Are the photographs of the Dyatlov group falsified and photoshopped?

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

A post based on comments about one and the second photoshop of the so-called filming of Dyatlovites.

There are a lot of Photoshop in these shots, I give these for a start. The falsification of the filming of the Dyatlovites began on 1959-27-01. This date means that the hidden events began to occur in the 41st quarter of the village. Although they were killed in the abandoned village of the 2nd Northern Mine - there is simply no place more conveniently. The corpses were delivered in two batches to the "location" on the eve of the "location", the first time - with things and a tent. The diaries and photographs were falsified.

And also photoshop means that all pear, crush, rocket-secret, Mansi, alien and other versions are going to pieces. The group did not go out on the route.

Photoshop of that era was more time consuming, but more accurate in terms of the result. Cutted photographs of objects were superimposed on a large panoramic photograph, on a scale selected on a photographic enlarger, shaded and retouched, pressed against with glass, and filmed.

An example of photoshop from the supposedly filming of the Dyatlov group.

Two photos. Supposedly made by Zolotarev on 1959-27-01.

We overlay two photos, look at the background. The line matches perfectly, only the second image had to be rotated along the axis, no more than 3 degrees. It should not be; the photographer has shifted significantly …

Now the poses. These two photoshopped photos used the same photos of Kolmogorova, Dubinina, Doroshenko. In this picture

put this transparent layer

Here's what happened.

The girls matched perfectly, the figure of Doroshenko was slightly shifted.

Photoshop can be considered proven. The group did not leave the village anywhere.

*

The second photoshop is quite funny.

Krivonischenko looks at "Mansi signs" on a tree.

Dyatlov was allegedly filmed on 1959-30-01.

The same tree is in the original photograph.

Krivonischenko allegedly filmed at the same time.

For the second photo, the photographer took a small step to the left of the Mansi tree, opening a gap between it and the next tree, i.e. the angle of view of the tree has practically not changed. But the distant shot has moved a huge distance, and not to the left, as it should be, but to the right)) This is impossible. Photo from Krivonischenko - Photoshop.

There is also a reference point in the background: this dry Christmas tree.

If we focus on the displacement of the details of the background, then the question can be posed like this: how did the photographer manage to move to the right in the second photo relative to the pine with the "Mansi pattern" and at the same time open the gap between the pine with the "drawing" and the next pine?

None. It's impossible. If only the "photo from Krivonischenko" is not Photoshop.