Fake history of mankind. The death of the Dyatlov group 2

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Like many others, I have been pondering this riddle for several years and as soon as I realized that the tent on the slope and the traces of tourists from it is a staging, for me the picture has taken shape. Hopefully someone will find it noteworthy:

1. The Dyatlovites were not killed by people.

2. Location of the incident.

It is impossible to say for sure where the tourists died, two options are possible:

- by the cedar.

For this option speak the bed of the corpse near Slobodin and the traces of breathing in the snow at the first three.

- in the other place.

In favor of this option, a riddle with cadaveric spots, as if the bodies were previously in a different position. Sauna skin is like corpses going through cycles of freezing, thawing and freezing again. Semi-unbuttoned and tangled clothes, inverted pockets, watches and cameras, like bodies in a hurry, undressed and dressed. Doroshenko and Krivonischenko, laid side by side under a cedar, are either covered or not with a mysterious brown blanket. The last four, hidden deep in the snow, seemed to be specially buried so that they would not find it ahead of time.

3. There were strangers at the scene before the search engines arrived. This is supported by the soldier's winding, extra skis and ski boots, a notched ski pole, a piece of ski, a flashlight on the tent, and other items that Yudin did not identify.

4. The present UD was started on the 6th, not the 26th of February. By this time, the authorities already knew about the incident.

5. The tent is set up on the slope and cut by the stage performers. In such a place, the Dyatlovites themselves could not put it. Traces of tourists leaving the tent-falsification.

6. Those searchers who were the first to find the tent know more than they say. They are very important witnesses.

Why should they chop down the tent with an ice ax, not knowing what or who is inside, if the entrance to the tent has resisted and it is open? All the more so if it has already been cut all over? There are no traces of an ice ax on the tent. The testimonies of Slobtsov and Sharavin differ and this is no accident.

7. The labaz may have been staged. Wall newspaper too.

8. No one on a hike will start after lunch. It makes no sense. Collecting things and laying the tent, as well as setting it up, is too time-consuming and tedious process. Better to give yourself some rest and stay for a second night.

9. Now about the fact that made a shocking impression on the search engines, and on all of us: the undressed Yura. This complicated the already difficult picture of the incident. The only explanation I see is that their radioactive clothing was cut off and buried together with the injured four deep under the snow until spring.

10. It is likely that the last four were specially kept under the snow until spring - maybe they simply could not figure out what to do with it and so that the passions would subside, or they waited for the decomposition to hide the traces of the object's impact on their faces, or maybe they wanted the level of their radioactive infection - it seems the pilots who transported their bodies grumbled about this, which means they knew something. The story of the Mansi pathfinder and the thawed path of needles and twigs leading to the stream is very similar to a lie. It's a forest - there are needles and twigs everywhere. In addition, freshly cut needles do not crumble, especially from dragging on soft snow.

11. I think that the authorities faced something so incredible at the MP that all decisions were made in Moscow. Only representatives of the special services and a limited circle of people from the country's top leadership knew the truth. The search operation was just a cover operation. It is from here that all this hodgepodge of students, military, Mansi, various specialists from Moscow and leapfrog with investigators. And it worked: the truth was safely buried under a heap of rumors, guesses, hypotheses and versions. Only one avalanche Moisey Axelrod pulls on scientific work and is very similar to a custom one.

12. The conclusion about the cause of the accident from the UD sounds more than strange. One thing comes to mind: the UD for the authorities at that time did not have any meaning and no one checked investigator Ivanov what he wrote there. And it should have sounded like this: they died as a result of erroneous actions in difficult weather conditions. UD is not a fantasy novel and there is no place for "force majeure".

13. By the time the last four were discovered (most likely they gave the command to "discover"), the authorities had already decided everything and behaved as they should: the high-profile case of the murder of 9 people, despite the public outcry, was stopped and classified, it seems forever. Those who were dissatisfied and had information were gagged, and so reliably that they did not utter a peep until today. Yudin seems to be a sincere person, perhaps he knew nothing and was not dangerous for the authorities.

14. The nature of the injuries among the dead tourists echoes the mysterious cases of cattle mutilation in America. When animals had injuries, as if they were being thrown from a great height, cuts and scalps performed with a super-sharp instrument and removed internal organs, including the tongue, cut out at the root.

15. It is very possible that the authorities at the MP have found something that has nothing to do with this world. Because even such a mysterious death of tourists cannot serve as a basis for such an impenetrable and long-term secrecy of this incident. By all indications, the reason lies deeper. Severe injuries, unnatural skin color and radioactive contamination on the clothes of tourists could not appear from scratch - there was an object that left them. This is the reason for the seemingly senseless, at first glance, staging with a cut tent and "barefoot" traces of tourists: the secrecy was high from the beginning. The organizers had a choice: missing or an accident. We chose the second option, furnishing everything as the circumstances allowed. It turned out to be clumsy but effective: we have been breaking our heads for half a century.

16. One circumstance remains incomprehensible to me: why investigator Ivanov requested a radiological examination and why was his request fulfilled? After all, the presence of radiation is a direct indication of the nature of the secret, which the authorities tried so hard to hide. Everything that investigator Ivanov knew about this case, he took with him to the grave. Leaving us an incomprehensible newspaper article about fireballs (by all indications, custom-made), and an absurd conclusion in the UD.

And one more thing: I believe that there is no secret file in the archives. The story of the deaths of nine UPI students was exhausted in the same 1959 by the closure of the UD - the state simply had nothing to declassify. And there is a state secret from the category of those that do not trust even secret archives. And this secret lies somewhere in a high office in a personal safe of someone who needs it and in the foreseeable future it will hardly become known to the public. Or maybe it does not lie, and all the documents shedding light on it have long been destroyed. We know everything that we are allowed to know about this tragedy.