Does nature need protection? Bright future or ecological disaster
Does nature need protection? Bright future or ecological disaster

Video: Does nature need protection? Bright future or ecological disaster

Video: Does nature need protection? Bright future or ecological disaster
Video: Did the Soviet Union win WW2 alone? 2024, April
Anonim

There is a theory that nature is so powerful that the influence of human activities on it is practically zero. Indeed, during the "world flood" there were no giant factories and factories that polluted the water and air of big cities; cars with exhaust gases; and regular rocket launches into space that create ozone holes. Everything on Earth has developed and develops according to laws that are completely unknown to us.

So is it worth paying serious attention to ecological and environmental protection activities, or is it just another niche for some groups of people to obtain the necessary material benefits?

TV show "Cultural revolution" the topic of the broadcast "Nature does not need protection" broadcast 2017-04-05

Discussion participants:

- Alexander Kislov - Head of the Department of Meteorology and Climatology of the Faculty of Geography, Moscow State University named after M. V. Lomonosov, professor;

- Vitaly Sundakov - professional traveler, expert on the planet's lullaby civilizations and extreme climatic territories;

- Mikhail Pavlov - Co-Chairman of the Center for Socioeconomics of the Faculty of Economics, Moscow State University named after M. V. Lomonosov;

- Danila Medvedev - philosopher, futurologist;

- Robert Nigmatulin - Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Scientific Director of the P. P. Shirshov RAS;

- Matvey Shparo - Arctic researcher, head of the Center for Continuing Education.

Recommended: