Table of contents:

Dmitry Medvedev has categorically banned anti-Semitism. At any level
Dmitry Medvedev has categorically banned anti-Semitism. At any level

Video: Dmitry Medvedev has categorically banned anti-Semitism. At any level

Video: Dmitry Medvedev has categorically banned anti-Semitism. At any level
Video: Boney M - Rasputin (Lyrics) 2024, May
Anonim

How not to recall the words of the great Voltaire: "To find out who is in control of you, just find out who you are not allowed to criticize."

Just recently, directly from the First Channel of Russian state television, Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev explained who, in his opinion, categorically not allowed to criticize.

And now it is becoming clear why the Jewish scum is cleaning the Ukrainian territory from the Slavs living in the Donetsk and Lugansk regions.

Just listen to what this polished man who returned from a tour of Israel said. The Jews' immediate plans are to transform Ukraine into a "Heavenly Jerusalem" !!! "Ukraine and Israel are one people, one destiny!"

And no one asks the 40 million Slavic people living in Ukraine whether the "goyim" want such "happiness" or not.

The Jews have already decided everything for them!

And our Russian Jews, on the sly from the state-forming Russian people, as it turned out, are implementing their large-scale project to transform Russia into a World State under a completely Jewish leadership!

I talked about this in the article "Passion for Isaac, what is behind them?".

And how, against the backdrop of all this, should we assess Dmitry Medvedev's statement about a complete ban on criticism of Jews and Jews, and at any level ?!

I gave my answer to this question in a previous article. "Slavic GEN, the awakening of which is very afraid of the Jews".

February 2, 2017 Murmansk. Anton Blagin

P. S

Important application: "Lies and truths about the rulers of the world":

A comment:

White Rus: if Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev raises the issue of anti-Semitism bluntly, then, obviously, there is an unambiguous need to give an absolutely clear and unambiguous definition of what is "anti-Semitism"!

Is it possible at all to use the words "Jew", "Zionism" ("Jewish fascism")? Maybe it makes sense to replace the word "Jew" with, for example, the word "alien", and if this term is accepted, should it be put in quotation marks?

I would like to know these things at the legislative level!

And if the message of our Nenashen Premier is not his personal funny fantasies and wishes, but a clear state message, then let's, for a start, start a broad public discussion on this subject! After which, I believe, the Prime Minister will either no longer fantasize on TV and will do what he is supposed to do according to his job description - the national economy with the Jewish managers subordinate to him, or he will come up with a legislative initiative to completely ban the mention of the word "Jew" in all cases except in extremely positive. And, moreover, to determine the degree of this very positivity.

Well, let's start raising questions, until they were banned about Jews in particular, or all other questions about our reality in general?

Go!

Are the questions people may ask themselves about the negative activities of Jews related to anti-Semitism? Can these questions be posed to society as a whole. (Example: can the question of the ethnic composition of criminal groups be raised and can this issue be considered from a scientific point of view to study this phenomenon? And is it necessary to obtain a special permit to study this issue, or maybe a special license is needed? And if it is is needed, who issues it, and to whom?).

What to do if Russians and other Russians are discussing in kitchens the issue of seizing the public property of the USSR (the abolition procedure of which is absolutely illegitimate) exclusively by representatives of a UNTITUAL people? Should such discussions "in kitchens" be interrupted on their own, within the framework of a public initiative, or should they be reported "where necessary"?

And if, for example, the father and mother are discussing the dismissal of the father from the job of a purely specific Russian, and his taking his place by Novodvorsky (nee Katz), who is completely inappropriate for the captured position in terms of working qualities, then will the son, remembering Pavlik Morozov, report on father? Or he should interrupt the discussion with the following phrase: "Be quiet folder, be silent, remember the order of Dmitry Anatolyevich! And, in the end, THEY are appointed by God, there is nothing to discuss here! Besides, I still have to finish my studies, and also then find a job …. "?!

Recommended: