From man to monkey. Liberal project

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

To counteract the destructive influence of the liberal project being implemented on us, we must always strive to act humanly and remember that man is born to know and create, and not to consume and indulge his instincts.

Over the past year, there have been several news about events related to the "rights of monkeys":

- German animal activists demand legal personality status for great apes.

- The US Copyright Office has ruled that "works created by animals, nature, plants" are not copyrighted.

- New York State Court dismissed animal rights lawsuit demanding that chimpanzees be recognized as an individual.

- Some human rights have been recognized for the orangutan in Argentina.

Logically adjacent to this news is the news that according to the results of the study, monkeys and three-year-olds learn the same way.

In general, you need to know that in the West there is a movement for granting a part of human rights to animals. And he already has his own "achievements", for example, New Zealand and Spain have recognized some individual rights for the higher apes. For example, former vice president and presidential candidate Al Gore is an active and active supporter of it. (Learn more about the "monkey project", etc.)

Where does such a struggle for the "rights of monkeys" come from in the West? After all, this energy could be spent, for example, on fighting for the rights of victims of NATO interventions or police brutality in the United States. Let us analyze what goals the "monkey project" pursues and what the activation of the "fighters for the rights of monkeys" means recently.

Purpose and methodology of the "monkey project"

The aim of this whole movement is to bring man down to the animal level as much as possible. The most effective in this case will be self-determination as an animal (one of the species, albeit the most developed) by the person himself.

Obviously, a person himself, “without prompting”, will never come to such a conclusion, and this whole “monkey project” is a well-planned and controlled process (and not “the natural course of things”). And this process is carried out in accordance with the well-known Overton window method (more about Overton windows); its algorithm:

1) From the area of the unthinkable to the area of the radical (1 window).

2) From the realm of the radical to the realm of the possible (2nd window).

3) From the realm of the possible to the realm of the rational (window 3).

4) From the rational to the popular (window 4).

5) From the area of popular to the area of actual politics (5 window).

It can be seen that the process of recognizing some human rights for monkeys is at the 5th stage: discussion is already underway at the government level.

The larger-scale process of reducing man to animal, of which the "monkey project" is a part, is at the 4th stage. The first three stages were successfully completed largely thanks to Charles Darwin and his work "The Descent of Man and Sexual Selection" (his publication was the 1st stage, its discussion and recognition as truth made it possible to gradually pass to the 3rd stage). The 4th stage is implemented mainly with the help of various articles about the predominance of the animal principle in humans, about the fact that his behavior is determined by instincts, primarily sexual (skillfully neglected and thoughtlessly repeated anecdotes on this topic play an important role here).

The "Monkey Project" should be the completion of the 4th and the beginning of the 5th stages. And one should not assume that the matter will be limited to the recognition of "some" human rights in the monkey; further actions will follow to recognize all rights, and then to recognize humans as animals (all this, first at the level of such awareness by people themselves, and then at the legislative level). The film "Planet of the Apes", where people and monkeys are not fundamentally different, was created precisely with the aim of "processing" consciousness in this direction.

Purpose and methodology of the liberal project

Reducing man to an animal level - this is the essence of the liberal project, and the whole ideology of liberalism ultimately works for this. Why is it necessary for its leaders (despite the fact that the opposite is declared - human development)? It must be understood that liberalism is not a naturally born ideology, it is a project aimed at preserving and developing a "crowd-elite" society, a society in which there is a crowd (not a people) in the position of slaves, there is an "elite" in the position of masters (but in fact - slaves-overseers) are the secret, but real masters of such a society. The latter are the leaders of the liberal project (and the “monkey project” that is part of it), and the liberal project itself is a subspecies of the global slave-owning project (that is, the project of the “crowd-elite” social order), according to which human civilization has been living for millennia *.

Therefore, it is necessary to reduce a person to the level of an animal - such a person is much easier to control, it is easier to make a slave out of him, he himself will happily become one.

In the 19th century, liberalism was analyzed well by the Russian thinker Konstantin Leontyev (the work "What and how is our liberalism harmful?" In liberalism itself, all this is hidden behind the juggling of words about “rights and freedoms.” It is not difficult to imagine that with the full implementation of the liberal project, when all the prohibitions and restrictions on the manifestation of animal instincts and all kinds of perversions (in accordance with liberal ideology) are lifted, and man will be brought down to the animal level (and even lower).

The liberal project's methodology is to promote two lines at the same time:

1) The gradual real decrease in the human in man and the strengthening of the animal principle. For this, first of all, various projects of sexual promiscuity work ("liberating" the "basic" instinct from human norms): first "free love", then homosexuality, pedophilia, etc.; in Europe now it comes to such perversions that their names cannot be written without disgust. This also includes the introduction of drug addiction (including alcoholism), and all the propaganda of the consumer (that is, appropriating, not creative) way of life. Each such individual project and this entire line as a whole are implemented in accordance with the already considered Overton windows.

2) Simultaneous consolidation in the mind of a person that he is just an animal, one of the species (which was already mentioned above). It is on this line that the "monkey project" has been working, starting with Darwin.

The instruments are TV, magazines, in general, the entire modern mass culture. Interestingly, there used to be folk culture, but there was no mass culture; and now the folk culture is not visible (although it is), but the mass culture is being intensively introduced. All this suggests that the so-called. “Mass culture” is the brainchild of a liberal project, and modern media work primarily for it (although many “cultural figures” do not realize this).

About man, monkey and Darwin

Who is a man? Man “was created in the image and likeness of God,” that is, he is, first of all, a creator, his mission is to cognize and create. And ensuring its existence is a necessity, but not its goal. The liberal project, on the other hand, puts at the forefront the satisfaction of "bodily", "animal" whims. And those people who become slaves of their instincts (including the instinct of consumption, appropriation) begin to lead an essentially animal, not a human way of life (although they look like people).

Darwin hypothesized that man descended from ape, and he did so in accordance with his theory of evolution. However, this is just a hypothesis, and it has not yet been proven, although it has been recognized by the "scientific community" (acting in accordance with the liberal project). Indeed, it is difficult to suppose that a monkey (ie an animal) somehow "evolved" into a man, ie. gained reason and conscience. The following assumption looks much more logical: the monkey is the result of the process of involution, human degradation; here is its algorithm:

1) Reducing a person to an animal in morality. Some ancient "liberal" project has worked for this.

2) Reducing a person to an animal in the psyche. This has already happened in accordance with the laws of the universe: there is no need for a creature with the morality of the animal psyche of man. Nature just brought them into line.

3) Reducing a person to an animal in the intellect. The same thing: bringing the intellect in line with the psyche and morality.

4) Reducing a person to an animal in external appearance. The same law of the universe: everything should be in accordance with each other.

At the exit, it turned out to be a monkey, somewhat similar to a person. Such a hypothesis is more correct than Darwin's theory: everyone knows that development (of both a person and a society) is a difficult process, but "everything can be let down" in a very short time and without any effort. Moreover, for self-development, both moral and intellectual will is necessary, inherent only in a rational person, but not in an animal.

If we take this assumption as a basis, then we can look into the future and see the end result of the liberal project and the "monkey" project as part of it. Probably, its leaders themselves have no idea where it will lead humanity (and their descendants as well).

On the protection of the "rights" of animals

The introduction of the concept of "animal rights" into circulation is aimed at removing human responsibility for them, since now they are no longer protected by man, but by "rights." And there must be precisely the responsibility of man for animals, in general for all life on the planet, for its biosphere, for the entire Earth. And “rights” (it is interesting that we are not talking about truth or justice) is another instrument of the same liberal project and the liberal society created by it. After all, it turns out that if they forgot to mention any "rights" in the laws, then they are not.

Removing responsibility from a person (in fairness) for animals is the movement of a person one step towards the animal; empowering animals is moving animals one step towards humans. Gradually, the liberal project will lead to an equalization of human and animal rights (for a start, monkeys), i.e. the result will be achieved by the line on consolidation of its "animality" in the consciousness of man.

Summing up about the protection of the "rights" of animals: there should not be "rights" and their protection, but the protection of the animals themselves.

conclusions

1) The activation of the theme with the rights of monkeys occurs within the framework of the “monkey project”; The monkey project is part of the liberal project; the liberal project is a subspecies of the global Slave project.

2) The activation of the theme with the rights of monkeys testifies to the acceleration of the process of destruction of the old world order, one of the foundations of which is liberalism (more about the processes in the world for December 2014

3) Liberalism, both as a project and as an ideology, leads to the relegation of man to the animal level.

Conclusion

It must be admitted that almost each of us combines both man and animal in himself: in some situations (usually requiring the manifestation of the best qualities), he behaves like a real man; in others (as a rule, in everyday life) - close to the animal. And in order to counteract the destructive influence of the liberal project being implemented on us, we must always strive to act humanly and remember that man is born to know and create, and not to consume and indulge his instincts. And one must live not as imposed by the media and popular culture, but according to conscience and in accordance with the moral traditions of the people. To begin with, you need to carefully observe what is happening in the world, track the various Overton windows and expose them.

* - Other subtypes of the Slave Project were, for example, fascist or Marxist. Throughout history, the slave-owning project has been opposed by the Russian project of a just social order. Read more about the Russian project and its fight against the Slave Project during the Soviet era.

Author - Anton Rusantov