The split of Russia: borders and the capital of Russia in the 16th century

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

According to the reconstruction of the chronology carried out by A. T. Fomenko and G. V. Nosovsky, in the 16th century, Russia extended on four continents and included the territories of Eurasia, North Africa and more than half of the territory of North and South America.

After the collapse of Russia at the beginning of the 17th century, the rulers of the new states created on its former territories began to rewrite history. Such a course of events is no longer surprising to anyone - many are used to it, because history has been rewritten many times in our time, and continues to be rewritten further.

The interpretation of history that the authorities need is a powerful tool for controlling the consciousness of society. The newly minted rulers of the former territories of Russia really wanted to forget about their subordinate position in the past and, more importantly, they wanted to hide the circumstances of their coming to power. After all, the split of a single country took place by overthrowing the legitimate leadership.

To give the appearance of the legitimacy of the new power, the Scaligerian historians had to invent a myth about the "Mongol-Tatar" conquest of the world. There are already a lot of materials confirming that this is really a myth, and we send those interested to the publications "We remove the charges against the Mongol-Tatars …", "What was covered by the Tatar-Mongol yoke?"

Considering that the overwhelming majority of the invented "Mongol-Tatars" were in fact carriers of the genetics of the Rus and they spoke Russian, it is even possible to determine the borders of Russia in the 16th century using official data. To do this, it is necessary to map what the myth-makers from history were ashamed to do. A. T. Fomenko and G. V. Nosovsky do this in his book "Caliph Ivan" [1]. They took two maps of the Scaligerian historians: 1260 (Fig. 1) and 1310 (Fig. 2) and combined the information from these maps, highlighting the "Mongol-Tatars" Empire in dark color (Fig. 3).

Rice. one

Rice. 2

It turned out to be an Empire as of the 14th century.

Rice. 3

Further, the creators of the new chronology note an interesting fact - the Scaligerian historians indicate with arrows the further advance of the "Tatar-Mongols" to Western Europe, Egypt, India, Japan, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, Burma, Indonesia, but they are careful to limit themselves to this! There are trekking arrows, but the result of these treks is absent. Like, there is no particular outcome. Such caution is quite understandable, because if this result is plotted on a map, then it will become very impressive. According to the research of A. T. Fomenko and G. V. Nosovsky in the 16th century, the Empire also included significant territories of North and South America. The result of the conquest is shown in Figure 4.

Rice. 4

There are many facts confirming the existence of Russia, huge by today's standards, in the Middle Ages. It is little known, but it is a fact that the French kings took the oath on a sacred book written in the Old Slavonic language, and the Jerusalem patriarch presented Charlemagne with a cross inscribed with Russian inscriptions [1].

Another very illustrative example is given in the book by A. T. Fomenko and G. V. Nosovsky "The Tatar-Mongol yoke: who conquered whom." Distances from the capital of Russia - the city of Vladimir - to many capitals and cities of now other states, and earlier governorships in the territories of the colonies of Russia, obeys a certain pattern.

In order to determine what kind of regularity is observed in the distances from the capital of Russia to the "regional centers", let's put ourselves in the shoes of the conquerors. But before doing this, we note one important circumstance - the level of civilization development of the annexed territories was much lower than the level of Russia (some lands were practically not inhabited), so we, as conquerors, will have to build large settlements ourselves.

In such an environment, it would be reasonable to place the centers of the new governorships along the trade routes created at that time at a certain distance from the center of Russia (Fig. 5). And so it was done.

This distance was chosen for reasons of establishing optimal communication in the field of trade, mail, and so on.

Many capitals lie on two circles with the center in the city of Vladimir (Fig. 6).

Rice. 6

The first circle with a radius of about 1800 km. The following cities are located on it: Oslo, Berlin, Prague, Vienna, Bratislava, Belgrade, Sofia, Istanbul and Ankara. Second circle with a radius of 2400 km. It houses London Paris, Amsterdam, Brussels, Luxenburg, Bern, Geneva, Rome, Athens, Nicosia, Beirut, Damascus, Baghdad, Tehran. And what is typical, if you take any of the listed cities except Vladimir and make it the center of Russia, then nothing of the kind will happen.

Hence, we can conclude that the name of the city of Vladimir has a very definite meaning - "Owners of the World".

Falsification of history

After the collapse of Russia into smaller states, the new European authorities began to falsify their history, and their henchmen in the rest of the Russian state - the Romanovs - began to rewrite the history of the Russian people. The falsification was full-scale. The Europeans invented biographies of their rulers and new languages, magnified their contribution to the development of civilization, renamed or distorted geographical names. The Russians, on the contrary, began to instill thoughts about the worthlessness of the Russian people, books containing a true story were destroyed, and instead they made fakes, culture and education were distorted and destroyed. The geographical names familiar to the Russian ear from Europe migrated to remote areas on the territory of Russia. And this, of course, is not all. Here are some indicative facts.

The kings of Europe were written off from Russia

Imagine the situation: the empire has been destroyed, new and, as they say now, “not shaking hands” authorities in the breakaway territories. What should they tell the new generation? The truth? No, we ourselves are disgusted to remember that they were in a subordinate position and did not come to power according to the law. We'll have to invent a past for ourselves. And certainly great. To begin with, they came up with the rulers. The simplest and most reliable option is to take as a basis the biographies of the ruling dynasties of Russia and, on their basis, create fake stories of their monarchs and kings, but only with different names and with life events tied to the conditions of the newly-made states.

This is how the Western European Habsburg dynasty appeared, which was written off from the dynastic stream of the Tsar-Khans of Russia in the 13-16 centuries. A detailed description of this basic dynastic parallelism is given in [1]. We will confine ourselves to two drawings from the above book. Figure 7 shows "the correspondence between the Russian-Horde dynasty of the 13-16 centuries and the Habsburg dynasties of the 13-16 centuries."

Rice. 7

Rice. eight

Figure 8 shows "the correlation of the duration of the reigns of the Russian-Horde kings-khans of the Great =" Mongolian "Empire of the 13-16th centuries and the rulers of the Habsburg Empire of the 13th-16th centuries." In order to recognize the "dynastic clones" this is quite enough. But the book also contains unique repetitions in the events of the life of clones and their prototypes.

Gothic is a Russian style

An interesting metamorphosis of architectural styles took place in the 17th century. In [1] it is indicated that with the coming to power in Russia of the Romanovs, there was a change in architectural styles. Moreover, the introduced samples were then issued for "typical ancient Russian". As a result, today's ideas about what Russia looked like before the 17th century are in many ways completely wrong.

Now we are assured that the usual form of the church is exactly what we see in our time: a roughly cubic building with an almost flat roof, from which one or more domed drums rise. An example of a "typical appearance" of the Russian church is the Nikolskaya church in the Nikolo-Uleimensky monastery near Uglich (Fig. 9).

Rice. 9

Such churches are strikingly different from the cathedrals of Western Europe (for example, the Gothic Cologne Cathedral, Fig. 10). This difference was artificially implanted.

Rice. 10

It was beneficial to the falsifiers of history, since they needed to show that there was nothing in common between Russia and Europe.

However, A. T. Fomenko and G. V. Nosovsky [1] cites facts that show that until the 17th century, the main architectural style in Russia, as well as in its European provinces, was the Gothic architectural style. This suspicion first arose in them while studying the old architecture of the churches of the famous Russian city of Uglich.

It turned out that all the churches of the city, with one exception, were either rebuilt or significantly rebuilt no earlier than the 17th century. The remake has a familiar form for us (Fig. 9).

The only exception is the famous Church of St. Alexei, Metropolitan of Moscow in the Alexeevsky Monastery. It is believed that it was built in 1482 and remained in its original form - a house with a high gable roof, on which three towers-spiers rise (Fig. 11, Fig. 12). The similarity of the architectural style of this church with the Cologne Cathedral is striking (Fig. 10).

Rice. eleven

Rice. 12

A reasonable question arises: there is a church of the 15th century, 17th century and later, too, but where are the churches of the 16th century? Did they not build anything for 100 years, or did they fall apart "by themselves"? The fact is that the Church of Metropolitan Alexei is a large cathedral of the 15th century, one of the largest in Uglich so far. Having built such a cathedral in the 15th century, the Uglians had to build something in the 16th century! Quite justifiably, the impression arises that all the churches of Uglich in the 17th century were rebuilt anew, and only the Church of Metropolitan Alexei, by the will of fate, remained and is now a "black sheep" among the remake.

In support of their assumption, the authors of the book [1] give the following example, for which they turn to the architecture of the famous old Russian Nikolo-Uleimensky monastery near Uglich. There are two churches there. One of them is the old church of the introduction (fig. 13, fig. 14).

Rice. thirteen

Rice. 14

In contrast to the new, "typically ancient Russian", the old one is a house with a gable roof, which resembles the Gothic style. Later, in the 17th century, a “quadruple” was added to it and a bell tower was built on.

There is a clear feeling that in the 17th century the overwhelming majority of the old Russian-Horde churches were rebuilt according to the reformist “Greek model”. Moreover, it was stated that it was so.

In some places in Russia, by inertia, they continued to build Gothic cathedrals even up to the 18th century. For example, the Church of Peter and Paul in Yaroslavl (Fig. 15), attributed to the years 1736-1744.

Rice. 15

A mosque was erected in the same style in the village of Poiseevo in the Aktanysh region of the Republic of Tatarstan (Fig. 16).

Rice. sixteen

But in the end, under the Romanovs, the Gothic style was supplanted and forgotten. Churches of this type were either destroyed and rebuilt, or tried to change their appearance with extensions, or adapted for other needs. For example, household. A striking example is the old long huge house with a gable roof, standing in the New Simonov Monastery in Moscow (Fig. 17), which in the 19th century was used as a grain dryer.

Rice. 17

Its architecture exactly matches the look of the old Russian churches-houses. Perhaps this is the former church of the monastery.

Other examples of churches in the Gothic architectural style:

Rice. eighteen

- The old Russian church in the village of Bykov (Fig. 18);

Rice. nineteen

- New St. Nicholas Cathedral in the Mozhaisk Fortress in 1814 (Fig. 19);

Rice. twenty

- The old church in the Luzhetsky monastery of Mozhaisk, which probably also looked like a Gothic house (Fig. 20);

Rice. 21

- Mosque in Starye Kiyazly, Republic of Tatarstan (Fig. 21);

Rice. 22

- A mosque in Nizhnyaya Oshma, the Republic of Tatarstan (Fig. 22).

Rice. 23

And in conclusion of this topic, we will give one example of the correspondence between the styles of the Russian and German churches. Figure 23 shows the German church Clementskirche in Mayenne, near Bonn.

Its dome is made in the form of spirals twisting upward. The dome of this shape is believed to have been created between 1350 and 1360. The reasons for such a design of the dome are firmly forgotten, and instead of them a story was invented about the devil who twisted this tower in a corkscrew.

According to the authors [1], in fact, here we are faced with the old style of Russian-Horde architecture of the 14-16 centuries. If we compare the dome of the German Clementskirche with the spiral domes of St. Basil's Cathedral in Moscow (Fig. 24), then we will immediately understand that here and there are the same style.

Rice. 24

Minaret towers decorated with spirals have also survived in the East and Asia …

The organ is a Russian instrument

Scaligerian historians paint the image of a Russian person in the form of a rude man in sandals and earflaps. It goes without saying that there is no talk of any high culture in general and musical culture in particular. All that is assigned to us is unpretentious dances around the fire, primitive obscene ditties, a tambourine, spoons, the squeaky squeak of pipes and the strum of a balalaika, in extreme cases - a gusli. All this is infinitely far from the exquisite Versailles with lace, violins and organs.

In fact, this is not the case. Take an organ, for example. Before the arrival of the Romanovs in Russia, the organ was a widespread instrument, but with their coming to power, a struggle began against the Russian cultural heritage - the organs were banned. And after replacing Peter I with a double, the total eradication of organs even from Russian household life began!

Let us turn to the testimonies of contemporaries of the "cultural cleansing", which cited A. T. Fomenko and G. V. Nosovsky in his book [1].

In 1711, "A Journey through Muscovy to Persia and India" by the Dutch traveler Cornelius de Bruin, who had been to Moscow in 1700, was published in Amsterdam. Simultaneously with him, the Italian Philip Balatri was in Moscow, who “to his surprise, discovers that many houses have organs of an original design, but for some reason they are hidden in closets. Later it is possible to find out: Peter banned them as a legacy of ancient Russia. The jester Shansky's wedding near Kozhukhov in 1697 was almost the last Moscow folk festival with 27 organs … ".

And then there are two more quotes from [1].

“The music makes no less impression. De Bruyne can hear it everywhere - oboists, horn players, timpani players in military formation and during solemn processions, whole orchestras of a wide variety of instruments, including the organ at the triumphal gates, on the streets and in houses, and finally, the amazingly harmonious sound of singing ensembles. Not a single holiday in Muscovy could do without it."

“… with the founding of St. Petersburg, the number of organists among free musicians sharply decreased. There are still organists in Moscow, and there are almost no organists in St. Petersburg. The fashion and personal taste of Peter I did their job. The death in the Moscow fire of 1701 of the old, excellently established Kremlin workshop for organs and harpsichords affected. They did not restore it - Peter had different tastes for the very construction of the Kremlin. Nobody began to take up the new workshop. Fewer musicians have become among the owners of Moscow courtyards. Unemployment? Poverty Creeping Up? It is not so difficult to verify by another type of accounting for the life of the townspeople - the carefully registered and taxed deeds of sale and purchase. And this is what was revealed: organists were changing their profession …"

And in the West, the organs have survived to our time and they were retroactively declared an exclusively Western European invention …

Germany is Great Perm

Let us once again put ourselves in the place of history falsifiers who are trying to hide the great past of Russia.

The empire collapsed, and many names of cities and territories of the breakaway provinces sound in Russian and have become firmly established in the annals. What to do? It is possible to destroy all the chronicles and prohibit the use of the old names of European provinces. Is it effective? No - it is long and laborious. It's easier to take a well-known name, make a sign with the words "city N" and put it in some wilderness, announcing that it has always been this way. And the Europeans themselves will happily forget about the Russian influence. And so they did. Therefore, the falsification of the geographical position affected not only the "Mongols" with Mongolia, which was moved on paper to the Chinese border. In [2], very interesting information is given about which territory was actually called Great Perm.

Chronicles are often mentioned about the Perm land, in which it is reported that this is a militarily powerful state, very rich. It is located near Ugra. Ugra is Hungary in Old Russian. In Russian, Ugrami is the name for the peoples who speak the Finno-Ugric languages. In the history of the Middle Ages, only one militarily strong Ugric state is known - this is Hungary. It is believed that the Perm land was finally annexed to Russia only in the 15th century.

The book [2] provides the following chronicle information somewhat distorted by modern historians: “The Novgorodians, making military-trade campaigns to the Ugra land through the Permian land … Nosovsky and Fomenko) to pay tribute. Since the 13th century, the Perm land has been constantly mentioned among the Novgorod volosts. Novgorod "men" collected tribute with the help of centurions and elders from the top of the local population; the local princes continued to exist, retaining a certain degree of independence … the Christianization of the region carried out by Bishop Stephen of Perm (in 1383 … he founded the Perm diocese, compiled the alphabet for the Zyryans)."

"In 1434 Novgorod was forced to cede in favor of Moscow a part of its income from the Perm land … In 1472, Great Perm was annexed to Moscow … the local princes were relegated to the position of servants of the Grand Duke."

Thus, the Perm land had its own princes, who were independent sovereigns until the 15th century. She had her own bishop and her own special alphabet.

And what do the Scaligerian historians tell us? The Great Soviet Encyclopedia indicates: "Perm land is the name in the Russian chronicles of the territory west of the Urals along the Kama, Vychegda and Pechora rivers, inhabited by the Komi people (in the chronicles - Perm, Perm, and also Zyryans)."

Firstly, the Komi people living along the Kama River (Komi and Kama are the same root words) do not call themselves either Perm or Zyryans! These names were assigned to the Komi already under the Romanovs. The fact is that the city of Perm until 1781 was just a village and was called … Yegoshikha! According to official data, the village of Yegoshikha appeared in the 17th century. The name Perm was given to Yegoshikha shortly after the suppression of the "Pugachev revolt", which in fact was nothing more than a civil war between Muscovy and Great Tartary, after which the Great Tartary ceased to exist and the memory of her was destroyed. In the same year as Perm - 1781 - Vyatka appeared, but this is a topic for a separate story …

Secondly, the above encyclopedia says that "the Komi people did not have their own written language." According to other sources, for worship in the Komi language in the 17th century, a writing based on the Cyrillic alphabet was used, but not the alphabet of Stephen of Perm! Where did the alphabet go and why does no one there remember the enlightener Stephen? Yes, there was no special alphabet in Yegoshiha Stefan, but more on that below.

Thirdly, the Great Soviet Encyclopedia reports that “the economy of the Komi Territory remained natural for a long time … in the 17th century there were only two settlements of Yarensk and Turya, one trading village of Tuglim … Only gradually, in the 17th and especially 18th centuries, did it develop trade and local markets are emerging. " By the beginning of the 20th century, "the Permian Komi were a small nation … doomed to the complete loss of their national culture … During the years of Soviet power, a literary language and writing system were created." Are there any signs of a militarily powerful and wealthy principality? We do not observe them at all. There was nothing to reign over there until the 17th century - Yegoshiha was not even there.

Fourthly, let's take a map of Europe and see how the Novgorodians (Novgorod is Yaroslavl) made "through the Permian land military-trade campaigns to the Ugra land" (that is, to Hungary) and recall the strange story of Karamzin: "The Mongols spread more and more their conquests and through Kazan Bulgaria reached Perm itself, from where many inhabitants, oppressed by them, fled to Norway. " What are these "zigzags of luck"?

Great Perm, we emphasize the word "Great", which clearly indicates its great importance, could not be where it was placed under the Romanovs.

Where was she then? A. T. Fomenko and G. V. Nosovskiy provide a justification for the fact that Great Perm is in fact the territory of southern Germany, Austria and northern Italy.

This is indicated by some obvious traces in place names. For example, in Northern Italy, the ancient city of Parma is known, in the name of which Perm clearly sounds. And in the capital of Austria, Vienna, there is still St. Stephen's Cathedral (Fig. 25).

Rice. 25

Perhaps it was the famous Stefan of Perm, the educator of Perm? The word Germany is possibly a variant of the word Perm.

Then it becomes clear why the alphabet of St. Stephen was forgotten in the history of the Komi people and the village of Yegoshikha. And here we can assume that this alphabet was Latin and it was it that was distributed among the Europeans for the cultural demarcation of Europe and Russia …

[1] Caliph Ivan / A. T. Fomenko, G. V. Nosovsky. - M.: Astrel: AST; Vladimir: VKT, 2010.-- 383 p.

[2] Tatar-Mongol yoke: who conquered whom / A. T. Fomenko, G. V. Nosovsky. - M.: Astrel: AST; Vladimir: VKT, 2010.-- 380 p.

The Advisor is a guide to good books.

From the article by Alexei Kulagin "The split of Russia".