Beauty and fashion are not the same

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

External beauty is always a reflection of inner spiritual beauty. And the external attractiveness for males, created in the modern world by artificial means, appeals to the sexual instincts of the crowd and turns people into animals.

In different biological species (animals, birds, fish and even flora), either males or females play an active role in attracting individuals of a different sex for procreation. If we look for analogs of this kind in the life of human society, then almost the entire history of the West is accompanied by the history of women's fashion, women's cosmetics and perfumery, and women's haberdashery. Men's fashion, men's cosmetics and perfumes and men's haberdashery are not yet such a subject of discussion and attention of society as women's.

Functionally, in essence, the entire arsenal of women's fashion, cosmetics, perfumery and haberdashery is a continuation of instinctive programs for attracting a partner for procreation into the culture.

Only in humans are these manifestations of purely animal "normality" (when instincts dominate in the psyche), which for Homo sapiens is madness. On this occasion, there is such an anecdote:

- Dad, tell me, how do they catch madmen?

- With the help of cosmetics, charming smiles, fashionable dresses and underwear, son.

In essence, this entire fashion culture appeals to the sexual instincts of men, as many victims of rape were undeniably convinced of, who, with their appearance, created by them with the help of an arsenal of fashion, cosmetics, perfumery and haberdashery, were able to excite in one of the males behavior on based on sexual instincts, which they could not restrain (or they were not used to restraining at all, since their entire psyche is subordinated to the needs of animal instincts).

Historically, real women's fashion, and even more so "high" fashion, has turned into a porno act, with which everyone is accustomed, accustomed to. This is not a gentle eros. The difference between porno action and eros is that action porno is addresslessly addressed to the sexual instincts of the crowd, and eros is addressed only to a loved one, necessarily of a different sex.

A woman of fashion, especially under the cover of a sophisticated culture, is, of course, not as obvious an animal as an openly lustful slut, but at a certain glance, the difference between them is only in the cultural continuations of the same - not subject to them - sexual instincts. If someone, having familiarized themselves with the views expressed on the established fashion institute, decides that our ideal is to dress everyone in a somehow well-made uniform, for example, in quilted jackets, then he will not understand anything. The aesthetics of clothing and the appearance and behavior of a person is one thing, but fashion porn is another.

See also: Pornomania - the scourge of modern men

In addition, cosmetics have long since become essentially a chemical weapon (and possibly a genetic one that affects future generations). One of the doctors advises: when choosing a lipstick, you should pay attention not only to its shade, but also to the composition (although the composition may not correspond to the true content of substances in the product). Doctors and environmentalists warn: many lipsticks are made on the basis of harmful synthetic substances. It is much easier to make lipstick from them than from natural oils, the work with which requires a lot of skill and time. Chemists have come up with many synthetic substitutes that really give lipstick improved qualities. But if herbal remedies are harmless, then mineral oils, as well as petroleum products, settle in the liver, kidneys and lymph nodes, and this is fraught with many diseases, poor health, and contributes to the appearance of the syndrome of increased fatigue. And with prolonged contact with the crystal paraffin used in lip products, inflammatory processes begin in the heart valves. This applies not only to the cheap lipstick that is sold on every corner, but also to the products of many well-known cosmetics manufacturers. Take a look at the composition of your lipstick. Petroleum products and chemical fats can "hide" under the guise of paraffin, microcrystalline wax, petrolatum (this is petrolatum obtained from petroleum residues), mineral oils, ceresite, methicon, and others.

Several years ago, the World Health Organization even set a maximum limit - every day a person can receive no more than 0.01 milligrams of mineral oils for each kilogram of their weight. But, using lipsticks, pencils, lip gloss, women unwittingly "eat" much more and cause damage to their health. And when kissing, all this stuff is eaten by men.

Environmentalists and doctors believe that companies should completely abandon the use of harmful oil products and follow the path of using natural products. But it is not profitable for firms.

And besides lipsticks, there are also other makeup products, shampoos, creams, lotions, hair dyes, deodorants, toothpastes, etc.; synthetic fabrics and dyes in underwear in the areas of perspiration of the body, decomposing or soluble in sweat, after which they are absorbed through the pores into the body.

For example, there are constant advertisements on television for deodorants that completely eliminate sweat. It turns out that this is extremely harmful to health. Our body must get rid of toxins every day. When a deodorant is applied to block the release of sweat, the toxins contained in the slags accumulate, soaking the nearby tissues of the body: mammary glands, lungs, heart … The risk of many diseases, in particular, breast cancer, increases, even in men. Perspiration should be avoided.

The press reported - and this does not contradict the possibilities of chemistry and biochemistry - that it was revealed that the oncological statistics were conditioned by bras made of some types of synthetic fabrics; and all kinds of pads and tampons containing chemically reactive components represent another chemical risk factor, as well as genetic risk for future children, acting directly on the skin and mucous membranes of the genitals of girls and women.

Miniskirts, combined with fashion's rejection of warm underwear, began to threaten with hypothermia of the organs located in the pelvis, in the cold wind and in the cold, with inability to control the energy of the body. In addition, the combination of a mini-skirt and the fashionable daytime underwear that does not cover the crotch and buttocks creates an additional risk of various infections entering the woman's body "downstream" - at least in the conditions of summer city life with their street dust and dirt, far not sterile public transport and other public places: it is enough to sit down once unsuccessfully, especially with the immune system - underdeveloped or weakened by spring vitamin deficiency - and troubles will arise.

In January 2003, the Italian newspaper La Stampa published an article entitled "Low-waisted jeans - a cause of femoral nerve irritation". It reported that, according to a Canadian doctor's research, new low-waisted jeans (they are called "low-rise") can lead to a very unpleasant disease "paresthesia" (numbness of the skin). Its symptoms are: burning sensation and irritation in the hips, painful sensations of some nerves, excessive sensitivity and a feeling of weakness in the spine. Although this disease does not pose a threat to life and health, it is very annoying. A Canadian doctor, faced with cases of this disease in young women aged 22 to 35 years and studied it, came to the conclusion that the cause of the disease is wearing tight jeans that press on the nerve located under the thigh bone, causing its dysfunction. Taking into account the popularity of "low-rise", the doctor urged through the media young people who want to avoid health problems, not to follow the fashion blindly.

Thus, we can conclude that the predominant passion of girls and adult women for new fashion trends in the current era is quite often dangerous to their health either directly or indirectly due to non-ergonomics (Ergonomics is the science of the correspondence and inconsistency of objects of the technosphere and its infrastructures of physiology and psychology of a person and collectives) of many fashionable things and rituals, which has become a fashionable set of rules of "good taste" of a particular subculture. But such a subculture is just a cultural shell of the instinctively conditioned algorithms of herd-schooling behavior and attracting the attention of potential partners for the reproduction of new generations of the "Homo Sapiens" species.

This herd-gregarious bondage to the current fashion of a woman, which behaviorally differs little from the behavior of a female animal, continues to operate even after she begins to live a family life, and even acts contrary to the tastes of her husband in the field of aesthetics and sexual desires. By this, the woman herself opens up the possibility of destroying her own family.

Beauty cannot in any way be provided by cosmetics. External beauty is always a reflection of inner spiritual beauty. On the contrary, there is only external attractiveness for males, which is deceitful and insidious; in the modern world it is created by artificial means. Natural beauty always matches spiritual righteousness. If a woman is righteous, then she is necessarily beautiful. About this and the verses:

And if so, What is beauty

And why do people deify her?

Is she a vessel in which there is emptiness?

Or a fire flickering in a vessel?

Read also:

Why did women wear skirts

A year without pants - a year of miracles and new impressions