Secrets of the Great Catechism

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

A catechism is an official confessional document of any denomination, catechism, a book containing the main provisions of the doctrine, often expressed in the form of questions and answers.

(encyclopedia "Christianity")

Among the many different books outlined by historians as the spiritual heritage of our ancestors, there is the Great Catechism, which hardly anyone reading this miniature held in their hands. And the point here is not the mass illiteracy or infantilism of the population. Working on my miniatures, I feel that my reader is drawn to knowledge and is ready to read many heritage of ancestors, but he just does not know what to read. Among the sea of historical literature, it is absolutely difficult for a person who is inexperienced in working with such material to understand. Yes, what is there to the layman, another scientist clutches his head from what is happening in the world of science, rightly believing that for the most part, there is actually no science, and the mass of academicians, professors, associate professors and doctoral fraternity is mainly determined by the conjuncture labor market. So they teach our students, graduated and denounced by the trust of the individual, for whom the place is in the stable, and not in bold classrooms, talking about what they themselves do not understand.

And this is at best, because a fool with a written sack is understandable even to the last poor student. It's another matter when the professors dress up in the toga of knowledge, deliberately distorting the laws of the universe and the development of mankind.

It was not for nothing that I remembered the Great Catechism, because the conversation in this miniature will be about the baptism of Rus, and we will have to read it in order to realize the depth of the deception of the priests of their own people. And here's what I’ll tell you the reader, in the first couples: nothing of the kind that is described in the Tale of Bygone Years did not happen, and the baptism of Rus by Vladimir is most likely an invention. Therefore, having stated such positions, I have no way back. At the risk of being labeled a heretic, I nevertheless begin to tell what happened in Russia in pre-Romanov times. Moreover, I belong to the Old Believers-Cathars, and we have long been dressed up as heretics. And so it would have lasted a long time, but only the truth has a strange peculiarity to win always and everywhere.

So, let's open the Great Catechism!

"Itako commanded to be baptized all the land of Russia. In the summer of six thousand UCHZ (that is, 496 in Slavic notation of numbers - Author of the miniature) from the patriarch saints, from NIKOLA HRUSOVERT, or from SISINY. Or from SERGI, Archbishop of Novgorod, under Mikhail Metropolitan of Kiev."

I deliberately left the original syllable of the author, because hearing the voice of a living person from the past is a real miracle and you are a witness to it, my dear reader. However, this author speaks of the oddities, since the year 6496 does not in any way coincide with the year of the baptism of Russia, in the reign of Vladimir. Yes, and the presence of a patriarch, archbishop, and metropolitan is surprising, because according to the official version of history, Saint Vladimir the Baptist drove into the waters of the Dnieper not someone, but YAZYCHNIKOV. Then where did these Orthodox priests come from, if Russia was unwashed uncleanness? Yes, not ordinary priests, but those who clearly led the dioceses, who are listed by the author of the cited document. As far as I understand, the ranks are ecclesiastical and considerable. Something is wrong here.

I had to lie in the hospital just now, because fragments from a mine that almost took my life began to stir in my body. This is an old matter, but when 4 of my companions rang about the ceramics of the operating room, I received unprecedented relief, both physical and moral. I had the feeling that I was freed not only from the fragments in my leg, but also with them, some kind of evil force that prevented me from living, carrying evil, left me. Whoever fought knows this feeling. This is the case with history: removing the rusty lie from the body of the epic, the researcher resembles a surgeon who hurts for the sake of continuing life. Perhaps many readers will be hurt by what they have read, but living with the pieces of death in the body is even more painful. I know it for sure - stuffed with shrapnel, like a yard dog with scars.

Today the church confidently declares that no church Russian hierarchy existed until Prince Vladimir, and the prince himself had to bring the first Christian priests from abroad. Many works of Orthodox hierarchs authoritatively assert this. I am familiar with the recent statement of Patriarch Kirill (Gundyaev), in which he clearly indicates the origin of the first Russian hierarchs. And besides him, there is evidence! And at the same time, the Great Catechism of the seventeenth century declares that the baptism of Rus takes place under the Archbishop of Novgorod Sergius and Metropolitan Michael of Kiev. And this means only one thing, that in Russia there are Novgorod and Kiev ecclesiastical dioceses. How so?

It would be interesting to ask this question at the meeting of the Pope and Cyril in Cuba, but I would hardly be honored with an answer, because many inconsistencies in priestly interpretations are well known. That is why Patriarch Kirill went on missionary work to the penguins of Antarctica, because fewer and fewer people in Russia believe the official version of Russian history. Where dad went, I don't know, but I think the Galapagos turtles were waiting for him.

And most likely, they would answer me that these words are a medieval invention, or even just a fantasy.

Fantasy? In the Catechism of the Church, the document governing her life? Interestingly the priests are dancing!

Or maybe something else, for example, the text does not fit into an invented concept called "Is Torah Ya", in which there are no archbishops of Novgorod and metropolitans of Kiev during the reign of Prince Vladimir. Then that explains a lot.

However, the lump of questions is growing. That in the 17th century no one really knew how Russia was baptized? Or haven't you read the Tale of Bygone Years?

A version arises that for the first time only the later "Russian historians" - Bayer, Miller, Schletser, learned the truth about the baptism of Rus. "Subtracting" it from the Tale of Time's Years. Which, in the seventeenth century, their predecessors really could not read. And the reason for this "not reading" is quite clear: Romanov historians rewrote the epic of Russia, bringing it into the canon of Jewish history, from that the Tale took on a modern form, only at the end of century 17. But at the beginning of the same century, before the Great Time of Troubles in Russia, the text of the Tale was different, which is clearly evidenced by the torn pages from this notebook and inserts, which differ from other sheets. The author has seen this literature and is ready to testify that several pages of the Tale concerning the moment of establishing statehood in Russia have been replaced by others. Moreover, there is a problem with the numbering of sheets - the numbers are stupidly corrected or simply torn off.

Well, well, such inconsistencies are always in favor of the investigation and the Qatar Commissioner made a stand. Raise your paw and you are a reader, raise it higher! Because, very soon a roast duck will fly up in front of us.

And how many dates of the baptism of Rus are mentioned in the annals? I found at least 5.

According to the Tale of Provisional Years, Russia was first and finally baptized under Prince Vladimir, allegedly in 986-989. The story asserts that only from that time a Christian church hierarchy appeared in Russia, and initially it consisted of foreign Greeks. And only a few decades later, under Yaroslav the Wise, the first Russian metropolitan appeared, and church books were translated from Greek into Slavic. We know this date, understanding it as the date of the baptism of Rus.

However, the same Great Catechism gives us completely different information. Printed in Moscow under Tsar Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov and Patriarch Filaret in 1627, it has a special section "On the Baptism of the Russian People."And this is what this set of Orthodoxy canons asserts, which the Romanovs have not yet had time to reform: it turns out that there were FOUR baptisms of Rus.

FIRST - from the Apostle Andrew.

SECOND baptism - from the patriarch of Constantinople Photius, during the reign of the Greek king, Basil the Macedonian, and under the Grand Duke Rurik of All Russia. And under the Kiev princes under Askold and Dir.

These baptisms have no dates, but the THIRD clearly indicates the time of the baptism of Rus - under the Grand Duchess Olga, in 6463 from the creation of the world, that is, about 955, which is thirty years earlier than declared in the Tale of Bygone Years (989-955 = 34). That is, the FOURTH baptism of Russia.

But the Apostle Andrew lived at the time of Christ, who, according to the priests, was born in the “zero year” of the new calendar. And this means that Russia received its first baptism long before the indicated dates, and Patriarch Photius will be older than Olga !!! Not to mention Dir and Askold.

Do you smell, reader, how you felt like a roast duck in Peking style, in apples from the priest's garden?

Those who have read my works about Christ know that his years of life are the 12th century (1152-1185). Therefore, do not bother your brains with official lies, reader, but just follow my reasoning for now.

So, the baptism of the Apostle Andreev is the 12th century. Photius-patrarch of Constantinople is the 13th century (you can check it yourself), and Olga is clearly 14th century.

So, what actually happened under Vladimir the Baptist?

The 15th century is a famous era of the great schism in the church. It was in the 15th century that the division of the previously more or less unified Christian church into several branches began. Apparently, in the era of this century, the secular power REALLY GOT A QUESTION OF CHOICE OF FAITH. By the way, the baptism of Rus under Vladimir is described as a CHOICE OF FAITH. Who does not remember, I remind that Vladimir was offered many faiths, even Jewish, and only one was chosen. So, it is quite possible to imagine that Russia was baptized more than once. Well, judge for yourself: if you consider that every baptism is a transition from paganism to Christianity, then you can go with your brains. Starting with Andrei, they drive Russia into bright waters and baptize them for nothing. No other people have this. That is, I confidently declare that the notorious ancient Kievites, at the time of their bathing in the Dnieper, were Christians a long time ago, they were simply driven into the framework of the official church of the state. Which state, you ask? Yes, of course, Kievan Rus, hastily made up from the Khazar city of Sambat, which stood on the Sambation River. By the way, Kiuv is the king of the Khazars, and if we consider that this city was called Kiev-grad, then it is quite clear that we have TSARGRAD, or rather its duplicate, BYZANTIA, which gave history to this town on the steeps of the Dnieper. And at the same time, the date of the foundation of Kiev was established recently. In Soviet times, out of the three proposed dates, the first secretary of the Communist Party of Ukraine Volodymyr Shcherbitsky chose 1500 years from the moment of its foundation, as evidenced by the decree of the Ukrainian authorities of that time. I wrote about him in one of my works.

However, let us return to the strange recording of the date of baptism in the Great Catechism. I quote it again, due to the importance of what has been said below:

"Itako commanded to be baptized all the land of Russia. In the summer of six thousand UCHZ (that is, 496 in Slavic notation of numbers - Author of the miniature) from the patriarch saints, from NIKOLA HRUSOVERT, or from SISINY. Or from SERGI, Archbishop of Novgorod, under Mikhail Metropolitan of Kiev."

I had to take a closer look at the letter "U" in the Slavic designation of numbers and the discovery was not long in coming. There is no "U" there. y has "C", which is written in Slavic handwritten text almost like "U". And to distinguish them, our ancestors wrote the letter "O" before "U", that is, "OU", but before "C" they did not write, as in this text. Apparently, the person who wrote the falsifications did not already know this. But "C" meant 900, and "OU" only 400. The difference is 500 years, gentlemen !!! At 500 years old!

And now let's read the text in a new way: "six thousand TsChZ" or 6997, not 6497. And now let's take the 989 year of the Baptism of Rus imposed on us and add 500 lost years (989 + 500 = 1489). That is the 15th century. This means that baptism under Olga took place in the middle of the 15th century, because between Olga and Vladimir about 40 years.

So, the group of the Commissioner of Qatar established that the baptism of Rus under Vladimir, in fact, took place in the 15th century and was not baptized, but only the choice of one of the Christian RELIGIONS, namely ORTHODOXY.

Well, it's time to take the case to court, where my reader is presiding. However, the performers are not named, although the customers are clearly outlined - the priests of the new state, which was part of the Great Tartary, the empire of the Slavs, as a federation. The motive is also determined - the transition from the Byzantine early Christian (clan-family) faith to the Greek apostolic faith.

It's time to deal with the priests declared for the Great Catechism, who witnessed the choice of faith under Vladimir. Well, it turned out to be much easier than doing applied mathematics, or rather adding Slavic numbers.

The Holy Patriarch Sisinius is one of the most famous Russian saints ZOSIMA, the founder of the Solovetsky Monastery. According to the official version, he died in 1478

But here's what's interesting: it turns out that exactly in 1489 - that is, exactly in the year of the baptism of Rus - the Moscow Metropolitan Gerontius died, and soon his successor, Metropolitan ZOSIMA, was installed. As you can see, priest Zosima was alive, and even as he is alive, since he baptized the people of Kiev in the Dnieper. This is what the encyclopedia "Christianity" says. Well, isn't it embarrassing ?!

Now Metropolitan Sergius. Despite the fact that Sergius of Radonezh, according to the official version, lived at the end of the 14th century, he was canonized as a saint in 1452, that is, almost 100 years later. And this does not happen in Orthodoxy. In addition, it is known that Sergius of Radonezh actively fought against the schism. It seems that the dates of his life are deliberately twisted and twisted. It was he who was in Kiev in 1489 when choosing the faith of the new Constantinople - Kievan Rus.

So, Zosima and Sergius are installed, but it took a long time to tinker with Nikola Khrusovert. The fact that this is a person "converted to another faith" from some version of Christianity, it was clear to me right away. The Hrusovert is the converted, that is, the one who has accepted the faith. In any case, our ancestors understood this word that way. Today it has been replaced by "cross". For example, a Jew who converted to Christianity is called a cross, and earlier a chrusovert.

Nikola Hrusovert is the famous Nikolai of Kuzansky - Nicolaus Chryppfs Cusanus, who lived (according to the official version) in 1401-1464. Today he is considered “the greatest of German humanists.” Theologian, philosopher, mathematician and church-public figure. His nickname KUZANSKY is a modified nickname KAZAN, and the version of the Germans about his origin from the unknown village of Kuza is clearly far-fetched. a peasant appropriated by the priests in the west. Relatively Russian, because Kazan before Ivan the Terrible is the capital of Khazaria.

So, this Nikolai Ku (a) zansky wrote an essay about the ROTATION of the Earth. And he did it 100 years before Copernicus. I wrote earlier that the canon-Pole had appropriated someone else's work, and even indicated the sources of such an assertion. Therefore, I believe that Hrusovert is not only, as a convert to faith, but also a CHRISTIAN who proved the rotation of the Earth. And if you believe the Great Catechism, then there is not the slightest doubt that Nicholas is one of the founders of the Christian Orthodox faith, which became the basis of the modern ROC.

However, I believe that Nicholas had already died by the time of the adoption of the faith in Kiev and Vladimir baptized the people of Kiev already without him, but on the basis of the doctrine compiled by him.

In general, in 1489, a departure from generic Christianity (Byzantine) began in connection with the fall of Byzantium itself and the coming to apostolic Christianity. Apparently, the basis of the latter was the Gospel of Thomas, which we do not know at all today. However, I have a certain text from the archives of my ancestors, Russian columnar nobles from the inner circle of the tsar, and now I am dealing with it. If this is not the Gospel of Thomas itself, then something similar to its retelling. Give me time, reader, and I'll deal with Foma.

Therefore, his nickname Nicholas HRUS could mean CHRISTIAN, on behalf of CHRIST (CHORUS - Russian pronunciation, author's note). Especially considering that he lived in the Khazar Jewish Kazan. As we begin to understand, it was with him, or soon after him, that the Grand Duke Vladimir = Vasily baptized Russia. Or rather, I chose faith.

In this regard, an interesting version of the origin of the word Christ = Horus arises.

I have already said that the Egyptian gods are the Russian pantheon, simply melted down into historical fables. As well as the "ancient" Rome and Greece. So I'm thinking that we are talking about the RUSSIAN MOUNTAIN, that is, the god Horus is the reflection of Jesus Christ in the mythology of Egypt. By the way, the word grief is from here, and means a heavy longing for this person.

Horus, Horus (; r - "height", "sky") is a god in ancient Egyptian mythology, the son of Isis and Osiris. Depicted as a man with the head of an eagle (falcon). His wife is Hathor. His main opponent is Seth.

Horus is the god of the sky, royalty and the sun; the living ancient Egyptian pharaoh was represented as the incarnation of the god Horus. So Christ = Horus, this is none other than RUSSIAN GOD. And since Jesus had a real prototype in Byzantium, Andronicus Comnenus, the son of the Sevastocrator Isaac and the Russian princess Mary the Mother of God, there is no doubt that Horus is the Russian god, and Christ is just a Greek translation of the name. Possibly garbled translation. Anyway, my colleagues from the Greek police think the same way.

And what about the enemy of Horus = Hora Set?

Seth (Seth, Sutekh, Suta, Seti egypt. St;) - in ancient Egyptian mythology, the god of fury, sandstorms, destruction, chaos, war and death, included in the Heliopolis Ennead. Initially, he was revered as "the protector of the sun-Ra", the patron saint of royal power, his name was included in the titles and names of a number of pharaohs. Set is a warrior god with red burning eyes, the only one of all who is able to defeat the serpent Apophis in the darkness, personifying darkness and eager to enslave Ra in the dark depths of the underground Nile. Later he was demonized, became an antagonist in the dualistic struggle of Horus and Set, a personification of world evil, Satan. Also Horus and Set can merge into a single two-headed deity Heruifi. He was the patron saint of distant countries and foreigners.

Well, well, in the history of Byzantium there is also such a character - the Angel Isaac Satan, the one who crucified the emperor Andronicus Comnenus, the prototype of Christ, and took his throne himself. Apparently, the two-headed deity Heruifi is the famous couple Christ and Antichrist, Andronicus and Satan Isaac.

Reader, the world is much more interesting than priests' tales and the plots of his past are in harmony with his development. All gods, demigods and other near-gods are real people who existed in our epic, which was replaced in the 15th century by a fictional story. You see, the church is a very profitable business, stable, proven, "logically" grounded. In general, religion is the opium of the people. This is life outside the laws of the universe and the prototype of the vital world. Note, I said religion, but not faith. The fact that God exists, I do not need to prove - you are an attentive person yourself and with sound reasoning you will understand the whole truth of my statement. After all, I am a believer, a Christian, an old believer, and my life in the war has proved a lot to me. But the absence of priests in my Qatari faith did not at all affect the convictions of mine and my fellow believers. Imagine, there is a bishop, but no priests. And the Qatari bishop is more likely just a wise man than a hierarch. We are bespopovtsy, we do not have professional believers ready to commit any fraud for the sake of their stable income.

For example, forgery based on the date of the baptism of Rus or the isolation of the religion of ancient Egypt, which is, in fact, a Christian country. It's just that it, in a different way, names the saints and saints and tells about them with a certain local flavor. For example, we are sure that Pharaoh is the king of Egypt. Why do we think so? It turns out, because of the inscription on the tomb, which was read as a pharaoh. In fact, it says FUNERAL and the name of this funeral is indicated. That is, a funeral is just a tomb. And this confusion arose recently, in the 15th century, when a previously non-existent Latin language was invented, on the basis of which the "ancient" European languages and Latin were created. I came across bulls of Roman popes of the 16-17-18 centuries (and European kings too) written in Russian, but already in Latin. But the Russian 172-letter alphabet is not in vogue now - we are offered the Cyril-Methodius alphabet.

Surprised? Well, then listen to what the names "ancient" mean in almost prehistoric countries. S. Dudakov's article "Jerusalem Notes" published in Russian in the journal "Jews and Slavs", No.8, "Oh, Jerusalem!" Russian sects ", published in Kharkov in 1910. In this book, on pages 394-395, T. I. Butkevich talks about a Russian sect called Subbotniks. Today this sect is practically unknown and there is very little data about it. Still would! Information about them is capable of blowing up all modern priestly Christianity !! TI Butkevich reports: “They no longer consider Russia their homeland, but Palestine. Books of Old Believers. There was one, and she won during the Great Troubles and Nikon's reforms. This is what the Romanov Orthodoxy is.

So, surprisingly enough, EVERYTHING IS SAID IN THE BIBLE AT THE ADDRESS OF BABYLON, ASSIRIA AND EGYPT THE SATURDAYS ARE RELATED TO RUSSIA.

However, it also did not resist the pressure of the West, since it was part of Judeo-Christianity or Catholicism. There were very complex processes of the arrival of modern Orthodoxy (renovationists) and they are not the topic of this miniature. And the modern ROC is generally the brainchild of Comrade Stalin, who created it during the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945. Before the revolution, no ROC existed, but there was a Russian Orthodox Catholic Church. And do not be afraid of the word "Catholic", because its meaning is only "universal". It was then destroyed by the Bolsheviks, creating their own church of the Russian Orthodox Church.

Another remnant of the Church of the Jews, that is, the Russian Jewish Church of the 15th-16th centuries, is the modern DUKHOBORY. The Christianity Encyclopedia writes: “The roots of the Dukhobors go back to antiquity. They are associated with strigolniks, with "Jews", with Bashkin and Theodosius the Kosoy”. It is known that Bashkin and Theodosius the Kosoy are prominent representatives of the Church of the Jews of the 16th century, which was closely associated with the Lutheran Reformed Church in the West. And perhaps even made a single whole with her.

The Dukhobors themselves trace their origins to "three youths: Ananias, Azariah and Misail," that is, biblical characters who lived during the time of King Nabuhudnezzar. I have already said that by this name the Dukhobors understood the Russian tsar … Ivan Vasilyevich the Terrible! So, the Dukhobor tradition understands one of the youths of Misail as Bashkin, that is, the founder of the sect during the time of Tsar Ivan-Nebuchadonsor. And this, gentlemen, is the 16th century!

By the way, Jewish or Russian Judaism plays a very important role in the life of Russia from the 14th to the 16th century. Just don't confuse it with modern Judaism. Today it is Zionism, but its roots are precisely from here.

By the way, Judea in the Bible is Western Europe, and Israel is Russia. The Israeli judges are Russian deacons, that is, the elders of the Bespopovites, because earlier this dignity did not require ordination at all, and even today its role in the church is very incomprehensible. It is rather a decoration of a temple and a tribute to an ancient tradition. And earlier the deacon was chosen by the people themselves from among the well-read and intelligent fellow believers.

How does it feel? Don't you think, brother reader, that the priests are already so lying that they themselves do not even understand what they are preaching about? It seems that the author is poring over his miniatures for a reason, since the number of my readers has stepped far beyond a million. And this is all over the world.

They write to me a lot, asking me to express my opinion on various questions. My friends! I’m not a prophet and not a deputy of God on earth in red shoes or miter. I am just a retired law enforcement officer, a descendant of an ancient Russian-Polish-Frankish family, perhaps a scientist (I have a degree) and I don’t know much either. Everything that I have written has been read in various sources, as well as in the archives of my family, taken out by the ancestor, the White Guard general of Denikin's counterintelligence from the fallen Crimea, during the civil war in Russia. The grandfather knew that there would be one among his descendants who would study the history of the clan, and therefore would see all the lies of the clergy. He will see and write the truth.

About the customs of Subbotniks and Dukhobors, the Christianity encyclopedia reports the following: “According to later research, in some places Subbotniks observed rituals according to the Mosaic law, but did not recognize the Talmud and read prayers IN RUSSIAN AND CHURCH-SLAVIC languages; in others (for example, in Pyatigorsk). and Irkutsk Gubernia.) Wore RUSSIAN CLOTHES AND GENERALLY ADOPTED RUSSIAN CUSTOMS"

To explain it more simply, a Jew and an interpreter of this doctrine settled in a Russian village. Perhaps the ruler of the master, and began to introduce the people to the new faith. While the master was serving in the regiment, his peasants became Dukhobors and Subbotniks. That is precisely why a real nobleman had to take care of the faith of his servants.

And further. All modern religions came out of Christianity. Orthodoxy is closer not to Catholicism, but to Islam. The Koran is just a different retelling of the Bible, like Buddhism, Judaism, Hinduism and other religions with their spiritual books. You will be surprised, but polygamy in Russia was quite common. An example of a Russian harem, I will give the most common TEREM, and an example of a tower - the Terem Palace of the Moscow Kremlin.

Harems in Russia existed until the era of Peter I. That is, until the 18th century. The fact is that, it turns out, it was Peter I who began an irreconcilable struggle with Russian harem customs. German historians of the late 19th century report the following: “Peter intervened even in family and social life. walked freely in European style. " Yes, and the face of the girl and the lady was covered, with a transparent fracture, like a burqa. Today this custom can still be found in a wedding dress and veil. So, the words of Petrukha from the famous film "Gulchitay, open your face" were also pronounced by our ancestors. Petruha was right, what if he would bring a crocodile to his mother! Now, look at the masks and bodies, as much as your heart desires, but in old Russia, the wives were sitting in the towers. In the lights. And they rarely went out to visit. Were they not called the Tsarevich's mothers?

The BYZANTINE emperors also had a female harem. For example, Theodulf points to “THE BYZANTINE CUSTOM OF KEEPING WOMEN IN GUARD.” And as you know, there was a Byzantine tradition in Russia from the very beginning. Comrade Nadia Savchenko We are not talking about one or two hermits, but about the USUAL !!!

Just like in a joke!

A guard comes to the king and says:

- Sovereign, what to do with Princess Shemakhan?

- Execute!

- Father, let me fall in love with her !?

- Execute!

- What are you, your majesty, did it, to execute and execute! She's so beautiful!

- Okay, voivode, love the night, but then execute!

And finally, I will tell the reader who the kagans are. Today, the church fathers insist that the kagans ruled in the Khazar kaganate, which was completely hostile to Russia. But what about the next statement?

In 1935, in the Kiev Cathedral of St. Sophia, B. A. Rybakov sketched the following inscription: "God save our Kagan S …". The inscription was on one of the pillars of the northern gallery and Rybakov wrote the following: “The Byzantine title (tsar or Caesar - Auth.) Replaced the EASTERN name of the GREAT DUCHES of Kiev“KAGAN”. In the same Sophia Cathedral, on one of the pillars of the northern gallery, there was an inscription … KAGAN OUR S … The capital letter C, which stood at the end of the preserved part of the inscription, may indicate Svyatoslav Yaroslavich or Svyatopolk Izyaslavich; the first assumption is more likely."

We open the famous "Word on Law and Grace" by Metropolitan Hilarion - the first Russian metropolitan, who allegedly ruled in 1051-1054, according to Romanov chronology. The question arises, what does Metropolitan Hilarion call the great Russian prince Vladimir, who is almost his contemporary, the hero of the previous generation?

Here is the original Old Russian text: "And faith in all languages extended to our Russian language and praise to OUR KAGAN VOLODIMIR, from him the baptism bykhom" [312], p.28. So, the Grand Duke Vladimir was also called KAGAN. And it was not some semi-literate scribe who called him that, but the HEAD OF THE RUSSIAN CHURCH.

KAGAN is an old Russian title equivalent to the word Tsar or Khan. It is impossible not to notice that the word KAGAN is simply KGAN or KHAN, that is, one of the old forms of the word KHAN. We will say below that in reality, Khazars or Kazars are the old form of the word KAZAKI. Just those who became Subbotniks or Dukhobors. And this is not just a hypothesis, but a DIRECT STATEMENT of the Archbishop of Belarus at the beginning of the 19th century. The Dukhobor Cossacks were defeated by Prince Svyatoslav in a famous battle, also dated back to early times. Apparently it was at the time of Yaroslav the Wise or his son Svyatoslav Yaroslavovich. And, the persecutor of the Jews, familiar to us, is a literary person. By the way, Kazan was the capital of Khazaria and Khazaria fell after the defeat of this city on the Volga by Ivan the Terrible.

She really was Jewish, so there is some truth in the song about the Jewish Cossacks.

You know, reader, lies are almost everywhere, but as many as there are in the official church, there is nowhere else, except in the state bank.

Understand the following, I am not urging you to give up your faith. I urge you to think a little with your head, and not rely on authorities, who cannot be distinguished from a washer in the bathhouse. Another washer will be wiser than other hierarchs - he has seen enough of the bodies of a monastic, during the years of service to a broom and a washcloth!

From my personal experience, I can say that most of the rabbis, cardinals, priests, bishops and other professional priesthood are none other than the most ordinary officials. Greedy, raking in, narrow-minded, exploiting faith. Of course, there are nice and religious priests (I have met such as well), but this is most likely an exception to the rule.

In my opinion, and in the opinion of the Old Believers, there is absolutely no need for a mediator between a believing person and God. You can speak with the latter everywhere: in the forest and in the desert, at home and in a temple of any denomination. Jesus is a very real person, a wonderful person who was degraded at the Council of Nicaea to the son of God. Before this cathedral, he was not like that. I know a lot about him and have written a lot about him. His personality is much broader and more powerful than it is now represented in my Cathar faith, he is given the honorary place of the PROPHET or the PERFECT man chosen by God. Cathars are generally created by his wife Maria Magdalena, as a belief in the Love of an ordinary earthly woman for a GENIUS. It was against them that the papal inquisition was created, which destroyed our faith, first in Europe, and then in Russia, but already by the forces of the Romanov priests.

The witch hunt is a hunt for Cathars and the sad ruins of the castle of Montsegur in France, from where my ancestor, who bore the rare title of species, came to Russia, are witnesses.

However, I know the prophecy of the Qatari bishop-count Bertrand de Marty, which says that the ancient faith will be revived and the world will change. I know and see that everything is happening as Father Bertrand said, burning at the stake of the Inquisition. Accurate to the minute. Remember, reader, the secret will still become apparent and this miniature is one of the attempts to tell the truth to the world. And the truth can no longer be held back. People finally started thinking.

My God, the hour has struck

East, the dawn of the Slavs took over, And although the Livonian did not calm down, The Russian spirit stirred in us.

Enough of the lies of other people's priests, Enough hunched prayers.

We have an eternal call to the sky of the Rus, Brings the hope of revelation.

To a happy conscience, The people will give birth to the leader of freedom!

Being proud of the second coming, Russia will lead the peoples to the Faith.

Great creator of nature, Law connoisseur, the law itself, By the finger of the great deity

Thunder in the sky

Let the lightning of faith blaze

And a thunderstorm of truth will break out.

Enough to believe us in chimeras

If the tear is not wiped from the eye.

We are Russians. Should we wait for destinies

Praying and passionately regretting:

That Phoebus is adamant now, That the bonds of Hymen are weak?

To blame your fate, Bozhkov and idols whining?

Sword-kladenets and Rus-armor

Here is the main reliability of the Rus.

Souls are beautiful impulses

Russia expects from sons.

And maternal motives

She cherishes her daughters in her hearts.

Great God, father to us Rus!

You are kind, You are wise, You are our judge.

There is no place among Russian cowards -

We are as one, Your family.

I know God your name!

You are Conscience, Eternal Soul, What goes out of the fire into the fire

The eternal path of destinies versh.© Copyright: Commissioner Qatar, 2016