Talmudic basis of the System

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

The degeneration of public morality taking place before our eyes, the urgent international recommendations on the molestation of young children under 4 years of age and the legalization of pedophilia have a clearly formulated religious basis.

JUDAISM. GENERAL METHODOLOGY OF IDEOLOGICAL DEGENERATION OF THE MAJORITY

The fact that the concept of liberalism has religious roots from Judaism [was convincingly proved [in his report by the publicist Israel Shamir [1]. He showed that liberalism is wrongly considered an "anti-religious trend of thought" (despite the fact that liberalism itself persistently avoids self-determination as an ideology). In his analysis, Shamir used the conclusions of the German thinker Karl Schmitt, who, after the defeat of Germany in 1945, living in zones of both Soviet and American occupation, noted that American liberalism is a militant ideology, less prone to compromise than Soviet communism. Schmidt's personal experience showed that American neo-liberalism is an ideology more dangerous than communism (which he extremely disliked).

The understanding of the aggressive ideology of liberalism won out in scientific circles only in recent years - after a long series of wars in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan and the repetition of the same type of "color revolutions". Liberalism has become a clear and formalized ideology that requires the implementation of the same guidelines everywhere. These attitudes reflect the interests of a narrow group of supranational oligarchy, which wants to deprive all societies of cohesion, depriving us of the opportunity to resist. Therefore, through the protrusion of limited individual rights, collective rights are destroyed:

- "human rights" (and denial of the rights of the collective);

- “protection of minorities” (and denial of the rights of the majority);

- “private ownership of the media” (and the exclusive right of capital to shape public opinion);

- "protection of women and homosexual relations" (and the elimination of the family);

- “anti-racism” (and denial of the preferred rights of indigenous people);

- “propaganda of economic independence (and denial of social mutual assistance);

- "separation of the church from the state" (and freedom of anti-Christian propaganda, with the prohibition of the Christian mission in the public sphere);

- "an elective form of government (" democracy "limited by the consent of the people and the authorities with the dominant discourse).

I. Shamir reminds us of another important thought of K. Schmidt: "every ideology is a hidden religious doctrine." The most important concepts of ideology are secularized theological concepts. This is how secularized Orthodoxy is felt in Russian communism, where the Orthodox idea of conciliarity dominated.

WHAT IS THE RELIGIOUS BACKGROUND OF NEO-LIBERALISM?

Israel Shamir draws attention to the fact that neo-liberalism is trying to erase all traces of God's Presence, to destroy any reminder of Christ. All the paraphernalia of liberalism turns it into a cryptorreligion, a secularized form of "neo-Judaism." The adherents of liberalism reproduce the views characteristic of the Jews, who often act as preachers of the new faith and believe in the "sacredness of Israel." Thus, support for Israel is an indispensable item on the program of all American politicians, and Judaism has become the only religion that is forbidden to fight the mainstream discourse. The paranoid fear and hatred of the Jews in relation to the Gentiles became the scheme of the Pentagon's actions. The ideas of neo-Judaism were reflected in the ideology of republican neocons and "neo-Trotskyists" from the Democratic Party - projecting the same fear and hatred, but on a global scale.

Neo-Judaism became the religion of the American Empire, where Christianity was almost completely destroyed, but Judaism and its derivatives triumphs.

At the same time, I. Shamir draws attention to the fact that the commonality of Judaism and the anti-religious cult of global neoliberalism, the destruction of families, public solidarity and traditions, is based on the pathological duplicity of Judaism. Like the two-faced Janus, he demands opposite things from Jews and non-Jews, which makes him different from Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, which do not impose any requirements on those who are not their followers, with the exception of one - to become their follower. Judaism does not require a goy to become a Jew. Moreover, he does not approve of it, if he does not explicitly prohibit it.

Judaism requires a goy not to have a religion, not to believe in anything, not to celebrate their religious holidays, not to help their fellows. All the described ideas of neo-liberalism fit into this concept.

- “The rights of the individual versus the rights of the collective” (“the goy has no collective rights”);

- “The right to a collective, group game belongs only to (neo) Jews, while others must play individually” (“human rights for you, collective rights for us”; “the international of working people has been destroyed, but the international of the rich is becoming more united”);

- “Protection of minorities, denial of the rights of the majority” (which is “natural for a minority religion”);

- “Private ownership of mass media” (as “the exclusive right of capital to form public opinion”);

- “Protection of women and homosexual relations” - implying the elimination of the family (“a goy cannot have a full-fledged family”; the elimination of a family increases the return on the worker);

- "Anti-racism" (as a denial of the preferred rights of the indigenous population - which is natural for a Jew who is not indigenous in any country, therefore liberalism allows the import of cheap labor and helps foreign corporations to operate in foreign territory);

- "Promotion of economic independence" (ban on social mutual assistance - Judaism [explicitly prohibits aid to non-Jews [);

- "Freedom of anti-Christian propaganda" (in the absence of a fight against Judaism - so in the United States in public places [the installation of Christian symbols is prohibited, but Hanukkah lamps are allowed [; in many countries, criticism of Judaism is subject to jurisdiction);

- "Democracy": if you do not agree with the above principles, then your vote is not counted, if you agree, it does not matter who you vote for (examples are the elections in Palestine, Belarus, Serbia).

Thus, liberalism is a form of “Judaism for non-Jews”, and the society where this quasi-religion is being introduced is subjected to [degenerative simplification (degeneration) [2].

HOMOSEXUAL DEGENERATION

Judaism is the vanguard of support for sexual deviation, rejecting the moral condemnation of homosexuality.

Thus, supporters of "Reform Judaism", who make up more than 39% of religious Jews in the United States, practically without exception encourage sodomy. Back in 1996, they issued a statement that said: “We believe that homosexuality is not an abomination, it is not a mental illness or social deviation, it is not a perversion of the natural order. Homosexuality is not a choice or a preference, it is not something that you choose to do or abstain from. This is as natural as heterosexuality. Therefore, there is no religious or moral basis for distinguishing people on the basis of their sexual orientation. " Rabbi Eric Yoffe, president of the US Union for Reformed Judaism, then declared: "For the first time in history, the main organization of rabbis has confirmed the halachic nature of same-sex relationships." [3]

In 2006, already the "conservative rabbis", who numbered 33% of religious Jews, [decided to ordain sodomites as rabbis [and to encourage homosexuality among Jewish men and women [4].

Thus, 72% of RELIGIOUS Jews supported sodomy. What then to say about their "secularized" tribesmen?

RELIGIOUS JUSTIFICATION FOR PEDOPHILIA

If we delve into the details, returning to the raised in the first part [the topic of child molestation and the legalization of pedophilia by liberals (using the example of Norway) [, we will find that this "concept" is fully justified from the point of view of Judaism.

Sex with girls before and after the age of three

“When an adult man has sexual intercourse with a little girl, it’s okay, because when the girl is less than three years old, it’s like someone sticks a finger in her eye, tears come to her eyes … but the vision returns, so the innocence returns to the little girl. a girl who is less than three years old”([Kethuboth 11b [; Talmud, 617); “Sexual intercourse with a girl is permitted if the girl is 3 years old” (Niddah 44b) (see [English version [); “Goyim girls from the age of 3 can be abused” (Aboda Sarah 37a).

Moreover, the Talmud at the same time provided for an "emergency exit" for the conscience of the Jews themselves … through the murder of a seduced child: "… if a Jew had intercourse with a non-Jew, be she three years old and one day old or an adult, married or not, and even if he is a minor at the age of only 9 years and one day - since he had a voluntary intercourse with her, she must be killed, as in the case of an animal (participating in the act of bestiality), because through her the Jew found himself in a difficult situation "(Rambam, Mishne-Torah, Halakhot Isur Bia, perek Yud-Bet, 1495, Hitt; [Maimonides, op.cit., 'Prohibitions on Sexual Intercourse' 12; 10; Talmudic Encyclopedia, 'Goy' [) [5].

At the same time, the Talmud does not condemn sex with little boys -

Sex with boys before and after nine years

“Our Rabbis [taught [: In the case of a male child, a young one is not regarded as on a par with an old one; but a young beast is treated as an old one. What is meant by this? Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel [said [: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that. What is the basis of their dispute? - Rab maintains [that only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw guilt [upon the active offender]; whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty [in that respect]. But Samuel [maintains [: Scripture writes, [And thou shalt not lie with mankind] as with the lyings of a woman”(Babylonian Talmud, [Sanhedrin 54b [).

Translation: “Our rabbis taught: In the case of (having sex with) boys, the younger are different from the older ones … What is meant by this? The slave said: Pederasty (sex) with a child under the age of nine is not the same as pederasty with an older child. Samuel said: Sex with a child under the age of three is not considered pederasty, as with an older child. What is at the heart of their dispute? - The slave claims that only those who are themselves capable of engaging in sexual intercourse (playing the role of a man) can accuse [an active criminal] of their rape; at the same time, whoever cannot (perform the function of a man in sex) cannot accuse (active homosexual) of his passive role. Samuel supports: the Scripture says, [and you will not lie with a man] as if you are lying with a woman."

The rabbis also agreed that a woman can have sexual intercourse with a little boy and this is not considered sexual intercourse: “A small boy who has intercourse with a grown-up woman makes her [as though she were] injured by a piece of wood "(Babylonian Talmud, [Kethuboth 11b [) (trans." A little boy who has a relationship with a grown woman makes her [as if she were] wounded by a piece of wood ").

A footnote to this passage [says [: "Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood" sexual intercourse is not considered, nevertheless the woman was wounded by him like a piece of wood "- that is, she did not sin, but she was disqualified from marriage with a rabbi).

The Talmud discusses pederasty of such women, ostensibly to determine the need to disqualify her from the possibility of marrying a rabbi. However, this opens the gate wide for all "faithful" to have sex with boys under the age of nine, freeing them from the sense of guilt. Thus, the "sacred" Talmud nullifies the "laws of Moses" on same-sex relationships, teaching that immature boys are "not human."

Isn't this a green light for perverts? And that is why, from the point of view of a liberal, as a bearer of the morality of secularized Judaism, there is “nothing reprehensible” in pederasty / “pedophilia”!

It turns out that for hundreds of years, sexual perverts received religious sexual indulgence, since little boys could not blame the adult Jew who raped him. It's about removing the blame from pedophiles. That now and [are trying to conduct support groups from the corresponding ethnic-religious group through the legislation of "all civilized countries" [.

And now, having gathered this information together, let us remember that [in 2012 [the Permanent Representative of Russia to the Council of Europe, in accordance with the order of the President of the Russian Federation V. Putin, signed in Strasbourg an international Convention with a beautiful name “for the protection of the rights of children from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse”. As usual, there is a fetid content behind the pretty wrapper. Because, among other things, we are crawling towards the "Standards for Sexuality Education" developed by the WHO European Office and the Federal Center for Health Education (Federal Center for Health Education) - for policy-makers, leaders and professionals in the field of education and health.

These Standards, which have already been translated into Russian, must be adopted by us as well. Let's list what we are [obliged to strive for by an international treaty [(list is incomplete):

“At the age of 0-4 years it is necessary to provide information

- about different types of love;

- about the feeling of joy and pleasure from touching your own body, masturbation at an early age;

- about the pleasure of physical intimacy (p. 46)

“At the age of 4-6, we must continue to provide information

- the feeling of joy and pleasure from touching your own body; masturbation at an early age;

- about the meaning and expression of sexuality;

- about sexual sensations;

- friendship and love for members of the same sex;

- different concepts of the family (pp. 48-50)

In addition, there is a great article called "1.3 Why Should You Start Sexuality Education Before Four Years?"

And let's compare these insistent recommendations for molestation of young children under 4 years of age and older with the pedophile fabrications of the Talmud creators.

That is, in 1993, a ban on any (primarily Russian, nationally-oriented) ideology was introduced into the Russian Constitution. And now "international treaties", which, according to the same Yeltsin constitution, are "above national laws", the ideology of Talmudism is instilled through degenerative casuistry.

_

[1] I. Shamir ["Religious roots of liberalism" [, report at the conference "Religion in the modern system of international relations: liberalism and traditional consciousness", Faculty of International Relations, St. Petersburg State University, November 24, 2006

[2] article "[Degeneration [", F. A. Brockhaus and I. A. Efron, S.-Pb.: Brockhaus-Efron. 1890-1907

[3] Central Conference of American Rabbis (CCAR) Responsum, 1996, plus comment by Rabbi Eric Yoffie, quoted by Religious Action Center of Reformed Judaism (quoted by Ted Pike, [“Judaism & Homosexuality: A Marriage Made In Hell” [, 09.22.06)

[4] Jennifer Siegel, "Key Rabbis Say Conservative Judaism Will Lift Gay Ban", Forward, Aug 25, 2006 (quoted in Ted Pike, Ibid.)

[5] cit. according to Israel Shahak, ["Jewish history, Jewish religion: the severity of three thousand years" [