There was no Boeing crash in Rostov on March 19, 2016?

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

In this material, I will not describe in detail all the facts, who will be interested in this topic, who will be able to figure out the facts themselves, but I will cite the most interesting and obvious ones. Hope this stuff gets someone thinking.

In the photo, you cannot see engines, landing gear, parts of the fuselage, wings, struts, or aircraft frame anywhere. There is nothing to say about the seats, the cockpit, etc. It seems that the plane was torn into small pieces while still in the air.

In the photo before the flight from Dubai, the seats are bright blue and should just be conspicuous, and we see the complete absence of the cabin in the photos and videos, except that we found one back from the chair, but no more.

Also, there is not a single side number on the "wreckage".

There is also evidence from the first to arrive at the scene - the Rostov Emergencies Ministry. They say there was no large debris initially! The largest piece was no larger than the back of a chair. When asked: "Where is the cockpit, engines and landing gear?" - they didn’t give a clear answer, but said: “everything must have been scattered during the explosion… they themselves were surprised, but where is the plane?” There were no surviving corpses. Only small fragments of bodies.

Why so many fire engines that stand on the field, where nothing burns and there is not even a hint of smoke, why were they overtaken there? It is likely that this time the props are weak and unconvincing and it is necessary to "enhance the picture" with technique.

White Kamaz trucks, like fire trucks, roll over the "wreckage", despite the fact that this is a violation of procedural investigative actions!

We have 4 videos, as always, of dubious quality, which raise a lot of questions about their authenticity, naturally filmed on a mobile phone from monitors. And this provided that the plane could not land for two hours and everyone knew about it. There are many high quality cameras at the airport, but not a single video from them. What could the cameras have taken at the airport? Of course, not the fall of the Boeing-737, but something completely different, which would leave no doubt about what actually happened. Therefore, these records are not, and will never be, even fake, even theoretically. And the airport employees were forbidden to comment on this incident in any way.

For example, there is a video about how video surveillance cameras work at this airport.

Regular exercises are held at the Rostov airport:

The first video of the "fall" has been disassembled in sufficient detail, with a high degree of probability the location of the shooting - the Peugeot car dealership - has been calculated. But at the same time, the explosion did not occur where the "plane fell", but to the left:

This is not to mention the fact that the plane flew at about 50 degrees (according to the video), but "experts" claimed that the plane touched the strip with its tail during landing and therefore flew into small pieces.

Analysis of the video of the Boeing crash in Rostov-on-Don on March 19, 2016:

Exposing another video allegedly with the crash of a Boeing: The plane, as it were, teleports.

The outbreak occurred above the fall, how can this be?

Fly over the Boeing crash site at Rostov-on-Don airport:

Where is the actual crater from the impact, the furrows from the debris flying after the explosion, where is the burnt grass from the fuel, the burnt runway, where is it all? If the person had not been told that the plane had fallen here, he would hardly have understood this from the photo (video) of flying around the site of the "disaster". The hole, which is shown, clearly does not pull on the funnel from the fall of a multi-ton aircraft.

According to people from Rostov, who live 2-4 km from the airport, they learned about the plane crash in the morning from the news, although some claim that they saw a reddish-orange flash, but did not hear the explosion.

Correspondent Olga Solovyova, who "accidentally" found herself at the airport, was forgotten by the authorities to warn that the plane had exploded, and she acted as an "honest witness" on the air,only then was she forced to correct her testimony in terms of "sound effects."

Compare what she said first at 0:20 and then at 14:00:

There are several photos with one strut, it is exactly from the front chassis, because the rear struts of the 737 are about the thickness of a human body, and their wheels are almost the same as a man's height, yet they take on the bulk of the weight of a 70-ton colossus upon landing and must withstand enormous loads. However, they are not, but there is a wheel. The rack has been neatly disassembled, all equipment, cables, hydraulic pipes, eyes for bushings (probably titanium) in perfect condition have been dismantled, and the bushings themselves, like other debris, are completely absent.

For example, there is a photo with the front chassis of the crashed Boeing 737.

Why didn't flight FZ981 fly to Krasnodar, which is only 20 minutes away, and circled around Rostov for 2 hours?

This despite the fact that two Airbuses landed safely in Rostov at half past one in the night. One managed to fly away at half past three in the night, and the second, according to the schedule, was supposed to fly at 05:20 Moscow time, but no luck. Other planes only learned about the "catastrophe" on the runway in flight, and flew to Krasnodar or back to Turkey. The airport is calm and quiet. Nobody arrives, nobody leaves, it's time for the show to start. An Airbus has just taken off for Khujand, and has already descended for an Airbus landing from the Czech Republic. Time is H, the most convenient moment for a "catastrophe".

And these are only the basic facts, but not all, you can also add here the "efficiency" of the media (dates of publication of publications, especially in foreign publications), an article on Wikipedia that appeared on the same night, the first video that appeared, if not before the "fall" (date on youtube March 18), then no later than an hour later. Immediately appeared the pilot's last conversation. And, of course, black boxes cannot be deciphered, although they must withstand a fall from 10 km in height. Relatives and friends allegedly recruited 600-700 people at once, despite the fact that only 62 flew, 10 relatives per person? Also, almost immediately it was announced that all the victims would be determined only by DNA examination. Here you can also add how the collection of evidence is conducted: people walk with their hands in their pockets and kick evidence (they should have crawled almost with tweezers), constantly point somewhere and pretend to be working. Dogs are also clearly for the sake of appearance, as if they are looking for drugs, and not evidence, plus the density of distribution of dogs is too high (in such a search, they only interfere with each other).

About the wreckage, I also want to add that much could have been brought up to the time of loading (so that there would have been something to show), then the pieces that looked like a fallen plane appeared, but even what was eventually collected was not enough to assemble the plane in the hangar:

Do not forget that in the same Rostov, in the yard next to the airport, there is an aircraft repair plant where planes are painted, repaired and where there are all sorts of pieces of old planes in the backyard.

Most of the information is taken from this forum:

Plane crash in Rostov-on-Don Boeing flydubai March 19, 2016 analysis of events: