Well, who is the "losh" now?

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

One day a certain person comes to a car service center, complains that the brakes are jammed and the wheels do not spin well for this reason, the disks get very hot while driving, the fuel consumption is high and it is difficult to get under way. In most cases, the matter is clear: the brake cylinders need to be replaced and / or lubricated and then replaced. Works for a couple of hours. But how does it really work?

The manager of the service center realizes that he is a "lousy", this is determined by a couple of test questions, which, in fact, do not mean anything for the work of the master:

- Have you pumped the brake fluid for a long time?

- How is it?

- It doesn't matter, we'll figure it out. Have you changed the pads for a long time?

- What is it?

- Well, well, we'll see for ourselves.

Everything is clear, "loshok", you can breed!

"Loshok" leaves the service center and expects a call, during which the manager will report the result of the brake system diagnostics and announce the cost of the repair. Here the bell rings, and from there Dr. Fox sauce pours out in a benevolent voice:

- You know, we saw that you actually have a serious problem there, it’s strange that you even got there… How long have you been driving with this problem?

- Well, a couple of weeks already. - says the confused customer.

- Yes-ah-ah … the pipe is the case, if they immediately turned, it would have been easier to do everything, and so change the main one with an amplifier, the pedal and fittings all burned out right away.

- Oh-oh, is it really so scary? - the customer is even more frightened.

- I say, you will have to change the master cylinder, moreover, together with the vacuum booster and the pedal at once, so as not to adjust to each other, the fittings for pumping the fluid have become attached to everything, and they turned out nafig, so you will have to change the calipers, and at the same time, of course, the disks with pads; preliminary price of N thousand rubles. Will do?

- Oh, and somehow it is easier to repair? - the client asks with hope in his voice.

- No, no, no, for us this is a passed stage, we often encounter this, then they bring such cars to us on a tow truck … yesterday they brought one, the owner also just wanted to do it, but now everything is bent for him and the steering wheel has fallen off. We do not do this, but we do it immediately and reliably. Are we going to do this or not?

- Well, let's. - the customer agrees doomedly.

That's it, the client has been successfully "divorced", the loot from the "loshka" has been cut and repairs costing a couple of hundred rubles magically turn out to be hundreds of times more expensive. But who are the "loshok" here in reality? And in order to understand this, you need to know the second half of the story.

So, our client paid the cost of the repair, comparable to half his salary, and the workshop workers didn't actually change anything, they just took out the brake cylinders, cleaned them with sandpaper, greased them with a special lubricant for the calipers and put everything back together. The price of the issue is comparable to the purchase of a good ice cream for the children of the hero of our story.

The craftsmen celebrate the next "wiring", praise the manager and quickly run to satisfy the entire spectrum of their degradation-parasitic needs with the proceeds. But what is it?..

Here one of the masters gets fired in a week, he contacted the wrong "losh" and that "leaked" him very well, substituting him in full. He slipped a cunningly broken car, and then dumped the breakdowns on it and made it fix it for free, threatening with connections in the prosecutor's office, and even sheared money for moral damage. The director did not tolerate this and drove the master with a filthy broom. Another master literally a day later gets into a major accident, after which the Mazda bought with the money of “divorced” clients turns out to be unsuitable for repairs in principle. He himself receives a lifelong disability and can no longer work in his specialty. Our manager swears heavily with his wife, as a result, she takes the children through the court, and he himself walks down an incline, and for six months is left on the street without a home and family, money; there is nowhere to take for the next dose - a year later he is found dead in a puddle under the bridge - he choked, because he could not get out of the puddle into which he fell. A car fell on the third master when he was digging under it: the lift racks broke down, and all at once and the safety brake system did not even help, which (as it is believed), in principle, cannot happen. The service itself closed, because the owner noticed a strange mysticism that began to happen, and the clients somehow stopped appearing, and the rest of the workers began to hurriedly run away. The owner of the workshop did not know all the scales of deception on the part of his employees, and therefore he got off the easiest of all: he simply lost his business and for a long time wandered from one job to another, unable to find a place for himself. Then he found the strength to work off his sins in an amicable way, embarked on the path of enlightenment, donated a significant part of his belongings to charity, with an extraordinary effort passed a series of tests in the form of temptations to make quick and dishonest earnings, after which he was “accidentally” invited to a good job right away to a high position, where he still works, without knowing grief.

Why did it turn out this way? Because our trusting and respectable client, who was "shod" in the workshop, turned out to be not quite an ordinary person, he had a special gift: absolutely all people who deliberately harmed him received a "return" that was many times greater in its consequences than the degree of that harm, which they inflicted, or even just wanted to inflict on their victim. The victim himself always, in one way or another, returned to himself what he had lost due to his credulity. So, for example, after the described case in a car service, an unexpected unscheduled bonus was given to him at work, equal to the cost of that ill-fated repair, plus enough for the children for ice cream. It was necessary at the end of the year to reset the cash desk of the company in which he worked, and the kind director decided to divide the resulting excess profit among the employees. By the way, the salary of the director of that company was significantly lower than that of most of his employees, everything was fair.

Absolutely everyone who made a profit at the expense of our hero and celebrated the "loshka", making fun of him, later turned out to be "loshkas" themselves. Why? Let's take a look at what happened in the subtle plane of Being. On the example of the described case.

For simplicity of description, we will use the image of the devil who tempts people, however, those readers for whom this does not suit, can easily find another explanation, it is not difficult at all, but it will take longer to explain, and I do not want to do this. So, the devil sees a "loshka-manager" working in a car service center and says to him:

- Look "loshok", dilute it!

- Is he definitely a "lousy"? the incredulous manager asks.

- Of course, look, here is his natal chart, he has Venus in the second house, Pluto in the fifth, the orbs of the aspects intersect at an angle of 39 degrees, which is three times my favorite number, which means I can guarantee the success of the operation. Moreover, the diagrams of the moments of mismatch of the basic antagonistic transits are strictly negative: he is a loser in life, he can and should be milked! And you have a wife, children, you need to feed somehow, if you want to live, be able to turn around, you know … well, the end justifies the means, then you will buy a fur coat for your wife with this money, and fix the house. And this "losh" is wealthy, he has enough money. Let's! - the devil pours the Dr. Fox sauce into our manager's ears.

- Hmm, come on, I'll try to ask him a couple of questions to check. - said the already warm manager.

- Come on, come on, ask how long he has been pumping the brake … - the devil, pleased with himself, suggested, warming up the boiler already prepared for the poor guy-manager.

Now ask yourself a simple question: who are you guys really getting bogged down with? Who turned out to be a "losh" here?

These people like our gullible hero are called "closers", and I mentioned them briefly in the series of articles "Black and White Methods of Education and Training" (Part III). The name comes from the word "bring". What to bring? The malevolence of a person before its finale, of course. That is, they turn out to be that last straw that triggers feedback, and all at once: the offender receives in one fell swoop for all his atrocities of a similar nature.

So, the "closer" can play the role of a kind of "zapadlo", or a trap for the villain. With all his appearance, he produces the feeling of a "loshka" and a harmless person who wants to harm. He can even provoke him to be harmed and more often always obediently puts himself under attack. From the outside, it almost always seems that the villain defeats the "closer", but in reality the malicious person must leave beaten in every sense of the word, he just does not always immediately understand this, since the denouement comes a little later than this fatal meeting. The closer's talent lies in the fact that he knows how to bear grievances calmly, does not get angry, does not want revenge and DOES NOT harm the offender. He simply makes it possible to carry out on himself someone's malicious intent (although this does not prevent him from defending himself, but if it came to that, then he does it without anger, feelings of revenge or hatred, but calmly and maybe even with pity for the offender). When meeting such a person, the villain is absolutely doomed, and the more righteous person is absolutely not in danger. An inattentive observer will always think that the villain has successfully implemented his plan, because from the outside everything is EXCELLENTLY VISIBLE: here is the villain, here he hits our closer in the face, he falls and crawls away defeated. The villain grins and considers himself the winner … but then something goes wrong. In a couple of days, the "closer" does not even have traces of a blow on his face, and the villain's life turns upside down, if, of course, he lives up to this moment at all. But the observer can no longer see this, everything is clear and understandable to him, he drew conclusions and went on.

If I have the opportunity, I will write about such people in detail, but now I have brewed this topic so that ordinary blog readers think about their behavior when they consider themselves winners or losers in any controversial issue. I will briefly describe the directions to which this topic immediately leads us.

First direction, which follows from this story, is described in the well-known aphorism: if we do not change the direction of our movement, then we risk ending up where we are going, or: be careful in your desires, they tend to come true. In more detail, all the same is written in the story "Well, what did you want?.." and in the First Epistle (part II-III). By exercising your malice, you can celebrate victory, but with absolute precision and reliability, you get negative feedback consequences that, like the monkey paw effect, destroy all the benefits you get. At the same time, you are well aware of this in advance, because the Rules of the Game are written in black and white in our culture, so you cannot but know about why it is so bad to deliberately commit evil.

Second direction … Many people get upset and offended when they are offended or bred as suckers, or when someone more cunning or powerful treats them inappropriately. They may be angry or even dream of revenge, in verbal disputes they also want to offend the offender as they were hurt. What for? After all, it is precisely with these base qualities that such people only postpone or soften the feedback for the offender, as if taking some of it onto themselves, because they themselves - KNOWING IN ADVANCE ABOUT THEIR MISCENSE - descend to primitive behavior. A person of high morality will not do this, he will try to help the offender realize his mistake if he thinks that he is capable of it, or will go on with the thought “God is your judge”, giving God the final decision. And this decision will be made immediately - the flow of events for the offender is now uniquely defined, as long as he does not change his morality himself.

Yes, the righteous in this case, it seems, can suffer himself. But in reality, this is how the situation looks ONLY from the outside. In fact, he always comes out clean, even if he dies. You just cannot know the whole plot and correctly see the picture of events in order to draw at least some plausible conclusions about other people, especially if the degree of their moral development at the moment turned out to be higher than yours.

What has been said in this direction does NOT mean that it is necessary in all cases to give up resistance to enemies. No, you can resist and sometimes you must, but the main thing is to do it without anger, hatred and other base feelings.

Third direction … Let's recall the lines of one famous song (fragment):

In life, everything is given a place

Evil coexists with good.

If the bride leaves for another, It is not known who was lucky.

Let's change our conclusions with the help of this logic: if someone successfully committed malice towards you and rejoices in victory, then it is not known who remained defeated. If it seems that you were “divorced”, then the “divorced” is actually the “divorcing”, and not you, but on one condition on your part.

What condition am I talking about?