Philosophical analytics: the USA legalized abortion at any stage of pregnancy

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

While in Moscow, within the walls of the State Duma, the Primate of the Russian Church spoke about the negative consequences of abortion and the need to limit them, overseas the opponents of life celebrated their local success. In January 2019, New York State passed a law allowing a mother to have an abortion at any time when there is a risk to her health.

State Governor Andrew Cuomo happily announced on his Twitter blog a "victory for all New Yorkers" the day before. What is this "victory"? In … legislative protection of the right to infanticide. The new law, signed by Cuomo last Tuesday, allows a woman to get rid of a child, including after 24 weeks, if something threatens her health (including mental health). The interpretation of these "risks" can be very broad, for comparison - the previous version of the state law, which was in force for about 50 years, allowed abortion at a later date only when there was a clear threat to the life of a pregnant woman. That is, we have the legalization of infanticide, incl. just before childbirth, at the request of the mother.

The Democratic governor, which advocates the lifting of all restrictions on abortion, celebrated the success among his neo-Malthusian colleagues in the state Senate with a pomp. In his speech, Cuomo timed this success of depopulators with a high-profile 46-year-old case called Roe v. Wade, when the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of a woman claiming her right to abortion without any medical indication, on the well-known feminist principle: "My body is my business." This set a legal precedent for the legalization of abortion throughout the country.

“We say here in New York: women's lives matter. Their decisions matter, too,”said Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stuart-Cousins.

American "Democrats" have long tried to push through this document, and after gaining a significant majority in the New York Senate, they nevertheless succeeded. Resisting the initiative, Republicans, for their part, proposed introducing new penalties for harming pregnant women.

The adopted law also transfers abortions from criminal law to health regulations, and in some cases permits these operations to be carried out by midwives and paramedics. It is quite obvious that it will seriously expand the opportunities for the abortion lobby in terms of earning money on infanticide, and most importantly, the number of late abortions will increase.

According to the information of the New York Department of Health, in 2012-2014. the state recorded 237, 499 births and 285, 127 abortions. The statistics are more than telling, with the vast majority of abortions performed in the first trimester of pregnancy. With the complete untie of the hands of abortionists, the number of murders of children in the womb will exceed the birth rate by at least one and a half times. This is a direct path to the degeneration of the nation - this is what every sane American should think about. Moreover, nine more states, including California, Washington and Oregon, have included similar laws in their statutes.

As American analysts note, the Democrats have outplayed themselves with the initiative to legalize infanticide at a later date: when Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump's rival in the presidential election and the "honored worker" of the abortion industry, began to actively promote it, even neutral citizens began to move into the proliferation camp. Virginia Democrat Governor Ralph Northam recently made the following statement: “If a mother has not decided on the future child, she can give birth, and then have a discussion with relatives and doctors. During this time, the child's vital functions will be supported. " In other words, he advocated the possibility of killing a person after birth!

It has become abundantly clear to most citizens in the United States and around the world that the Democrats have become a party of genocide. In fact, they are very much afraid of the Supreme Court's statements about the possibility of a revision of the Roe v. Wade case in the direction of legislative restrictions on abortion, which is also advocated by President Donald Trump and his many supporters - the defenders of life.

“Do you remember I told Hillary Clinton that she would love to rip apart a baby that is about to be born? This is what they do, it's just awful. Such steps will raise the pro-life movement to a new level and make it very popular. Previously, his support in American society was about 50%. But now everything will change,”Trump said recently.

He was backed by Vice President Michael Pence, who responded to the Democratic’s dire laws with material in The National Review.

“This approach to human life violates all generally accepted norms of morality and ethics. The laws passed in New York and Virginia are not a bold step into a brave new world. This is the last breath of a dying movement that is in irreconcilable conflict with the timeless foundations of our nation,”writes Pence.

The question raised is extremely topical not only for our "esteemed partners", but also for Russia. And I really wanted that not only the parishioners of the Russian Orthodox Church and representatives of the conservative majority of Russians, but also the inhabitants of the corridors of power, realize this as soon as possible.

RIA Katyusha

It is curious that in a recent lecture the scientist O. A. Chagin just practically illustrated (in a polemic with a senior student) one of the positions put forward by the author: not every “doing good” is true good.

However, even before Chagin and the author, the Iraqis or Libyans, for example, realized this even before Chagin and the author, when goods from the West fell to them directly from the bombers …

… "A civilization that makes its main" stake "on an active (!) Mind that does not really know the truth (not to mention real! Love for it) is the deep root cause of its natural self-destruction."

(That is, this is the “systemic inferiority” of the Europians and making them doomed - it's just a matter of time.)

At the same time, the following quote will probably not hurt:

“Doing the same thing and waiting for a change for the better is what is called to have European brains” (however, I didn’t seem to say that; but it’s not so important).

I'll start by “copying” part of the text from the “Bicycle notes …” itself (almost from the very beginning):

<< … Because you don't have to be very smart to understand a simple thing: cycling is more mental work than physical (however, like any other activity)..

But in my mind I really understand, because I work on my mind, as far as I can remember.. And it's a pity, of course, that I still can't find a like-minded person who is as worried about his mind as I am (noticed that people sometimes complain about their memory, but no one complains about their mind)

Well, for example, I constantly think about everything: “what, how and why” (and most importantly - WHY) … And I think, for example, will I harm people now, in a year or in 100 years? (That is, so that the consequences of my activity-act do not affect us harmful either in a year, or in 10 or 100 years).

And the basic principle that I try to use in my life: "Move away from evil - and you will gain good".

“I do not advise people to think about the benefits of people”, but especially to do.. For I noticed: with their “such mind”, in practice, as a rule, except for harm, in the end it does not work out (it is not for nothing that they say: as always ).

"Doing good" for them, rather a kind of cover for themselves and others - their greater harm emanating from them, from which you just don't want to give up (or you can't)

Good is a natural state for man. He does not need to be specially remembered - he is remembered when evil appears.. But then you really need to think not so much about good as about evil

It's like with air: it exists - and we breathe without remembering it. But when it is not enough (or whoever spoils it nearby), then we also remember about the air. and about doing good).

In life, in practice, it is inevitable, if you follow this honestly (ie, for example, "do good"), you come to the conclusion that harming your “harm” and, at the same time, “harm” around you - and there is a real meaning to “benefit”(“Do no harm” is, among other things, to bring benefit - if you fail to do it, you will “inflict” unjustified harm on someone)

Everything else is not real and is hypocrisy. Here HYCEMERY is the basis of our being (mainly European); to get it “as we would like” it does not work - all that remains is to say that it can work out (not always perceived “cunning”, for example, they say “you can build socialism”, or - “you can ride a bicycle for health”)

And in order to "harm harm" - you need to understand what harm is and what is not harm (benefit).

A person brings evil and harm to other people, not because they are evil (evil) and pests (harmful), but because they do not have enough intelligence.

This is what it means "the mind is not enough" - this is what we are talking about

After all, hundreds of times in our life we have been convinced that what for us (others) seemed good (benefit) actually turned out to be evil (harm), and vice versa (which is the basis of our misfortunes in life). And it’s better, it’s more correct to think of this not afterwards, but in advance.

But for this you need to have, I repeat, a developed mind that will be able to understand this in advance (so that there are fewer problems in life because of your stupidity). That's why the mind is "given to us"

When one hand does "harm" and the other tries to do "good," nothing good will come of it anyway; checked by history - this is the law (it's like smearing white and black - all the same, black will turn out)

For now, I’ll say that, first of all (!) “Evil and harmfulness” of a person is reflected in his underdeveloped (not harmonious) features of mental and mental activity (for example, in unjustified hypertrophy of some “mental functions” due to the infringement of others, important) - and only then, as a consequence of his some individual qualities.

And what exactly love of truth and constant striving to truly understand(?!), „What is it really (not to mention constantly following it in your thinking) - and there is the most effective way to "align" your intellectual and thinking abilitiesleading to a more harmonious interaction with the environment environment and with myself

The inability, I repeat, to distinguish useful from harmful (good from evil, etc.) or the erasure of the line between them (which is happening now) is DEGENERATION

This is what we are talking about …