Etruscan has long been read

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Fadey Volansky and Egor Ivanovich Klassen

We will begin our story about decoding the Etruscan inscriptions from the end. Then we'll tell you about the beginning.

Brief help. KLASSEN Yegor Ivanovich (1795-1862) - Russian nobleman, German by origin. Russian subject since 1836 [6 [, p. 3. In 1831 he became a trustee of the Moscow Practical Commercial Academy. In 1826 he was a member of the Commission for the coronation of Nicholas I [6], p. 3. Doctor of Philosophy and Master of Fine Sciences, State Councilor [6], p. 109.

E. I. Klassen translated into Russian and published the most interesting work of the 19th century Polish professor-linguist Fadey Wolanski entitled "Description of Monuments Explaining Slavic-Russian History". Klassen provided the translation with a detailed introduction and comments. All this he collected in the form of a book "New materials for the ancient history of the Slavs in general and the Slavic-Russ of the Doryurik time in particular with a light sketch of the HISTORY OF THE RUSSIANS BEFORE CHRIST", fig. 1. Klassen's book was printed by the printing house of Moscow University in 1854 [6]. We refer the interested reader to this wonderful book, since today it is available in reprint editions, see, for example, [6].

Klassen bases his conclusions mainly on archaeological data and decryptions of ancient inscriptions. Here are some of Klassen's statements as an example.

He writes: “The facts that serve as the basis for the creation of the most ancient Russian history were lying under the wraps for a long time … Meanwhile, the history of ancient Slavic Russia is so rich in facts that everywhere there are traces of it, woven into the life of ALL EUROPEAN PEOPLES” [6], p. 80.

Klassen, being German by birth, notes that some Germanic historians sincerely tried to study Russian history, but turned out to be ill-prepared for this, because they did not know enough Slavic languages [6], p. 8. At the same time, Klassen speaks EXTREMELY NEGATIVELY about the German historian professors who created the generally accepted version of Russian history in the 18th century.

He says the following about them: “These UNFULFUL PERSONS include: Bayer, Miller, Schletzer, Gebgardi, Parrot, Galling, Georgi and a whole phalanx of their followers. They all Russian, characteristic, they adopted their tribe and even attempted to take away from the Slavs-Russ not only their glory, greatness, power, wealth, industry, trade and all the good qualities of the heart, but even their tribal name - the name of Russ, known from ancient times as Slavic, not only to all the Asian tribes, but also to the Israelites, from the time of their coming to the promised land. And among them the Russ are at the head of not only the Romans, but also the ancient Greeks - as their progenitors …

We know that HISTORY SHOULD NOT BE PANEGIRIC, but we will not allow them to TURN RUSSIAN HISTORY INTO SATIRE "[6], p. 8-9.

And then he quite rightly continues: “Unfortunately, I must say that some SLAVIC writers, like Karamzin, Dobrovsky and others - know or unknown - but are not completely alien to this sin. But, perhaps, these scientists were afraid to go against the then imaginary authorities. We are not talking about some of the newest Russian historians; let them - in all honesty - say for themselves why they are trying to develop Schletser's system and brand the ancient Slavs …

But, fortunately, we have two kinds of sources for the reconstruction of the ancient Slavic world: these are chronicles and monuments that speak completely against them. These sources must first be destroyed in order to make it possible to PROVEAL A BOLD LIE”[6], p. 48.

Further, Klassen writes: “The Slav-Russians, as a people, educated earlier by the Romans and Greeks, left behind in all parts of the Old World many monuments that testify to their presence there and to the most ancient writing, arts and enlightenment. Monuments will remain forever incontrovertible evidence; they tell us about the actions of our ancestors in our native language, which is the prototype of all Slavic dialects”[6], p. eleven.

We are talking about numerous archaeological sites that from time to time are found in Europe, Asia and Africa during excavations, the inscriptions on which Western European scientists allegedly "are not able to read." In fact, as will be seen from what follows, historians DO NOT WANT to read them. Because they are written in SLAVIC.

Klassen quotes the following words of the Polish linguist Fadey Volansky: “Scientists stumbled upon these monuments and worked in vain until our time by sorting out their inscriptions in the Greek and Latin alphabets. all unsolved inscriptions are ONLY IN THE SLAVIC primitive language … How far the residence of the SLAVS in AFRICA stretched in ancient times, let them prove the SLAVIC INSCRIPTIONS ON THE STONES of Numidia, Carthage and Egypt”[6], p. 73-74.

Below we will describe in more detail the most interesting studies of Fadey Volansky and his brilliant reading of the Etruscan inscriptions. Today his work has been completely silenced by historians. Moreover, PARODIES are published on him (without mentioning his name) under deliberately "learned" names. We mean, in particular, the book by G. S. Grinevich, “Proto-Slavic writing. Decryption Results”, Moscow, 1993, published in the“Encyclopedia of Russian Thought”series by the Public Benefit Publishing House. The books of the contemporary author V. A. Chudinov. Such pseudoscientific "research" is by no means harmless. And hardly sincere. Their goal is to overshadow and discredit the important scientific discoveries of F. Volansky, A. D. Chertkov and other serious scientists who deciphered many ancient archaeological inscriptions from Europe, Asia and Africa on the basis of the Slavic language. We emphasize that these inscriptions, despite the many years of efforts of specialists, did not lend themselves to deciphering on the basis of other languages.

The fate of Fadey Volansky was difficult. They could not forgive him for honest scientific research on the history of the Slavs in Western Europe. Bonfires were made from Volansky's books - quite in the spirit of the reformist pogroms of the 16th-17th centuries. Moreover, they tried to destroy the scientist himself. The following is reported: “We cannot pass over in silence the feat of the Warsaw University professor Thaddeus Wolanski. This he sought out and discovered in 1847 "The Song of the Beating of the Jewish Khazaria by Svetoslav Khorobra" … THE JESUITS FOLDED A COSTER … FROM HIS BOOKS … Such were the Jesuits in Poland in 1847. " [9], p. 277-278. However, Tsar Nicholas I imposed a ban on the execution of Fadey Volansky, who was demanded by fanatics.

Alexander Dmitrievich Chertkov and Sebastian Ciampi

Fadey Volansky was not alone in his discoveries. Even before Volansky, the Italian scientist S. Chyampi and the famous Russian scientist Alexander Dmitrievich Chertkov were engaged in decoding the Etruscan inscriptions on the basis of the Slavic language. In 1855-1857, the thorough work of A. D. Chertkov "On the language of the Pelasgians who inhabited Italy, and its comparison with the Old Slovenian" [21]. Based on the deep and comprehensive analysis of A. D. Chertkov proves that the oldest surviving inscriptions in Italy - "Etruscan" inscriptions - are made in the SLAVIC language.

The discovery of Chertkov could not suit the Scaligerian historians in any way, and they immediately accepted him with hostility. Indeed, it came into sharp contradiction with the whole picture of the Scaligerian version of history as a whole. After all, the Etruscans lived in Italy even before the founding of Italian Rome. And the city of Rome, according to Scaliger, was founded in ancient times, in the VIII century BC. e. At the same time, the history of the Slavic tribes and the Slavic language in the Scaligerian version of history begins much later, only in the Middle Ages. That is, according to Scaliger, the Slavs appeared on the historical arena about a thousand years later than the Etruscans lived. Therefore, in the Scaligerian version of history, it is completely impossible for the Etruscans to write in Slavic.

Probably, nevertheless, suspecting that the Etruscan inscriptions conceal a serious danger to the Scaligerian chronology, historians of the 19th century finally convinced themselves and others that the Etruscan inscriptions allegedly “were completely unreadable” (see below for more details). And then there were scientists who read them in SLAVIC! This overturned all the established ideas about ancient history, in particular - about the history of Rome. But the history of Rome is the cornerstone of the entire historical and chronological version of Scaliger. Thus, the works of Chertkov, Chiampi, Volansky came into sharp conflict with the Scaligerian history and chronology in general. Historians had absolutely nothing to argue on the merits, so they resorted to the usual method in such cases - hushing up "objectionable" discoveries. They pretended that they simply do not exist.

Let us give brief information about A. D. Chertkov. He was an outstanding scientist of his time, who did a lot for Russian history. Historians still use the fruits of his activity. Although they prefer not to remember his name. The Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary reports on Chertkov, in particular, the following.

“Chertkov Alexander Dmitrievich (1789-1858) - archaeologist and historian, the grandson of the famous book collector S. I. Tevyashova. Serving in the Life Guards Cavalry Regiment, he took part in the wars of 1812-14, especially distinguished himself in the Battle of Kulmin. Having retired in 1822, Chertkov spent two years in Austria, Switzerland and Italy; in Florence, he became close to Sebastian Ciampi, AUTHOR OF THE FAMOUS BOOK ABOUT POLAND'S RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA AND ITALY … With the opening of the Turkish campaign in 1828, he again entered military service, but at the end of the campaign he left military service forever and lived permanently in Moscow … Soon … devoted himself exclusively to the study of Russian history and Russian and Slavic antiquities. One of his first works in this field was "Description of Russian coins" (Moscow, 1834) with "Additions" (1837, 1839 and 1841). IT WAS THE FIRST TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SCIENCE AND LAYED THE BEGINNING OF AN EXACT, SYSTEMATIC DESCRIPTION OF OUR ANCIENT COINS … The Academy of Sciences awarded the full Demidov Prize for Description, but Chertkov refused it, providing money for the publication of Ostromelia. Possessing an extensive collection of the most ancient Russian coins, he, together with Count S. G. Stroganov, took an active part in stopping the then widespread counterfeiting of ancient Russian coins. Further works of Chertkov, mostly published initially in the publications of the Moscow Society of Russian History and Antiquities: "On ancient things found in 1838 in the Moscow province, Zvenigorod district" (M., 1838); "Description of the embassy sent in 1650 from Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich to Ferdinand II the Great Duke of Tuscany" (M., 1840); "On the translation of the Manassian Chronicle into the Slavic language, with an outline of the history of the Bulgarians", brought to the XII century. (M., 1842); "Description of the war of Grand Duke Svyatopolk Igorevich against the Bulgarians and Greeks in 967-971." (1843); "On the number of Russian troops who conquered Bulgaria and fought with the Greeks in Thrace and Macedonia" ("Notes of the Odessa General History and Russian Antiquities", for 1842); "About the Beloberezhye and the seven islands on which, according to Dimeshka, the Russian robbers lived" (1845); "On the resettlement of the Thracian tribes beyond the Danube and further north, to the Baltic Sea and to us in Russia, that is, an outline of the ancient history of the Proto-Slavs" (1851); "Thracian tribes living in Asia Minor" (1852); "Pelasgo-Thracian tribes inhabiting Italy" (1853); "On the language of the Pelasgians who inhabited Italy and its comparison with Old Slovenian" (1855-57), etc. Having inherited a significant library from his father and maternal grandfather, Chertkov diligently expanded it mainly with works about Russia and Slavs … in all European and Slavic dialects. In 1838 g.he published the first volume of the description of his library "The General Library of Russia or a catalog of books for studying our fatherland in all respects and details", seven years later the second volume of the "Catalog" appeared, in total there were 8,800 books in both volumes … but before the formation of the Rossica department in the Imperial Public Library, it represented the ONLY VALUABLE COLLECTION OF BOOKS ABOUT RUSSIA AND THE SLAVS IN RUSSIA, and by the abundance of the rarest editions it served and serves as the RICH TREASURE ABOUT RARE MANUSCRIPTS …

The Chertkov library was transferred to the jurisdiction of the city and placed at the Rumyantsev Museum (later the Chertkov Library actually served as the basis for the creation of the modern State Public Historical Library in Moscow - Auth.) … Chertkov was vice-president, then president of the Moscow Society of Russian History and Antiquities "[24].

It is noteworthy that in the article from the Encyclopedic Dictionary, the work of A. D. Chertkova "On the language of the Pelasgians who inhabited Italy, and its comparison with the Old Slovenian" is mentioned only in passing as an insignificant work. In many other encyclopedias and historical studies devoted to Chertkov, complete silence is generally kept about her. But in this fundamental work Chertkov, no less, provides a solution to the problem over which whole generations of Etruscan scholars have fought. In it, he lays the foundations for decoding the Etruscan language and proves that this language is SLAVIC.

I must say that for the first time the idea that the Etruscan language is Slavic was expressed not even by Chertkov, but by the Italian Etruscan scholar Sebastian Ciampi, with whom Chertkov was personally acquainted. Chertkov refers to Chiampi in his work on the language of the Etruscans (or Pelasgians, as they were called in the 19th century). Below we will talk about Chyampi and Chertkov in more detail. Here, for now, we only note that it was Chiampi who owned the initial idea that the Etruscans were Slavs. However, having not met with approval in the scientific community, he did not complete his research. Chertkov developed Chiampi's idea, carried out its scientific verification and gave an exhaustive proof that the language of the Etruscans is indeed a Slavic language.

Please note in what expressions the Encyclopedic Dictionary writes about Chiampi, see above. Say, Chyampi is the author of a certain "well-known book about Poland's relations with Russia and Italy." Complete silence about the fact that Chyampi is the author of the fundamental hypothesis about the Slavic origin of the Etruscan language.

In fig. 2 we present a portrait of the remarkable Russian scientist Alexander Dmitrievich Chertkov. Unfortunately, we could not find a portrait of Sebastian Ciampi.

Why Chyampi, Chertkov and Volansky, despite their obvious correctness, did not manage to convince historians?

The most important for history results of deciphering the ancient written monuments of Italy (and not only Italy), obtained by S. Chiampi, A. D. Chertkov and F. Volansky, are still not perceived by historians. For the simple and unique reason that THESE RESULTS CONTRACT SCALIGERIAN CHRONOLOGY. And no evidence, no clarity of the Slavic decipherment of an ancient monument found, for example, in Egypt or Italy, will not be able to convince the Scaligerian historian that these places were once inhabited by the Slavs. As long as the Scaligerian version of history dominates in his head, he will be deaf to even the most obvious arguments of reason.

On the other hand, neither Chyampi, nor Chertkov, nor Volansky, nor their other like-minded people, being under the same influence of false Scaligerian chronology, could not satisfactorily explain the presence of ancient SLAVIC written monuments discovered by them in Western Europe, Asia and Africa. Perhaps, in particular, this is why their voice remained unheard.

But today, thanks to the New Chronology, we can finally put everything in its place. And to give those necessary explanations that neither Chertkov, nor Volansky, nor Klassen, nor many other conscientious researchers of the monuments of the past could give.

The essence of the matter is that we should not talk about some incredibly ancient eras - as Chyampi, Chertkov, Volansky and Klassen thought - but about the events of the XIV-XVI centuries AD. All those monuments, which will be discussed below, were created, according to our reconstruction, already AFTER THE GREAT SLAVIC CONQUEST, in the XIV-XVI centuries AD. See our book Slavic Conquest of the World.

Download the book "Et-Ruski: The Riddle They Don't Want to Solve"