Mathematics and physical meaning

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

The religious reverential awe of the scientific community for mathematical symbols has done science a disservice, turning it into a kind of astrology or palmistry, with its shamans, soothsayers and interpreters.

According to the wretched notions of pseudoscientists-mathematicians, nature first performs a lot of mathematical calculations and, according to their results, begins to sculpt atoms to each other, forming a leaf of a tree or a hair on the skin of an animal.

The desire to deduce certain physical truths from the manipulation of abstract mathematical symbols and formulas led to the invention of concepts that are not compatible with the laws of nature. Mathematics, as a short language, can describe any phenomenon, but it is not able to explain it and creates only the illusion of understanding.

Unlike mathematics, there is nothing negative or imaginary in nature, therefore there is no and cannot be any antimatter in it. Positive and negative charges are simply opposite properties of matter, analogous, for example, to the transparency and opacity of substances.

And when material objects with opposite properties are combined, their properties are also combined, either compensating or reinforcing each other. Otherwise, any interactions of substances with opposite properties would lead to their physical disappearance, which contradicts the second law of thermodynamics.

In nature, there are no integrals, no square roots, no sines, or even radii and lengths. Because all these are not even some physical quantities, but just their conventional representations. And in a hundred years, descendants will roll with laughter at such "scientific" gems as the Higgs bosons, black holes, Wheeler's pens, Schrödinger's cats and other products of primitive consciousness. As Einstein once said, mathematics is the only way to get oneself by the nose. And he himself got himself head over heels into it.

Gravitational collapse and accretion, like lifting oneself by the hair or the struggle of Nanai boys, the Big Bang, like a divine creation of matter out of nothing, molecular kinetic theory and string theory, like poor examples of a perpetual motion machine and many other absurd and meaningless hypotheses derived from mathematical transformations, eventually disappear forever from science.

After all, it is not surprising that the theory of the big bang, as a divine creation of matter out of nothing, was eagerly recognized by the religious obscurantists of the Vatican.

It cannot be denied that it is mathematically possible to predict how much the length of an iron ruler will increase at a million degrees, but only the insane can discuss its properties, because it simply does not exist at such a temperature.

However, despite this, pseudoscientists quite seriously describe, for example, black holes, as if they had already touched them with their own hands, they talk about accretion, as the fall of matter on itself, as if they were already lifting themselves by the hair.

Descriptions of various paradoxes, inexplicable effects and phenomena that supposedly exist in nature are already pouring from the screens of most TV channels and turned into a profitable business on the ignorance of the inhabitants and so not so much burdened with the ability to think. And the worst thing is that even among the pseudoscientists, ignorance has already reached such a degree that many of them believe in God, and some do not even hide it.

Moreover, in some educational institutions, attempts are already being made to establish departments of theology. And I will not be surprised that soon the turn will come to the revival of the most holy Inquisition. Having created for themselves a god named "mathematician", pseudoscientists have been leading themselves by the nose for several centuries without even knowing it.

Knowing that twice two is four and piling on each other a mass of multi-storey formulas, it is easy to write a completely scientific article about any physical phenomenon, without even understanding its physical meaning, and nevertheless, creating an illusion of high scientificity in the eyes of the average person.

And this illusion can be easily reinforced by a simple check of mathematical calculations by the reverse action - dividing four by two, since any mathematical proofs are tautologies that fit into the simple formula: "two times two equals four, because four divided by two equals two." And practically all the so-called scientific theories are built on such tautologies.

Publishing in its peer-reviewed scientific journals, where access to fresh thoughts is closed and endlessly quoting the brilliant statements of each other, the scientific community has turned into a sect of mediocrity, consisting mainly of people who can only masterfully manipulate numbers, without really thinking about their physical meaning. And there is even a completely delusional opinion that the more absurd the theory and the more mathematics it contains, the more brilliant it is.

The embryonic state of logical thinking of the entire scientific community is the reason that pseudoscientists are unable to more or less plausibly explain the essence of even very simple natural phenomena.

Using mathematics, it is impossible to describe even a simple circle through its diameter, because these quantities are incommensurable. Although, on the other hand, the number Pi perfectly explains why there cannot be electrically neutral material objects in nature. However, the pseudoscientists somehow did not notice this. Any material object will always have some excess electric charge, due precisely to the spherical metric of the universe.

The Big Bang theory, for example, was developed on a primitive extrapolation, the so-called recession of galaxies, mistakenly explained by the Doppler effect. Taking into account the horizon of the universe's visibility from Earth and extrapolating the scattering of galaxies, pseudoscientists "brilliantly" calculated that 14 billion years ago the universe was a dimensionless point with infinite mass, which, for some unknown reason, suddenly exploded …

In fact, there have always been delusions in science. Sometimes they lasted for centuries, and sometimes for thousands of years. Any scientific experiments are always planned in such a way as to get some expected results.

And if the results obtained differ from the expected ones, there is a temptation to correct them with some very important coefficient. For example, come up with some kind of "Boltzmann constant" or invent some kind of "uncertainty principle", perpetuating your name in the history of science and fixing your delusions in it.

In nature, unlike mathematics, there are no parallel lines, the proof of the theorem about which is thoroughly understood in school textbooks, any lines in it always intersect. Even light cannot move in a straight line, because straight lines simply cannot exist in nature.

To date, such mathematical errors and contradictions in science have accumulated so much that some pseudoscientists, having lost faith in the possibility of knowing nature, admit the existence of God.

And already especially clever "geniuses" from pseudoscience are trying to promote "theories" based on medieval ideas that "rays of sight" come from the eyes, which means that the results of scientific experiments directly depend on whether the experimenter is looking at them or accidentally turned away. It must be assumed that a new, hitherto unseen term - an observer - will soon appear in the formulas. And perhaps it will even be declared a new world constant.

If a person did not have the organs of vision, then a theory might well appear, asserting that the speed of sound cannot be exceeded. And theorists with a clever look would argue that it is impossible to determine the speed and coordinate of a flying plane at the same time, and therefore it is not a material body, but a wave and is simply "smeared" across the sky …

Let's take a simple formula for example, E = mc²and let one of the pseudoscientists try to explain the physical meaning of the square of the speed of light. What happens when you multiply speed by speed? What's this, 9*10¹⁶square kilometers per square second ??

And by the grace of mathematicians, there are plenty of such lapses in physics. Enough in any case to turn it into a pseudoscience. And the worst thing about this is that for more than a hundred years now, under the guise of high science, they are "injecting" into the heads of students, in fact, the new pseudoscientific system of Ptolemy.

Although the delusion in geocentrism was not out of stupidity, because in order to see that the Earth moves around the Sun, you need to live on the Sun. Therefore, in the history of science, the Ptolemy system will remain as an inevitable and natural stage of scientific knowledge.

But quantum physics, the theory of relativity, gravitational collapse, black holes, in the near future, will share the fate of numerous treatises of medieval scholastics on the number of devils or angels on the tip of a needle. They will never receive confirmation and development, as they are evidence of sheer stupidity and scientific ignorance …