Forbidden analytics about Muslim standing in Moscow

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

This analyst about the essence of the Muslim protection rally at the Burmese embassy was banned after an hour of its publication. And this suggests that our leaders have not yet decided in which direction to swing the Burmese boat.

Muslim non-brothers: for whom did the activists actually rally in Moscow

No, it’s not a curiosity when in the center of Moscow (and in other cities) there is an unauthorized demonstration of Muslims who "protect their fellows in Myanmar", despite the fact that 99% of the demonstrators could not find this country on the map. This is not a trifle, but a serious threat. It boils down to answering the question - what will the ideologues of the "Islamic State" * do if they are defeated in direct military aggression (seizing part of the territory of sovereign Iraq and Syria).

The answer is that they will do this. To carry out subversive activities around the world by relatively legal means, looking for any pretexts for their propaganda.

How they seize foreign lands

First, after all, about Myanmar. Our demonstrators, and we have to say this, defend the rights of criminals there. Although this is a special kind of crime. Special - and very relevant for, for example, today's Europe. In short, we have before us an exact repetition of the situation in Kosovo.

Both in Kosovo and in Myanmar (formerly Burma) we are talking about a long-term tactic, if you like - tradition, of squeezing land from the indigenous population.

Illegal migrants year after year create their own ethno-religious enclave in the Buddhist country, causing impotent hatred among the local population. The authorities are doing something, but generally do not know how to solve the problem.

In Kosovo, we will remind, it all ended in a war in the center of Europe, "mysterious" support from the West for the aggressor and land invader, as a result - the creation of a drug state, or, as it were, a state, on the ruins of Yugoslavia. By the way, Westerners are now on the side of the aggressors and invaders. for complex geopolitical reasons(create problems for neighboring China and so on).

In the case of Burma, the story is old, almost a century ago, the former colonial invaders, the British, are to blame for it. Burma became part of British India, to the dismay and outrage of the locals, who vainly argued that they were not Indians. The British imported labor from the neighboring Indian territory - Bengal (today it is the state of Bangladesh). Illegal immigration of Bengalis continued under the independence of Burma, which later renamed itself Myanmar.

Here you need to know the specifics of what the Rohingya are (those same migrants from Bangladesh).

The governments of Muslim Asian countries are verbally expressing support for their "suffering brothers", and privately, the same officials say: there is no question of massively resettling them somewhere in Malaysia or Indonesia. Because the locals - also Muslims - know well what happens if a Rohingya camp appears near the house. There is dirt, crime and hatred of the indigenous people, pondering where to run.

By the way, in the current aggravation of the situation in Rakhine State, the Rohingya are clearly to blame. They have an underground (terrorist) "Salvation Army", which at the end of August staged another attacks on the surrounding villages (where Burmese Buddhists live), as well as on government agencies. Dozens or hundreds of people were killed, and an army operation had to be carried out. The situation is again exactly the same as in Kosovo: the population organizes an armed militia to resist the aggressor and asks for support from the army. But sometimes he does it on his own.

Well, it is clear that this is no longer a local phenomenon. Among the Rohingya, propagandists and organizers from IS * settled. It would be strange if they didn't. This is how they operate on an international scale, using tactics familiar from the war in Syria or organizing migration to Europe.

Remember the drowned Syrian boy? Now we see the same boys and girls in photos and videos from Burma (Myanmar). Who there will understand the affairs of a little-known country, whose boy and who offended him …

Criminal people?

Let's draw some conclusions from this situation. For a start - something in terms of international law and law. The Russian Foreign Ministry adheres to a neutral position, condemning any and all violence. How about internationally recognizing as a crime the tactics of forcibly seizing land by migrants, Muslims or whatever?

What is it for: let's imagine that Europe wakes up from sleep (this is already happening) and begins to do at least something with the migrant ghettos somewhere in the cities of Italy, France, and so on. It will almost inevitably find itself - will be forced to - in the same situation as the current government of Myanmar. Therefore, the government must support this openly and clearly, it works not only for itself, but creates a precedent that everyone needs.

There is a subtle question here: can an entire nation be declared criminal. In the case of the Rohingya Bengalis, there are ethnographers disputes. Some of the latter argue that the Rohingya became a separate people precisely thanks to the idea of acquiring part of the territories of a neighboring people that captured them and passed from generation to generation, and before that they were just Bengalis or, which is almost the same thing, Bangladeshi. But ethnographers are ethnographic.

And we will remember that in the recent history of Europe there are curious cases of collective responsibility of peoples or part of them. For example, the Germans who lived in the north of today's Poland (in Gdansk, aka Danzig). They were evicted after 1945. And the photographs of the suffering German boys were nowhere to be seen.

Now about our business. It would be nice to understand how this mechanic of organizing Muslims for such actions is already working on the territory of Russia.

Once again I will refer to my material in May about what the ideologues of jihadism will do after the Iraqi-Syrian defeat. They will work all over the world looking for acceptable topics for legal campaigns, protests and other provocations. This, by the way, is already happening in the aforementioned Indonesia, Malaysia and similar countries.

The reasons must be neutral or partially acceptable to someone from the other population or authorities. You can fight against kisses on the street or couples holding hands, for the prohibition of alcohol and smoking, against the "too revealing" clothes of women, or now - for the condemnation of the authorities of a distant and incomprehensible country. Everything is suitable for mobilizing rabid activists and for inciting them against society and power.

It is clear that all these areas of struggle quite accurately coincide with what the jihadists did in the occupied territories of Iraq and Syria, already in the form of total bans and orders.