American "lunar scam" and new revelations

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Russians have a saying "we look at a book - we see a fig !?" This is about the fact that many people, looking at a text, picture or photograph, may not understand or comprehend even half of the information that this or that text, picture or photograph carries.

This feature of the human psyche has been known to sages for a long time, as evidenced by the words of the famous medieval Italian artist, the author of "La Gioconda", who presented to the world, in addition to talented paintings, the idea of a parachute and the idea of a "helicopter" (helicopter). So Leonardo da Vinci (1452 - 1519) about "we look at the book - we see a fig !?" said this: "There are three types of people: those who see, those who see when they are shown; and those who do not see (even when they are shown)."

And Leonardo da Vinci also said: "Among the fools there is a certain sect called hypocrites, who constantly learn to deceive themselves and others, but more others than themselves, but in reality they deceive more of themselves than others."

Have you already guessed who it was said about ?!

On March 8, 2017, I published an article "Everything secret is becoming clear: the Americans were not on the moon!" to the moon.

The main goal of this grandiose deception was that the United States wanted to demonstrate its greatness to the whole world. They say that the first person to fly around the Earth in the Vostok spacecraft in 1961 was the Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin, and the first person who managed to step on the lunar surface was the American astronaut Neil Armstrong! And this is much cooler than just flying around the Earth in a spaceship!

And now, half a century later, it became finally clear that the "American lunar epic" presented with great fanfare was a grandiose deception! In 1969, the United States did not have such rocket engines that could propel their spacecraft to the Moon with a crew on board and bring people back later. The United States, as it turned out, does not even have such engines today!

In this article, I want to talk about the fact that not only were there no American astronauts on the moon, but also their car, which was presented to the whole world in 1971. Here it is in this picture: on the right, a module allegedly descended from lunar orbit, and on the left a lunomobile delivered to the surface of an earth satellite on August 7, 1971 by this very descent module during the Apollo 15 space expedition.

Many people, looking at this famous photograph, took the information presented on it for the truth and believed that this picture was actually taken on the Moon …

The consciousness of millions of people half a century ago was amazed and distracted by a picture of how American astronauts dashingly saddled an "iron four-wheeled horse" ride on the Moon. By the way, to this day, only a few sober-minded people think, but could such a thing have happened then ?!

Now let's remember how Leonardo da Vinci said: "There are three types of people: those who see, those who see when they are shown; and those who do not see (even when they are shown)." My further story will be the story of a "seer", which I dedicate to the second kind of people: "those who see when they are shown."

We are now opening an encyclopedic article in the world Wikipedia: "Lunar car":

Lunar car (also lunar rover, lunar vehicle, English lunar rover, from English lunar roving vehicle, abbr. LRV) - a four-wheeled transport rover for movement of people on the lunar surface, used during the last expeditions of the Apollo program - Apollo 15, Apollo 16 and Apollo 17 in the early 1970s.

The developer and general contractor is Boeing. It was a two-seater electric car powered by two non-rechargeable batteries. The control of the electric vehicle was entrusted to the commander of the crew … Source.

Another encyclopedic article in the same world Wikipedia:

"Apollo 15" (eng. Apollo 15) - the ninth manned spacecraft in the framework of the "Apollo" program, the fourth landing of people on the moon. Crew commander David Scott and lunar module pilot James Irwin spent almost three days on the moon (just under 67 hours). The total duration of the three exits to the lunar surface was 18 hours and 30 minutes. On the Moon, the crew used a lunar vehicle for the first time, having driven it for a total of 27, 9 km … "Source.

Why do you think the Americans had to show the whole world that their astronauts ride on the Moon in 1971 in a Boeing car?

The answer is simple: on November 17, 1970, the Soviet Proton rocket launched from the Baikonur cosmodrome with the Luna-17 space station, which successfully delivered the world's first rover (Lunokhod-1) to the moon. Accordingly, the United States wanted to literally surpass the technical achievement of the USSR and show that the Americans could not do that!

Lunokhod-1 (Apparatus 8EL No. 203) is the world's first rover that successfully operated on the surface of another celestial body - the Moon from November 17, 1970 to September 14, 1971. It belongs to the series of Soviet remote-controlled self-propelled vehicles "Lunokhod" for exploring the Moon (project E-8), worked on the Moon for eleven lunar days (10, 5 Earth months), traveled 10,540 meters.”Source.

This stamp, issued in the USSR on this stunning event, clearly shows that the Soviet "Lunokhod" is attached to the descent module, which is equipped with soft-landing liquid-propellant jet engines.

But along these guide skids, Lunokhod-1 was then able to safely move to the lunar surface. They are shown folded on the stamp.

The above image is computer graphics. How Lunokhod-1 descended from the lunar module is presented by the exposition in the Russian Museum of Cosmonautics:

Now attention!

How the American lunomobile descended from the Apollo 15 lunar module in 1971, and where it fit there, probably no one knows! The mass disinformation media have so foolish people's heads with the very fact of "American astronauts riding in a lunomobile" that for some reason no one thought about such an important question!

Where could a lunomobile be located in this descent module, and how did it then end up on the surface of the moon?

By the way, in comparison with the Soviet "lunar module", which at first glance looks like a high-tech creation of scientists made of metal, tubes and wires, the American "lunar module" in this photo looks like literally a craft made of foil and cardboard …

This picture clearly shows the ratio of the size of a man in a spacesuit and that props, which was revealed to the world as the "lunar module" of the Apollo series.

In the center is the "lunar module" Apollo 15, which allegedly delivered this car to the moon.

Lunar Rover # 1 at the Boeing plant in Kent, Washington, just before being sent to the Kennedy Space Center.

Where could a car with such wheels fit in this module, given that the rocket power plant should have been located below, for some reason carefully hidden by the Americans behind a shiny golden foil, and at the top there should have been a workplace of two brave astronauts? One, according to legend, remained in circumlunar orbit.

And another "joke", as the young people say: even if the lunomobile was hidden somewhere inside this structure, how did it get out of there?

Where are the guide skids similar to those along which the first Soviet Lunokhod was launched to the moon ?!

Please note: Soviet engineers placed Lunokhod-1 in the descent module in the only place where it could be: above the fuel tanks and a liquid-propellant jet engine, which ensured a soft landing of the entire complex on the lunar surface.

Here, apparently, the US Apollo 15 descent module should have had fuel tanks and a soft-landing liquid-propellant jet engine:

Attention again! This one (below) can be said to be a giant "landing module", not covered from anyone's eyes with foil, was created by Soviet engineers solely so that the entire structure with "Lunokhod-1" on board would softly land on the lunar surface. So much metal and fuel were needed to simply provide a soft landing for Lunokhod-1 alone (without people!). This module did not need to take off from the Moon and fly back to the circumlunar orbit. He remained on the moon forever.

The American descent module Apollo 15 had to then be injected into the lunar orbit of two astronauts: James Irwin and David Scott. Moreover, for the ascent of astronauts into a circumlunar orbit, a propulsion system was required at all not of such size! The force of gravity on the moon is only 6 times less than the earth's gravity, and not thousands! And there, yes, there is no atmosphere, the resistance of which does not need to be overcome as when launching a spacecraft from Earth, but still! Remember how much fuel was needed and what jet engines had to be created in order to put the world's first cosmonaut, Yuri Gagarin, in a tiny capsule with a diameter of about 2 meters!

Everything that was under the capsule with Yuri Garin was fuel and rocket engines.

Now reduce this rocket in mass even tens of times, and you still won't get what the poor quality cartoon shows us, which the Americans officially pass off as a real filming of the Apollo 15 module launch from the lunar surface. This shooting was allegedly carried out by a camera mounted on a lunar car!

Commentary: “After the cockpit was pressurized, the astronauts did not take off their spacesuits for the first time in three days on the moon, they only removed gloves, helmets and portable life support system backpacks, connecting oxygen and water hoses of the lunar module to the spacesuits. 23 minutes before takeoff, an announcement was made in Houston for the press that the TV camera of the Lunar Rover, due to the problems that have arisen, will not track the ascent of the Falcon (the commander's call sign), but will only show a static plan. David Scott pressed the stage separation button and started the engine, after which he confirmed to the on-board computer that the program could be continued. After 9 seconds, the Falcon's takeoff stage broke away from the landing stage and began to climb rapidly. And immediately the music of the USAF song “Let's Go! blue heights! " (English "Off We Go Into The Wild Blue Yonder") Source.

Attention again!

We are assured that the take-off stage broke away from the landing stage and rushed into the lunar orbit! Judging by this very poor quality video, the landing stage is what is indicated by the red ellipse in the left photo, and the take-off stage is what is indicated by the red ellipse in the right photo:

The question is, where are the containers with tons of fuel? And where is the main engine, which was supposed to bring the take-off stage into the lunar orbit ???

Ah, the high-temperature jet engine was, it turns out, according to the drawings, built directly into the living compartment where the two astronauts were ?! And at the same time they were not cooked in this compartment like two hard-boiled eggs ?!

Look, the Americans have published a drawing (picture!) For the "suckers", explaining the internal structure of the "lunar module" descent. Studying it is like looking at a fence with a three-letter word written on it. The informative value is about the same.

Pay attention to the drawn tanks with fuel 15 and oxidizer 17, placed in the landing stage. They are, firstly, much smaller than the landing stage of our "Lunokhod-1" and, secondly, at the takeoff stage (outlined by a red ellipse) the fuel tank 9 is ridiculously small, and for the oxidizer tank it looks like and there was no place at all !!!

This "drawing of Apollo" is just a mockery of common sense! Particularly shocking is the fact that the takeoff stage jet engine (its combustion chamber!) Goes deep into the living compartment, and only a small thin-walled hood separates this hot "soldering iron" from the asses of American astronauts!

And how can you not remember the great Leonardo da Vinci again ?! "Among the fools there is a certain sect called hypocrites who continuously learn to deceive themselves and others, but more others than themselves, but in reality they deceive more of themselves than others."

Appendix:

1. "All the secret becomes clear: the Americans were not on the moon!"

2. "How the drivers of Lunokhod-1 congratulated women on March 8!"

March 9, 2017 Murmansk. Anton Blagin

Comments:

Karmadon: about "Moon Rover" you are wrong, Anton. Here is a video that proves that the lunar vehicle was manually removed from the Apollo 15 lunar module by two astronauts:

Anton Blagin: thanks for this unique video! It explains why the Americans needed on their "lunar props" a metal foil covering the bottom of the module! This is the magician's screen! Its purpose is to make it incomprehensible how both the lunomobile and the engine for soft landing on the Moon with their own fuel supply could fit in the same volume!

If there was a lunomobile behind the golden foil, then where is the engine for a soft landing on the moon ?! This is already a rhetorical question that does not require an answer!

It was a grandiose scam to raise the prestige of the United States of America, whose leaders were trying to prove to everyone that the United States was the No. 1 superpower

I want to end my story with this very caustic, but fair caricature.

Alex Boberman: Anton, why pour from empty to empty, if the American launch vehicle did not have enough MOMENT OF PULSE to bring all this Halabuda even to the Earth's LEO … Everything else is already secondary … there, in three days, a dose of over 600 roentgens per snail was obtained), and lunar photos without stars against the background of a black sky, and not bloated spacesuits, and a landing module made of bare shiny galvanized steel about a millimeter thick, and even no signal delay when communicating with missions …

AntonBlagin "Alex Boberman: we must talk about THIS until an end is put in the story with the "lunar scam" and until all the media write that the Americans have deceived the whole world! So far this has not been observed! So I did the right thing to write about this grandiose fraud! It is necessary that literally every person knows this!

Slavik Yablochny: you need to change the name of this country. America - Scam! This will be more accurate. Yes, and you need to remember who inhabited this country … (Rogues of all stripes).

Hourly: Anton, if you want to make comparisons in energy more correctly, then you need to start not from Lunokhod-1, but from Luna-16 - with approximately the same flight pattern and energy costs, as well as the degree of reliability. By the way, about reliability - Luna-16 was able to deliver lunar soil only on the 4th attempt. Apollo, with its series of trouble-free flights, is certainly beyond the bounds of reliability!

So, for Luna-16, the Proton-K / D rocket complex was used, 23 tons at LEO. Having squeezed everything out of technology and mathematics, our scientists and engineers were able to deliver 101 grams of soil to Earth - this is everything that the energy capabilities of rocket technology and Tsiolkovsky's formulas allow. How it was possible, with a supposedly missile system only 6 times greater carrying capacity (140 tons of LEO), to manage to return a 5-ton module to Earth, still remains a mystery.

For clarity, here is a photograph of a Soviet module taking off from the Moon. The red circle marks the capsule returning to Earth.

Vsevolod Voronov Sentry: there is no mystery here. First, 101 grams is the mass of the lunar soil, not a capsule. Secondly, the Apollo descent vehicle did not land on the moon. The engines and fuel needed to return to Earth remained in circumlunar orbit, while only the landing and take-off stages descended on the Moon.

Sentry Vsevolod Voronov: otherwise I do not know! This does not provide significant gains. Lugging an additional landing module with you in which 2/3 of the crew and plus an electric car, etc., and then throwing it away is not the case when you can win something. The weight of the Luna-16 capsule is about 30 kg, the Apollo descent module is about 5000 kg. Do you feel the difference? By the way, the capsule overloads during the descent reached 100 G. How could the Apollo capsule first manage to get into the thinnest ballistic corridor, having no control or experience, and then splash down exactly next to the aircraft carrier? Everything has long been clear, do not waste time trying to prove the unprovable!

White Rus: Anton, I'm shocked by your analysis! Nobody has done such an alignment yet! Although you are not the first to question the American "moon epic". As for the Pindos pioneers, this is just an intellectual lewdness for the narrow-minded Pindos and the Russian fools who have joined them, looking both in the mouth and in the ass to the same Pindos.

That's when NASA experts will explain how pioneers shit in flight and on the Moon and, as in the absence of knowledge on space medicine, drugs for adaptation and special. simulators, these unfinished star-pilots, a few hours after splashdown, galloped along the ramps of airplanes and helicopters, unlike Russian cosmonauts, who themselves could not move normally for several days. Let them explain at least these everyday little things, although in fact, these are gigantic problems!

I don't even want to talk about other jambs. Let the Pindos create a space toilet for a start, vaginonauts are shitty! It's funny. P. S. A month later, April 12, is the Day of the Cosmic Triumph of the Russians, the Russian Spirit and the Russian Intellect. Let's get back to the topic and post it!

Pol Pot's smile: two or three people can agree and deceive all of humanity and, yes, fuck it, fifty people (although this is already beyond the limits of possibilities) … But to organize and make lies for decades several thousand involved directly in the lunar program … how, how? Look how sincerely Americans are happy in the control center … Is that all the actors from Hollywood? Just imagine, they all know that this is a lie, EVERYTHING! And none of them screwed up in front of the camera … The great director gathered them in the MCC and taught them how to make faces like that ?!

Anton Blagin: You ask me how hypocrites could deceive all of humanity for fifty years? OK! My answer is: read next my article about the fake terrorist attack in the American Boston, which was staged in 2013. In this article, I have revealed the technology of another grandiose deception of humanity. The facts and the audacity of the people involved in this deception are simply amazing.