Fake history of mankind. Stalinist skyscrapers

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

For more than a hundred years, we unconditionally believed everything that the media broadcast to us from the pages of newspapers and TV screens and school textbooks told us. But it's time to wake up. Humanity has existed on this planet for no more than 200 years and has nothing to do not only with the Egyptian (and other) pyramids, but also with the cities in which it lives. All our epoch-making scientific discoveries are a set of tales. Judge for yourself: an apple fell on Newton's head and he discovered the Law of Universal Gravitation, Archimedes took a bath and discovered (Oh! Eureka!) Archimedes' Law, Mendeleev slept and saw the Periodic Table of Elements, etc. Do you think that machine language, programming language and personal computer were invented by people? I strongly doubt it. Everything that we know about the Earth, the Solar System and the Universe suggests that, perhaps, we exist in a selected volume of the universe, a capsule of space-time, the so-called. realities and the laws of this reality, perhaps, differ from the laws of the rest of the universe. We do not know where the border of our reality lies. Maybe our reality occupies a part, or maybe the entire volume of the universe. What if the universe is just a drawing on the shell of our reality. Could this be the origin of the throwing of cosmological scientific thought: from dark matter to dark energy (it seems that these terms were borrowed from "Star Wars"). Our reality and humanity have a Creator. Yes, this is a logical dead end, but no worse than the Singularity and the Big Bang or the Biblical Divine Creation. All human history is invented and, in fact, is a heap of the Absurd. It's just incredible: how did we believe in all this for so many years? And 99% of people continue to believe! It's easier for them. Someone or Something regularly corrects our reality from the outside, throwing us new scientific ideas and technologies at the level of finished production, and setting the vector of development for humanity. If with science and technology, some kind of clarity can be traced, then what happens to our mentality is covered by twilight. We have ceased to understand what is happening with the human world and where everything is going. Everything is mixed up: moral guidelines, human values. Is this the result of outside interference, or is our consciousness simply not keeping pace with the rapid scientific and technological progress? In particular: this is an absurd opposition of the Russian world to the rest. Do you think this is a natural course of events, or do our leaders play roles in a play they only know (or maybe they don’t even know about it)? Personally, I tend to the latter. It is enough to take a close look at the behavior of GDP (it has long had nothing to do with Russian reality). Nothing has ever depended on people on this planet, and the possibility of choice is just an illusion. Let's hope that everything will work out and the disaster will blow us.

Yes, these are just my thoughts, and I do not urge you to recklessly believe them, but only to look around you with a critical look and think….

The reality in which we exist is non-linear. I cannot explain exactly what it is (and hardly anyone can). In simplified terms, this means that its development in time does not occur progressively from the past to the future and at a constant rate. Perhaps it is discrete in time and cut into pieces that do not necessarily add up to a logical picture, i.e. cause-and-effect relationships can be violated. And its space does not obey the Law of Conservation of Energy and Matter (after all, icons flow myrrh, giving birth to matter out of nothing). Figuratively, our reality can be imagined as a winding road, which, if you look back, hides from us around the bend and reappears, but already another, one that we have never passed. In life, we feel this as a kind of surprise when we suddenly discover that our memory of some event, well known to us, unexpectedly differs (albeit in insignificant details) from its official version or from the memory of other witnesses of this event. We usually attribute this to forgetfulness. But what happens to human consciousness when it falls into a cause-and-effect gap, when two pieces of reality suddenly join, not connected by the fabric of time, and sometimes by logic? Do we notice this? Or is it only visible to subsequent generations, as we see blind spots in our recent history? Perhaps it is then that "eyewitnesses" of events appear that did not happen in reality?

I want to give an example of such a change in our reality based on the events of 1947-1953. We are talking about the construction of seven Stalinist skyscrapers in Moscow.

This grandiose event in the history of Soviet urban planning and architecture is perceived by us as completely natural, but upon close examination, it never happened.

The idea of their construction is attributed to Stalin, but is this so?

What is the leader (in his right mind) of a state, half of which lies in ruins after the hardest war, in which more than 20 million able-bodied and active population was lost, and half of the population is malnourished and lives in dugouts and barracks, instead of throwing all their strength and funds to restore the national economy (do not forget about the Lend-Lease debt) and make the life of the victorious people easier, will he suddenly start decorating his own capital and erecting unnecessary skyscrapers (although it is very reminiscent of the bridge to Russky Island and the Sochi Olympics)?

But it costs a lot of money and human labor. Yes, there is a documentary film about how the Moscow State University was built (I think, because it was built in an open field and not in the middle of the city), there are memories of architects who participated in the construction and those who received apartments in these fantastic new buildings, even the documents on how they were distributed are declassified these apartments are among the Soviet elite.

All this is there and all this is probably true (I'm not sure about the documentary), except for one thing: no one built the buildings themselves.

With the level of Soviet architectural thought, technologies, building materials, and the general situation in the country that existed at that time, this was simply impossible. Can you imagine what it means to withdraw from the national economy 20 million pairs of working hands of fellow citizens who died in the war? In my opinion, this is the collapse of the national economy itself …

This whole construction site is shrouded in mystery. Why? Except for the film about the construction of Moscow State University, several photographs and memoirs of "eyewitnesses", such as: one skyscraper was built at an angle on a previously artificially frozen ground, after which it thawed it took a vertical position (very similar to the American lunar odyssey), we have more about nothing is known about it.

Conclusions:

Stalin's skyscrapers were born as a result of a change in reality. What is the mechanism of this phenomenon? We can only guess about it.

Did people participate in the construction and thought that they were really building all of this, or were they just watching the floors grow over the fence of the construction site?

And perhaps the very part of reality with construction does not exist and the buildings appeared instantly, and people simply "remember" what they were building? And, surprisingly, they have been standing for 60 years in our climate, and only the cladding is falling off in some places, sculptures are decaying, and communications need to be replaced, and the Rossiya hotel (apparently, people actually built it) fell into disrepair 40 years later. and was demolished (except for the foundation, since it, apparently, is also not human handiwork).

And what about the interior decoration of high-rise buildings (especially hotels)? Could we have done this in 1953 with the help of prisoners (as the story goes)? You decide.