Video: Historians are drunk after this video. Tartary is a Russian state. DNA Mongol Tatars Slavs Scythians
2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55
In the comments to articles and videos about Tartary, we are sometimes asked to pay attention to the fact that Tartary is a non-Russian state. Well, let's deal with genetics. Let's look at the ruling dynasties of the Tatar-Scythians, at the research of DNA genealogy, in particular, the so-called "Aryan" haplogroup R1a.
Scythian conquerors If we open the “Historiography of the Slavic Kingdom” by Mavro Orbini of 1601, we will find lines about the conquest of Eurasia and Africa by the Slavs and we will see the almost complete identity of the Slavs with the Sarmatians and Scythians. It is obvious that modern historical science does not know something … or does not say anything. Where and when did the Slavs conquer half the world? Another question: if the Tatars were mainly carriers of Turkic or Mongolian genetics, then probably it should have somehow manifested itself in the territories conquered by the Tatars? Let's check.
Let's open the diagram “Genealogy of ancient emperors of Tartaria, descendants of Genghis Khan” from the book “Historical Atlas” by Nicholas Gudeville in 1721. Before us is a diagram of the descendants of Genghis Khan, whom the authors of the document divided into 4 branches. The first branch owned Kipchak / Kapchak, that is, the south of modern Ukraine and Moldova, as well as the territories of the Caucasus and present-day Tatarstan. In the Russian version, this is the Polovtsian steppe. The second branch of the descendants of Genghis Khan ruled the lands of TransoXan (or Zagatay) and Turkestan, the ancestral home of the Turks. The third branch belonged to the Golden Horde, the country of Mogolov (that is, India) and Northern China. Representatives of the fourth branch of the descendants of Chingiz ruled in the lands of Khorasan, Persia, India. But only the descendants of Genghis Khan are mentioned here. Later we will see that the area of distribution of the Tatars' power was much wider. Little Tartary in Europe and the Turks Let's start with Europe.
On maps up to the middle of the 18th century, one can see the possessions of the Tatars in Eastern Europe. In the historical remark to the genealogical scheme just shown, it is said that the Europeans have no idea in what exact period the Tatars conquered these lands. For example, on the maps of the alleged XIV century under the great Khan Usbek, these lands really belong to him - the flags of the Scythian Tatars fly over the cities of this region. The Kumans, or Kipchaks, are the Polovtsians.
Either a derivative from “people of the fields”, “steppes”, or from “sex” - from Church Slavonic “straw” - that is, these are people with yellow hair like straw. “Kapchak” means “lucky” from the Turkic language. And who are the Turks or Turks, Turkomans? "The ancient layer of the ethnogenesis of the Turkmens was also made up of the ancient tribes of the steppes, known as the Sako-Massaget (by the way, the Saki are, in fact, the Scythians) and the Sarmatian-Alan (that is, the Slavic-Alan)."
The book of 1676 says that the majority of "born Turks" (obviously, Turkmens) "still support (that is, honor) their barbarian ancestors and put Scythian and Tatar marks on their foreheads and limbs." In the 15th century, the Turkmens, who had previously settled in Anatolia, shortly before the capture of Constantinople, seized the lands that began to be called Little Tartaria.
On some maps of the 18th century, the northern and northwestern Black Sea coast is divided into Ochakovskaya, Budzhakskaya and Malaya Tartaria. Later, by 1740, Russia conquered territory from the Ottomans, part of it called Little Russia, Little Russia. Now who are the Ottomans.
In the description of the map of the Ottoman Empire, published in the 17th century, it is said that Osman, or Ottoman Gazi, was a military man under the Great Khan of the Tatars. It turns out that Osman, a Turkic warrior with a Tatar passport, decided to make himself a career as a ruler in the neighboring lands. It is possible that “OTTOman” is generally a position - ataman - a military man of the Scythian-Tatars.
Mamilyuki - Egyptian Cossacks In Egypt, everything began with the Abbasid dynasty - by the way, relatives of the Prophet Muhammad; these rulers recruited gulyams (that is, youths, “servants of the court”), mainly from the Turks-Kipchaks-Cumans-Polovtsians, as well as Georgians and Circassians, as their personal guards.
Then they took shape in the regular Egyptian army - the Mamilyuk (“Mamluk” from Arabic means “belonging”). Do not forget that, in fact, these are former citizens of Tartary. The next Egyptian Fatimid dynasty continued the tradition of maintaining the Muslim Mamluk army.
Related materials:
And also our previous videos on the topic:
about the formation of Tartary
about the pyramids and tombs of Tartary
about the book about the Slavs
about the Slavs in Britain
about Europe
about the flag and coat of arms of Tartary
about facts about Tartary
Recommended:
Scythians, Sarmatians, Mughals, Tartars - ancient names of the Slavs
In the official history there are many mysteries, one of them is who the Scythians are, where they came from, where and why they disappeared, these are the questions that this video article is designed to answer
WORLD AFTER VIRUS. PLANET AFTER ZERO
What if the pandemic of some kind of virus was inflated to the size of a mental epidemic? Then she will fulfill the tasks that only a world war would solve, because as a result of an emergency, quarantine, unprecedented measures will be taken, thanks to which a completely new world will come
How historians composed the Mongol Empire. Part 2
As Montaigne said, "People believe in nothing more firmly than in what they least know." Historical knowledge, or rather ignorance, is the same. Most people are fanatically confident in the existence of Ancient Hellas, Ancient Rome, Ancient Babylonia and Ancient Rus
How historians composed the Mongol Empire. Part 3
Even professional historians, no matter how stupid they are, understand that without weapons the Mongols could not conquer anyone, it will not work to prove that they have metallurgy, but they need to be armed with something. And then they came up with the idea that the Mongols did armor-piercing superbows
How historians composed the Mongol Empire
As Montaigne said, "People believe in nothing more firmly than in what they least know." Historical knowledge, or rather ignorance, is the same. Most people are fanatically confident in the existence of Ancient Hellas, Ancient Rome, Ancient Babylonia and Ancient Rus