The destruction of moral bonds by the example of the Rat King

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

The current situation in Russia was created by using a technology known as the "rat king". The purpose of this technology is to destroy key nodes, invisible foundations and bonds of social construction.

Create an atmosphere of fragmentation, when everyone is for himself and there is no concept of "his". To achieve this, morality must be broken. An indicator of broken morality is behavior when one betrays another.

The essence of this technology is very clearly revealed by the example of rats. These animals are primarily known for their incredible survivability. The basis of such vitality is social cohesion. Rats are incredibly social animals. They go to work together, help each other, protect, if possible, take the wounded with them. Rats feel like a single organism and behave like a single organism. They quickly exchange information, quickly warn of danger, transfer skills of protection. There is no individual gain in this behavior. The defense mechanism is of a moral nature.

One of the most effective ways to deal with rats is based on the destruction of defenses. Since protection is based on morality, the method is ultimately based on the destruction of morality. Morality cannot be broken for everyone. You can break it alone, and even then not immediately. They break down gradually. For this, conditions are created when rational logic becomes decisive. The main thing is to make you take the first step - an action that was previously under an absolute taboo.

This is done as follows. They take a large and strong rat, starve it for a long time, and then throw a newly killed rat into its cage. After some deliberation, she devours her dead brother. Rational logic dictates: this is no longer a fellow, this is food. He doesn't care, but I need to survive. So you need to eat.

The second time, the bar of immorality is raised higher. A barely living animal is thrown into the cage. The new "food", although almost dead, is still alive. Again, rational logic dictates a solution. He will die anyway, but I need to live. And the rat again eats its own kind, now practically alive.

For the third time, a completely live and healthy "food", a weak rat, is thrown into the cage. In the strong rat, the rational logic algorithm is turned on again. There’s nothing to eat anyway, she tells herself. What's the use if we both die? May the fittest survive. And the fittest survives.

Note that the rat took less and less time to make a decision each time. At the same time, the level of immorality of each new devouring was more and more. After a while, the rat did not think at all. She treated her countrymen like food. As soon as a new rat was thrown into her cage, she immediately pounced on it and devoured it. From the moment when she did not think at all whether to eat or not to eat, her morality was broken. Then she was released back into society, from where she was taken at one time. It was not the same rat. It was already a being without signs of morality. In its actions, it was guided only by the logic of selfishness. But those around him did not know this. They took her for theirs and completely trusted her.

Very quickly, a creature that looks like a rat came to the idea: why somewhere to look for food, if it is around, warm and fresh. Rational logic determined the nature of the action. The rat-eater chose an unsuspecting victim and devoured it.

Very soon he came to the conclusion that the best option was not to openly attack and devour, but to do it secretly from society. The next time, under one pretext or another, this rat lured its victim to a secluded place and devoured there.

When the rat community had no doubts that a wolf in sheep's clothing had wound up among them, the rats left this place. Moreover, they left in a hundred cases out of a hundred. The animals seemed to be afraid of being poisoned by the fluids of the transformed rat. They were afraid to become the same. They instinctively felt that if their consciousness absorbed new attitudes, a society without brakes would emerge, a society of traitors, a society of consumers. The atmosphere of immorality will destroy the social protection mechanism and everyone will die.

This begs the question: why did the rat community leave, why couldn't they destroy the "king"? This behavior also has deep meaning. The collective mind, which in this case can be considered instinct, calculated that the strongest individuals, the elite of society, would take part in the liquidation. Who knows what will happen to them when they grind with their teeth into the living flesh of an immoral brother. Will not they themselves become infected with his depravity?

Even rats do not want to live in a civil society built on a constant war with each other, tearing one into multiple. Rats are smarter than humans. Rightly fearing that the rat elite will become infected with the rational logic of egoism, they leave for another place.

If one fantasizes and imagines that society has not left an immoral fellow, but is left to live with him, it is easy to assume that he would infect the elite with his rational logic. I would also figure out how to do it in stages and imperceptibly, in full accordance with the logic. Instead of one "rat king" a whole caste of such "mutants" would appear. Lacking principles, they would quickly defeat the traditional elite. Then they would find a way to give the new order the status of justice and legality. If we completely let go of the reins of fantasy, logic leads us to the formation of a democratic society. The members of the new society would choose for themselves those who will feed on this very society.

The rat is saved from such a transformation by the lack of freedom in human understanding. Lack of such a powerful intellect as a human. They are guided by instinct. Instinct determines the main value of society not food and not even the life of an individual rat, but morality. This is the foundation on which any social structure is built. For the sake of its integrity, they move away from the source of the infection. While maintaining the foundation, rats preserve themselves as a single society with a traditional scale of values, ultimately preserving as a species.

Human society does not have such an instinct. But it is also based on morality. If you remove this foundation, the whole structure quickly turns into a mountain of debris, which begins to grind itself to a state of powder, that is, when there is nowhere to be finer. To grind into powder means to cut off from the roots, traditions, way of life, and most importantly, to nullify moral foundations. For a society, the last stage of grinding is the moment when it turns into unrelated individuals. An atomized society, human dust, a building material for a new world order is emerging.

Do you want to get an image of the processes going on at the global level? Look at the table you are sitting at. There are different items from different materials. Each object is, as it were, a prototype of each nation. Objects are original and not connectable. As long as they are intact, it is impossible to create something single from them. But if all of them, and a ceramic ashtray, and plastic, and paper, are ground into dust and mixed, you get a homogeneous mass. Then this mushy mass is put under pressure, and the pressure will create something fundamentally new. It can be anything, any configuration, the characteristics of which are difficult to even guess.

The destruction of human society is carried out using the technology of the "rat king". The whole blow is concentrated on the destruction of morality. By all means the concept of one's own is burned out.

The consumer society teaches: there are no people of our own in nature. All are strangers, all are potential food. The most optimal food is those who are nearby and consider themselves to be your loved ones. And he has no idea that you are actually the "rat king". He believes, and you eat him.

There are more and more such "rat kings" in modern society. These are the worst predators. They unite in groups, treating compatriots as cattle (food). Having discovered the "truth" that their happiness can be built on someone else's misfortune, at first they acted head-on - they "devoured" the people openly. Then they realized that the best option is to devour under a veil of beautiful high words.

Streams of promises and pompous words about freedom and equality poured from the screens. Initially, the "kings" were not going to fulfill their promises. For them, it was only a means to lure "food". They rushed to the key nodes of society in order to eat their own under the cover of beautiful words. Every year they gained strength, became stronger, more resourceful and dangerous. Their main danger is that they do not outwardly differ from healthy members of society. They have learned to disguise themselves in such a way that they look better than their honest fellows. But if you do not listen to words, but look at deeds, it is not difficult to discern the essence of these creatures.

All the power of their mind and will is concentrated in a narrow, selfish sector. They have forgotten how to think in terms of society and state. They think only of themselves and their brood. They eat their fellows just like that rat-eater. There are many of them, they have multiplied incredibly, and their number continues to grow. They divided into small and large, breaking the country into hunting grounds, hunting and feeding places.

The petty "rats" working in the criminal sector argued - here is a drunk man, money in his pocket. Someone will take it anyway. If so, why not me? And he took it on the sly. Then he took it from a half-drunk man. The explanation was different: he would drink anyway, but I needed money for the right things. And then he came to the thought: since everyone does not have enough money, everyone does not live well, then let the strongest survive. Then he looked out for the victim, beat him on the head and robbed. In the absence of morality, there is nothing to object to such logic.

In business, logic first led to the idea that a person could be fired, thrown out into the street. The train of thought is clear: if I don’t throw it out, I’ll go broke, and in the end he will still end up on the street. And I am with him. Since he will end up there anyway, it’s better without me. And fired.

The second stage: let it work, but you don't have to pay the salary. Otherwise I will go broke and everyone will be on the street. And so the enterprise will be preserved. And deliberate delays in payments began.

The third stage: for example, an entrepreneur deliberately began to make products harmful to health. If I think about the fate of strangers, I will go broke. Let them think about themselves. For him, the brothers were nothing more than warm live meat, which itself crawls into the mouth.

Politicians reasoned similarly. The first scrapping, eating a corpse, is a promise that is obviously unrealistic to fulfill. Logic: if you don’t promise from three boxes, you will not be chosen. They will choose another, worse than you, who promises that his mouth will speak. Since, in any case, society will be deceived, but in one case you will be among the fools, and in the second case among the chosen ones, let there be the second option.

An analogue of the second stage of breaking up morality, devouring a half-dead brother, is trade in places in your party. The logic is also clear, the elections need money. If you make yourself a "gymnasium student", your competitors will take the money. As a result, someone will take the money anyway, and in any case will be chosen. Since this is inevitable, then I'd rather take it than someone else.

The third stage, devouring a living and healthy brother, is lobbying for laws that are harmful to society. The logic is the same. If you refuse to participate in the outright robbery of society, others will rob it. The cannibalistic law will be pushed through anyway, but if so, what difference does it make through whom it will be done? Better to let through me.

Today the political public sector is a last-stage bunch of "rats". They have nothing sacred, nothing personal, only business. And this process cannot stop. He will improve, obeying rational logic.

Government officials, too, with the help of rational logic, gradually broke their morality. At first, many were shy when they were offered money. The Soviet attitudes that this was despicable were still working. Then they called the bribe another word, which removed the reflex to the word "bribe", and the process went on. Now no one took the bribe. Now they were "rolling back", "bringing in" and "sawing". They were no longer thieves, but respected members of society using the “window of opportunity”. The worst thing happened - by default and behind the scenes in the eyes of society, it was legalized. A man could trade his honor. Society entrusted him with the general cash register, and he gave it to predators for a bribe. A respectable woman would reject an offer to have sex for money. Consumer society officials selling public goods have sunk below the woman selling body. At least she trades in hers, and these in others. In general, this was called the "business approach to life."

At a certain stage, it reached the point that it was proposed to officially recognize: they say, a market with its own rules and prices has developed in the administrative sector. If so, why not legitimize it? Simply put, there was a proposal to legalize embezzlement and corruption, and at the same time prostitution. They say, everyone knows that it is! At that time, the legalization of all three vices was rejected, but the process of decay is underway, everything is changing … Practice testifies: a phenomenon that has arisen, if it has roots in society and nothing can resist, will one day be legalized. In the foreseeable future, if nothing interferes with the ongoing processes, we will see what we cannot imagine today. Everything will be bought and sold. What cannot be sold will disappear. For example, conscience, because it evaporates at the moment of sale. The first stage in breaking the morality of civil servants was offering a bribe in the form of gratitude for legal, but, for example, accelerated work. Then they offered to “eat half-dead”. This was expressed in the fulfillment of ambiguous orders. For example, to push through the budget to finance a school, and take a kickback from the allocated amount. The logic is the same - if you refuse, the other will agree. And then you will earn money yourself, and the children will benefit. The third stage is "eating the living and healthy." Under a plausible pretext, it is proposed to steal, for example, money for the sick.

The scheme outwardly, as a rule, is very pious, the mosquito of the nose will not undermine. But knowledgeable people understood everything. And again the same logic - if you don't take it, the other will hurry up. Better you will not do to anyone, the budget will drink, and you will remain a fool. "Rat Kings", having gone through all the circles of logic, were released into society. They understand their people as food. They liked the food, and they themselves are taking the initiative. Appetites are growing, technology is improving, "rats" get lost in groups, between which competition begins. To make it clear, members of these groups do not consider accomplices as their own. In principle, there cannot be any of our own people. These are partners who help each other devour fellows. As soon as a partner weakens, he is immediately devoured by former partners. No, not even the former. The devoured and devoured continue to be partners. A new morality even began to be cultivated, like, there is nothing to take offense at me, it is my own fault that I relaxed, I just took advantage of it. Nothing personal, just business! New conditions give rise to new logic.

Partnership boils down to devouring the weak, whoever this weak may be, even a brother. The Rats remained lifelong partners until their death. If the weakened partner, whom the brothers were about to feast on, who had been pretty bitten, managed to escape, he began to denounce the "rat kings", wash the dirty linen out of the hut. So he hoped to recover in the same place. Someone succeeded, and they again accepted him "in the cage", as if nothing had happened. Well, think about it, he wanted to devour me, but I didn’t. Now we sit together and think about how to eat whom, and one after another we look to see if the partner has weakened, whether to start eating. Your partner's strength and willingness to devour you is a constraining factor. The picture we have drawn is only a pale reflection of current morals. As long as people take the words about freedom, happiness and equality at face value, as long as they “work” as an electorate, go to elections or participate in “orange” revolutions, they, without realizing it, create a system that breeds “rat kings”. Some people are devouring others today. In the forehead or by deception, the technology is secondary here. The main thing is direct cannibalism. Yes, those at the top are not personally smeared with blood. It is on the lower level of the "rats" that there is a direct robbery of fellows.

On the top, there is mediated cannibalism, which is also cannibalism. And on such a scale that the lower ones never dreamed of. The money received by the above methods is the essence of someone else's grief, suffering, death. If "rats" are shiny from fat, then someone has lost their life. It only seems that the weak were only parting with their wallets. No, these processes lead to the physical death of the weakest members of society. It is not difficult to verify this by looking at the dynamics of death and fertility.

Russia is dying out under the rule of "rat kings". You cannot blame people for not being able to associate corruption, corruption and lack of principle with personal grief, personal problems. The chain of cause and effect is too long. Intuitively, they guess that they are being fooled, but here's where and how … That's why the elite is needed, so that the strong protect the weak. The situation needs to be urgently corrected by introducing a law on the responsibility of managers. There is no responsibility without a predetermined punishment! And, of course, sift the managers-officials according to the presence of conscience and the human structure of the psyche.