Hate and common sense

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

What is the main disadvantage of classical education? The answer is dogmatic. From the very first day of schooling, every schoolchild is taught that there is no need to reinvent the wheel, because it has long been invented, and it is necessary to develop the already known and search for the unknown.

But what about the fact that if a researcher relies on an erroneous theory, then he inevitably moves further and further from the truth, and leads the development of science along the wrong path?

There can be only one way out of this situation: - to question everything, even the unshakable, fundamental, considered the truth in the first instance. Indeed, quite recently, the statements that:

- the machine gun will never shoot under water, - an apparatus heavier than air will never fly, - at a speed of 60 miles per hour, a person will suffocate, etc. The list is endless.

What would happen to us now if no one questioned these postulates? Right…

And if we leave science, and consider such a delicate area as morality? Does it need to be as flexible as science? The answer is obvious: - NO. Without unshakable moral principles, humanity will die out within two or three generations. What we are seeing now. What was considered impossible until recently has now become the norm. It started with a little thing, with a change in terminology. When the whore turned into a "socialite", and buggers began to be called a cute nickname "gay". It would seem that everything is clear, and there is nothing to talk about, however …

One of the highest virtues is loyalty to ideals. For example, even the thought of betraying the faith of ancestors is considered unacceptable. You were born into an Orthodox family, and you must be an Orthodox Christian, otherwise you will become a renegade, apostate, a traitor to the memory of your ancestors, etc. But guys … Ancestors themselves, at some point, betrayed the faith of their ancestors! How shoud I understand this? The ancestors of the ancestors were pagans, glorified Rod, Svarog, Lada and Perun, and also hoped that their descendants would strictly adhere to the worldview of previous generations.

But for some reason, their descendants suddenly became renegades, and adopted an alien Christianity, in fact, voluntarily doomed themselves and all subsequent offspring to slavery. How to deal with this?

Here's another example. In the Third Reich, citizens sincerely believed in the ideals of National Socialism, and suddenly they were told they were wrong. Why should they trust strangers and betray their ideals ?! So all the Germans who admitted that they were wrong and believed in false ideas are scoundrels and unprincipled opportunists?

On the face of the paradox. And it may very well be that there is no solution to this paradox. However, let us recall what the legendary founder of the airborne troops of the USSR V. F. Margelov. He deciphered the abbreviation of the Airborne Forces as: - "Always Two Hundred Variants." And he's damn right! Thank you, Uncle Vasya (one of the popular variants of decoding the Airborne Forces - "Uncle Vasya's Troops") for such a lesson.

Truth is never alone. True, more often than not, it is in the middle between mutually exclusive statements. For example, it so happens that those who argue that ice is water, and those who shout that water is what flows from the tap, and still others who argue that steam is water, are equally right. and there is water. But even the first and the second and the third, until recently, did not suspect that there is a fourth statement. It turns out that water can also exist in a plasma state!

What does this mean? That it is necessary to listen to each other, to admit the possibility of one's own wrong, at the same time not depriving the opponent of the chance to be right, or rather one of those who expresses one of the true versions of a certain event.

Here's a recent example. An acquaintance of mine is categorically against any war, in any form. He's right? Undoubtedly. But what about the fact that peace is impossible without war? To stop the war, you have to fight, whether you want it or not. If you refuse to participate in hostilities, you will receive in return slavery and oppression at best, at worst, your family will disappear from the face of the Earth. So that? Is it good that he is so consistently advocating for peace?

And here's another. One musician and poet, in the past very beloved by the people, from an early age fought with the system, more precisely with the state. And he so sacredly believed that one must always fight with any state that he cannot stop to this day. Protesting against the current regime is like paranoia. To change the record, for him, means giving up the principles. And to admit that this is paranoia, there is no possibility, otherwise the world will collapse, the very foundation of its worldview will collapse. However, the example is not entirely successful, since it turned out that this “singer of freedom”, who in no way can stop his “battle with fools,” in fact, is not so principled. When it comes to money, ideals disappear like a dream.

And now about the saddest thing …

Today, when the fate of our Motherland is again under the powerful blow of the "civilized world", we Russians must unite into a single organism, into a single brain, otherwise we simply will not be. Russians are not only those who consider themselves "ethnic Russians". For me, Russians are all those who consider Russia their homeland, their country. An official sending his child to study abroad is NOT a Russian. And a Bashkir, Tatar, Chechen, or Yakut who considers himself Russian outside of Russia is a REAL RUSSIAN.

Society is split. Split for an idiotic reason. More idiotic, and hard to invent. Not ideology, not religion, but attitudes towards

The personality of the President became a decisive factor in the confrontation between the "Soviets" and "advanced denunciators of a swindler and a thief." Fidelity to principles does not allow very many people to admit a simple fact. Once deciding that they would hate to the grave the traitor to the nation, the leader of the Leningrad mafia, they are unable to react to changes in the situation. I called this phenomenon "Nineties Jamming."

The "stuck" until now think in terms of the transition period from Yeltsin's "seven-bankers" to Putin's "cooperative-Ozersky". To this day, they only see bad roads and fools in their offices. They cannot understand in any way that the world is actually changing, and changes for the better are visible in Russia with the naked eye. It takes time to realize that our confrontation is the most powerful brake on rapid change.

It is necessary to realize, and finally, to recognize that today a situation has arisen in which part of the interests of ordinary citizens and part of the interests of the ruling elite coincided. So isn't this a reason to use the situation in the interests of the people? Who would benefit from the fact that we made a vow to hate Putin, and we will hate him in any situation?

And if, for example, you are drowning, are about to hide under water, and suddenly Putin will lend you a hand of salvation? Are you going to go to the bottom on principle? "To spite my grandmother's ears will frostbite"? And while you continue to consider yourself smart, right? A principled, staunch fighter against evil?

Is it really not clear that those who dream of bringing Russia to its knees are only rubbing their hands, watching how many morons there are in Russia - Stoics, who value principles more than their own Motherland! Anyway … To hate is so stupid and humiliating! You have to be a complete fool to blame one person for all the troubles. You laugh at the fact that Ukrainians with maniacal persistence blame Russia for all the troubles. More precisely, not even Russia, but personally Putin. But at the same time, just like they continue to spit saliva on their President. Whatever it is, the height of stupidity is internal squabbles at a time when the external enemy does not even try to hide his true goals, and openly wages a war against our common Motherland. This is also the Motherland of Putin, right?

And in such a situation, it is not just stupidity. This is already a betrayal. Playing into the hands of the enemy at any time was considered a betrayal. No, I didn’t say that everything is “in chocolate”, and Putin took care of how to make the life of every Russian happy. No, the shepherd and the flock have different interests, and they are essentially opposite. But there is common sense! If you are drowned in the same river with the enemy, maybe it makes sense to think about why you BOTH are drowned? Maybe you are not enemies at all, if someone else considers you both his threat?

I would like everyone to hear me, but not a single TV channel will be allowed on the air. I can't be silent either, that's why I do what I can. Now for us, bickering among ourselves is like death, we need to realize this. You also need to understand that breaking what exists is not subject to terminology at all. This is beyond common sense, we have already gone through this so many times. It is necessary not to break, but to improve. During the first five years, achieve at least this:

-1) Change the constitution (adopt a new one) so that the state, and not the Central Bank, have the right to issue money, and abolish the priority of international law over national.

2) Return the state monopoly on:

- medical support, - education, - use of natural resources, - transport (aviation and railway), - connection, - the banking system.

3) Deny:

- private ownership of land, water resources and their trade, - the use of hired labor by private individuals, in the amount of more than 100 people.

Then I have a lot more prepared, including the abolition of private legal practice, the revival of the state propaganda system, and much more, but this is a separate topic.

The main message was to express the idea of the need to consolidate the efforts of the entire society in a single impulse together with the President. When we demonstrate unity, hysteria begins in the West. Is this not the best proof of the correctness of such actions? Remember how we together took to the streets to demonstrate "Immortal Regiment" on May 9? This is how you need to act.

Think about who is praised by our enemies and who is being sown with mud. They love Gorbachev, Yeltsin, Nemtsov. But Stalin is hated. Ivan the Terrible is hated … Why? Because Stalin, like Grozny, was too tough for them, and made Russia independent and strong.

Now they hate Putin. Is it really not clear that since they hate, then he really is our man. To deny this is to write yourself down as paranoid, with poisoned brains, unable to add two and two. Which in the current situation is tantamount to betrayal.

Well? Will we think? Or stay true to principles?

The choice is yours. Of good!