Do they really think they can escape the flood in the foothills?

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

The foothills where I currently live has a popular topic that many of you have heard of. This is the topic of survival in the event of a global flood on the planet. It is believed that at an altitude of 150+, it will be possible to escape the consequences of the likely rise in sea levels expected due to global warming. Indeed, in our area there are a LOT of sectarians of different stripes, most of whom came to flee. This article will be instructive for those who have also contracted this especially dangerous virus of stupidity about rescue in the foothills.

In short, all people who save themselves in advance in this way, moving to the foothills, have the following set of characteristics: they are atheists (regardless of faith), they have superficial straightforward thinking (regardless of the presence of academic degrees), pronounced self-centrism and a very limited set of knowledge about the world, which they generally do not try to expand (despite attempts to deeply study any esoteric nonsense). Each characteristic can be more or less pronounced in different people, but all of them are present in one way or another. And now I invite the reader to read my counterarguments against the possibilities of rescue at altitude, from which all the necessary justifications for the above characteristics of naive sufferers will follow.

First

A naive seeker of a flood rescue position, apparently, believes that everything will look something like this: he sits in his house at a height of 150 meters or more, everything looks exactly the same as always, the birds are singing, you can go to the grocery store, calmly to walk in nature, but all other people who live below the specified mark suffer and suffer, or even drowned. Seriously, they seem to really think that everything will be exactly like this, and do not even realize that their habitat, long before the flood, may become one of the most dangerous on the planet. Firstly, such global events as a rise in the water level cannot take place instantly, this is a long process, and many people, naturally, will begin to panic long before the first tens of meters are submerged.

Secondly, during a panic, people will start to run somewhere and save themselves, and this will happen spontaneously. Do you know why it is almost never impossible to escape from a burning building? Because everyone starts pushing and running to the exit, clogging it up so that no one will come out. However, with more dignified behavior, EVERYONE would calmly have time to go out simply on foot, even without too much haste. The same situation is often observed on highways, when, for example, there are three lanes for traffic in one direction, and two of them are closed for repairs. There is only one left. EVERYONE rushes and pushes into this hole in order to quickly pass the narrowing of the carriageway. As a result, we have a traffic jam for an hour or two. However, if you just reduce the speed by half and calmly rebuild everyone in one row, you can safely pass the obstacle at a speed of 50 km / h, and not 2. But this is too difficult for people who think in terms of “the main thing is for me to be in time faster!”, That is, standing on positions of self-centrism. More severe manifestations of panic during natural disasters can be found in the note of the USSR VP "Hurricane Katrina as a manifestation of social issues", when a small (when compared with the scale of the expected flood) natural phenomenon turned a good part of an entire large city into animals.

And so, our seeker of salvation believes that people who have gone mad from the flood, who managed to escape, will come to his village and will do nothing to him at all. They will not take away the house, they will not demolish the fence, they will not devour everything in the garden, but they will simply come and sit there on the grass as if they had come to a picnic. Just like during the revolution of 1917, no one offended the nobles, they did not take the land from the landowners through the "decree on land" on October 26, and did not transfer it to the peasant deputies. Was that so?

And no one stole anything, there was no robbery on the sly. Everything was somehow quiet and calm. Am I right? If not, then why do those seeking salvation expect everything to be somehow quiet and peaceful?

Second

Global warming (IF this hypothesis is believed at all) has MANY other consequences besides rising water levels. These are serious climate changes, as a result of which, for example, new diseases may appear, or those diseases that exist now only in African countries or somewhere in India will come to Russia.

Since the global flood will affect not only one country, but all others, military clashes cannot be avoided. It is generally difficult to predict what will happen to the economic system. How the food chains in animals will be disrupted and what will happen to the planet as a result - no one knows.

Thus, our sufferers think too superficially if they think that it is enough just to climb higher - and everything will be covered in chocolate. A lot of other consequences, which they do not even suspect, can turn the lives of such people into hell, especially against the backdrop of a wave of refugees who are unlikely to spare the "snickering parasites", and it is precisely such views that can easily appear in relation to those who are in a hurry in advance, having bought up a bunch of land, while it was cheap. After all, remember that "kulaks" could be not only snickering farmers, exploiting workers or profiting from speculation, but also really honest laborers who achieved a lot with their labor and talent, but the CPSU (b) did not particularly divide one and the other: dispossess everyone - and business with an end. That is, it does not really matter whether you bought a lot of land through honestly earned money or somehow stole somewhere, but the only important thing is that you have a lot of land, but the refugees do not have it … and there are a lot of refugees themselves … but land in general, there is very little in the world … so it is necessary to share … I think it is not worth continuing the thought.

Third

People fleeing in this way believe that they are in a more advantageous position than others: "I am high, the water will not reach me, and all the others who do not have time to swim away will drown." In reality, this is a typical atheistic and materialistic position, because, firstly, we are talking only about physical salvation, and, secondly, the fact that God is not indifferent to the events taking place is not taken into account. If God wills to save any person (in the physical sense) from those who remained in the flooded place AND IF this person himself wants to be saved, then God will save him IN ANY scenario and development of events and with ANY actions of ANY other people. If God wants to remove his protection from the physical body of the person who moved to the foothills in time, then from that moment it does not matter at all whether he is in the foothills, or somewhere else, how many guards he has, what is the height of the fence, how much money is on the accounts - none of this will save such a person from an impending social catastrophe in the event of a flood.

Accordingly, we can confidently say that such people are characterized by many other features of behavior characteristic of atheists and materialists, while it is NOT important whether these people are fond of esotericism or not. According to my observations, here almost all those who are being saved consider themselves believers or are engaged in spiritual practices, but when I talked with them on this topic, I saw nothing but a materialistic approach projected onto subtle plans. So, for example, these people may quite seriously consider that it is possible to appease some local spirits with some kind of material handouts. And some even brought their generator here, which can appease the spirits in automatic mode.

However, projecting the features of a dense plan on a thin one is a separate topic that deserves a separate article. We will not go deeper here.

Fourth

It is absolutely clear that those fleeing from the floods in the foothills do not believe God and care mainly only about their physical shell, while many of them do not produce anything, but live at the expense of others (renting out housing, selling their "esoteric" knowledge, etc. services and various anti-scientific nonsense, which tourists willingly buy). And this means that such a terrain is PERFECTLY suitable just in order to rid the world of a fairly large number of very dangerous parasites in one fell swoop. Moreover, from one married couple, I directly heard that they consider other people to be a cancerous tumor on the body of the planet, and they argued this quite aggressively.

This is a great form of provocation! This is how to collect a bunch of parasites in one place, creating a trap through the tales of the coming flood - this is really very cool and causes a feeling of admiration. Imagine this picture more vividly. So, in society there is a bunch of pseudo-esoteric-oriented useless parasites that have gone too deeply into the hedonistic-consumer form of spiritual dependence. Here we launch a fake news: "Guys, guard, the flood will come soon, everyone is finished, you can only be saved at an altitude of 150+ meters!" Parasites, trampling each other and demonstrating their "high spirituality", pushing and sweeping away everything in their path, run to flee to the foothills … and then all of them at once are covered by some phenomenon: a strong earthquake, meteorites, an explosion of a nuclear power plant, and some other some totally unexpected bullshit. Well, since the number of parasites on the planet has sharply decreased, the Flood can be canceled.

Nice, bravo!

The existence of various offshore zones and other phenomena in our world, where something can be hidden somewhere, concealed, laundered - these are exactly examples of the same provocation. Absolutely all such things are transparent and open, but not for everyone, but only for those "for whom it is necessary." Only a person with a certain morality can fall for this provocation, which will close his way to many options for constructive development. By the way, such things as a loan at interest, for example, is exactly the same form of provocation: a person knows in advance that for the sake of his comfort he creates financial problems for some other people, but he still chooses this comfort, which locks his development in some directions and at the same time accelerates the collapse approach. It seems to him that it will not be he who will manage the consequences, but those who have adapted worse, who are lower in the life chain of natural selection.

Bravo! And now, looking at the list of borrowers, we immediately see everyone who voluntarily signed their utilitarian attitude towards other people and with whom we can now ask. Due to my youthful stupidity, I also visited this list, but now I made a commitment to work out the error (the SL project allows me to personally solve this problem as well).

With the foothills and the flood, everything is exactly the same: whoever went to the wiring and went to escape, preferring a feeling of comfort to common sense - he signed his stupidity for everyone to see.

Fifth

God is not a tyrant. Everything in the world is happening in the best way in accordance with the way people deserve it. The flood and its consequences depend only on the people themselves. With a sufficiently diligent development and, as a consequence, a more nature-friendly attitude to the biosphere, there will be no global warming due to the side effects of human activity, and therefore there will be no global natural phenomena of an unpleasant nature. Everything is natural. Well, if these simple things are not clear to people, then why should this civilization continue to exist? The best option for its future turns out to be the destruction and launch of another iteration after a time sufficient for the restoration of nature.

For this reason, just such atheistic behavior is more likely to make the flood more likely and closer. So the fears associated with the flood, through a chain of cause-and-effect relationships, will lead to the fact that this very flood will just come true like a self-fulfilling forecast.

Conclusion

To save your ass from the consequences of your own stupidity, while demonstrating even greater stupidity, does not make sense at all, because such an approach does not slow down, but accelerates the catastrophic outcome, as it generates an even greater imbalance between the thin and dense plan.

The most correct way out of ANY problem has always been and will be the same: in ANY situation, remain human, believe God and understand that everything in the world is happening in the best way. And this means that if you remain human and act in accordance with human nature (and not animal), then whatever the result, it will be your best realization of yourself as the viceroy of God on Earth.

All the suffering of people is due to a lack of understanding of this simple rule. And it is very difficult to observe it. For example, I can't. And you?