Fake history of mankind. Front entrances

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

I live in Bashkiria, Sterlitamak. The old city (as elsewhere in Russia) is built up with wooden log cabins, nearly 100 years old. I myself was born in this (I am 57 years old) and throughout my life carried love for their discreet but so graceful and calm beauty (as in the song of Yu. Antonov). So, many of the log cabins have a beautiful front entrance. And he was in our house. And I remember myself as a child, and the front doors were already boarded up tightly, i.e. no one used the front door. A gate in the fence was used to enter, and the house had another entrance from the courtyard. Why? Only one logical conclusion suggests itself: the front door WASN'T NEEDED BY PEOPLE IN THE START. Like all of us, I never thought about the expediency of such an architectural excess, until a year ago (under the impression of A. Kungurov's films) I got carried away with alternative history. Over the past year, I have developed my own view of the passage of humanity and all that is that surrounds us. I (as best I could) presented this view in my previous articles. In this present I offer to the readers' judgment my last observations, thoughts and conclusions in line with my views on our history.

So why spend extra money on the front door (in those, as we know, far from well-fed years) in order to immediately hammer it tightly and enter the house from the yard. Perhaps the point is in the urban planning norms of those years (officials and bureaucracy have always been), although I have come across such entrances in remote villages where they hardly had any idea of norms and rules. Everything speaks for the fact that for builders in the first place was not practicality and cheapness (as for us today), but architectural and aesthetic harmony. Unexpected priorities for people who walked in bast shoes, isn't that so ?! And they spared no effort and money for this. And often, as we can see, the aesthetic component began to live its own separate life and went beyond common sense - people immediately built a monument of wooden architecture.

Secondly, fences are stylistically different from the design of houses and discord with them. Obviously, they were built later than the houses themselves. This is now the asphalt, but imagine unpaved streets and sidewalks, which in the spring and autumn turn into an impassable swamp. And in the middle of this! Splendor the front door sparkling with lights …. It somehow does not fit, right ?! The state of the houses shows that they were all built at the same time (as, indeed, all over Russia). Where 100 years ago in the Bashkir wilderness construction boom? For what money, why? In the absence of electricity, transport, and most importantly, timber. And the houses are made of 100-120-year-old pine. The whole city! In the vicinity of Sterlitamak there are no such forests. Moreover, there are no such forests around the city. wild trees, only forest plantations. Again, 80-100 years old. Rows and columns, such are the streets and avenues. It turns out that our great-grandfathers not only built houses, but also managed to plant trees on an industrial scale? And who paid them for this? Or on a voluntary basis? And there was no appropriate technique then, everything was manual?

The decorative elements of home decoration are machine-made and perfectly executed! How?! I myself was engaged in woodcarving and I know what I am talking about … And what complicated and expensive carpentry work are the front doors ?! Could our great-grandfathers afford it? Many houses are open-air museums of wooden architecture and decorative arts! They are wonderful!

People didn't just build houses, they also decorated them! Did they have the opportunity, time, effort and money? Now the overwhelming majority of our citizens live in concrete and brick hives, devoid of any aesthetics and only dream of a separate home, and 100 years ago, each family could afford a more or less decorated house! Paradox?

All houses of about the same size - did the developers have the same social status and family composition? It happens? The houses are of the same type and are decorated in the same way (again, all over Russia) - again, strict urban planning norms and one contractor? Unlikely. Yes, in addition to individual residential buildings, we have many office, profitable, apartment and 2-storey buildings of the same age, material, quality and manufacturing style, but now I am talking specifically about the private sector.

I believe that people did not build these houses. They couldn't physically. I think those who have ever built a private house will agree with me. In many regions of Russia there is simply not enough timber to build all these cities and villages. It is the incredible number, the same age, standard sizes, stylistic uniformity, the same building material, high cost, complexity and quality of decorative design of old log cabins that suggest that these houses appeared at once (I think, all over Russia) from nowhere, just materialized. And without fences Fences were made by people later - after all, it is unthinkable for us to live with neighbors without a fence. The one that took care of house kits for people simply did not know (probably even IT cannot know everything) about this psychological feature of the biological species created by IM, and at the same time they did not think to asphalt the streets. It was the people who boarded up the front entrances, put up fences, made gates and gates in them, and began to walk into the house from the yard.

And think about this fact again; about a third (offhand) of the urban population of Russia and almost 70% of the village live in these 100-year-old log cabins, which our great-grandfathers built so playfully, without electric tools, transport, mortgages and maternity capital, and are in no hurry to improve their living conditions. Why? But because in reality it is very expensive to build (and not receive as a gift from the Creator) a house, and the vast majority of our population simply cannot afford it. We haven't gotten that rich even in 100 years. Someone will say: the state helped the great-grandfathers. And our state was then, according to history textbooks, in deep life: world war, Russo-Japanese war, three revolutions, civil war, red terror, white terror, intervention, dispossession, war communism, collectivization, endless monetary reform, industrialization and etc. etc. I never cease to be amazed: where did such enthusiasm, enthusiasm and passion come from in our people then ?! Especially in comparison with today's indifference of the population to their fate. But nothing has passed since those turbulent events. Have we changed, become different over several generations? Or maybe it would be more logical to assume that the events described in the textbooks never happened and that someone is just fooling us?

In my hypothesis, a new time marker has appeared - 100 years. In my article "Fake history of mankind. Our civilization is 200 years old" I started from the age of St. Petersburg, brick temples, churches and estates, gravestones and ground floors covered with soil, and believed that our history can be traced back 200 years. But now, in the light of the above, the question arises: what happened 100 years ago and earlier? Where and in what did the population of Russia live before, when suddenly, by the whole world, by magic, overnight received the keys to brand new pine log cabins? In dugouts, huts, caves? At 30-40 degrees below zero? Do you have any answers? Or maybe it, the population, also appeared out of nowhere, like brand new houses? This option immediately removes all our perplexed questions about history.

I have no doubt that our reality is changing. Being in the present, we clearly imagine what our tomorrow should be and also what our yesterday was. And we have always believed in the constant vector of time and the continuity of cause-and-effect relationships of the space-time continuum, as we were taught at school. And I believed for 50 years of my life. Until today, when he rested his forehead on the obvious paradox: OUR PAST IS NOT WHAT IT SHOULD BE!

All these magnificent log cabins are NOT OUR PAST!

It seems to me that two options are possible:

First:

We have no past. The whole story is invented and the junction between reality and fiction is somewhere very close. Since the Great Patriotic War already appears before us with huge blank spots and a heap of absurdity. In this case, I will assume that we appeared on this planet (or together with it) at the turn of the 50s of the 20th century.

Second:

We have a past. But our reality changes regularly (or irregularly). Perhaps our past is like footprints on wet sea sand.. The oncoming waves of the new reality wash them out grain by grain of sand, and cause-and-effect relationships, that is, common sense, are the first to disappear from our past. So much so that even very recent historical events appear before us in an absurd light, discouraging our attempts to somehow understand these events. And where our story begins, and what it really was, we will never know.