Another history of the Earth. Part 2d + 2f

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Start

The beginning of part 2

Traces of the catastrophe on the territory of Eurasia

In the previous parts, I examined in detail the traces that remained after a large-scale catastrophe caused by the collision of the Earth with a large space object, which pierced through the Earth's body. The inlet from this blow is located in the Tamu massif, which is a giant shield-like underwater volcano, and the outlet is in the so-called Tarim Basin, located in the Himalayas in China. The impact during the collision was so strong that it caused a displacement of the solid earth's crust relative to the liquid core, which in turn led to the formation of a giant inertial wave in the world's oceans. This wave threw a huge amount of salt water to almost all continents, including high into the mountains and into the so-called closed areas, from which the water, due to the features of the relief, could not drain back into the ocean. Over time, most of the water dried up, and the salt it contained formed many salt marshes, which I talked about in the last few parts. At the same time, the territories of both Americas, as well as Africa, were considered in detail.

If we consider Australia, then about 44% of its territory is occupied by deserts. Moreover, almost everywhere there are salt marshes or salt lakes. In other words, Australia is not out of the picture.

But in Asia, especially in its western part, the picture is slightly different. At the same time, it cannot be said that there are no salt marshes or salt lakes here at all. In the comments to the previous parts, one of the readers, writing under the nickname

shurochkin, even sent a selection of salt lakes located in the mountains of Turkey:

There are many salty lakes in Turkey, everything that is not Tatlı su in the last column in the plate is salty, salty, soda. What I personally myself clearly attribute to the post-Flood is:

But in the rest of the territories, the picture is completely different. This is connected, on the one hand, with the relief of the west coast, and on the other hand, with the fact that the volume of water in the Atlantic Ocean, which should feed the inertial wave, was much less than the volume of water in the Pacific or Indian Oceans, which flooded both America and Australia … If you look at the map, you can clearly see on it that the bulk of the water in the Atlantic Ocean, moving along the parallels, falls on Africa. And there is much less water in front of Europe, so the inertial wave and its consequences will be weaker here.

But, if you look closely at the map, then Europe has one place where the impact of an inertial wave must be very strong. This is the Iberian Peninsula, on which Spain and Portugal are located, since there is also a fairly large amount of water in the Atlantic Ocean in front of it. And this means that there should be noticeably stronger traces of this catastrophe. And it turns out that they actually are there! While working on this part, I remembered that I once read on the blog of

axsmyth material that, relatively recently, the entire Iberian Peninsula moved from its original position and shifted eastward towards Europe and Africa. Moreover, before the disaster, it was most likely a very large island in the Atlantic Ocean. True, in his article, the author names the impact of a large meteorite as the cause of this displacement. But this version has a number of questions.

First, the author himself points out the fact that we observe not one, but two traces of the previous position at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean. In the image below, which I borrowed from the article, these positions are indicated by a yellow and red line.

An intelligible explanation of why we see exactly two tracks, if the meteorite hit was one,

axsmyth in his article he never gave it.

Secondly, the size of the trail from the impact of the meteorite, which was found

axsmyth, practically coincides with the magnitude of the displacement, as if the Iberian Peninsula has no mass, and the earth's crust has no viscosity. Why this is so, the author also could not explain, answering the following in the comments: “No, I don’t think this is strange. I accept it as a fact."

I will not dispute what was said

axsmyth the version that in the relatively recent past there was a meteorite fall, which led to the displacement of the Iberian Peninsula, which at that time was still an island in the Atlantic Ocean. But, most likely, that impact resulted in a much smaller shift from the position indicated by the yellow line to the position indicated by the red line. But the second displacement, from the red line to the current position, is already a consequence of the impact of the inertial wave, which actually imprinted the former island into the edge of Europe.

Also, a good selection of facts that confirm the passage of a powerful oceanic wave in the European part of Russia in the recent past is given by Igor Vladimirovich Davidenko in the film “Faroese astroblema. Star wound of the Apocalypse. Those interested in alternate history are likely already familiar with this movie. I recommend the rest to look. But it is necessary to make several remarks about Igor Vladimirovich's theory.

First, he dated the catastrophe to the 14th century, so he says that the catastrophe happened 700 years ago. But in his reasoning and calculations, he relies on the official chronology, therefore, does not take into account the 200-year “Romanov shift”. If we take it into account, then the catastrophe described by him occurred in the 16th century 500 years ago, that is, it begins to coincide with the facts and dates in Europe, including the observed change in the content of maps at the turn of the 16-17 centuries.

Secondly, there is no evidence that any large objects actually fell in the Faroe Islands region. This is just a hypothesis, with the help of which Igor Vladimirovich's group tried to explain and connect together the facts they discovered. In doing so, they mainly relied on the facts that were known to them on the territory of Russia, therefore, by the method of reverse calculation, they came to the conclusion that for the passage of a wave that could leave observable traces, large space objects had to fall into the region of the Faroe Islands. But if we had a powerful inertial wave from west to east, caused by the catastrophe I am describing, then it should have left exactly the same traces.

But from such a catastrophe should be observed not only traces that were left by the inertial wave.

When an object passed through the body of the Earth, it should have heated up to very high temperatures. Most likely, part of the object's substance passed into a plasma state, and the rest melted. But not only the substance of the object experienced intense heating during the collision, but also the substance that makes up the body of the Earth. From the impact, the temperature of the magma should have increased sharply, and not throughout the volume, but mainly along the trajectory of the object. As I wrote in one of the previous sections, an increase in temperature significantly increases the fluidity of magma. Also, a sharp increase in temperature should have caused an equally sharp increase in the pressure of matter inside the Earth. As a result, we should have formed two processes.

First, magma inside the Earth should have started flowing along the punctured channel in the direction of the object's movement.

Secondly, not only magma inside the Earth should be set in motion, but also all the continental plates that make up Asia, which are located above this region. Moreover, the speed of movement of these plates will be different. Those that are closer to the breakdown will move faster, those that are further slower. And this means that the plates will begin to creep one over the other, which should lead to strong earthquakes, as well as deformation of the continental plates with the formation of folds and mountain ridges.

In works that are devoted to changing the position of the Earth's rotation pole, the following diagram often flashes, in which the red arrow shows the assumed direction of motion of the inertial wave at the moment of the revolution.

I must say right away that I could not determine the original source of this image, so that one could say anything about how reliably it shows the position of the ridge-trough complexes. But, since I myself had to be in places where there are similar formations, the direction of which coincides with what is indicated in this diagram, for now we will assume that this diagram more or less correctly captures the fact of the orientation of such structures.

Almost most of the authors who cite this scheme in their works, for some reason, are sure that all these structures are formed precisely by the passage of a large volume of water, that is, they are traces of water erosion of the Earth's surface. It just looks like none of them even tried to study the structure of these formations, drawing their conclusions only on the basis of maps or satellite images. This spring, I was able to personally visit an area where there is a similar structure, and to make observations from which it clearly follows that at least some of these structures have a completely different reason for their formation.

The photographs that will be given below were taken on the bank of the Yamashlinsky reservoir, located in the south of Bashkiria near the border with the Orenburg region.

The terrain there is hilly, with many folds, along which streams or rivers flow below. If you look at the general plan of this area, you get the impression that this entire relief was formed due to water erosion.

But this impression is deceiving. Even when I was in those places for the first time, I drew attention to the fact that the river valleys there are very wide, in some places up to several kilometers, while having rather steep and high slopes. At the same time, very small rivers or even streams flow along the bottom of these wide and deep valleys, many of which dry up altogether if the summer is dry.

In other words, these relief structures could not have formed due to water erosion from those weak water flows that are now flowing there. And even during a spring flood or heavy rainfall, these rivers and streams do not turn into powerful stormy streams, since they have a very small catchment area. Since the general orientation of streams and valleys was from West to East, it goes without saying that the very first thought was: "Here is another confirmation that the waters of the global flood passed here, which washed all these deep ravines." And it is precisely this conclusion that those who will study a given territory only from space or aerial photographs usually come to.

However, if you find yourself on the spot, then driving along the road past the Yamashlinsky reservoir, you can see the internal structure of one of the hills, which was exposed during the construction of the reservoir and the road along its bank, when the builders had to cut off part of the hill.

The black line at the bottom of the hill is the bump stop along the edge of the P361 road. The photo was taken exactly from the place where the icon with the camera is shown on Google-maps. Since a google-mobile with a panoramic camera has already passed this place, you can look at it in panorama mode.

And so this structure looks close on ordinary photos (photos are clickable).

What we see in the photographs presented does not at all look like sedimentary rocks washed out by a powerful stream of water. All layers are crumpled and twisted by some powerful catastrophic process. Why catastrophic? But because this entire layer of sedimentary layers was deformed at the same time. And in order to deform such a layer of sedimentary rocks, an enormous force must be exerted on the surface of the Earth.

Moreover, all this happened very recently, since the outer layers go almost parallel to the surface of the Earth, completely repeating the terrain without visible traces of leveling due to water-wind erosion, which should have formed if this happened a long time ago. The outer layers are parallel to the outer surface practically along the entire height of the hills from the base to the top. This can be clearly seen in the following photos.

This is the right edge of the cut hill we saw earlier. At the top, the direction of the layers runs parallel to the hillside. If we look at the very first photograph of this hill (with cars), then it can be clearly seen that the top of the hill coincides with the bend of the inner layers, and right below it there is a characteristic fold, due to which the surface was squeezed up. That is, in this place, the layers of sedimentary rocks, squeezed from both sides, began to be squeezed upward.

And this is not a single entity. There are many other places in that area where the inner layers can be seen running parallel to the surface, and the structure of their bends generally coincides with the terrain. The next few photos are taken a little further along the same road. If you look at the above diagram, then this place is to the left of the village of Kugarchi, just beyond the river.

In this place, part of the hill was dug, using the rock in the construction of local roads. On the right side, the inner layers are clearly visible, which also repeat the surface relief.

Now the hills from above are gradually overgrowing and the soil layer has begun to form, but it is very thin, which also suggests that the catastrophe happened relatively recently, several hundred years ago, and not millions or hundreds of thousands of years ago.

Another place where the inner layers are clearly visible, running parallel to the surface.

That is, this hill was squeezed out from below, and not washed with water from above. When a powerful stream of water erodes a layer of sedimentary rocks, then we see a completely different picture. Below is a photo from South America, which shows very clearly how the area should look after a powerful stream of water passed through this place.

Despite the fact that we see huge ravines washed out by the flow of water, we do not observe any bends and deformations of the layers of sedimentary rocks that repeat the surface relief. On the contrary, all layers remained parallel to the horizon.

What was the reason that the surface of the Earth in the south of Bashkiria, as well as in many other places, was deformed, forming folds?

As I wrote above, one of the consequences of the breakdown of the Earth's body will be the formation of a magma flow inside the liquid core. And since continental plates float on the surface of molten magma in the same way as ice floes float on the surface of water, then this magma flow, which arose again due to breakdown, should have caused an active movement of the continental plates. At the same time, the Asian plate should have started to move faster, since it was under it that the main flow of magma was located. And the European plate, which is farther from the breakdown site and the resulting flow, will move more slowly. As a result, in the place where these plates touch, the Asian plate will begin to squeeze the European plate with tremendous force, forming folds in the relief and even mountain ranges along almost the entire contact line.

Now let's take another look at the scheme of ridge-trough complexes in Eurasia, but slightly modified.

The place where the object exits the body of the Earth is in the right part at the bottom outside the image. If the southeastern part of the continent starts to move due to the generated magma flow, then it will press on the rest of Eurasia in the directions that are indicated in the diagram by green arrows. Moreover, the orientation of the ridge-trough complexes correlates well with this pressure.

Part 2e

I have seen cut slopes many times where the structure of the inner layers was very readable, which looked like an "accordion". That is, as in the photographs from Bashkiria. Moreover, I saw such a picture not only there, but also in many other places. For example, on the Black Sea coast near Gelendzhik and Novorossiysk (it's a pity that I don't have photos of those places). Even then, such a picture seemed very strange to me, but at that moment I could not understand what was strange about it. This time I had the opportunity to examine all this in detail close up and climb the slopes, after which I realized that the observed picture does not correspond to the explanations offered by official science.

In the diagram below, I, to the best of my ability, tried to depict what we see in fact and what we should observe if this process, as we are assured, took place slowly or quickly, but for a very long time.

The left diagram "observed structure" shows the observed pattern in fact. The layers of the earth's surface under the action of a certain force moved towards each other (red arrows in the diagram), which caused their deformation. This is an obvious observable fact.

The observed pattern of the layers shows very clearly that all these layers were deformed at the same time. Moreover, the process was quite fast. Also pay attention to the fact that the thickness of all layers is almost the same. This suggests that when these layers were formed, they were located horizontally.

If it were a long process, in which the layers of the earth's crust slowly creep on top of each other, then the pattern of the layers should be completely different. Lower layers will have to be deformed more, but their thickness will be the same. But those layers that will later be formed from above will have a smaller thickness on the hills, and more in the lowlands, since due to water-wind erosion, part of the soil will be transferred from the hills to the lowlands. Moreover, over time, as the level of deformation increases, the thickness of the newer upper layers on the hills will become less and less, and more and more in the lowlands, as shown in the "slow deformation" diagram.

If the deformation process occurred quickly as a consequence of the catastrophe, but a very long time ago, then the picture should be partially similar to the first scheme, but due to the same water-wind erosion, the structure of old layers on the hills should already begin to collapse. In this case, new layers of sedimentary rocks will form from above, forming a new structure, which in lowlands, where there is no strong water-wind erosion, should be multilayer. That is, in this case we should see a picture as in the diagram "ancient deformation".

And, finally, if these were ravines that were washed out by a powerful water flow, then in this case the old layers would remain parallel to the Earth's surface and would simply be cut by ravines and canyons, as happened in California or South America.

Thus, the observed facts indicate that the existing structure of the layers was formed as a result of the rapid movement of the layers of the earth's crust, and this happened relatively recently. In addition, since a similar picture is observed in other places, and not only on the territory of Bashkiria, this catastrophe was global.

Now let's go back to Spain. One of the readers drew my attention to a place in Spain called Zumaia, where he happened to be.

On Google maps, these places can be viewed through the Street View service, for example here.

First, in this case, we can also say that these layers of sedimentary rocks were formed horizontally and only then they were turned upwards. This is evidenced by the fact that the layers have the same thickness over almost the entire length that we can observe. We can also say that all these layers were deformed at the same time, since the parallelism of the pattern is also preserved practically over the entire visible area.

But the most interesting thing is how these layers are oriented. On Google maps, when viewed from a satellite, the orientation of the layers is quite clearly visible. In the diagram below, I marked it with a red line.

That is, if the Iberian Peninsula moved in the direction indicated by the arrow, and bumped into the lower part of France, then the layers should have been deformed exactly as we are now observing. And between Spain and France, during this collision, the mountain ranges that make up the Pyrenees were formed.

Thus, we have a number of facts that prove that in the past the Iberian Peninsula shifted to the east, which was accompanied by a serious deformation of the Earth's surface.

But there is one more point, which my readers also pointed out to me after the publication of the previous part. If this shift occurred during the catastrophe that I am describing, and which, in my opinion, occurred at the turn of the 16-17 centuries, then there must be old maps on which the Iberian Peninsula should be depicted either separately from Eurasia, or in another position. But, alas, I could not find such cards. Almost all old maps I could find show the Iberian Peninsula exactly where it is now. So until other facts appear, we will assume that these are two different events and in the previous part I was quick to draw conclusions.

Now let's once again return to the general model of the catastrophe that took place and analyze what other traces should have formed on the surface of the Earth, after which we will try to find them.

The pool object collides with the Earth at high speed, breaks through a rather thin solid earth's crust, and almost completely plunges into the molten body of the Earth. Many of the readers in the comments and letters write to me that in such collisions at cosmic speeds, the collision should be accompanied by a very strong explosion, since almost all the kinetic energy of a small body during a collision should almost completely turn into thermal energy, as a result of which the matter of this body should almost instantly turn into plasma. There are even mathematically appropriate models that support this scenario.

But there is one important point to consider. All these models are valid precisely in the case when a small object hits a large one, the mass of which is many times greater. In this case, the second body, indeed, almost instantly stops, due to which the kinetic energy is converted into thermal energy, heating the small body and turning it into a plasma cloud. In this case, the dimensions of the second body are very small and its substance will interact with the surface of the planet at almost the same time. Therefore, heating will also occur throughout the volume.

In the case we are considering, the situation is completely different. At that moment, when the leading edge already touches the surface of the Earth, the rear edge will still be in open space. In addition, as we have already found out, upon collision, the second object does not stop instantly, but continues to move at a sufficiently high speed. This means that only part of the kinetic energy goes into heat. Further, the substance of the object has a finite thermal conductivity. For most minerals, the thermal conductivity is in the range from 2 to 5 W / (m * K). Therefore, when the matter on the front side of the object already begins to turn into plasma, the back side, which is in open space, will still remain cold.

But even if all the substance of an object, in the process of passing through the body of the Earth, heats up and turns into plasma, this does not mean that this substance will completely lose its kinetic energy by this moment and stop moving. In fact, after the transition of a substance to another state of aggregation, its mass does not disappear anywhere.

In addition, it is necessary to take into account the so-called square-cube effect, which consists in the fact that with an increase in the linear dimensions of an object, its area will grow in a square, and the volume, and hence the mass of the object, will grow in a cube. In other words, if we made a calculation for an object with a diameter of 1 km, then after we increase the linear size 500 times to match the size of our object, then the area of the object will increase 250,000 times, and the volume and mass of the object will increase by 125 million times. Thus, to convert the matter of this object into plasma, we need 125 million times more energy. On the one hand, since the kinetic energy directly depends on the mass of the object, this means that we have energy. But now the ratio of the object's area to its volume, and hence its mass, has become 500 times less. And our heating goes through the outer surface. Consequently, the heating rate will drop 500 times.

In other words, for the case we are considering, the available models of collision of small objects with the Earth's surface are not suitable. It is necessary to build another, much more complex model, but this is already far beyond the scope of my modest knowledge and capabilities.

On the other hand, since we observe a characteristic trace both at the place of entry of the object into the body of the Earth, and at the place of its exit after the breakdown, I simply accept as a fact that the object hit, entered and exited.

At the same time, the ones I have, like most of the readers, are enough to understand another important point. When the object passed through the body of the Earth, then not only the substance of the object should have heated up to very high temperatures, but also the substance inside the Earth itself! And when heated, as we all know from the school physics course, the substance expands, and the pressure rises. But this means that inside the Earth, as a result of the breakdown, not only a magma flow should have formed. Due to the rapid heating of the magma, its pressure should have increased sharply and it should have begun to be squeezed out through all the cracks and holes in the earth's crust. Yes, and the earth's crust itself with such an impact should have been covered with many cracks. Therefore, we need to look for places where such outcrops of igneous rocks are observed.

We will not have to search for a long time, since dear

sibved at the end of August 2017, I published most of the two parts, which I repost in my magazine:

When the Earth was expanding … Part 1

When the Earth was expanding … Part 2

In his article

sibved cites a lot of facts that indicate that, relatively recently, molten magma was actually squeezed out from the bowels of the Earth. It is thanks to this that many megaliths were formed, which are in the form of pillars or narrow walls, which, pay attention, go mainly strictly along the tops of mountain ranges. In fact, the slopes of these ridges were once the edges of cracks that were simply turned outward by magma pressing on them from below. And where this crack opened, magma seeped higher into the layer of sedimentary rocks. After that, the magma froze, and the sedimentary rocks were washed away by the intense rains of the "World Flood", which began after the catastrophe due to the intense evaporation of the waters of the world's oceans, and it is also possible that here sibved is right again, due to the squeezing out and evaporation of the water that was in the underground reservoirs and aquifers.

And in the end we got a picture, which can be seen in the following photos, which I borrowed from sibved'a.

This is what the stone walls look like in a satellite image, which run along the tops of mountain ranges.

These are not the vents of volcanoes, these are the cracks in the earth's crust, through which molten magma was squeezed upward from the inside under pressure, which then froze, forming structures that are clearly visible in the next picture.

Moreover, at the moment when the catastrophe occurred and molten magma was pressed through the thickness of the earth's crust, there was also a layer of loose sedimentary rocks, which served as a form for these formations. Later, this layer of sedimentary rock was washed away from the ridges into the lowlands, exposing solid outliers in the form of walls or pillars, as in the image below.

Moreover, such formations are found not only in Altai or in the Krasnoyarsk region. Exactly the same pillars and walls are found in our Urals. Below is a selection of photographs that I borrowed from the magazine from

gelio from the article about the Northern Urals.

These formations are located on the Manpupuner plateau in the Komi Republic.

Please note that here the pillars go in a row, and in the background we no longer see pillars, but a characteristic ridge-wall, which was squeezed out through a crack in the earth's crust.

It is likely that other formations, about which he writes in his article sibved, such as mud volcanoes and emissions of superheated water and steam from the bowels of the Earth, could also have formed as a result of the described catastrophe, like the stone objects shown above. But only in these cases, the magma was unable to break through to the end to the surface, but only rose through the cracks formed in the earth's crust to higher layers, causing their intense heating, which led to the boiling of underground waters and the release of water vapor and soil mixed with hot water. to the surface.

I think that this is where we can finish the search for traces of the disaster on the surface of the Earth, thereby completing the second chapter, and move on to the next chapter, in which we will try to find out when this catastrophe occurred, is there any mention of it in the mythology of different peoples and to what extent these references correspond to it.

Continuation

Let me remind you that the first Ural conference of thinking people will be held on October 21-22 in Chelyabinsk.

Details on the link.