A criminal case is being sewn on Viktor Efimov

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Recently, a prominent public figure, Viktor Alekseevich Efimov, known to millions of our fellow citizens for many years of educational and educational activities, which he conducts, giving his worldview lectures absolutely disinterestedly, for children, schoolchildren, students, politicians, law enforcement officers and housewives, was detained in St. Petersburg the other day. - hundreds of his performances are easily found on the Internet.

The focus of his lectures is primarily educational, he easily and logically reveals the essence of deep-rooted social myths, reveals ways of manipulating society by malicious representatives in power. Without any exaggeration, thousands and thousands of people, and above all among young people, without any drugs, suggestions and manipulations, just listening to V. A. Efimov, received a conscious attitude to alcohol, smoking and drugs, as a result of which they were able to independently free themselves from long-term addictions.

However, the educational, moreover, completely peaceful, anti-violent, activity of V. A. Efimova, in all the years meets resistance from representatives of the alcohol-narcotics industry in the government, from manipulators, who, when opening the mechanisms of manipulating people's minds, prevents them from realizing their plans for the undivided ownership of the “human herd”.

And this long-term confrontation spilled over into the incident with the detention of a 70-year-old public figure on corruption charges. Moreover, this whole fraud is worked out so rudely that the "customers' ears" stick out literally from all sides!

So, the publication "Fontanka" in some completely incomprehensible way publishes an ALREADY READY article about the "corrupt official-Efimov" 5 (FIVE !!!) minutes after the documents were signed by the investigation!

In the same, unrealistically short time frame, a lot of publications appeared in other "semi-yellow" publications - so, it is not known how, a video from a house search appears in the public domain. Under the heading “Wads of money were withdrawn from the former rector of the Agrarian University”, we are shown the surroundings of a small wooden house V. A. Efimova, trying to evoke a feeling of "incredible luxury", which turns out very badly - gold-diamonds, which are seized in kilograms from real corrupt officials, could not be removed, and the "bundles of money" turned out to be one million eight hundred thousand rubles! This is such an incredible amount for a person who has worked as the rector of one of the largest universities in the country for 10 years.

Definitely - proof of corruption! Journalists “accidentally” forget to indicate a specific amount, describing it as “wads of money”.

Contract articles are full of ready-made indictments, which leave no room for doubts and opportunities for excuses: “The former rector of the Agrarian University was detained for a million-dollar kickback. He “pinched off” the innovations of the agro-industrial complex”.

The person has not yet been charged, a protocol of detention has just been drawn up, and the press is already trumpeting - detained for a kickback, pinched off from the agro-industrial complex.

Help on criminal case No. 11801400018000695.

Criminal case No. 11801400018000695 was initiated on 08.06.2018 on the grounds of a crime under Part 4 of Art. 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation on the fact of fraudulent actions on behalf of the management of SPbGAU, as a result of which SPbGAU suffered damage in the amount of more than 1 million rubles. Currently, it is in the production of the senior investigator of the SO OMVD of Russia for the Pushkinsky district of St. Petersburg V. S. Klyushnik.

2018-03-08, the period of preliminary investigation in a criminal case was extended by 1 month, and only up to 3 months, that is, until 2018-08-09.

2018-08-09, the preliminary investigation in the criminal case was suspended on the grounds provided for in paragraph 1 of part 1 of Art. 208 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation.

On 2018-01-10, the decision to suspend the preliminary investigation was canceled.

On 01.11.2018, the preliminary investigation in the criminal case was suspended on the grounds provided for in paragraph 1 of part 1 of Art. 208 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation.

On 2018-14-11, the decision to suspend the preliminary investigation was canceled, the criminal case was accepted for production by the investigator V. S. Klyushnik.

2018-14-11, the judge of the Pushkin court of St. Petersburg, Stryuchkova Y. G. a resolution was issued to authorize the search in the home of V. A. Efimov. The purpose of the search, in accordance with the issued resolution: to find and seize documents relating to the conclusion of an agreement dated 2011-19-11, as well as other documents and items, including electronic media, seals and other documents relevant to a criminal case, as well as items and documents withdrawn from civil circulation.

2018-15-11 at the place of residence of Efimov V. A. a search was carried out, during which, contrary to the requirements of Art. 182 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, without the participation of a specialist, 2 mobile phones, a laptop, as well as a number of documents, cash in the amount of 1.8 million rubles were seized. The seized items and documents were issued by V. A. Efimov. voluntarily.

2018-15-11 at 2:30 p.m. Efimov V. A. detained in the order of Art. 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation.

2018-15-11 Efimov V. A. interrogated as a suspect in a criminal case on suspicion of committing a crime under Part 4 of Art. 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

2018-16-11 Efimov V. A. charged with committing a crime under Part 4 of Art. 160 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (the decree on the re-qualification of the actions of V. A. Efimov, as well as the grounds for re-qualification were not provided).

2018-16-11 Efimov V. A. interrogated as a defendant in a criminal case, pleaded not guilty of committing a crime, gave detailed testimony of his labor activity at SPbGAU.

On November 19, 2018, the judge of the Pushkinsky District Court of St. Petersburg, Yu. G. Stryuchkov. Efimov V. A. a preventive measure was chosen in the form of detention for a period until 2018-14-12. During the trial, the lawyers revealed a number of procedural violations, which the judge did not give any legal assessment.

In the materials submitted to the court in support of the petition for the selection of a preventive measure in the form of detention, V. A. there are copies of the interrogations of witnesses, as well as of the victim, however, none of the interrogated persons in the case directly points to V. A. Efimov, as to the person who committed the crime described in the decision to bring him as an accused. Moreover, a number of the interrogated witnesses do not know V. A. Efimov at all. and his surname does not sound at all in their testimony. However judge Stryuchkov Yew. G. in his decision indicates that the materials of the criminal case contain incriminating Efimov V. A. testimony of witnesses and the victim, which contradicts the very essence of the protocols presented by the investigator.

When choosing a preventive measure, the judge did not take into account either the age of V. A. Efimov, nor his social status, nor the presence of many state awards, nor his contribution to the development of science, nor positive characteristics, as well as the absence of a criminal record, social attachment to the place of production, preliminary investigation and the presence of a complex disease (shingles), requiring constant monitoring in medical institutions.

Conclusions:

• None of the defendants in the case directly points to V. A. Efimov, as the person who committed the crime described in the decision to bring him as a defendant, in connection with which the basis on which V. A. was detained in the order of Art. 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, disappears.
• The information specified in the SPbGAU inspection report does not confirm the involvement of V. A. Efimov. to commit a crime.
• Taking into account the procedural violations committed during the search, the search protocol also has no legal force, since it was drawn up in violation of the current legislation, the items seized during the search must be returned.
• The charge was brought against V. A. Efimov. illegal, since there was no re-qualification of the actions of V. A. Efimov. from st. 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation on Art. 160 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the right to defense of V. A. Efimov has been violated.
• Taking into account the violations of the current legislation during the collection of evidence, given the fact that none of the defendants in the criminal case directly points to the commission of V. A. crimes under Part 4 of Art. 160 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, taking into account the fact that V. A. to commit a crime, as well as taking into account information about the personality of V. A. Efimov. - age 70, permanent residence on the territory of St. Petersburg, inability to influence the witnesses and the victim in any way, in any way to threaten them, given that V. A. is not socially dangerous, has no previous convictions, is socially tied to the place of preliminary investigation (family, work, housing), has a rare disease, the treatment of which is carried out in special medical institutions and not carrying out treatment can only aggravate the state of health of V. A. Efimova, a preventive measure in the form of detention is not necessary, and its election may lead to a deterioration in the health of V. A. Efimov. and vice versa, exacerbate the already complicated process of criminal investigation.
• In this connection, V. A. it is necessary to change the measure of restraint to one not related to imprisonment, that is, to recognizance not to leave the place and proper behavior, house arrest, or bail.

Explanation of V. A. Efimova on the essence of the incident to the leadership of SPbGAU

Dear Evgeny Viktorovich! Since 2005, I have worked as a rector of the university, I resigned in December 2015 due to my age due to the expiration of the contract. During his work, he was awarded the Order of Merit to the Fatherland, II degree, certificates of honor of the Government of the Russian Federation, the Presidential Administration, city and regional authorities. He had no penalties or comments. In the past, I worked as the Secretary of the Leningrad City Party Committee, I am a public person who defends the sovereignty and public security of Russia, the ideological foundations of a healthy lifestyle and overcoming negative manifestations in the youth environment.

After my dismissal, in agreement with the Ministry of Agriculture, my appointment was supposed to be the president of the university, but it did not take place. The opposition to my appointment was organized by a group of historically influential people at the university, as a demonstrative and intimidating event in relation to everyone who is focused on suppressing corruption in the collective. I stated my position in a statement addressed to the rector on 2016-29-01. (copy attached). Its essence is that in November 2015, the dean of the Faculty of Law, Zeynalov I. M., was arrested for a bribe. I really took an irreconcilable position in relation to corruption, earlier twice at the Academic Council I raised the issue of suspicion of Zeynalov, in addition, I was a member of the Public Council at the OmVD of the Pushkin region. In the statement, I pointed to the anonymous threats against me of possible physical harm and threats of future financial disclosures. All the directors of the institutes were involved in the formation of a negative attitude towards me using the administrative resource, and today they "remain loyal" to the previously held position. After the introduction of the formed negative assessments in my address into the team, they only purposefully developed over time, which ensured their stability to this day.

Despite my appeal, all personnel decisions of S. N. Shirokov were made in the direction of strengthening the position of the group, prone to manifestations of corruption. Suspended from work under my pressure early. of the legal department Magomayev R. M., headed the administrative and legal department. Former Chairman of the Anti-Corruption Commission IV Solonko, who had previously worked as a career officer in the special services, was removed from this work. In the context of the weakening of anti-corruption control, which was previously carried out by me and I. V. Solonko, corruption has ceased to be an exceptional phenomenon. As a result, subordinates directly to the rector RM Magomayev were arrested for bribes and early. Department of Development and Capital Construction Gluzman E. B., and rector Shirokov S. N. in November 2016 was removed from his post.

The arrests that took place, the removal from office of the newly appointed rector, undoubtedly, created nervousness and instability in the work of the university. This objective dissatisfaction in the collective with the skillful rumors of a group consisting of six supportive people, with the speeches of the committed Chairman of the trade union committee Sergeeva LS at the general meeting was again redirected to me. After that, the work on discrediting I. V. Solonko and me acquired a systemic multifactorial character, with the connection of new, presumably known to me, centers of official and non-official influence outside the university. In many ways, this was facilitated, according to my estimates, by the transfer of I. M. Zeynalov from the regime of detention to the regime of house arrest, the trial of S. N. Shirokov. on reinstatement to the post of rector. At the moment, there is a coordination of all multidirectional actions and the writing of an endless stream of lengthy anonymous letters to all administrative and law enforcement agencies with false names and positions. In the Ministry of Agriculture, in other departments, this creates the illusion of the reality of the information reflected in the letters, allegedly, of university employees. The events that take place, when five people are summoned to the prosecutor's office for extremism and financial violations attributed to Efimov, according to my estimates, are perceived in the collective as a temporary tactical victory of corruption-oriented movements.

It is obvious to all sane employees that an order is being processed for me. An implicit, covert influence on the law enforcement system is realized with the help of rumors and anonymous letters, by throwing them some, personally oriented to me, previously unnoticed by numerous control commissions, administrative and legal violations. The anonymous letters contain information that is available only at the level of the rector, early. legal department. All developments are selective for the period of my rector's office and are selected so that they do not directly affect the activities of S. N. Shirokov, who was then vice-rector for property management.

The current situation not only negatively affects the work of the Federal institution, but also demonstrates to the team what can happen to those who decide to fight corruption. I have always actively cooperated with law enforcement agencies, including the FSB department for the Moskovsky district, and today I would like to count on their more active position in countering the collusion formed against me. At present, according to my estimates, a professional team of lawyers is working against me, who is not experienced in the intricacies of jurisprudence, one of whose Associations was R. M. Magomayev.

Dear Evgeny Viktorovich! I believe that the information I have provided will allow you to evaluate all processes with greater objectivity. occurring in the collective, to more actively prevent unjust influence on the position of law enforcement agencies on issues that are actually raised against me by corrupt lines. For my part, at your suggestion, in agreement with you, I am ready to take any steps that can objectively lead to the stabilization of the situation in the team under your leadership, to a decrease in the level of corruption.

Professor Efimov V. A.