Artificial intelligence, more powerful than human - already in development

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Education or o-programming: how to reach the advanced level of human degradation.

All-Russian Scientific Conference on Neurocybernetics. The journalist covering it, expressing the general mood of the participants and talking about their plans for the near future, concludes that “Scientists create an Intelligence that will be stronger than human. It will facilitate our thinking. Let the computer think - it is made of iron. (!). In other words, scientists are working to create a brain that is, they hope, thousands, millions of times larger than the human. And ourselves, against this background, remain brainless? Yes, but how else, if there is a similar ratio. But the journalist, and most importantly, scientists, even more importantly, practically no one, does not care. Judging by the journalist, they were already left “without”. This is the result that will be objective. Regardless of our intentions. In the movement of human knowledge in this direction lies the secret of all reforms in education, their content and ultimate goal. They write about the achievements of neurocybernetics thoughtlessly (just as reforms in education are being carried out) and with enthusiasm. Have thought of not thinking anymore. And to stop being human, this is what advanced humanity has striven for as an ideal. To Nothing. Determination by the future. Which belongs to the Technique. Fasting / superhuman.

So, reader, especially if you are (po) in a hurry, pause your life and here's the keyto an understanding of what is going on in education, with education and in modern life in general: “Let the machines think, but people don’t need to think any more”. The key is not fantastic, it was actually made at the cutting edge of science. In the international program "Global Education of the Future", in which Russia also participates, by 2030 it is planned, along with the use of nootropic (legalizing doping!) Means, "the use of nanotechnology for the implantation of technical devices into individual parts of the human body to increase his educational abilities." Other, no less monstrous methods of turning people into cyborgs are also listed. At first glance, the creators and participants of the program are not crazy, but … The technique forces one to apply. Pere (o) limits the person. Onse more, once again: Determination by the future.

Now there is a transitional period, someone is ahead, others are half way, someone is resisting. They argued for a long time about the introduction of the Unified State Exam in education. Most of the arguments "for" and "against" are extraneous, private, petty. The largest protagonists and opponents - ministers, rectors, academicians, etc. Without understanding what the essence of the matter is, which is that the main thing here is the transition to test learning, when the answer is modeled in advance by a question. The motto "know and be able" is replaced by competence. In other words, the knowledge “where to press” in order to receive and can be regrouped ready-made knowledge for your problem. This is, more precisely, the transition to machine processing of knowledge, which obviously leads to the primitivization of thinking, the deprivation of its creative (k) creative component, to the loss of imagery and associativity. To stupidity, mechanization and formalization of consciousness. We got "under the car".

Literature lesson: today we are studying the poetry of S. Yesenin. Find his poem on the screen: “The golden grove dissuaded. In a birch, cheerful language …”Read it (to yourself, don't, don't shout, don't aloud). Now answer the question: (only silently) What language did the golden grove dissuade? 1. Sosnov. 2. Osinov. 3. Berezov. 4. Dubov. Where you think is correct, put a check mark. Well done! The next poem by S. Yesenin "You are my fallen maple." Etc.

The educational community fiercely resisted this, but was defeated. "Dumb officials." Officials, however, are only a function, and the arguments here are the need for further technological progress. This is the whole point. Everything has become technology, and technology in the field of knowledge is computer technology. And if you introduce computers into teaching, promote e-learning, then please think and speak in such a way that the technology understands you, in its language. And it is based on the principle of "either-or", "yes-no", + -, 1 and 0. This is a language of unambiguity. So that there is no ambivalence, contradiction, subjectivity, historicism, feelings, wisdom, poetry. No "notorious" spirituality. No culture, just civilization. No civilization, just Technos. Economically, it is being driven by global multinationals that require pragmatic performers and consumers. Selection and calculation. Vocational school (industrial and technical school) at the information level - this is now the ideal of universities. They compete in who first eliminates the human character of education, and then education in general. Crossword-rubricatory consciousness of a superficial manipulator and - a tremendous effect of mathematization and automation of self-developing thinking alienated from man. The progress of technology, the material goods created by it, and - regression, de (e) volition of man, including, in the end, his creative principle. "Humanizing" machines and dehumanizing people through control over their, first consciousness, and then unconscious. As one of the developers of a "fundamentally new electronic textbook" boasted to me (not in fantasies, but a specific developer, to me, now) "there will be no more bad and good students, everyone will know what is written in the textbook equally well." How is this possible? Only if the content of the textbook, of course, electronic, will be "pumped" into their brain from the outside, bypassing the personality and abilities. Or maybe it won't be necessary to upload. There is no need. No education. Put "brain accelerators". Which company will deliver the fastest - that is the question. Yes, just a chipped person will know everything that is on the Internet. As its element. The Internet of Everything is the ultimate goal of posthuman technoscience. These are not some idle assumptions, but the plans and projects of really working firms, which are mentioned, for example, by the technical director of Google R. Kurzweil. Promises that the goals will be achieved by 2045. Calls for an early transition to the sixth technological order, the essence of which is that all material and intellectual activities of people will be given over to automatic machines, are heard louder and louder, and are about to turn into a general joyful cry. What does this mean for the fate of mankind, what they will become and why are parasitic people needed in this case, no one is going to think. The main concern is that GDP grows and how to appropriate it, coming up with new needs in order to consume more.

They are preparing to introduce virtual lecturing. The best professors of Moscow universities make a package of courses in various, at least humanitarian, subjects. They could be expanded to the entire country and replaced by local teachers who are "by definition" less qualified. It is as if replacing all football teams and competitions between them with one or two best teams and everyone would watch them. It is even more logical to replace the already Moscow footballers / professors with Western ones. There is now football and, for example, it is believed that "philosophy" is better than ours, that they read / play there more skillfully. Or not to go to the Hermitage anymore, all the more not to create new branches of it, but to view all the paintings under the “virtual museum” program. They are even brighter there, details are more clearly visible, etc. Spread out on the couch and admire. In general, to close all stadiums, universities and museums. Close everything. Let there be one media reality! Leave only screens.

But screen football, virtual paintings and phantom lectures are remembered as you watch, and dissipate after a few hours, like the contrail of a passing jet plane dissipates. While going to the museum, to the stadium, to the audience, and especially if he himself played, drew, performed, he remembers the whole body for many days. Especially if he got bruises, tore the paper and argued with the lecturer. They hurt the soul, settle in the unconscious. In being. And do not remain empty knowledge. Virtually we were everywhere, we saw everything - penguins in Antarctica, people on the moon, fish under water. Who hasn't virtually been to Paris or New York? Everyone, at any moment. And what does it give? After all, “everything is on the Internet”, these best lectures / pictures / games can also be replaced. Others. “Get an education”, shoveling information until the chips are inserted, then there will be no need to shovel. I pressed the button and everything will be rearranged as needed for the answer. "I have known".

What a fool these scientists (and) technocrats are. Scary (s) e! Especially in education. (Self) killers.

Such is it, the tragic dialectic of the development of an information civilization, which, for the sake of self-deception, is called a “civilization of knowledge,” which was suspected, but, avoiding the danger of understanding, the disputants did not dare to understand. The "tested" ones will not even guess about it. All the more so to argue. In dictionaries that are not yet old, "virtual" is defined as unreal, imaginary. And there is. From the point of view of human perspectives, an imaginary formation appears. Post-education. Computer = automated education of a person, of which testing is a part, is his Programming. Grams are the humanitarian name for "bits", units of information. Due to the need of progressives for an adaptation lie, they still say: knowledge management. Even a magazine is published like this: "Knowledge Management". And in fact it is: the management of consciousness. Why know if the computer knows everything. Everything is "there". It is enough to learn how to operate the computer most effectively. Hence the shift in emphasis to “competencies” instead of knowledge in all programs and manuals. When mastering this technique, there is no more creativity in human activity than it once was in driving a mare or a Mercedes. Hence the enthusiasm of innovators about the possibilities of further development of computer = virtual = imaginary education. And the groaning of conservatives, of all seriously thinking people, about the moronization of schoolchildren and students, about the growth of pathological bureaucracy in schools and universities = the influence of "management", i.e. formalism and methodism.

Globalists from education suggest switching to English as much as possible and faster. To think superficially, not to mention how to feel. Maybe in computer science this is what is needed. But they are globalist totalitarians to standardize everything. And the very progressive frostbitten offer to teach even philosophy in English. Look at that in a foreign language will be forced to teach native speech and literature. "This is a global process." Because globalization is informatization, formalization, algorithmicization. But…

If you take any of the living words in translation, you get only one, at best two or three meanings. There are no transitions, subtleties, ambiguity, but there is naked, dead information. So there will be no anecdotes, because they will cease to be understood, because their characteristic "shift in meaning" occurs under the condition that words touch the unconscious. And the unconscious is affected in words when they are warm or cold, good or evil, sour or sweet. Information is the skeleton of meaning, words without flesh and blood, without a soul. Or genetically modified, you can consume, but do not bear fruit. How can one convey in a foreign language, all the more to algorithmize such a situation: there was a large crowd. I was assigned to find a strange woman. The sign was indicated absolutely accurate: "all of himself is like that." I recognized her at once; when this is formalized and reproduced in a computer, we will cease to recognize each other. Or from a conversation between teenagers: if I were kinder, I would have kicked him in the face; when this is formalized and the computer understands, it will be with us the very kindness. “Come to me yesterday, we will remember tomorrow”; when computers appreciate this past-future irony, then their present time will come.

Mehau Kulyk "Artificial Intelligence", 2013

* * *

Nowadays in education we can talk about the complete victory of technocratism. At the same time, it is astonishing that some still continue to write about his humanization. A corresponding journal is published. Apparently, they do not understand at all what they are writing about, what should be understood by this. If they did, they would take an example, at least from the instructions that were issued by the Ministry of Education of Russia in the late 17th - early 18th centuries. In them, it was forbidden to use “belts, sticks, rulers, rods, pushes and fists; tugging by the hair, by the ears, kneeling; all the shame and honor touching shame, such as: donkey ears, stupid caps, and the names of cattle, donkey and the like … schools, so as not to give a mad sword."

Here it is, the beginning of true concern for humanism! Which now, fortunately, alas, is no longer needed. Because there are no such lively, headstrong, stupid and stubborn, passionate students and the consequent need for a gesture (about) their pedagogical methods of pacification = processing = education. The “material” does not resist, it has become much more prepared, malleable, intelligent and weak-willed, at the same time passive-autistic and, rather, needs to be aroused. And they excite, activate, stimulate - by continuous formal control. It is not humane to spank your own child for an act that is impudent or dangerous for his own life or for rude behavior. Humanely, by introducing chips, to put it under complete, self-depriving observation. And (on) they put it. Chip after the dogs. Then everyone. Fools and hypocrites. Looking at all these innovations, at least the intelligentsia, especially the liberals, should be pulling their hair out, rolling on the floor and banging their heads against the wall. I can not hear anything. Only conservatives grumble. Because the intellectuals have become intellectuals, and the liberals, having betrayed their freedom, have become technocrats.

Instead of physical violence for students, and at the same time for teachers and teachers, the problem is now in time to follow the instructions of new sadists - from the management, armed with information technology and juvenile justice. Quality management, for example, is pure cybernetics! The inputs, outputs and other processes are checked quantitatively by counting and comparing. Quality is quantity. They check not by the perception of the audience, not by students, not by colleagues (mutual visit, in particular, which everyone was afraid of and prepared for it very much, you will rearrange the whole lecture in front of him), but formal, from the outside. Above, they urge "not to nightmare the business" with checks. The budget workers are even more nightmares, but there is no one to intercede for them. I, like a professor, but every now and then, with suppressed hatred, I fill in, draw up and send somewhere, according to the principle: not a day without a report (I can imagine what is being done in schools). If we care about humanization, then it would be necessary to fight these stupefying students and teachers with methodism and reporting, paper and electronic (continuous monitoring - idiots are proud), focusing on the result of training, semester and final tests on exams. There are enough of them. Hence the turn in the task of humanization, the need for which still remains. Stop endless accreditations, and in front of them are internal university accreditations, faculty pre-accreditations, then state, then "public-professional", but in fact this public consists of businessmen and their task is to narrow education to the needs of sales and profit.

* * *

Distance education. The Russian government adopted a resolution on the creation of a Unified Distance Education Center. Progressors, whose consciousness has been torn away from themselves as living people and rebooted by external forces, naturally rejoice. “Get your diploma without leaving your home,” the advertisement tempts. How great it is! Open, (pr) illuminated conservatives are again dissatisfied: distance is "fake", it means absentee, superficial, flawed. As a dark, rooted conservative, I object: for remote work, which is now becoming the main occupation, it is the most real. Distance education and work are adequate to the distance life that an increasing number of people lead. In addition, it corresponds to the universally introduced USE, the essence of which is the remote verification of test results. It all fits together. The system builds itself up to integrity. For superficial relationships, distance education is deep, for disadvantaged individuals it is full-fledged, for virtual life it is real. Give distance education for distance people! New (e) education (for) a New (not) person. Ino (th) person. So everything is logical, only the speed with which the dismantling of the human world is taking place is striking. Spiritual and physical. The only striking thing is that all this was pre-seen by futurologists in novels and dystopian films and seemed to be warned. Only the blindness of people who do not want to see this foresight, but to hear warnings, is striking. Moreover, to understand and undertake something.

* * *

Catastrophically, the mind (d) is altering the semantic, actually human content of education. Understanding the world. It doesn't interest anyone. About the development of a person, personality, that production and the market are not a goal, but a means, it’s even somehow embarrassing to speak. Now it is not the person who is important, but the "human capital", i.e. a person as a source of profit. Hence, "educational services" instead of education. We are witnesses and participants in the initial stage of the end of education. Its zombification as an initial stage. The logic of the historical movement is as follows: upbringing → education → knowledge management → mind control → programming. = Personality → actor → zombie → cyborg → robot. This is reality itself, it happens before our eyes, if you are not afraid to look at reality as it is. If the process of bringing our education to the world level and preparing for its transformation into programming cannot be slowed down, it will only get worse. There will be no education in the 21st century. We need (would) an ecology of education.

* * *

Social speed reading. Speed reading life. A short life. But there are still teachers who teach children to feel, disobjectify the world, and develop intuition. They form a person, a personality. Whereas for social success it is necessary to train robotic ones. All these outstanding teachers, of whom, it is true, are decreasing, are inveterate conservatives and reactionaries. It's time, it's time to finally replace them with remote information technologies. And no personalities are needed. Enough about that. In logistics systems, any subjective interference is a hindrance. Let all universities, and then schools, be all computerized. Yes, and kindergartens or "prenatal computerization" to begin to influence the brain of the child in the womb (!). Thanks to this, education, instead of comprehending reality, will immediately teach the search and distribution of information, its organization in graphs, diagrams and "cognitive menus." The search for a solution to the problem is replaced by its selection from the list. This is empiricism, but abstract, and theories are empirical. From analytical-synthetic, our thinking becomes rubricator-sorting. And also consumer. "Press the button - you will get the result" (advertising on the road). Mental activity is facilitated, its creative components are degraded. Let's do without creativity.

As we have forgotten how to count (someone will argue with this?), So we have forgotten how to think. Substantially it is one and the same process. Only different forms.

Teacher! The most humane and humanistic profession. And now - we can do without people. But if it is possible in this area, then even more so in others. The latest news: the journalists are already beginning to be replaced by machines. Write notes and articles. Much faster than people write reviews, especially on economics. They also determine the stock exchange financial indices. In September 2016, the world's first international scientific conference dedicated to sex with robots was held in the UK. The theme of the conference is "Technology and Proximity: Choice or Coercion?" A robotic surgeon was created. It is quite obvious that he will only perform operations at the initial stage. "Normally" these robots will replace human organs. Instead of 32 teeth, for example, forty-eight (third jaw) will be put. And the face will be remade under it. Transhumanists will say: this is a Human enhancement. Eat more, which is the main valor in a consumer society. People, what are you thinking! Yes, about nothing, except how to increase GDP and that it is economical, modern and perfect. How smart and discerning they are, these innovators. They write, although not yet robots, but already in their favor, articles such as: Joy B. Why the Future Doesn, t need Us? // Wired - 2000. Apr. vol.8.№ 4. (Why the future does not need us). Where everything is convincingly explained. Reach for self-destruction! And they are in a hurry, rejoicing at the same time so that … there are no censorship words. And obscene too. On blue fences, in my city, instead of the once familiar life-affirming three letters, I see three apocalyptic words: No future people! Censored, but how much more scandalous. International terrorists are not up to such ideals. The voice of the (not) people (who wants to check, the fence near the Nebo shopping center, on the left). Historically, it is fair to make one assumption: the Luddites, it turns out, saw further, and even thought deeper than some Joy B. and K% + other meaningless: reformers + innovators. But, despite this fatal dilemma, the crowd, especially the scholar, will curse conservatism (so you, what: for the Luddites?), And do not hesitate to continue to praise what, according to the progressists' own admissions, brings death. Euthanizers!

While: Everything a person needs has already been invented.

Somewhere in the middle of the twentieth century, before the Great Post-Human Revolution (GPR) = Great Post-human Revolution (GPR) took place - before the discovery of micro and mega worlds. Created. Further creativity, innovations, especially their modern rise, lead to its dismantling. And at the same time - to the attenuation of the creative abilities of a person. To the degradation of thinking. The invention of electronic computers (ECM) was the invention of electronic thinking machines (EMM). But just as "every hunter wants to kill a pheasant," so every machine wants to become automatic. And it becomes. This means that it was the invention of thinking automata = automatic thinking, which makes "manual" = brain thinking unnecessary. How earlier automata made manual labor unnecessary. Hence the inevitable erosion of human, meaningful thinking proper. What is most clearly seen in education, in the field where they teach, or rather, they taught thinking. Someone aptly said that education without a teacher is like learning to play the guitar from a tutorial. It turns out primitively, schematically, without implicit, non-formalized knowledge and aura of living experience. Self-extinguishing of creativity occurs and we, as progressive theorists happily report, are entering the "post-creative era." A person will only have to describe the problem, and "supercomputer systems will solve it." This means that they will set the task, but this evidence is beyond the understanding of enthusiasts for the further uncontrolled development of science. Well, they rejoice at everything, the main thing is that "it was progressive." The ministers of education, as professional functionaries who ensure its mechanization and automation, become enemies of the genuine, i.e. creative thinking and therefore education. Adepts in testing and competence - instead of knowledge and understanding. Adepts of degeneration and de (e) volition = human degradation. The Americans (this is already noticeable in their faces and behavior) de (e) volunteered - and achieved tremendous material and technical successes. And we are lagging behind. We must catch up. Therefore, one should not be surprised that our technocratic ministers of education have (are) an idiotic connotation in their faces and behavior. The education system is almost overwhelmed by technoids. She (and not only) is controlled by mutants. Destroy the human character of education, it as such - such is their terrible and, in their stupid necessity, tragic role. When this principled and dirty work in transforming education into programming is done, it will be fully automated. They will say: "e-government", "sixth technological order", "Internet of Everything" (by 2045). The remaining living people will be his subjects.

Forward to the de (e) volition of life? Progressive, stupid, unhappy humanity. A philosophy of resistance is needed …

Kutyrev Vladimir Alexandrovich, doct. Philos. Sciences, prof. (Nizhny Novgorod)