Video: What is the nationality of the main population of Rus?
2023 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-11-26 22:42
What was the self-name of the people who lived in the vastness of the United Empire, which entered the western maps and sources under the name Great Tartary? What is the meaning of the word Rus in Russian? Who are the Slavs? Why now the people of the largest state in the world are called the adjective "Russian"?
Over the past two days, I have had to answer several times almost the same question about who inhabited Tartary. And yesterday a very good video appeared on the Cognitive TV channel, where a researcher from Bulgaria, Plamen Paskov, talks about the research of their group, from which it follows that no “Ancient Slavs” have ever existed (link to the video below).
In fact, this question is not as simple as it seems at first glance. Most of us are accustomed to considering and calling ourselves Russians, which was greatly facilitated by the national policy that was adopted during the Soviet era, when everyone had a "nationality" column in their passports. But many researchers note that the word "Russian" cannot mean nationality, since it is an adjective, and our adjectives denote this or that quality or property of an object. And by the way this concept is used both in our country and in foreign countries, this is precisely the quality of a person. Abroad, everyone who lives in the territory of modern Russia, as well as many neighboring countries, including Belarus, Kazakhstan and the Baltic countries, is still called Russian. That is, Tatars, Bashkirs, Chuvashes, Jews from Russia, and even Chechens in the same Europe will be called Russians. Why? Because we all speak Russian! That is, the concept of "Russian" denotes precisely the linguistic affiliation, and not the nationality. The same principle lies within such a concept as the "Russian world", which is now very popular. It also includes everyone who speaks Russian, regardless of what actually nationality this person is.
But, you must admit that it cannot be that there was a Russian Tatar, a Russian Chechen, a Russian Jew, even a Russian German, but at the same time there was also a huge number of people, according to the last census of 2010 77, 45% who are just Russians … There must obviously be some word indicating belonging either to one of the small nations, as in the previous examples, or to some large and ancient family. Which?
You can immediately exclude from the variants the word "rus" or as a variant of the name of the ethnic group "rus", since this term is not found either in documents or as the self-name of peoples or nationalities, which would be reflected in the oral or written of these peoples. If anyone has any objections, then I will be happy to familiarize myself with the justification of your arguments in the form of specific references specifically to old documents and ancient legends, and not to a modern remake. Again, when we try to substitute this word in our formula, we get "Russian rus", that is, a phrase like "butter oil".
When I was already working on this material, one of the readers sent a link to a story from a textbook for primary grades, the author of which is Stanislav Timofeevich Romanovsky (1931-1996). This story very well reveals the true folk meaning of the word "Rus":
“The word“rus”also has one more meaning, which I did not read in books, but heard firsthand from a living person. In the north, behind forests, behind swamps, there are villages where old people speak in the old way. Almost the same as a thousand years ago. Quietly, I lived in such a village and caught the old words.
My mistress Anna Ivanovna once brought a pot with a red flower into the hut. She says, and her own voice trembles with joy:
- The flower was dying. I brought it to Russia - and it bloomed!
- To Russia? I gasped.
- To Russia, - the hostess confirmed.
- To Russia ?!
- To Russia.
I am silent, I am afraid that the word will be forgotten, it will fly away - and it is not there, the mistress will refuse it. Or did I hear it? You need to write down the word. He took out a pencil and paper. For the third time I ask:
- To Russia?..
The hostess did not answer, her lips pursed, she was offended. How much, they say, can I ask? For the deaf, two mass do not serve. But I saw the chagrin on my face, I realized that I was not mocking, but for the deed I needed this word. And the hostess answered, as she sang:
- To Russia, falcon, to Russia. On the most, that neither is, Russia.
Be careful careful I ask:
- Anna Ivanovna, will you be offended by me for importunity? I want to ask.
“I won't,” she promises.
- What is Russia?
Before she even had time to open her mouth, the owner Nikolai Vasilyevich, who was silently warming himself on the stove, take it and bark:
- A bright place!
The hostess took her heart from his barking.
- Oh, how you scared me, Nikolai Vasilievich! You’re sick, and you don’t have a voice … It turns out that your voice has cut through.
And she explained to me the honor of honor:
- We call a bright place Russia. Where is the sun. Yes, everything is bright, read it, so we call it. Fair-haired guy. Fair-haired girl. Light brown rye - ripe. It's time to clean up. Haven't heard, perhaps, never?"
That is, "Rus" is a bright place, a bright country. And "rus" is a bright person. That is, this is again an indication of the quality of a person, and not of his belonging to one or another genus.
The next option, which we will consider in more detail, is the "Slavs". Now, in the light of the active promotion of various neo-Slavic cults, the term "ancient Slavs" is very popular. Some even began to answer the question about their nationality that their nationality was "Slav". Substitution of this option for verification into our formula gives a "Russian Slav", which already has the right to exist, if not for one thing, which is that such a nationality never existed, and the term itself with this meaning began to be used relatively recently, in the 17-18 centuries.
Anyone who is seriously interested in this topic will be interested in fully watching the above video by Plamen Paskov, where he proves this on specific facts and with links to specific documents. If someone does not like to watch videos on youtube, then on the site you can find the full text of this conversation, as well as download an audio file for listening or a full video for watching.
In many old texts, indeed, the word "sklaviny" is found, which in fact means "slave". In Greek it is "sklavoi" (Σκλάβοι), slave (English), sklave (German), esclave (French), esclavo (Spanish) - and everywhere it means "slave", "subordinate", "led" in the sense controlled by someone something, "a person without rights."
In other words, all slaves in Europe were called "Sklavins" or "Slavs", and regardless of what nationality they were. In the same Roman Empire, according to the official version of the historical myth, slaves were from all adjacent territories, including North Africa, European countries and even the British Isles. It is the word "sklavin" that is found in the old texts that Plamen Paskov demonstrates in the video. At the same time, it follows from the content of these documents that we are talking specifically about slaves, and not about representatives of a particular people or territory.
Other words such as "Sakaliba" and "Slovenes" are also mentioned, but these are completely different words.
Plamen also talks about the appearance of the word "Slovenes" in Bulgaria. It turns out that this word appears only in 863 and means literate Bulgarians, those who knew how to read and rewrite the Bible. That is, this is again an indication of the quality, skill of a person, and not of belonging to one or another genus.
And what do we have in Russia? In our country, the term "Slavs" or "Slavic peoples" appears precisely with the advent of the Romanov-Oldenburgs. Even according to the official historical myth, the very idea of uniting the Slavic peoples appears under Catherine II. At the same time, this term begins to be used in documents and various scientific works, that is, this is the middle of the 18th century. Until this moment, the term "Slavs" is not used at all.
Some of the commentators were especially pleased when they began to cite quotations from the works of B. A. Rybakov (1908-2001), who studied the origin of the ancient peoples of Rus, including the following quote from his work "The Birth of Rus":
“Approximately in the 8th - early 9th centuries, that second stage of development of Kievan Rus began, which is characterized by the subordination of a number of tribal unions to the power of Rus, the power of the Kiev prince. Not all Eastern Slavic unions were part of Russia aVian tribes; there were still independent southern uliches and tivertsy, Croats in the Carpathian region, vyatichi, radimichi and powerful Krivichi. "Se bo tkmo (only) Sl OWensk language in Russia: Polyana, Drevlyane, Novgorodtsi, Polochane, Dryvichi, North, Buzhany, along the Bug, after the Volynians "(" The Tale of Bygone Years ")."
Yes, Rybakov himself uses the term "Slavs", but he was born in 1908, which means he received higher education during the Soviet era, when the term "Slavs" was already firmly introduced into the scientific vocabulary. But at the same time Rybakov cites a quote from "The Tale of Bygone Years", where exactly the spelling through "O" - "Slovenian language" is used. I was deliberately not too lazy and checked, in the original text of the "Tale of Bygone Years", the spelling is used everywhere exactly through "O"! However, those who wish can check it out for themselves using this link. When the page is loaded, an introduction opens, while immediately under the heading there is a switch where it is most convenient to select the "Parallel" mode. Then turn on the page search mode and type "glories" to search. You will not find a single "Slavic" in the original text, only in the modern translation, where all "Slovene" and "Slovenian" are methodically replaced by "Slavs" and "Slavic".
The term "Slavic peoples" begins to be actively introduced at about the same time as the Nazi theory of racial inequality appears, according to which some nationalities and peoples are the highest, whose destiny to rule. And other nations and peoples, respectively, are inferior, which the superior nations must rule. Accordingly, the lot of the lower ones is to be ruled, led, subordinate to the higher peoples. That is why they are "slaves" or "Slavs". Moreover, this word is just suitable for a variety of meanings. That is, they are not just servants, workers, slaves. To denote these concepts, as some researchers correctly point out, many languages have their own terms that differ from "sclave / sklave / slave". These are precisely the lower nationalities and peoples led by the higher ones - the "Slavic peoples".
The fact that this term was actively introduced into the Russian language and into the scientific vocabulary under the Romanov-Oldenburgs, who systematically conquered the territory of Russia, is also quite natural. How natural is the emergence of serfdom, which turned most of the population of captured Rus into powerless slaves, that is, "Slavs."
But if we about the origin are not "Slavs" and not "Rus", then who are we? To what clan does almost 80% of the population of Russia belong? It was the answer to this question that I really wanted to hide by those who introduced and continue to introduce into our consciousness the concept of "Slavs" or the invented nationality "Russian".
At the beginning of this article, I already said that I am often asked, but who lived on the territory of Tartary, which was destroyed at the beginning of the 19th century? In fact, the answer lies in the name itself. But first, I want to make a small digression.
Collecting information about Tartary, I found that this name of our territories is found only on Western European maps, primarily British ones. Most likely this means that the inhabitants themselves called their country differently. There are different options, for example, the name "Sarmatia" is found on some maps. But we are interested in exactly how the Anglo-Scassians called this territory, they are also “Ivers”, that is, “Jews”, in honor of whom part of the territory of Asia they had captured was called “Europe”. You can read more about this in the article "Forgery in geography: who and why invented Europe?"
That is, the Jews-Ivers, who came up with the name "Anglo-Saxons" for conspiracy, themselves called that part of Asia / Asia, which they had not yet been able to capture, Tartaria.
The word "Tartaria" consists of two parts, tart-aria. "Tart" is the same as "cake", the French word "tarte" means an open cake made from a special shortcrust pastry. In Russia, the word "tarta" was the name given to a special holiday cake that was baked on Shrovetide on the day of the spring equinox, which was cut into pieces and handed out to everyone who came to the holiday. So with the word Tartary, the Jews-Iberians designated a part of the territory of Asia that belonged to the Aryans, and which they really wanted to seize. A tasty morsel that sooner or later they must eat. But the most important thing is that the name of this territory contains a hint of who actually inhabited these lands. They were inhabited by the Aryans!
We are now being told that the Aryans are some kind of ancient people, which are now completely extinct, disappeared, giving rise to all other peoples of the so-called "white race". Allegedly, traces of it were lost many thousands of years ago. But at the same time, even at the beginning of the 19th century, there was a huge country that belonged to the Aryans.
When a planetary catastrophe occurred that destroyed most of Siberian Tartary, which I describe in detail in my article "How did Tartary die?", In Siberia, most of the Aryans who inhabited it apparently died. And those who managed to survive were later captured by the Romanovs-Oldenburgs in the process of joining Siberia to their empire. But there was also Moscow Tartary, the majority of whose population was also made up of Aryans. The territory of Moscow Tartary or Muscovy was captured by the Romanovs-Oldenburgs during the war of 1809-1816, which was later passed off as "the war with Napoleon of 1812". And taking into account the 200-year shift, which was discovered and substantiated by Igor Grek, in the annals and documents of the Moscow state, which were dated according to the old style, the same events are "the Troubles of 1589-1613", with a peak precisely in 1612, when supposedly " Moscow was liberated from the interventionists."
Some of the Aryans who inhabited Moscow Tartary were captured during this war and turned into slaves, the very "serfs" from whom most of the population of modern Russia actually originates. Most of those who are accustomed to considering themselves precisely "Russian", if they try to find out their roots, will very quickly discover that they come from the peasants.
It goes without saying that after the destruction of Tartary, it was necessary to erase from the memory of people not only the fact that such a state once existed in Asia. It was necessary to destroy the memory of the Aryans themselves, who created and inhabited this state. At the beginning, the invaders did not particularly bother themselves with inventing a new nationality, therefore they began to call all the peoples captured on the territory of Tartary simply "Slavs", that is, "subordinates", "led", "dependent" peoples ". A little later, a new nationality, "Russian", was invented, the introduction of which into public consciousness began in the middle of the 19th century, and was finally completed already in Soviet times, when the overwhelming majority of the population was assigned "Russian" in the column "nationality".
But this is all a lie, invented by the invaders in order to deprive us of our roots, to make us forget about our ancient Rod, from which we come. All of us are not "Slavs", but Aryans!
To understand why the Aryans are so scared of the invaders of our planet, why they are trying so hard to destroy them, you need to know a few more important things.
It is the Aryans who are the real masters of this Planet, since we are the descendants of the Azov or Ases, those who once created this Planet. The Azy are our progenitors. For the same reason, our continent is called Asia - the Azov continent. And now, many well-known phrases are beginning to take on a completely different, true meaning.
This is our alphabet with the original order and deleted or rearranged letters: "I know God to the Verb Good There Is Life …" - in this case, Az is precisely the progenitor, the ancestor who, knowing God with the help of good (correct) words, created life.
Or the phrase that is attributed to Ivan the Terrible: "Azm is the Tsar" - where the first word does not mean "I" at all, as it is translated now, but an indication that he is a descendant of Azov (Az me - Azm), and therefore has the right to be King. True, it is also necessary to add that in fact the Tsar is not the one who rules other people. The king is the one who controls the Planet, the forces of the elements, natural processes, including the weather. And it is for this reason that such honors are given to him by other people, including a part of the harvest received, because if the Tsar did not control the weather and natural processes, then there would be no harvest. That is, the real King receives not tribute or taxes, but payment for his work for the benefit of the whole society.
And when the king is not real, then, of course, he cannot control the Planet, the weather and natural processes. This means that a drought begins, a crop failure, and therefore a revolt of the population. Even in the official historical myth, such events are described.
And the same Romanovs-Oldenburgs, in principle, cannot be Tsars, since none of them is Arius, that is, a descendant of the Azov who once inhabited Asia. Therefore, they cannot establish contact with the Planet, and without this control of natural processes and weather is impossible. Therefore, they had to establish their power on the territory of Russia by force, through blood and the destruction of the rebellious Aryans, who do not want to be slaves.
In order to break our will, to reprogram our ancestral memory, the invaders have come up with many myths that are stubbornly implanted in the minds of the population since school. To begin with, we are told that we are "Slavs", that is, slaves. You can, of course, argue for a long time about where this or that term comes from, what meanings and meanings it once had. But the whole trick is that this word works here and now, while people perceive precisely today's meaning, and not the one that was many centuries ago. Now, just try to answer yourself a simple question. You have come to one of the Western countries, for example, Great Britain or Germany, where the word "slave" has a very specific meaning today - "slave", "subordinate", "dependent", which means "slave" in relation to a person. Someone from the local asks you: "what is your nationality?", And you proudly answer in response: "I am a Slav." But what did the European hear, in whose language the word "slave" means precisely "slave"?
Further, we are constantly told that Russians are no good for anything, that they are lazy bums and drunks, that they themselves cannot organize anything. That if there are no foreigners who will organize everything, then the Russians will simply starve to death in poverty. In fact, all this is also a blatant lie, which is refuted very easily!
Our ancestors survived in the harsh climate of Siberia, the Urals and even the Far North. But if you are lazy, poorly organized, and do not know how to plan for the future, then you physically cannot survive in such a climate!
Many features of our worldview and attitude to the world around us follow from the need to survive in a harsh climate. We have a craving for collectivism and mutual assistance, because only helping each other can we survive in such harsh conditions. We have a strong rejection of parasitism, since the appearance of any parasite in a community not only creates an additional burden on everyone else, but also jeopardizes the survival of this community as a whole if there are too many such parasites. We are able to find non-standard solutions to how to do something with a minimum consumption of resources or in a shorter time, since this contributes to survival in critical situations. For the same reason, it sometimes seems to strangers that we are lazy, but in fact it is not laziness at all! This is the ability to save energy and resources without wasting them on trifles, because otherwise they may not be enough later in a critical situation, when it will be really necessary. But when it is necessary, we are able to mobilize and give our all in a way that no European can, which we have repeatedly proved in practice over the past century and a half. At the same time, the ability to give all my best to the end, clenching my teeth, through I can’t, this is also an ability that was acquired as a necessity for survival in our harsh conditions!
Well, do you still believe in that blatant lie that the invaders constantly repeat to us from TV screens and pages of glossy magazines?
It's time to wake up, it's time to throw off the darkness into which the parasites, accustomed to living at someone else's expense, are trying to immerse us! And for this we all first need to remember who we are, what people we all belong to, the descendants of what great Family we all are!
Remember once and for all!
There is no and never was such a nationality as "Russians". Rus is a bright person who lives by conscience, which means that it can be a person of any nationality. A Russian is a person who lives on the territory of Russia, speaks Russian and lives in accordance with local traditions and customs, without which it is impossible to survive in the harsh conditions of Siberia, the Urals and the Far North, that is, it can also be a person of any nationality.
There are no and never were any "Slavs". There were "Slovenes", that is, those who speak a word, speak the same language with us, which means that this is just another synonym for the concept of "Russian". At the same time, never allow anyone to call themselves "Slav", because in the language of the occupiers it has only one meaning - "slave"! And it doesn't matter what kind of noodles they will hang on your ears about the "ancient Slavs".
But the most important thing is to realize that we are all Aryans. We have a nationality that has been trying to destroy for several centuries! And if you are ever asked again, for example, during the next census, what is your nationality, then you can safely answer that you are Arius, a descendant of the most ancient Family, a descendant of the Azov, who created this Planet, and therefore, by the right of kinship, you are one from her masters.
They failed to destroy us. Despite all the wars and disasters, we still survived. And this means that sooner or later we will still gain strength to regain this Planet for ourselves.
As Katyusha has already said, an anti-people anti-constitutional bill that allows digitalizers from government and business to ignore the current laws
REDUCING POPULATION THROUGH GMOs. Geneticists are FORBIDDEN TO SPEAK THE TRUTH about genetically modified food
How do you imagine plants mutants? Maybe so? … Or like this: … In fact, you see products with mutant plants in the store every day and buy them
Chechen parliamentarians introduced a bill banning mentioning the nationality of terrorists
I'm Russian! Not Russian or Russian, but Russian. And I am offended for my Great People, who gave this world almost everything, gave birth to other peoples, but slandered and humiliated by slavish morality. Qatar
More and more often there are disputes about what a nation, people, nationality means. Some public figures are trying to re-enter the column nationality in the identity document