Artificial conflicts are deliberately introduced by the elite into society

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

To destroy a country even with educated citizens, you don't need to shoot or bomb. It is not even necessary to be at enmity. You can be friends and destroy, for example, the Baltics, the former Soviet republics, or the Russian hinterland. Another 25-30 years of independence and almost nothing will remain of many.

The best way is to build in conflicts among the population. That began to be applied since the time of Aristotle. Initially, embedding conflicts was intended for vassals to avoid conspiracies. But the result exceeded all expectations, which was extended to the entire people. I call this Aristotelian Social Engineering.

Without understanding what embedded conflicts are, as the main instrument of influencing the masses, it is difficult to understand what is happening in any country or world.

By creating internal problems for a person, the solution to external ones is automatically blocked. Psychologists have long noticed that external problems are nothing compared to internal ones. If a person has agreement and composure inside, then external problems are irrelevant. Embedding conflicts is precisely intended for a person to endure his own brain, instead of living and rejoicing.

Embedding conflicts paralyzes will and potential

Have you seen people who for years have not been able to change something in their life and continue to pull the same "bagpipes", constantly complaining about life that everything and everyone is bad?

Intrigues at work, quarrels with neighbors, alcoholism, laziness, sabotage, rudeness, rudeness, low productivity, theft, scandals in families, treason, divorce, reaching up to 60% (and in some areas up to 80%) and much, much more is the result of purposeful embedding of conflicts in society. Yes, yes - infidelity and divorce too.

No, this is not a conspiracy theory or my bias. And not looking for the guilty with flight from responsibility for your life - this is reality! And no need to tell - the idiots themselves and you can solve any problems, there are enough opportunities.

The impact on the masses gives a guaranteed effect with an accuracy of percent. 95% of people are naturally led, and if the top 5% are not taken care of, their life becomes a nightmare.

A person is born as a white sheet - what parents and society "write" on him will grow out of him. If a person is physically mature and can reproduce, it does not mean that he (a) is mentally adult and can be responsible. It is useless for such people to say - "you are a fool yourself" or "be smarter" - it's like spitting in their faces - well, they don't have sufficient skills to survive in society.

I remember one friend of my grandfather died, who lived to be 75–80 years old. And his wife went to the neighbors on the bench - “Oh, babanka, how he tortured me! How did he torture me …”. With undisguised joy from "liberation." Is that all that remains after 50+ years of marriage? That is, she lived with him for so many years, but there was nothing good? Why then lived with him?

Read psychologists - they spend half a book each to explain and convince readers that you can live and enjoy life even in such circumstances. But training books are read only by 5% of the most advanced in society. What to say about the rest?

For those unprepared for life, depression begins at age 18

At the first encounter with reality. Life does not stand on ceremony with anyone and teaches "face on the asphalt." By the age of 26-28, some people begin to burn out and even die, like the famous Club 27.

At the age of 30, agonizing maturation begins. By the age of 40, some life experience appears, but there is no strength, no health, and many have already burned out their desire. That would be the experience of the current 40-year-olds by the age of 18?

Don't say you didn't want to!

I know one such person - at 24 he was already a millionaire. In the blind realm, the one-eyed is the king. In my life, I have seen very few adequate men under the age of 30 - healthy, happy, successful, joyful in life. They were almost always elite children. The son of a minister, academician or famous doctor, grandson of the former mayor of the city.

Doesn't the system understand these things? Understands, but the elite does not want to.

Learning comes from parent to child. The elite - yes, they know how to bring up children and bring them up quietly, at home. And the rest, someone taught to raise children? Did they study themselves? Not! So they replicate their "cockroaches" in the sense that built-in conflicts are passed on to their children.

Embedding conflicts significantly reduces labor productivity

Even sanctions do not need to be imposed. People with built-in conflicts are complex, do not know how to get along with others and work in a team. And it doesn't matter what kind of professionals they are in their field! I have seen companies that have super-professionals on their machines and in the office.

But the overall productivity of the company is at the level of 20-30%. Why is this happening? Yes, because each of these professionals, on their own square meter, makes themselves a king and a god, and the rest do not give a damn - they work as it is more convenient for them. As a result, while one is processing a part or an order, the rest are waiting for these same parts to continue processing them further.

Therefore, we have to explain that it is not necessary to hire employees whose personal qualities and ability to work in a team are assessed below 8 points out of 10. Their professionalism is not important - look for others, albeit without professionalism, but to have an 8+ personality.

It is easier to teach to work from scratch than to re-educate. Education - it takes years - re-education is either tens of years, or even impossible.

Why does the school raise such people?

Naturally, the rating scale is different for all managers. A score of 3 in one company can mean an 8 in another. But in any case, some% of people - will be unfit for work - lumpen. Taking care of them is a heavy ballast on the country's budget.

In Europe, unemployed lumpen reached 5–8%, even at the best of times in 2005–2008. Wouldn't it be easier to educate and teach right away in a normal way? Elites think differently.

That is why Western countries have opened their labor markets to citizens of Eastern Europe. Lumpenes are not able to do even simple low-skilled work.

Rudeness and rudeness - turns into the norm

Show calmness - is regarded as a manifestation of weakness. Making a concession is beneath your dignity. Mutual winnings are excluded. You only need to be on top, just screw up, squeeze out, push through, assert yourself or even throw it - but not a mutual benefit.

We need trust in each other so that we can lend, give products for sale. And if it is not there, then cooperation is only on an advance payment. The effectiveness of such trading is several times lower. Instead of thinking about how to develop a business, entrepreneurs are forced to think about how they would not get thrown.

And how to start a partnership? If you don’t know how you’ll run away with people, then you don’t need to start anything with them.

Embedding conflicts among company employees

In the western courses on personnel management in business, it is explained that conflicts must be built in among the employees, otherwise they will demolish the bosses. If the employees are friends, then they are strictly against the boss and, therefore, are united. If they are at enmity with each other, then the boss is their savior.

Some executives take this literally and build intrigues, support gossip, denunciations, as a result, working in such a company turns into a nightmare. But the main thing is that this is a great way to over-exploit people: to make them plow twice as much for a salary that is 2 times less.

The productivity of such companies is rather low due to ineffective management. If you work in one - run while you are alive! If you have nowhere to run, go to a specialist for help. On job search sites, these companies are called juicers.

But there are other ways to introduce conflict: competition. However, this is art! Correctly built competition in the team - raises the company to the skies from nothing.

And you can also make the conflict external - that is, the struggle for a place in the sun, with competitors, with a crisis, with a lack of resources, but you never know with what? In the 90s, many of today's famous companies grew up like that. People worked around the clock, spent the night on camp beds - building their future.

Many, however, were then thrown, but some were lucky - they got a share and became millionaires, TOP-managers.

In the Soviet Union, conflicts were also introduced - socialist competitions. The result was also amazing. My opinion is that if humanity sets out to eliminate some big problem - for example, lack of food, water, housing, cancer, find free energy - the problem will be completely eliminated in a maximum of 5-10 years. But who will allow this?

Embedding conflicts starts at school, through teachers

Embedded conflicts have a viral nature. People with inner dislocation will spread rot around their surroundings.

If you have questions about why modern teachers are forced to write a bunch of unnecessary reports, then this is a way to bring them to severe annoyance. Which SHOULD be drained on the children at school and on the husband at home. Well, the children will then let their parents come off. This is how people with weak social skills grow up.

The passport office, polyclinics, ambulance, tax, judicial system, licensing, control or other departments, which are overloaded with necessary or unnecessary work, beloved by humorists - there are many ways to take people's brains out of the blue.

Small incomes lower self-esteem below the baseboard and it is very difficult to correct it later. Therefore, in some countries there is a minimum salary - so that people have something to live on.

The family was good, but they were spoiled by the housing issue - that is, the lack of money

Fursov gives an example: in the States, when couples with incomes of $ 120,000 a year get divorced, they quietly divide the income. And if with incomes less than $ 80 thousand per year - murder - they share the debts.

Low-level bureaucracy is another great way to take out people's brains, and thus build conflict.

There are also sophisticated sadistic ways - refugees in Europe or crime in America. First, the system breeds an army of criminals. Then the second army of law enforcement agencies, which should catch these criminals. But both of them terrorize the population.

The solution to how to reduce crime has long been known - to educate and educate, to provide jobs. Because 75–80% of criminals are uneducated and ill-mannered morons who still want to eat. But the elites - they don't want to fix this problem - they are making good money on it.

As our compatriot, who worked "there" for 20 years as a policeman, argued that the problem of crime can be solved in 1 day, but they do not want to.

Some live very well exclusively, because others live very poorly!

Embedding Conflict Leads to Inequality and Misery

Noum Chomsky often discusses in his interviews about embedding conflicts according to Aristotle - did Aristotle know that conflicts breed inequality and suffering among people? Of course he did. But let's not overestimate Aristotle - sooner or later, this method would still be invented by someone. In China, India - everything is the same without him.

Andrei Fursov claims that the elite has lived for 80–85 years over the past 3 thousand years. And the people lived for 35-40 years until the beginning of the 20th century. Remember in Pushkin - "my decrepit old woman", the age of people whom he calls "old" - starts from 33–35 years old. In China, India, Muslim and African countries, most of the population by the age of 40 already looks like old people, or even dies.

Yes, built-in conflicts are the main reason why people live so little. This is really so destructive.

Consulting companies, I often see that the teams are mostly female. Or the leaders are mostly women. Remember in Tsoi - Few remained in the bright memory, in a sober mind and with a firm hand in the ranks.

A large percentage of men do not tolerate the turn of 40 years old "in a blessed memory, but with a firm hand." Most burn out and gradually withdraw from social life. Someone gets drunk, someone switches to fishing or sofa sports with pivasik, or a simpler job, and not to be tugged.

Different conflicts are introduced to men and women

And it is explained by the fact that women had to give birth to children from an early age (as now among Muslims), and died in childbirth after 10-16 children or simply from a difficult life. That is, there was no particular need to purposefully destroy women - they themselves were dying. And men are still being rotten through a distorted value system imposed on society.

Thanks to socialism, these processes were suspended - and it turned out that a woman in 45 berries again. (However, the reverse process is going on, about which the film "Killing us softly" was shot long ago)

But the elites are now working hard to bring the situation back to the 19th century, but without fertility. For the people to die - at 35-40. Like the poor in many countries.

Why is this happening?

Banal savings on pensions and social security. Stopping social lifts, reducing competition between the elite and the people. To be able to exploit the population to the maximum. In order not to be distracted by caring for parents, who should already be dead when a person turns 15-25 years old.

Well, and most importantly - let it be better for people to die after living half their lives, having neither the strength nor the will, to change the established order of those in power. As Zhirinovsky said in the Duma - There is no need to raise education, otherwise they (the people) will change power every 10 years.

Embedding conflicts - classic "divide and rule" - partial genocide of the population

The introduction of conflicts is, in fact, an information war against one's own people. And according to the results - this is a partial genocide - they do not kill completely, but give only half their lives to live. And so it has been for the last 2300 years. And if you have questions why so many people live below the poverty line, you already know the answer.

Now the main attention is paid to the information war between Russia and the West. But, as you can see, according to the results, this is a minor war. The Russia-West conflict is likely to be resolved in the next 5-7 years. But what will happen to the social Aristotelian engineering against his people - I do not know.

Breaking out of the trap of internal conflicts is very, very difficult. Books that give such an opportunity are very, very rare - 2-3 for a hundred years. And they were regularly withdrawn and withdrawn from the mass circulation. And if it cannot be withdrawn, they are strongly discredited. I know a couple of such cases.

Education is designed to raise not even consumers, but slaves

The current education in all countries prepares only for work and hardly prepares for life. Nature is arranged in such a way that the driving force in nature is conflict. As Putin quotes - "That's why the pike is in the pond, so that the crucian carp does not sleep." This is how nature works.

The school is simply obliged to prepare for life. For example, teaching how to get along with other people. In my time they said: there are no brains - goes to Ped, in the sense of a pedagogical institute. How to bring up a worthy replacement with such an attitude to teachers and training? Teaching is hard and challenging work.

Bypass the barriers of consciousness so that the material is remembered and reached the subconscious. Develop life skills, create the right habits, cultivate the right self-esteem, so that there is a craving for learning all your life. To be able to draw conclusions from mistakes and competently experience refusals. Yes, there are many more things I can list.

Children must be cared for and cherished, raised for decades as a fragile creature, so as not to break with a rude approach or a word. Socialization is a breakdown of human nature and is always painful even at school - knowledge, skills, conditions are needed. And where are they? And if you have to relearn and change your habits at the age of 25-40, this is a breakdown.

It is necessary to prepare for family life - men and women are different after all - it is necessary to teach how to communicate and get along with each other correctly. Teach you how to choose the right pair for yourself.

How to find a job, how to build a career, how to overcome setbacks, how to choose a profession, how to choose the right institution, but it is banal how to behave in society, neatness, cleanliness, decency, politeness, how to be friends, how to endure separation, loss, illness - unless this teach at school? No.

Unfortunately, and will not be in the next decades. Deliberate inaction is the basis for embedding conflicts.

If you and your children want to live until the age of 80–85, you should take care of this yourself and eliminate your "cockroaches" from your head. Just don’t tell you that you don’t have them - don’t be fooled. Everyone has them, someone has more, someone has less.

Nationalism always means war

Without understanding the principle of embedding conflicts, as the main tool in the theory of power, it is impossible to understand what is happening in the international arena. The USSR was destroyed through, God forgive me, "the rise of national consciousness."

Embedded interethnic conflicts. Did the young reformers - reformers know that this would lead to the collapse of the country at least, and potentially to war? Did Poroshenko, Yeltsin and Gorbachev know? Of course they knew. But that's another article.