Complete self-exposure of vaccinators. What Stanley Plotkin, Godfather of Vaccines, said under oath

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Recently in the United States there was one of many lawsuits between divorced parents regarding the fate of their children. One of the controversies was the issue of vaccinations, which the mother refused to do. The vaccine industry decided to make this process indicative and not only paid the provocative unfortunate father of lawyers, but also sent there as a top expert one of the most influential characters in this field, the author of the rubella vaccine, vaccinologist Stanley Plotkin. This move turned out to be absolute PR for them. -failure.

Pltokin, who agreed to testify as an expert, on 2018-01-11 was forced under oath under a procedure called "deposit" for EIGHT hours in a row to answer questions from a lawyer from his mother.

During this interrogation, Plotkin virtually confirmed all the accusations and suspicions about vaccinations and vaccinators, which the industry and the press have a habit of rejecting with the stigma of "conspiracy theory."

A specialist with an honorary diploma from the UC Berkeley School of Law and experience in the Supreme Court of Israel, Aaron Siri, came to interrogate Plotkin.

Almost immediately, the lawyer forced the vaccine expert to acknowledge an open conflict of interest.

Plotkin confirmed that he actually came to testify in favor of the forcible introduction of pharmaceuticals manufactured by Merck, GSK, Sanofi and Pfizer, from each of which Plotkin himself has regularly received millions of dollars for decades.

Then Siri, with the help of the tax documentation he had received in advance, forced Plotkin to admit that he was "mistaken" about the lack of funding by the pharmaceutical industry for his pseudo-public organization "Voices for Vaccines", and to confirm that, like the rest of the similar ones founded around the world, "Parents for even more injection "his pseudo-OA exists for the money of the pharmaceutical industry.

With the next round of questions, Siri proved that Plotkin personally embodies all the signs of "corrupt science", as Marcia Angell once described it in a very famous article on this topic - he was. editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine.

Namely:

- Plotkin forgets to indicate a conflict of interest, which leads to his work as a consultant in the same companies whose products he evaluates, - in addition to "advising" he sits on corporate advisory boards, - has patent and royalty agreements, - agreed to sign pseudo-scientific publications written by someone unknown in the interests of corporations, - promotes pharmaceuticals at Industry Sponsored Symposia, - welcomes expensive gifts and luxury travel from pharmaceutical companies.

Siri methodically went through each of these points, with irrefutable evidence on hand.

And in each of them, Plotkin was forced to answer "Yes".

In the part of the interrogation, which was devoted to the actual testing of vaccines, Plotkin, under pressure from the evidence provided by Siri, was forced to admit that

- many vaccines from the current children's calendar were tested for safety only for a few days, which is insufficient (and this was also directly confirmed by Plotkin) to detect damage to the immune system, - the published test results deliberately hide or underestimate the data on adverse reactions and at the same time overestimate the effectiveness, - the effect of vaccination is weak and lasts only a few years, - reporting on adverse reactions in post-marketing surveillance registers only 1 out of 100 real side effects.

Plotkin has shown that he is an atheist, has contempt for the faith of others and denies the right of anyone to refuse vaccination for religious reasons.

After that, the Israeli lawyer decided to demonstrate the level of humanism of the doctor himself and moved on to the questions that were included in a two-minute form at the link:

Have you ever used orphans to test experimental vaccines?

- Yes

Have you ever used the mentally retarded in your vaccine research?

- I do not remember my participation in research involving the mentally retarded. In the 60s, this was considered common practice. Although, perhaps, I did participate in such studies.

- Do you remember this article about rubella vaccine?

- Yes.

- 13 mentally retarded children were vaccinated with this experimental vaccine.

- OK. Yes. In this case, I did it.

- Have you ever argued that it is best to experiment with those who are less able to contribute to society, for example, children with disabilities?

“I don’t remember exactly, but it’s quite possible.

The lawyer cites Plotkin's article, which contains the assertion that vaccines, first of all, should be tested not on healthy children and adults, but on children and adults, "which are people in form, but not in the sense of social potential."

- Yes.

- This is very reminiscent of Nazi philosophy.

- Yes.

- Have you ever conducted experiments using an experimental vaccine on infants whose mothers were in prison?

- Yes.

Have you ever used people living in colonial countries to experiment with experimental vaccines?

- Yes

- Did you conduct these experiments in the Belgian Congo?

- Yes.

- More than a million people participated in this experiment?

- Yes.

The next morning after this interrogation, Mr. Plotkin officially refused to further participate in the process.

You can familiarize yourself with the full record of the interrogation of a person from the very top of the world vaccine pyramid.

Here is this episode of the meeting in which Stanley says this:

(full recording of the interrogation at the court session dated 2018-11-01 (playlist of 9 videos per hour, total 9 hours at this link