Another history of the Earth. Part 1d
Another history of the Earth. Part 1d

Video: Another history of the Earth. Part 1d

Video: Another history of the Earth. Part 1d
Video: Kherson Counter-Offensive Map - Ukraine War w/ Google Earth 2023, December


Judging by the questions and comments that I received after posting the last part, it is necessary to make some clarifications and additions. Earlier, I wrote that several global catastrophes occurred on Earth, including those that led to a change in the parameters of the physical environment on the planet, in particular, the atmospheric pressure, which gradually decreased from a level of about 8 atmospheres to the current level of 1 atmosphere. In the last part, I wrote that, judging by the traces that we can observe today on the surface of the planet, there was only one catastrophe with a displacement of the earth's crust and a shift in the position of the rotation pole, during which a powerful inertial wave was formed. We do not observe other similar traces, which inevitably should have formed from such shifts and displacements. Some of the readers saw a contradiction in my statements. In the beginning, it was about several disasters, and now I argue that there was only one disaster.

In fact, there is no contradiction. It's just that not every planetary catastrophe that causes a change in the parameters of the physical environment must lead to a shift in the earth's crust, a shift in the position of the rotation poles and the formation of an inertial wave. It depends on the nature of the impact. For example, in the case of a massive nuclear bombardment, a change in the parameters of the physical environment will occur, but there will be no shift of the earth's crust and no displacement of the position of the rotation poles.

Another point that I would like to repeat is that as a result of the described catastrophe, not only a shift of the earth's crust relative to the inner core occurred, but also a serious deformation of the earth's crust, especially in the northern hemisphere. That is, the earth's crust did not move as a whole. As a result, there was a change in the shape of the continents and the mutual position of their parts. In particular, this led to the fact that the place of the former south pole of rotation was displaced in one direction, and the place of the north pole of rotation in the other. Due to the nonlinear deformation of the Earth's surface, it is hardly possible now to establish the exact location of the previous pole of rotation. But we can well determine this place approximately, and also establish that earlier the north pole of rotation was in a different place, not coinciding with its present position. For example, based on the analysis of the location of soils, which he wrote about

chispa1707 in his note "Soils are a witness of the pole shift"


Another good comment was on trying to determine the previous pole position from the orientation of old temples:

“… After this part I will allow myself to interfere with your train of thought. It's about the orientation of the temples. Don't tie them here. This is a cruel mistake based on false dogmas. There are no and never were any bindings of temples to the cardinal points. Dmitry, once again - it never happened! And now no. There were only some ties of the location of the altar part of the temples to the sun, and even then only in the temples dedicated to the sun gods. Temples dedicated to non-solar gods, had an orientation exclusively along a nearby street or river bed in this particular place. Temples to the sun gods were oriented towards the sunrise with their altar part. The god of the winter sun, in the Russian version it is Kolyada, the altar part is shifted to the south, because in winter the sun rises later. At the temples of the summer sun, or rather the spring sun (spring was half a year from March to September), the altar was shifted to the north, because in summer the sun rises early. In the Russian version, these are the temples of Yar (Yarila). Temples to the gods of the dying autumn sun are oriented close to astronomical coordinates, for the main festivities for the autumn god fell on the beginning and middle of autumn with reference to the harvest. In the Russian version, these are the temples of the god Khors (Horst, Khoros).

Who and when started the duck that the temples are oriented to the cardinal points, I do not know, but this happened relatively recently, in the 20th century, most likely at the end of the 20th century. As for the orientation of the crosses on the domes, here too there is no reference to the cardinal points and never has been. Already under Soviet rule, there was an unspoken demand on churches to put crosses with an oblique stick oriented to the astronomical north, in order to simplify orientation, primarily in military needs. But today, there are no more than half of the temples oriented in this way. And now the new temples have crosses in any direction, and the old temples where they did not have time to change the crosses, in general, are oriented in any way, including with an oblique stick to the south.

I have an article on this topic"

Despite the fact that I do not entirely agree with the author of this commentary, on the whole he is right when he says that not all old temples are obliged to be oriented to the cardinal points. But I wanted to say something completely different. Even if we select those temples that should be oriented to the Sun, then due to the nonlinear deformation of the Earth's surface, we will not be able to establish the exact position of the previous pole on the basis of their current orientation. But, at the same time, the fact that today their orientation is violated allows us to conclude that the catastrophe that changed their orientation occurred after their construction, that is, in a relatively recent historical time, and not thousands or millions of years ago. And a little later we will find a lot of confirmation of this.

The next fair question was asked about the fact that if an inertial wave was formed during the shift of the earth's crust, then it should have formed not only off the coast of North and South America, where the consequences of its passage are very clearly visible. A similar wave should have formed in all oceans, and in the Atlantic, and in the Indian, and in the Arctic oceans. And this means that we must observe traces of the passage of such a wave along all coasts, including Africa, Europe, Asia, the Indian subcontinent, and also Australia.

I agree that in the event of such a catastrophe, such traces must necessarily be observed in all the listed places. The only question is, how should these traces look? It is not at all a fact that these should be exactly the same formations as on the Pacific coast of the Americas. Firstly, because the size of the oceans, and most importantly the depth of the oceans, are different, therefore, the amount of water that will move will also be different. Secondly, the nature of the consequences will depend on what relief was near the coast before the disaster, that is, whether the water will meet obstacles in its path in the form of mountain ranges or roll over flat terrain.

It is also necessary to note the fact that it is not at all a fact that the level of the world ocean before this catastrophe coincided with that which we observe now. The presence of vast flooded areas in the Atlantic Ocean both off the coast of North America and off the coast of Europe and North Africa may indicate that the ocean level has risen after the disaster.

But in any case, even if the level of the world ocean was somewhat lower, traces of flooding of territories and the passage of an inertial wave along the mainland should be observed in one form or another.

Frankly, at the moment I still have little data on Africa and Australia, which would clearly indicate the passage of such a wave through these territories. But if we talk about the European part of Asia, then a fairly large number of facts have already been collected on this topic, which confirm the passage of a powerful wave along the entire Atlantic coast of Europe. One of the researchers who wrote and talked a lot on this topic is the geologist Igor Vladimirovich Davidenko. I think that many of the readers who have long been interested in the topic of the real history of the Earth are familiar with the film by Alexander Grinin with his participation "Faroese astrobleme - the star wound of the apocalypse", in which Igor Vladimirovich lists in sufficient detail many facts that confirm the passage of the ocean wave through the vast territories of Europe … But in his works and speeches, Igor Vladimirovich does not quite accurately determine the time of the catastrophe and its cause. A group of researchers, to which Davidenko belongs, put forward the theory that about 700 years ago a large double asteroid fell in the Atlantic Ocean, which caused a wave, the traces of which they found. In other words, at the beginning, this group discovered many facts that indicated that some time ago a powerful ocean wave passed through the territory of Europe. And only then they began to look for a possible reason for what could have caused such a wave, ultimately stopping at formations in the Faroe Islands in the Atlantic Ocean, which look like two impact craters.

As for the dating of this event, since Igor Vladimirovich and his group in their research relied on facts and events that are dated according to the current official version of history, and at the same time they did not question the official chronological system, their conclusions were influenced by all official history chronological shifts and distortions. But we'll talk about this later. Now it is important for us to fix the facts that in the relatively recent past, several hundred years ago, an ocean wave several hundred meters high swept across Europe.

Next, I want to answer the questions and objections of one of my readers that I received from him by e-mail, since he collected in his letter most of the questions and objections in one form or another asked by other readers.

“When collisions of rigid bodies occur, especially of similar strength, leading to a small through penetration of a large body, the diameter of the outlet is always larger than the inlet. There are no exceptions to this. But even if you imagine that they could be, then, nevertheless, the exit point will never be flat, like a table, but will always be a "rose" of turned inner layers."

Generally, in this case, we cannot say that the collision of exactly solid bodies occurs, since it is the outer shell of the Earth that is solid. The object traveled most of the way through molten magma, heated to very high temperatures. In this case, the object itself during such a breakdown should also have heated up to high temperatures, since in a collision, the kinetic energy of motion is converted into thermal energy. But due to the huge size, as well as the restrictions imposed by the rate of thermal conductivity of the substance of which the object is composed, at first its outer shell was heated and destroyed, while its inner part remained cold for some time. Therefore, when passing through the dense layers of the Earth, the object will gradually lose matter and decrease in size, as a result of which an object already noticeably smaller in size will reach the exit.

As for the shape of the outlet and the "rosette" of the inverted layers, then it is necessary to take into account the effect of the square-cube, which have an effect when the linear dimensions increase. As the diameter of the object that punches the hole increases, the height of the “rosette” and the amount of material pulled out will not increase in proportion to this diameter. An increase in the linear dimensions of the "rose" will mean that the masses of the parts that are turned inside out will grow in a cube. This means that the edges will simply collapse under their own weight. Add to this the fact that the exit hole after the passage of the object was filled with molten magma from the inner layers of the Earth, heated to high temperatures. Therefore, the edge of the hole had to melt. In this case, the turned-out edges of the "rosette", by definition, will have lower strength, since this is a zone of rupture of the earth's crust, through which many cracks and ruptures will pass. And when the molten magma begins to come out from the inside, it will fill the formed voids and cracks, which will accelerate the heating and melting of the substance in the "rose" zone.

In other words, the jagged edges around the outlet most likely melted and collapsed into the pool of molten magma that formed at the outlet.

“If you look at the asteroid entry scheme that you propose, the asteroid enters the Earth at a fairly acute angle. At the speed at which he walked, it does not matter whether the surface is solid under him or not (even at a speed of 1000 km / h, the strength of water in a collision with an aircraft is equal to the strength of the soil). Therefore, the likelihood of a ricochet (it is clear that with the partial destruction of everything) would be much higher."

In this case, there will be no ricochet, since the ricochet occurs due to the elasticity of the materials of which the bullet / projectile consists and the material of the obstacle from which the ricochet occurs, that is, the rebound of the bullet / projectile. But the mass and speed of the object in this case are such that no strength and elasticity of the substance that make up the Earth and the object is enough to create the necessary repulsive force, which can significantly change the direction of movement of this object. Interatomic bonds in matter are destroyed before the object changes its direction of motion and the breaking effect stops.

In addition, do not forget that the object has a diameter of several hundred kilometers, while the depth of the world's oceans is only six kilometers, and the dense layer of the atmosphere is about 20 kilometers. That is, at the moment when the lower edge of the object has already reached the solid bottom of the ocean, most of the object will still be in space.

“Even if we assume that a large amount of soil was thrown out of the Earth from space from the impact, then this soil could not go into orbit around the Sun - the Earth's gravity works for about 900,000 km. from it, at this distance the gravity of the Sun is disconnected. No debris could have gone so far, which means that either it would have gone into orbit or fell back."

If some fragments at the time of the explosion of the object were able to acquire a speed higher than the second cosmic one, then they could go beyond the gravitational field of the Earth. The distance that any object can move away, regardless of its size and mass, is only derived from its initial velocity.

“If you look at the picture taken from your own work, you can see quite a large number of absolutely straight lines at the bottom. Such lines cannot be a product of the movement of masses of water - especially since the lines go in different directions. These are clearly hand-made things."

It is not entirely clear what specific lines are you talking about? If about the lines that form islands and underwater volcanoes, then they are formed along the internal faults of the earth's crust. If about dark lines, then this issue has already been discussed many times in my blog and on various forums. These are not real formations that exist on the ocean floor, but the so-called "artifacts" that were formed when processing the data of scanning the depth of the ocean floor using special oceanographic vessels. These lines show the routes of the ships that scanned the bottom, and nothing more. If you open the Google Earth program yourself or go to Google Map via the Internet, you will be able to see for yourself that when you zoom in, these lines turn into stripes, along the width of which the quality of the bottom topography display is noticeably more detailed than outside these lines. So you are right, these are actually man-made "lines", but not ancient, but obtained at the moment of the very bottom survey.

“The same goes for the Venezuelan Basin. The washout, whatever caused it, and whatever scale it may be, under no circumstances can there be an absolutely straight section at the end of the trajectory, as well as a vertical wall at the end. This is also much more like hand-made things. In any case, Pavel Ulyanov's version seems to be much more believable."

Below I specially inserted a fragment of the place you are talking about from Google Map, so that everyone who wants to can see for themselves that there is no question of any "absolutely straight section", as well as the vertical wall at the end. At the end of the formation, we see exactly the same arc as below, at the end of the formation between South America and Antarctica.


Again, if this is supposedly a quarry, as Pavel Ulyanov claims, then why does it have an arc at the end and a size that matches the size of the formation between South America and Antarctica?

This is where I want to end the answers to the first block of the most frequently repeated questions and return to considering the consequences of this disaster.

In the previous parts, I described only the impact itself and the accompanying processes that took place immediately after the disaster. But after the passage of shock and inertial waves that formed the waters of the world's oceans, the disasters did not end there. Indeed, at the place of impact, a giant Tamu volcano, about 500x1000 km in size, was formed, and along the coasts of the Pacific Ocean and along the internal faults of the earth's crust at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean, several hundred volcanoes were simultaneously activated or re-formed. And since most of them, especially at the initial moment, were at the bottom of the ocean, including the Tamu massif, the water of the world's oceans should have started flooding these volcanoes, which should have led to intense evaporation of a huge amount of water. That is, our water, air and temperature balances in the atmosphere are sharply violated. Due to the high temperature of the magma with which the water comes into contact, not just steam will be formed, but highly superheated steam, which will then rise to the upper atmosphere, heating them, and also increasing the pressure in the area above the volcanoes. The consequence of this should be hurricane winds, which will equalize the pressure, as well as prolonged torrential rains, since we have formed an excess of moisture in the atmosphere.

Further, during the eruption of volcanoes, not only a lot of evaporating water will enter the atmosphere, but also a huge amount of ash and oxides of those minerals that make up molten magma flowing from volcanoes. The most interesting thing is that contact with the water of the world's oceans will intensify the process of formation of small solid particles, which will rise together with steam and heated air into the upper atmosphere, after which they will be carried over great distances. At the point of contact with water, a zone of intense cooling and crystallization of magma will form, which, due to temperature compression, will here be covered with microcracks and disintegrate into small particles. In this case, the smallest particles will be picked up by the superheated air and steam and rise to the upper atmosphere, where a dust layer will form, and the small ones will fall back. That is, we get a kind of separator that will separate the formed particles into fractions, while the smallest particles will rise to a great height. Further, this dust can be carried by winds for many thousands of kilometers until conditions are formed that will cause this dust to fall back to the surface of the Earth. It is most likely that this can happen when a dust cloud meets a cloud of water vapor, as a result of which we start to have not just rains, but mud rains, including those flooding cities with layers of clay.

It should be taken into account that if the primary catastrophe passed relatively quickly, the impact itself within tens of minutes, and the passage of air and water waves for several hours, then the volcanic eruption could continue after the catastrophe for many years, and the fallout of the dust raised into the atmosphere and water even longer.

In addition, a huge amount of dust and ash, which were raised into the upper atmosphere, formed for some time a dust layer, which began to impede the passage of sunlight to the Earth's surface. This means that for those who managed to survive in this catastrophe, a real, not a mythical end of the world has come. The "dark ages" began on Earth, during which obscurantism began to seize people. That is, all these terms that are used to describe the so-called "Middle Ages" are not just a "figure of speech". They should be taken literally as they describe the real consequences that arose after a given disaster. But we will talk about this in more detail in the following chapters.