Careful with the word! Part 1

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Why don't they like Russian at school?

How the Russian language was crippled in the twentieth century

OPG in philology. Part 1

OPG in philology. Part 2

OPG in philology. Part 3

S. L. Ryabtseva "Sketches of the Living Russian Language"

S. L. Ryabtseva "Dialogue at a Desk"

S. L. Ryabtseva "Children of the Eighties"

S. L. Ryabtseva "The Truth About the Russian Word"

In workshops of explosives, they do not smoke, wear special soft shoes, avoid all metal things and do not even speak loudly … Where the flesh is in danger, people are ready to give up their habits, but it does not occur to them that a thought could produce a much more dangerous explosion invisible but incorrigible

("M. O.", h. 3, 593).

A. R.- Now people more or less observe body hygiene, wash their hands before eating. But in thoughts, deeds and words, as a rule, they are monstrously sloppy …

S. R.- Indeed, the hygiene of the inner world is much more important than the hygiene of the body. In the world, another person will take with him not a body, not a temporary "shirt", but exactly what he acquired, accumulated (during the next incarnation) in his immortal (!) Spirit … but also for every word, for every thought, for not a body with a person - forever, but thoughtsand the wordshim with him - forever!

A. R … - On the ethereal tablets of the universe is fixed allthat each person has created in life. So it is arranged living intelligent universe, which we maliciously described as an accumulation of chaotic dead matter, for no reason at all developed right up to fundamental physicists …

There are forces of darkness on Earth that deliberately create a false idea of the universe, pollute the spiritual space - the sphere of the WORD, the sphere of THOUGHT.

S. R.- So you said about “ strength"Darkness … It's like saying" mighty soap bubble "or" invincible mirage "… Strange expressions, isn't it? The same is with the "forces of darkness", which by definition cannot be forces, since darkness has nothing … Absence! But strength is energy, not its absence. Here's an example. It is clear that from time immemorial Russia has come under someone's oppression. Who is our enemy? Predator or parasite? Let's figure it out. Predator strong, it makes no sense for him to grovel and hide. He attacks and destroys. A parasite (a worm, for example) is weak, vulnerable, has no power of its own. He is forced to wriggle, hide, disguise himself as a "secret power" and, most importantly, be in darkness. Until he is visible, he can tell tales of his irresistible power and feed on the fear of the victim … But as soon as they pulled him out into the light and saw this insignificance, which for so long caused pain and sucked all his strength, the worm's "power" ended.

Only the Upper World has power. And man is His co-worker. So that the combination of the words "powers of darkness" does not make sense.

A. R. - Let's stop at WORDS now … Yes?.. Recently it seems that many words are losing their meaning, and in all spheres of life …

S. R. - The word itself still carries meaning, but in the minds of people this meaning disappears … It has become fashionable to play with words, toss them to each other, like in a ball game. They are not learned. Based on precisely unassimilated words almost the entire civilization is spinning today - that's why it slides down, losing knowledge. Those who don't believe can check: turn off computers and mobile phones, give a pen and paper to any audience and check knowledge level … Is it scary?.. Well, yes, knowledge is only that a person learned, what understood, for what relies on in my life, what can transfer to others … And now words are like balloons, light and empty.

But at the same time, a turning point has been outlined, an increasing number of people are beginning to be interested in the meaning of the word … Here we are addressing them. All the more so, sensing the growing interest of the Russian people in their native word, the awakening of the people, from all the cracks, professional scammers jumped up. They succeeded with Ukraine, now they are working on Russia. The main thing they are trying to implement is their proven destructive tool: democracy in the sphere of speech. Democracy is the destruction of hierarchy anywhere, especially in the spiritual sphere. Democracy has already destroyed society, now, according to their plans, it must destroy literature and language.

Slothroots and … intruders

A. R. - In the Internet comments to our previous conversation "OPG in Philology" there are such objections (on the Kramola website):

"People's scientist Sergei Alekseev (see" Forty Russian lessons ") produces the word" people "not from Latin, but from ancient Russian root syllable "lu" - light. Those. "people" are "light-bearers." And there is no connection to Latin … [Here I will already note in parentheses: why "get rid of" from Latin?.. It's a kindred language. And the meanings of the Latin words "highlight" the meanings of the Russians … -] Therefore, it is incomprehensible, - the reader continues, - the reasoning regarding "people" and "man" - both words are very respectful. " [We are not talking about respect, but about the meaning of the roots of words. -]

Or such a comment (ibid.): “In Latin, a related word is LUDUS (game, fun, trifle). But what about the Russian initial letter L, which is pronounced as "people" and the semantic load of the initial letter:. Where do people come from here (as supposedly lifelong PLAYERS)”?

S. R. - Well, what can I say … We have about science we are talking, not about superstition. “An ancient Russian syllable root” … And I’ll say that I recently talked with one mammothybe - so what? Will you believe in mammothyba, as in the syllable root? Or do you still require provethat they exist? Both!

Or: "…" people "and" man "are both very respectful words." I answer: V. I. Dal and the Russian people have a different point of view. See Dahl's Dictionary. This article (Human) from the dictionary it is useful not just to read, but to study, to ponder the folk wisdom, then the difference between human (as a cosmic individual) and people (as plural material for self-creation human).

A. R. - A non-human?..

S. R. - A inhuman - these are only people in appearance, but they do not belong to the human race. (Compare with V. I. Dal: "We drink, eat like people; why are we non-people?")

Further… People's scientist do not choose by vote or based on emotional lecture. A scientist must have scientific knowledge, and not speculate on the people's interest in the Russian language. Scientist confirms facts his hypothesis, and does not pass off his inventions and dreams as science.

Where did you get the "semantic load" - "? " People - these are peoples, tribes and groups, united by something: good or evil, age, occupation, state or feelings, etc. " (Church Slavonic literacy. Educational essays. SPb., 1998. 588 p. S. 91). But it is better to read the article in the Dictionary of V. I. Dahl ourselves, carefully. If you want to understand well, you need to make extracts, re-read more than once. (This technique was known to everyone in Russia at one time.) I will give a quote: "we are all people, but not all people", "there are many people, but there is no man." Think about it: it turns out that PEOPLE are only potential PERSONS. A person must work hard to become a person.

It seems that today the audience of lectures does not ask the lecturer to prove anything, but simply believe him. So empty talkers have bred … To create a folk science, we must all search hard the truthrather than fantasizing.

A. R. - Followers believe that Alekseev's "philological teaching" is omnipotent, because it is allegedly true a priori (as much as "Forty Russian lessons"!) … On the Internet, I looked for the topic " syllable root " … A swarming abyss has opened … People tear words into two or three letters, not making out whether these letters refer to the root or to the ending. A the hierarchy of the parts that make up a word (the law of the Russian language!) they completely ignore.

This is the same as with the word PEOPLE: arbitrarily (following S. Alekseev) two letters are taken from the root BJ (they say, LIGHT - and BJstream here, and BJbov …) and scrutinize under different seemingly similar combinations. But what about the rest of the word? So, DI (in the word lyu-DI) - what is it?.. Also the syllable root?.. And even the end of the word does not exist?.. Well, according to S. Alekseev's breakdown, let's put this word in different cases: lyu -DYAM, LU-DEY, LU-DMI, LU-DYAKH … Is this also syllable roots?.. There is no answer … S. Alekseev claims that suffixes, prefixes and affixes interfere(!) understand speech.

But any literate person knows that suffixes form new words (maiden, girl, maiden, maiden, maid, maiden, girly, girl, girl, girl, girl, girl, etc.), and with the help endings word related in a sentence with other words (a girl came to give a gift to a girl, to admire a girl, etc.). This is how language works. How far will we advance in understanding our native language with the help of invented syllable roots?..

Alekseev claims that, for example, the syllable root BE - always knowledge (faith, broadcast) … Well, let's check: in words a bucket, a rope, a broom, a camel, a hanger are also the syllable root BE?.. After all, it was stupid!..

Let the preachers of TYPOORNEY (this myriad of abbreviations and puzzles) answer, how they gather on the basis of their theoretical nonsense to teach children to WRITE AGAINST in Russian on these "syllable roots"?.. Well, how?..

Baudouin de Courtenay and K^O tried to substitute fictitious phonemism morphological law (the law!) of the Russian language, and the current ones (like the attacker from Chekhov's story) are trying to destroy the natural composition of words, turn them into a heap of rubble.

How can a person resist such massive stuffing of false theories?..

S. R. - Very simple: read the text in a row and ask the author for each statement separately: “How can you do this PROVE?! While asserting all sorts of nonsense with aplomb, they are not going to prove it, expecting that they will be believed without checking.

Here is a sample of their actions (caught in one of the many "works" on this topic). The example is the most typical. They got the knack to mechanically parse the words in this way: "NAME, NAME, SIGN (US - picking up, attraction)". Say, these are related words.

Then they do a trick, like in a circus: distract attention a piece of US, and at this time they hide everything else. Those. arbitrarily rip a piece out of the wordwho is being manipulated. The public's attention is so focused on focus that they forget to ask, and what do the remnants of words mean:? Such analysis is akin to the manipulation of a thimble-maker. Does he educate the public? He's cheating on her! These magicians do the same destroying the hierarchical basis of language in the minds of people. There is always in the word main part (root), minor (prefix and suffix) and service (endings). This is not all, but in general terms. In fact, in the word " viceroy"There is no US, but there is a root PLACES, prefix HA, two suffixes H and IK. By the root of PLACES, we immediately recognize the nest, the relatives of this word: PLACE, VEGETABLE, LOCAL, LOCAL, etc. Here we see formation and order. And the meaning! And in the parsing of thimblers there is nothing but debris.

A. R. - But they claim that they have found a pattern in the language!..

S. R. - And how, of course, they say! What else is left for them, because they are not going to PROVE their innocence. Yes, this is impossible to do, because they write FALSE. All they have to do is to promote it with arrogance and pressure, since there is no truth, no evidence, or even just common sense.

Linguistics - exact science (cm), and these are trying to present it in the form of a kind of "humanitarianism" for which the law is not written, and there may be a dozen or more so-called "scientific schools" …

Dahl's dictionary entry:

Why don't they like Russian at school?

How the Russian language was crippled in the twentieth century

OPG in philology. Part 1

OPG in philology. Part 2

OPG in philology. Part 3

S. L. Ryabtseva "Sketches of the Living Russian Language"

S. L. Ryabtseva "Dialogue at a Desk"

S. L. Ryabtseva "Children of the Eighties"

S. L. Ryabtseva "The Truth About the Russian Word"