat "DIAGNOSIS - CANCER: To be treated or to live?"