General parasitism, necrosis of responsibility
General parasitism, necrosis of responsibility

Video: General parasitism, necrosis of responsibility

Video: General parasitism, necrosis of responsibility
Video: Российская Империя в цветных фотографиях / The Russian Empire in colour photographs: 1909-1916 2024, November
Anonim

VTsIOM, with some of its own goals, conducted a large survey with many questions. As a result, it turned out that almost a third of young Russians want to emigrate from the country - and it is clear that not in Somalia. This is one more fact in the collection of our ideas about the primary source of the troubles of human civilization - the epidemic of psychological parasitism and necrosis of responsibility among people, from which the youth, corrupted in the post-Soviet reality, suffer the most from the cradle.

The fact does not stand out from the general range of what we know about the worst (and constantly growing) share of necrotic youth.

A similar result was obtained during the poll - will you defend your country even in the event of a war or an invasion? There, too, is the depressing result of social parasitism, exhibited with pride, as a beggar exposes an ulcer. More and more young people turn into worms with a sucker, constantly looking for someone to cling to. This parasitism is accompanied by the "delusion of personal overvalue" characteristic of the consumer society - the conviction of the degenerate that he has made everyone happy with one fact of his existence.

Why they believe that a wealthy foreign country should enthusiastically accept young parasites who are exclusively consumer-minded (take the maximum, and not be responsible for anything) is difficult to understand logically. This is the same pathological delirium of a degenerate, as well as the belief that someone else will fight for him (as well as work) - protecting him three times useless life of a social worm-opportunist.

The idea that it is cheaper for any invader to kill him than to contain him does not occur to the consumer's creature, which can only be useful by disassembling for donor organs. And the thought that bargaining, negotiating will only be with those for whom there is strength and value - too. And what benefit can a drapoon and marauder bring to the “new homeland”, who is longing for the abundance of others? To escape from there, too, at the very first impulses of the economic crisis - again to where the pieces seem sweeter?

Of course, Russia can be congratulated on the fact that through the mechanisms of emigration it gets rid of permanent traitors, professional Judas, who have been looking for another 30 pieces of silver all their lives - and of course, they also shock the countries of their new stay with their marauding egoism.

Among older people, the picture is more decent: the majority of Russians surveyed by the All-Russian Center for the Study of Public Opinion (VTsIOM) are still not going to leave the country.

To the question "Would you like to go abroad for permanent residence or not?" 88% answered negatively, 10% answered positively, another 2% were undecided. At the same time, among 18-24-year-old Russians, the number of those wishing to leave increased to 31% (against 25% a year earlier).

They collect information about the country where they would like to move, 26% of those who expressed their desire to leave, 22% learn a foreign language, 21% consult with friends who have left abroad, and 19% save money to move.

Since 2016, the number of Russians who say they have acquaintances who have gone abroad over the past five years has increased - from 20% to 26%. Germany remains the most attractive place to move - 16% of those planning to leave Russia would like to go there. Also among the leaders are the USA (7%), Spain (6%) and Canada (5%).

They seriously think that they will make a foreign rich country happy with their freelooking arrival!

+++

Many factors are fused in the deplorable picture of growing psychological parasitism and necrosis of responsibility among young people. On the surface, there is the corrupting absence of its own ideology in the country (it is the ideology of implied inferiority) - against the background of the rigidly totalitarian machine of Western propaganda, an ideology that is by no means deprived of it. The gingerbread house of the European witch is advertised among the Hansel and Gret by all the rules of market marketing and by experienced advertisers.

The image of the West as an earthly paradise is supported by the most severe political regime (already totalitarian) - in which any criticism of the system is punishable up to the removal of children from the family 1] (and for a long time already - the maximum in speed and volume deprivation of any means of subsistence [2]).

A Western person always smiles and demonstrates cheerful optimism - he starts crying, the local "Gestapo" of the European Union or the United States will work on him. There is not enough information about this - because the Russian "Elita" is itself enchanted by the Western fairy tale about the gingerbread house and has long been deprived of its own ideology, having turned into an imitative monkey …

But, besides the totalitarian propaganda of the West and its impact on fragile minds, which by no means demonstrate the ability to "figure it out on their own" - which the completely conceptually confused and relaxed Russian government hopes for - there are, of course, objective reasons.

In the post-Soviet reality, young people have no future. It does not exist in the West either - but it is carefully hidden (they are trying, at least). But it also does not exist in the Russian economy, copied from Western liberal models. Of course, the hopelessness that is closer is more painful than the one that is far away and covered with the romance of the propaganda fog …

The entire planet is divided by predators, the plots are stripped by their secretion of private property - and new people born into the world have no chance of success unless they are the heirs of the first generation of privatizers.

This system of deep satisfaction with animal domination is incapable of developing, and for several decades it has been demonstrating a reverse growth throughout the planet: from Japan with its "lost 30th anniversary" to the USA, where two workers in a family receive in real terms the same amount as in 1970 received one working man, the head of the family.

Since the Russian Federation has been made a peripheral resource part of this economy, the problems common to the entire global economy (first of all, turbulence and hopelessness, loss of hope for a better tomorrow) affect the Russian Federation especially sharply and deeply. But this acuteness does not mean at all that Germany has some other disease, and that there are processes of a different direction: the whole world with the liberals is marching into the same hole, just at different speeds, pushing "suckers" forward, persuading life - "let him will die today, and I will die tomorrow "…

In general, the existing market consumer model of the world economy is completely sterile from the point of view of civilization, since everything is based on the priority of plundering and sharing the loot instead of accumulation and creation.

The resentment of the worst part of the corrupted post-Sovietism with its bestial motivations of young people towards their country is twofold. On the one hand, the young parasite wants everything at once, because it suffers from a clearly expressed mania of its overvalue. Everyone internally feels like a prince, illegally deprived of the throne, and is convinced that no matter how much society gives him, everything will be small.

On the other hand, in parallel with this "revolution of consumer expectations", which immediately set the beggars the highest level of demands, the pathological irresponsibility and ultimate selfishness, previously characteristic only of the criminally marginal environment, is spreading.

Spoiled by liberal chatter (the essence of which is assent to any whim of the crowd, because the crowd is doomed to slaughter, why make the dead nervous?) "Beggar princes" are not ready either to work or fight - to regain their "lost (imaginary) thrones".

They are not ready for any form of SELF-PROPERTY IN LIFE - neither peaceful nor military, and behave like prostitutes, convinced that in response to their favor there will always be someone to pay for them in a restaurant …

This is how a very strange (sociopathological) combination of high ambitions with the behavior of worms is born, the expectation of high consumption simultaneously with the payer for this consumption (for example, Germany, which, according to the parasites, exists only to give a good life to Russian fugitive freeloaders).

Meanwhile, both the real historical aristocracy and the real historical democracy were equally the power of armed and decisive men. Claiming for the best pieces, these people (feudal lords or cowboys) understood perfectly well that everyone needed the best pieces, and were ready to engage in mortal combat for them - first with swords, and then with revolvers and rifles.

Military education, which our slug-like privatizing scum disdains, is the lot of both the English aristocrats and the American bourgeois elite (who know better than others that they will not trade with an unarmed person, they will simply rob him).

Understanding of life opposes the delirium of the personal overvalue of parasites: they want everything at once, but the world around them is not dad and mom so that the parasite can buy everything. The prevailing mood of the worst third of Russian youth turns its carriers into potential victims, into rams that will be slaughtered - either by Europeans or Asians, who will be the first to get to the unprotected throat …

While the young parasite is looking for - where is better, the world is just as persistently looking for - why it might need this young parasite. And if for nothing, then why should he exist at all? - will ask the cruel world.

After all, a person does not live by what he wants, but by what he has managed to defend. What is not protected will be taken away, the law of life!

And what can defend a generation rotten at the initial stage, determined to take everything and not give anything away? As there are natural-born killers, there are also natural-born deserters, and their number in our sick society is simply off scale.

And one day they will hear, as a sentence to their entire way of life - the famous European "Rome does not pay traitors!" But for some reason, the one who betrayed everyone himself is more surprised than others when they betray, use him as a bargaining chip and consumable …

For example, our thief, who at home, among his fellow tribesmen, did not spare neither a child nor an old man, robbing everyone - he is very surprised and makes round eyes when the exported assets are plundered in foreign banks: "how is it, we were told that Swiss banks do not treat customers the way we do!"

The psychological paradox is beyond rational understanding, is not it?

[1] 2018/6/18: UNcalls on USAimmediately to stoppractice removal of children from familiesas punishment for the actions of the parents, said the Supreme UN commissioneron human rights Zeid Ra'ad al-Hussein.

[2] Contrary to the naive propaganda myths persistently blown into the ears, there is currently no clear definition of the right of alienation in the US common law. The amorphous nature of the legal concept allows the judicial system to carry out any volume of confiscations at any time. The famous American economist Lawrence Kotlikoff, winner of the Nobel Prize in Economics for 1972, reported in 1993: “In the United States, over the past ten years, property confiscation has grown from $ 10 million in 1985 to $ 644 million in 1991. year. And that figure nearly doubled the next year when the government confiscated over $ 1 billion in property … The rapidly growing list of reasons why your property could be confiscated now includes over a hundred types of nagging: starting with tax evasion, money laundering and ending with the violation of environmental laws."

Under a law passed already under Obama, virtually any property in the United States can be confiscated in favor of the state in peacetime if the president deems it necessary to "protect national security."

On October 1, 2014, an article was published about how the harsh norms of the American law "Against Property" are embodied in everyday life, using the example of specific personalities: or to the crime they committed. Civil confiscation allows the city to confiscate any property without bringing any charges against the owner. In 2012, the Department of Justice alone recorded confiscations worth 4,200,000,000 billion dollars.

Recommended: