The last line of defense of Tartary

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

What does the winner do in the occupied territories in the first place? That's right, he destroys the history of the captured country. Without the destruction of the people's memory, it is impossible to establish dominance in the occupied territories.

Otherwise, a guerrilla war awaits him, and it always ends in defeat for the occupier. As long as the warrior remembers why he shed blood, it is not possible to turn him into a slave. As soon as a person loses the heritage of their ancestors, he immediately does everything possible to regain what belongs to him by right. As soon as a person loses his mind, read - memory, everything becomes indifferent to him. He loses his taste for life, ceases to create and goes with the flow, considering himself a hostage of circumstances. Having lost the meaning of existence, a person takes the path of self-destruction, burning himself up in idleness, drunkenness, drug addiction, and wallowing in all other types of "legal drugs". Such as: television series, battles of sports fans, lists of idols, and eternal aimless walking in the desert, under the whistle of the whips of the drivers, following the carrot dangling in front of the nose on a string. By "walking" I mean what millions of Egyptologists, Sumerologists, Accadologists and other "OLOGOV" are engaged in transfusing from empty to empty. Their activity boils down to one thing - to be busy all the time and to follow the wrong path, leading them further and further from the truth. The main goal of progressors is to make slaves feel involved in "great" things and not be distracted by what is really going on. The set of tools for this is the broadest. From inflating a "sensation" about a buffoon who fancies himself a people's artist and believes that he can crush people on an expensive car with a drunken snout, with purchased rights in his pocket, to the deliberate creation of all-consuming tragedies, such as "terrorist attacks" with exploded "terrorists "high-rise buildings and towers of the World Trade Center in New York. The purpose of all this is one: so that the slaves do not have any questions. For example, why is there still registration at the place of residence, or where does the money go from the sale of Russian hydrocarbons to the west and east, who built this fort and who destroyed it?

This is not a Magendavid, drawn by green men in a wheat field, as one might think. These are traces of a fort that was here, but which has been completely torn down, level with the ground. Those. Do you now understand what the Russian expressions literally mean: - "One cannot leave a stone upon another, and raze it to the damp earth"? Where do you think this is filmed? In France? Germany? Spain? There are such forts - a dime a dozen, and they are all rebuilt and maintained in the best possible condition, and this is removed … Do not fall from armchairs and chairs. This is the Omsk region!

Once on the ground, you will see this picture. More precisely, you won't see anything. Not a single stone, block, or brick. Everything was dismantled to zero, and taken out!

How much effort and money has been spent on this? Was the end so important that it justified the means?

There is no doubt that it is so. Target! This is what is most important for understanding how this could happen. If you know that the enemy will destroy any reminder of the past of the conquered people, burn archives and books, prohibit the primordial religion, destroy culture and art, then it will become clear that this fortress was razed to the ground - the victors. Who was defeated in that war? Who defended themselves inside this Siberian fortress? We do not know this yet. Perhaps they called themselves Russians, perhaps Tartars, what any guess is now. I called them pre-Russians. I categorically do not want to be a Russian. This clumsy, alien name came from the Kremlin, and I do not intend to apply it to myself. Was there anything useful from the Kremlin at least once? I remember that the first law abolished by the new "democratic" Russian Duma was an article of the USSR Criminal Code that punished sodomy. Everything fell into place. The homosexuals came to power. And it is their laws that I have to follow? Have mercy!

So that's it. If the pre-Russians lost in that war, then the Russians won. They won and destroyed everything that allowed the pre-Russians to know about their recent past. If in Europe there are forts to this day, and their existence in Russia has become known only now, then what is the conclusion? Right! The conquerors came from where the forts are intact. If you decide that our scientists know nothing about them, then you are deeply mistaken. Return to the beginning of the article, to the first photo. It is clearly written "-" Protected by law. " the same in the hands of the invaders, like all the usual levers of power.

We, the people of Russia, are slaves of the occupiers who rule the country. We are ruled by the descendants of those who dismantled the defeated forts of Tartary, they are still at the helm and at the sails, continue to mock the vanquished. Just like their great-great-great-grandfathers, who performed the successful drang nach osten of the eighteenth century.

If you think that the Pokrovskaya fortress is the only one, then I hasten to surprise you. There are thousands, if not tens of thousands of such forts on the territory of Russia, and all of them, ALL !!! - Completely buried!

If the invaders at that time knew that they would someday invent cameras and aviation, they would have covered it all with sand. People roam the earth and it does not occur to them what kind of picture opens from a bird's-eye view.

Not all forts presented in this article are located in the Irtysh region. As can be seen from the geographical coordinates, there are a great many of them in Ukraine. But the greatest density of discovered fortresses is in a very limited space in the Omsk and Tyumen regions. What is written there in the textbooks about the development of Siberia?

Do you know why reference books do not lie that these are forts of the eighteenth century, and not earlier? Because their fortification speaks for itself. Such "petals" and arrows began to be erected only with the widespread use of artillery. A nucleus or a projectile "loves" a perpendicular surface, and from an inclined one it ricochets and flies to sleepwalkers or Martians.

Can you imagine how much effort was put in order to "clean up" the area so thoroughly? After all, we could never have found even traces of the former fortification power of the Siberian "savages". Was this how the occupants of the Romanovs mastered the Urals and Siberia, or, as they truthfully write, "conquered"?

The answer is before your eyes. it was the first blitzgrieg - the thrust of the invaders to the east, drang nach osten. Our grandfathers stopped Hitler, but what if they could not? Believe me, they would have done the same with the Kremlin as with these forts.

And the intervention of the eighteenth century was only the development of the aggressive war of comrade Yermak Timofeevich!

Well chiiista ruusky muschiina! If you don’t know who, you’ll decide that this is some kind of Vaska da Gama.

In Europe, each fort is built according to an individual project. Siberian forts are typical. Like "Khrushchevs". Do you know what this says? This suggests the existence of standardization at the time of their construction. The specialist will say that this is from the category of fantasy, and he will be right.

There can be no standards in a non-industrial country. Standards appear where there is in-line production and a unified personnel training system. One, do you understand?

We can also draw a very important conclusion from quantitative indicators. Such a huge number of complex fortifications suggests that their workers, engineers and designers had not only high qualifications, coupled with a huge number of builders, but also the most powerful material and human resources, which does not fit into the tales of scattered principalities on the territory of the medieval Rus.

Only a centralized country with an education and training system capable of mobilizing a huge amount of resources, both monetary and human, can do this. Having a system of military education and training of soldiers. How do you like this? Sounds like a history textbook? There they write about endless deserted spaces inhabited by savages who worship wooden idols to the sound of a shaman's tambourine.

And the conquest lasted more than one century! Until the middle of the nineteenth century, the dorussia tried to throw off the yoke of the occupiers. In a series of national liberation wars, there are such events as "peasant uprisings and riots" by Stepan Razin and Emelyan Pugachev.

Stepan Razin. Descendant of Tamerlane, judging by his appearance. And not surprising. All this is nonsense, as if a simple Cossack decided to jump on the royal throne. The people followed him precisely because he remained one of the last legitimate heirs of one of the former rulers of Tartaria.

The wars of Peter the Great were also not against "foreigners", but against the former republics that were part of the pre-Russia, who remained loyal to their country and tried to overthrow the power of the invaders, the door to which was opened by False Peter, who is now called the "great".

Charles XII. His official title is Ruler of the Goths and Wends. Do you understand? There was no Sweden yet. He was the governor of Tartary in Scandinavia, ruled the Venda (Russians) and the Goths (the so-called European Tatars). And near Poltava, Peter defeated the "federal troops" sent to restore constitutional order in a separate treacherous enclave, with the capital in captured Petersburg. Peter is the elder brother of Dzhokhar Dudayev. You know who supported the first Chechen general. Do you think that Peter had support from another diaspora?

I dare to suggest that Peter, entrenched in captured Petersburg, was at the forefront of the treacherous war between the Russians and the pre-Russians, who, it is not even known what they called themselves. I doubt they are Tartars. Tartary is not a self-name. That was the name of this country in Europe, which replaced the tsar, and he, like a traitor in a besieged city, opened the gates at night, and let the bankers, lawyers, jewelers, priests, "scientists", tobacco workers, vodniks, homosexuals, lesbians, tolerance in the barbaric, ignorant land of savages.

Probably the only fort left to us from pre-Russia is the so-called Peter and Paul Fortress.

It, like Petersburg, was not destroyed. It is much easier to attribute the credit for the construction to yourself. But the invaders simply could not explain how all this was built. They did not know anything about such high technologies, so the French in the nineteenth century wrote fairy tales with pictures about the construction of St. Petersburg.

Pay attention to the building density of fortifications on the Irtysh alone.

And this is wild undeveloped Siberia? What is it about, I do not understand!

Was it possible to build the tribes under the leadership of shamans? Yes, fullness! Modern Russia is not capable of this. More precisely capable, but only with the help of guest workers from Moldova and Tajikistan, and then within a hundred years, at least.

But this is not all, only a small part! And what is the Great Wall of the Trans-Volga?

She, too, would surely fall asleep if they knew that aviation and aerial photography would appear in the future. Scientists say that it was built to repel the attacks of Asian nomads on Muscovy. Well, yes, yes … Only the protrusions of the towers look in the opposite direction - to the west. Those. the defenders of the wall defended themselves against invasion from the west. Do you know the length of these fortifications? Obviously, no one knows for sure. But no one doubts the fact that the fortifications were from Astrakhan to Perm!

Sorry, I didn't remove the markers on the map, don't let them confuse you. The red line indicates the wall. Its length is about two and a half thousand kilometers! Now pick up a calculator. Today, the remains of this wall are on average five meters high and SEVENTY wide! Add a moat about ten meters wide and up to four deep. Sochi - baby talk! This is just fantastic, these are unrealistic numbers! And that's just what has survived to this day. We boldly add thirty percent to these figures, and the Egyptian pyramids simply fade in terms of the amount of work performed. You feel like a dwarf in comparison with your ancestors. Did they do it all without building mechanization? But I believe it myself, but you can't argue against facts. What we see with our own eyes really exists. It is impossible to brush it off. And this is the history of the country in which we live. Why are historians silent? Where is this information in the textbooks? A? Sorry! I forgot that there was an ice age on these lands, and at that time Western civilization flourished … It seems that the Western "enlightened" civilization, through deception, betrayal and using information attacks, was able to defeat the civilization in the east that was many times higher than its level of development. Then I had to invent her story. It's hard to invent from scratch, so it's easier to take and change the names of key characters and place names. This explains the paradox discovered and described by the remarkable researcher Andrey Stepanenko chispa1707, who gave the name to the phenomenon

Do not be lazy, read. It is laid out here in a concise form. you will immediately understand the origin of the surname of the Romanovs, ROM - ROM, MAN - MAN. Romanov - literally - a man of Rome.

The newly emerged Russians what they could - destroyed, partially - appropriated, and began to parasitize on the ruins. But she inherited such technologies that humanity does not possess to this day. For example artillery. Alexey Kungurov noted that there are obvious non-docking in the development of artillery. All indications are that technology has degraded instead of evolving. This is confirmed by the findings of other researchers. Konstantin Raldugin put forward a very interesting version that resolves the questions posed by Kungurov. Namely: Why the early artillery pieces (mortars) are more perfect than the later ones, loaded from the barrel, why, along with mastering the technique of casting copper barrels with a steel core, the use of stone cores continued, etc.

The essence of the version seems fantastic only at first glance. If you go into details, then everything falls into place, and it seems so logical and simple that you wonder how you can not see it! Have you heard of hypersonic kinetic weapons? Not? Well, who will tell you! Super secret developments. Okay…. I'll tell you and show you on my fingers. The bottom line is that if you accelerate even a small particle to hypersonic speeds, then when it collides with an obstacle, or when it is destroyed, a fantastic amount of energy is released.

A grain the size of a rice one, for example, is capable of destroying a modern tank. The only question is how to achieve this speed. The solution of this problem could be helped by the use of the fifth state of aggregation of matter - plasma. If a plasma "cocoon" is formed around a flying object, a dumbbell, for example, or a kettle, then it is capable of accelerating to speeds many times higher than the speed of sound, and colliding with the goal of causing an explosion comparable in power to a nuclear one!

Now, armed with knowledge, we can take a fresh look at the archaic copper (bimetallic) weapon, loaded from the barrel, using a spherical STONE core. Copper (Honey) is a very soft and expensive metal. It is cheaper and easier to use cast iron or steel barrels for firing shells, but the "ignorant" ancestors persistently cast cannons from copper. Why? Indeed, to increase the service life of the barrels, it was necessary to burn out and make them bimetallic - the barrel - iron (less resistant to wear), and the "jacket" - copper. And if you know that after gold, copper is quite a suitable conductor? And if you know the properties of minerals to emit microwave radiation? And if you remember about the piezoelectric properties of quartz-containing minerals? After all, the very fact that having the opportunity to cast cannons a person made shells from a stone is already nonsense! The stone is light, brittle, such properties minimize its damaging properties, and is very laborious to manufacture. A cast-iron core is another matter! Take a piss - no problem. Heavy, when shooting - the very thing! But no … Stone cores!

So … Copper, electricity, piezoelectricity, perhaps a few more unknown, or simply not accounted for "ingredients", and everything ceases to seem so fantastic. Read Raldugin yourself, at least the first page, and you will see that everything is completely scientific. There is every reason to believe that we are dealing with a case when the tomograph ended up in a camp, and they did not find any other use for it than as "oppression" for pickling mushrooms. Anyone who knew used a bimetallic tube to accelerate a piezoelectric projectile to hypersonic speed, and he destroyed an entire city with one explosion. Isn't that why there are so many craters and craters up to a kilometer in diameter on the territory of Russia, and all the altos are puzzling about the origin of which? They think that these are traces of an atomic bomb, but in fact these are traces of firing from simple copper pipes? Hypersonic kinetic weapons?

Well, why not? After all, then it is logical that the invaders simply did not understand the true purpose of the copper cannons. Petrusha the First even ordered all the church bells to be poured into cannons. I thought it would work out now, and his guns would work the same way as those of the savages whom he conquered. However, nothing came of it. He did not know that it was not at all gunpowder that had to be poured as a charge, but something else, creating an impulse for a shot with a piezoelectric projectile. Therefore, over time, copper was abandoned, which is completely logical for pre-Petrine times, if you shoot with simple cannonballs, and with the help of an explosive. And the cores began to be cast from cast iron, which is also absolutely understandable, and the development of artillery proceeded along a dead-end path. Degraded to today's level. This, of course, is only a version, but other, indisputable facts only confirm the version. See for yourself:

The invaders on the lands being developed were strangers, and did not know the essence of geographical names, just as they did not know the history of their origin. That is why some old names drive Russians into a stupor. If the village is called Vasilyevo, then there are no questions, but what if the lake is called Alol? What is this alien language? By the way, the most beautiful place in the Pskov region. I recommend it, especially to lovers of multi-day kayaking. Alol is the final destination of the route along the rocky turbulent river.

However, let's continue. The invaders, invading, did not even imagine the size of the land they began to conquer.

Here is an example: In schools and universities, teachers cite Muravyov-Amursky as an example of the genius of Russian diplomacy, who was able to bloodlessly return the territories previously ceded to China, and thanks to his talents, the border passed along the Amur River. What a blatant lie! This "diplomat" had to be tied to a pillory for a whole day, and then sent to one of the strictest prisons - to the British islands, Japanese or Sakhalin. He didn’t even know that he donated thousands of square kilometers of primordially Russian lands to the Chinese for free! The border with China was marked on the ground. It is she who is now passed off as a miracle of the fortification thought of the ancient Chinese.

Maybe he knew. Then he got some money from the Chinese for a pretty house in Miami. I would rather not say anything about stone processing technologies. This is such an obvious fact that it does not require proof.

What the pre-Russians could do with a stone in Europe learned to do only at the beginning of the 20th century.

But it is interesting about iron casting. The Dorossians cast statues from cast iron with a wall thickness of only one or two centimeters. They say that with modern foundry equipment such results can be achieved if casting under high pressure, but practically our contemporaries are not able to repeat anything that the invaders got from the pre-russia. Not so long ago, the triumphal arch in Moscow was dismantled in order to restore it. It almost ended in complete failure. Our luminaries of science and technology could not restore ancient thin-walled cast iron, because they themselves do not know how to do this.

With the allegedly Ural Demidov factories, there is an even more surprising embarrassment.

Nikita Demidov.

Was it this person who built the world's best metallurgical enterprises throughout the Urals? Well, he does not pull more than the "most humane" of all professions - the craft of a usurer. No, miracles happen, of course, it happens that hidden talents wake up in people, but judging by the deeds and deeds of this family, far-reaching conclusions can be drawn. Lies, betrayals, bribery, theft, cruelty and indiscriminate methods betray the true role of "great industrialists". Rockefeller and Ford became great businessmen precisely because of these same qualities.

So, recently there was information that already in the middle of the twentieth century, Soviet engineers puzzled over the purpose of some machine tools and mechanisms at the old Demidov factories. This is nonsense. How can a person with a higher technical education fail to understand the principles and purpose of the unit that he holds in his hands, or beholds in an abandoned workshop! And it is also worth remembering that even during the Great Patriotic War, many of the industries remained operational, and took part in the production of weapons to defeat fascism. Without steam engines and even without electricity, I use the power of rivers and waterfalls. The kinetic energy of the flowing water was converted into mechanical energy on an industrial scale. It sounds fantastic, but it is a true fact, and against the facts, once again I repeat myself, you cannot trample.

Now I propose to recall in this context the replicated quotation of M. V. Lomonosov: - "Siberia will grow the Russian land"! A completely different meaning is heard in this long-worn phrase, isn't it?

Well, now, I believe that there will be fewer mistrustfuls, because the motives and ways of destroying the memory of Russians about their history have been revealed. Now it is clear why not a single reliable written source has survived before the reign of Peter the Great. True, in the nineteenth century, something global happened again, which made it necessary to rewrite the whole history, including from Peter to Nicholas II, but this is another topic. If I solve the great secret of the nineteenth century, I will eat my own hat without salt on the air.

Good to you all. Teach children correctly!