Blooming Sahara: when was it?

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

The now deserted North Africa has recently been a flourishing land, with numerous large cities, full-flowing rivers and other benefits for humans. After all, there is no point in developing civilization in a resource-poor climate. How did the area become deserted, where there are traces of a highly developed civilization at every step?

Dating

Officials say the Sahara - the largest desert on the planet - is thousands of years old. According to the latest data about 6 thousand.

But why, then, a few hundred years ago, were full-flowing rivers and large cities in northern Africa painted on medieval maps?

Of course, there are many questions about the dating of the maps themselves, but they are not questioned by official science, which once again shows its inconsistency and schizophrenicity: the deserts are thousands of years old, but on the maps of the 16-17-18 centuries it is a flourishing land with large cities.

However, geologists and climatologists still do not have a generally accepted theory of the formation of deserts, including the Sahara.

And one of the most important proofs of the blooming Sahara thousands of years ago are ancient graffiti found in the very center of the desert. For example such:

They were discovered in 1933, but were examined by a French expedition led by Henri Lot only in 1956. By the way, it was not without paleocontact sensations (the "Great God of Mars" petroglyph with a drawing in the figure below) and accusations of falsification of some petroglyphs by the French themselves.

However, let's return to the maps, and we will localize our searches in the Sahara region.

Sahara inhabited maps

1. Africa -1688 (high definition link)

Let's overlay on the modern space image of the scorched desert:

We see an abundance of cities and rivers, the coast is very densely populated, but there are many cities in the center of the desert, and Cairo is highlighted with the same icon on this map - that is, large cities - now we do not know anything about them.

2. Typus orbis terrarum 1575

The color is different, but this is the same card:

Likewise - rivers, lakes, cities.

3. Map of Africa by Heinrich Banting, 1581

Slightly smaller, but the map itself is less detailed.

4. Africae nova descriptio, Willem Janszoon Blaeu, 1642.

There are also maps, but there is no point in citing from the point of view, everywhere is about the same picture, which roughly corresponds to the African savannah, and not the scorched desert that the Sahara represents today.

Mainstream science curtsy about these awkward cards, noting:

A significant deviation from normal conditions was observed from the 16th to the 17th century. During this time, precipitation increased significantly along the tropical border, in the desert itself and, possibly, in its northern regions. In the 19th century, climatic conditions returned to those that are similar to the current ones.

But is such a vague explanation enough?

Fertility traces

According to the New Chronology of Nosovsky and Fomenko, which is not necessary to adhere to, but it is always useful to keep in mind, the Great Sphinx and the Great Pyramids were erected in Egypt 500-700 years ago. At the same time, it is generally known that the Sphinx managed to get scars from the water - it is eaten by tropical downpours from above, and not by the winds.

Throughout the Sahara, there are a huge number of dried up rivers, lakes, there is a lot of groundwater in the desert. These remnants of their former splendor can be seen on this map.

See also: Who and when built dams in Africa?

White population of North Africa

There are many tribes in the Sahara Desert, but the proud Tuaregs are most famous. A stern horseman, wrapped up to his eyes with a bandage, sitting on a camel or horse, is a symbol of the great "land of the sands."

They are fair-skinned, with little blood in their veins of the Negroid race. How the Tuaregs appeared in the Sahara is a question for official science that has not been resolved. Nevertheless, it is generally known that the Tuaregs are the people of the Berber group, and where the Berber (Greek. βάρβαρ οι, lat. barbari), there is a barbarian, so everything is on the surface, there is no special mystery here. Read more about the White Race in the Sahara region in the article Amasakhi - the white north of Africa.

It is important to note that the ability of peoples for a long time to maintain the purity of genetics, their traditions and customs among an unfriendly environment is most likely greatly exaggerated. Which, in turn, can serve as indirect evidence of the existence of a different from the traditional history and chronology of Africa.

The cause of the cataclysm

According to some researchers, the reason for such a sharp climate change is a strike by a high-power weapon, which in our understanding is closest to a thermonuclear one. Let's take a look at the example of the Eye of the Sahara.

Rishat (Guel-Er-Rishat, Eye of the Sahara) has a diameter of about 50 kilometers.

It has already been noted here that in this area the rocky terrain is melted down, as after an explosion of enormous power. In our terminology, it would very approximately correspond to 200-250 megatons in TNT equivalent. For comparison, during the explosion of the tsar-bomb in 1961 with its 50 megatons, a multi-process was launched, in which the power increased to 58 Mt. That is, the matter of the surrounding space began to be involved in thermonuclear fusion - the air itself began to burn. According to some reports, this dangerous process was then stopped artificially and not by those who detonated this bomb.

One way or another, we observe the upper layer of burnt stones, below the layer of light stone. In other photos, the stones on the upper side are melted, and on the lower side they have a light shade, which clearly indicates a powerful radiation in all spectra that came from one direction.

The approximate correspondence of this place with the old maps is the city of Hoden, but with such a power it is not entirely logical to talk about individual cities.

This crater, as well as many others found in North Africa and other parts of the world, suggest that deserts are not the result of natural geological processes, but the deliberate destruction of the most habitable territories, as well as the destruction of traces of life in these territories … And all this happened relatively recently, not thousands, but hundreds of years ago.

See also the video from the cycle Distorting History: Impact

About the Eye of the Sahara and other funnels in Africa and adjacent territories from 10:50 to 15:50 in the video below: