The wonderful world that we have lost. Part 3
The wonderful world that we have lost. Part 3

Video: The wonderful world that we have lost. Part 3

Video: The wonderful world that we have lost. Part 3
Video: Prague, Czech Republic: Strahov Monastery - Rick Steves’ Europe Travel Guide - Travel Bite 2024, May
Anonim

After the publication of the last part of the article, "Orthodoxy is not Christianity," there were many comments like: "The author suffered, slipped into mysticism, and started well." On the kramola.info portal at the end of the article, for the first time, they even made a reservation “The team of the kramola.info portal site may not share the point of view of the authors of the materials posted on the site,” which I have not seen in any of the articles posted on the portal. I happened to read over the past year and a half, including also very controversial and controversial. As they wrote to me in the comments: "you have obviously gone too far at the expense of intelligent planets and stars."

Well, let's try to deal with this topic more thoughtfully. Obviously, the concept expressed by me requires additional detailed comments and explanations so that it does not look like another delirium of a madman, of which there are now a large number on the Internet.

For those who do not like to read long and abstruse texts, I can immediately say that this material is not for you. This is not entertaining reading and not another sensational exposing article from the series "they all lie to us."

This article is for those people who think about how the World works, how and why certain processes occur in this World. For those who are not bothered by the need to reflect on what they have read. For those who are not afraid of the possibility that the new information received may turn out to be such that they will have to revise their worldview, that is, their inner idea of the World around us.

Once again I want to emphasize that in my articles I express my personal opinion, I try to show my vision of the surrounding World, which does not at all pretend to be “the ultimate truth”. I myself have many more questions to which I have no answer. At the same time, I realize that not all the answers that I have already found are correct. To a large extent, this requires the publication and constructive discussion of certain theories in order to identify weaknesses in them.

To the best of my strength and abilities, I try to show the thinking reader one more point of view on the surrounding World. To accept it or not, this is a personal matter for everyone. I absolutely do not need to just take my word for it. Check, compare, find your answers to questions. It is true that what really works and helps to solve certain of our problems, everything else is from the "Evil One". At the same time, problems are understood not only "how to fill your stomach", but also how to ensure the survival and long-term sustainable development of Mankind.

Modern science estimates the age of our Universe at 13.7 billion years. Dimensions, according to different methods, from 46 to 156 billion light years (light year about 9, 5e15 meters). To represent the ratio of the sizes of the macro- and microcosm, you can take a look at the wonderful presentation "scale of the scale of the universe." Most of us can easily repeat such numbers, perceiving them as some kind of abstract concepts, but with great difficulty can really understand such scales of time and space. We simply have nothing to compare it with. The world of most people in space is limited not even by the size of the planet, but by the city where they live. Our lifespan is measured in several tens of years, so we hardly realize what a thousand years is, and millions and billions of years are no longer a conscious abstraction.

The age of the Earth is estimated at 4.54 billion years, the time of the origin of life, which today is called by official science, is about 1.5 billion years, and the emergence of Homo sapiens was only about 200 thousand years ago.

The range of temperatures in the Universe is also very large, from 2.7 degrees K of the relic vacuum radiation to 70 thousand degrees K on the surface of blue stars and, according to some theories, up to a million degrees K inside (the surface temperature of our Sun is estimated at 5780 degrees K).

The protein form of life based on carbon compounds, to which we belong, is actually very capricious and demanding on the conditions of the environment. Biochemical reactions normally take place in a very narrow temperature range. For warm-blooded animals, the temperature optimum lies in the range of 36-42 degrees C. At temperatures above 45 C, the processes of thermal denaturation (destruction) of protein molecules begin. At temperatures close to zero, biochemical reactions proceed very slowly, and at temperatures below 0 C, water freezes and the reactions stop altogether, and many cells are completely destroyed during freezing.

In other words, for the emergence and maintenance of organic life, it is necessary to maintain a very narrow temperature range of about 30-40 degrees, which is thousandths of a percent of the total temperature range found in the Universe. For all other physical parameters that are necessary for the emergence and development of protein organisms, including the mandatory presence of water, the composition of the atmosphere, its pressure and humidity, the conditions are no less severe. The probability of the accidental appearance of all the necessary conditions on one planet is close to zero, it is the poet that the official "scientists" still argue about "is there life in the Universe", implying that they mean exactly the same protein form of life as we do …

On the other hand, the plasma itself, high pressure and temperatures above 2000 K are required to start the formation of plasma self-organization and the formation of stable structures in it. Similar structures are observed on the Sun in large numbers. Even the red, "coldest" stars have a surface temperature of 2000 K - 3500 K. All stars have high pressure, as a result of their large mass, and are completely composed of plasma. That is, in the Universe we observe, the presence of conditions for the emergence of self-organizing living plasma organisms is almost 100%. The existence of conditions for the emergence of protein life at the moment is reliably known only on one planet Earth.

I don’t know about everyone else, but it’s obvious to me personally that the probability that over billions of years the internal structures of stars could reach a complexity sufficient for the emergence of Intelligence is billions of times higher than the probability of the accidental appearance of a protein form of life on Earth, not to mention that she had accidentally developed to the level of Homo sapiens.

In our Universe, the protein form of life is secondary. The primary life is the Stars - giant plasma Intelligent living organisms. Today from the Earth we can observe about 1 million 600 thousand galaxies, this is a photograph taken using a special technique at a wavelength of 2 microns

03-01 Galaxies of the Infrared Sky
03-01 Galaxies of the Infrared Sky

The total number of stars in the Universe is estimated by a number that can be represented as one followed by 24 zeros. This is another quantity that our brain is simply not able to fully comprehend. The world's population is now officially estimated at just over 7 billion people (9 zeros).

So, whether someone wants it or not, but it is the Stars that are the dominant form of life in our Universe. But most of us find it difficult to accept this fact, since we are taught from childhood that it is a person who is the most perfect creature in the Universe. We are the "crown of evolution", "Kings of Nature", etc. To admit the obvious fact that on the scale of the Universe a person is similar to a microbe in comparison with a person himself, well, I really don't want to.

All this is good, skeptics will say, but you invented everything about plasma self-organization and the formation of certain structures in it. Where are the facts, where are the proofs?

The first experiments, which unexpectedly showed the fact that plasma is capable of self-organization, were carried out by our cosmonauts in orbit. More details can be found in the video.

It turned out that in zero gravity, the plasma behaves not at all like a liquid, but like a crystal. At the same time, there is also such a phenomenon as "dusty plasma", when the inside of the plasma contains dust grains ranging in size from 10 to 100 nanometers. But the most interesting thing is that computer modeling of the processes occurring in dusty plasma, which was carried out by the group of Professor Gregor E. Morfill from the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, unexpectedly showed that dusty plasma is capable of forming structures that are very similar to DNA spirals!

Usually in a laboratory, plasma crystals are a group of particles uniformly distributed in space. But this time, Morfill decided to simulate the behavior of these particles using a computer. As a result of such an experiment, the conditions were, of course, ideal - without any external influences, including gravity.

Imagine the surprise of Morfill and his colleagues when they saw that as a result of computer simulation, something different from what happens in real conditions happened! As a result of their experience, it turned out that plasma crystallization led not to the appearance of granules regularly distributed in space, but to the formation of long chains of dust grains.

Interestingly, these chains twist themselves into spirals. In addition, they are stable and able to interact with each other. This is rather strange and, one might say, suspicious, because, as the researchers noticed in an article published in the New Journal of Physics, such features are usually characteristic of the organization of living matter. In particular, for DNA …

03-02 Plasma DNA
03-02 Plasma DNA

These computer structures, as it turned out, can evolve over time, becoming more resilient. In addition, for certain plasma parameters, spirals can be attracted to each other - despite the fact that their charge is the same. They are also capable of making copies of their own.

The process of creating a copy of a spiral implies the existence of an intermediate vortex of particles that appears next to a depression in one spiral and creates a new depression in another (illustration by Tsytovich V. N. et al.).

Even more interesting is that parts of the spirals can be in two stable states with different diameters. And since many segments with different sections can be placed on one spiral, they, obviously, can transmit information in this way.

Full article about these experiments

It is interesting that the article says that the existence of such spiral structures by the Morfill group was obtained only theoretically, although if you carefully watch the video about the experiments of our cosmonauts, then at the end there is a demonstration of exactly a similar spiral structure that was obtained experimentally. It is obvious that after such discoveries, which require a serious revision of our ideas about the Universe and the place of man in it, the official science is in some confusion. This is also evidenced by the comments at the end of the article about the experiments with the dusty plasma of the Morfill group, where most commentators did not dare to call it life, with the exception of our Vadim Tsitovich, who said the following:

These complex self-organizing structures in plasma have all the properties necessary to qualify them as candidates for the title of inorganic life form.

Recommended: