Performers of global falsification

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2024-01-07 16:23

Sometimes, looking at frescoes, drawings, mosaics, engravings, "medieval" books, icons and other documents provided as historical materials to confirm the facts of history, it is difficult to get rid of the feeling that these are some kind of children's drawings, or drawings of novice artists. But this is not always the case.

For example, paintings by the Ruinist painters of the 17th century, such as the Pyrenees. In such paintings, antique ruins were painted with paintings of the highest quality, almost photographic quality, with correctly superimposed color. Statues of that time are still displayed in museums in a large number of cities. Artistic paintings of that time have come down to us in more modest numbers, but they still exist.

So why are the works of that time of the highest quality, while our civilization reached this level only in the XX century, and the works of the Middle Ages do not differ in artistic value at all? And all this concerns, first of all, chronicle documents and illustrations to them, which now forms the basis of the foundation of the modern historical school.

According to Oleg Pavlyuchenko, the author of the YouTube channel AISPIK, antiquity and the Middle Ages are one and the same time, which ended in a global catastrophe in the 17th - 18th centuries, and on the ruins of this civilization by its remaining representatives, the inter-flood was built. It is assumed that the level of development of this civilization was significantly high. But this civilization existed for a relatively short time and was destroyed by a flood in the middle of the 19th century. And the surviving representatives were building our existing civilization at the moment.

Each surviving civilization in this chain tried to get rid of the baggage of historical events that were in the previous civilization in order to substantiate their claims to power and leadership. First of all, information about the state structure of the former global metropolis and, in general, about world laws and rules were subjected to destruction.

In 1828, by order of Nicholas I, an archaeographic expedition was established, which was entrusted with the task of collecting sources on Russian history. The accumulated material was published from 1841 to 1863, then 10 volumes were printed, then the publication was suspended for 22 years. The next 10 volumes were printed from 1885 to 1914 from 14 to 23, with 10 being replaced for some reason. Volume 24 was published only in 1929, and from 1949 volumes 25-43 began to be published. This is the so-called collection of Russian chronicles. Separately, it should be noted the first period of publication from 1841 to 1863, when the first 10 volumes were published. According to Oleg Pavlyuchenko, the chronicles were published, prepared as a result of the works of Miller, Schletzer and Bayer, according to the official chronology, this was in the 30-60s of the 18th century.

After the work of Miller, Schletzer and Bayer and European falsifiers, the chronology from the end of the 18th century can be considered correct, they did all their dirty work, pushing all historical events apart, removing entire periods, sending periods of the Middle Ages into antiquity.

Even during the reign of Peter I, all the books were collected from all over Russia, almost on pain of death, and they were sent by carts to St. Petersburg. The Germans rewrote some books by hand, translating them from Old Russian into German, and some, for example, like the Radziwill Chronicle, seemingly like into Russian, but the meaning, of course, was changed in their Norman interests. Some part was rewritten, the rest was destroyed.

The second period of publication of Russian chronicles was from 1885 to 1914, when 10 - 23 volumes were published. This is the bulk of forged ancient chronicles, documents, decrees, letters and everything that is possible.

Let us consider in detail the documents that were forged in the 18th century and published from 1841 to 1863.

• Nesterov list. It was translated by Yazykov from German at the beginning of the 19th century.
• Laurentian list. Discovered by Musin - Pushkin at the beginning of the 19th century.
• The Pskov Chronicle. Published by Pogodin in 1837 in three copies. The rest was published in 1851 in the complete collection of chronicles.
• Radziwill list. The original was acquired in 1760 from Prussia at Königsberg. This is the pure work of Miller, Schletzer and Bayer. Before that, it seemed like a copy was presented to Peter I
• Facial annalistic set. Until the middle of the 19th century, it belonged to Zosima, some kind of Greek nobleman and merchant. From which, it seems, and got into scientific circulation. Although there is information about him in 1786, when he was transferred from the printing library to the synodal library.
• The Kiev Chronicle, published in 1908, and the Chronicle of North-Eastern Russia, as revised by Kostomarov in the 80s of the 19th century, are pure remakes of the late 19th century.

In most of these finished or newly appeared annals, lurid drawings, scribbles, as well as fake "ancient" maps with distorted banks and borders, which are dated XIV-XVII centuries, appeared.

One gets the impression that the one who drew these cards could not qualitatively redraw from the sample lying in front of him and distorted everything. This suggests that those who redraw maps have nothing to do with cartography. They are made by amateurs.

Why did the falsifiers have such an approach - the pictures were not drawn by professional artists, the maps were not made by professional cartographers, and all texts were translated not by professional translators, although at the time of the first falsifications, the real level of civilization was quite high.

Who were the perpetrators of the falsifications? They possessed some very strange zeal in redrawing a huge number of historical documents, as well as the scale of their actions. This scale covered almost the entire world. They were engaged in redrawing in Europe, and in Russia, and in Turkey, even in Central Asia and Iran. Who are these people?

Monks! Imagine a closed community in which there is a certain capacity for work and diligence, it is easily organized, and most importantly, most of all original documents are kept by this community. This process involved the monasteries of all concessions. True, Muslims and Protestants do not have monasteries. But among Muslims, this was done by students of madrassas, and Protestants, as ideologists of capitalism, could well have ordered it on the side from the same Catholics.

The monks, not being artists and cartographers, but having great zeal and a lot of free time, scrupulously copied really ancient printed books by hand. Likewise, the monks did not translate the texts professionally. Translating from Old Russian into German, into Latin, into new or ancient Greek, monks who did not know the languages redrawn and rewrote books, using only dictionaries.

Related materials: