The last city of Tartary

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Is it possible only on the basis of the presence of solar symbols and ancient Vedic signs on the wooden houses of Tomsk, to assert that this is the last city of Tartary?

To fully understand the concept of this article, you need to at least stand on the platform of a single base, so to speak. This work is a logical continuation of the video "Tomsk Unknown":

Therefore, of course, you would need to read the materials and watch the video. At least “Tomsk is unknown. Addition. The last city of Tartary :

Also a number of articles, and. This right is not an attempt to advertise your own work. No. I just do not want, not only to repeat myself, but also to overload the article with materials and photos that have already been indicated in other works. The most important question that arises after such a serious research work:

- How and why such unique Vedic wooden architecture was preserved in one single city of Rus? An architecture that can only be found here, only in Tomsk? Moreover, the building of houses in this architectural aspect took place in the late 19th and early 20th centuries? There are similar platbands and elements of carving, and in other Siberian and not only Siberian cities, but massive buildings of the same style are found only here. Why?

There would be no question if the nearby villages had houses with such platbands and solar symbols, but they are not. All villages are built up with houses of modern depersonalized architecture. There is truth and openwork carving, and some similar elements, but nothing more. This can be attributed to the residual worldview of those people who built these houses. The indigenous people also built, and the exiles also built. Tomsk is massively built up in this style. And this leads to some thoughts and questions arise. Moreover, I repeat that the building itself took place, so to speak, in the established Christian time! The mind refuses to work here. I am tempted to ask what is really going on? In the villages around Tomsk, there is not a single house over 100 years old either. And no house looks like the houses in Tomsk. None of them has a solar symbol that at least somewhat resembles the symbols of Tomsk. Well, okay, the villages grew at the expense of the exiles. They were from all parts of Russia, which is why there is no such rich carving and architecture. There was already no Vedic heritage in those people. Yes, and the exiles came to the places, that there was nothing, what delights are already here. There would be enough money for food. You can agree. And who then, or for whom was Tomsk built up? Why is Tomsk completely covered in solar symbols?

There can be one answer to these and other questions: there were no villages around Tomsk at the end of the 19th century. In any case, in such an amount in which the villages grew at the expense of the exiles precisely at the end of the 19th century. Where did so many exiles come from during these years? No, there were, of course, exiles in the 17th and 18th centuries, but the main stream went to the Tomsk land in the middle of the 19th century. Why? Because the last stronghold of Tartary fell at that time. And not only in Siberia. The Crimean War and the war between Russia and England ended. The territories were finally colonized. There is little left to do, to break the last remnants of the Vedic worldview among the people. It was then that the main stream of exiles fell to Siberia. Did this stream bring Vedic architecture to the Tomsk land? Probably not. In those territories from which there was a stream of exiles, Vedic roots have long been practically destroyed. The exiled people could bring only partial scraps of the Vedic worldview. The basis of the Russian spirit was in the Tomsk area from the very beginning. It is precisely the Russian spirit about which Alexander Pushkin said: "Here is the Russian spirit, here it smells of Russia."

This is the Lukomorye where Pushkin's ancestor, his great-grandfather Hannibal, once referred to. This is exactly that Sadina, Graciona, which later turned into the city of Tomsk. True, on different cards and the name differs both in sound and spelling. This is Grestina, this is also Gustinsky, this is Graciona, this is Tomskoy, this is Tomsk. There is both a noun in the title and an adjective. As a matter of fact, I don't think the point is important. Before the Latin maps were compiled (and I did not find a single map in the Russian vocalization, except for the very new ones, for example, the end of the 19th century), the city apparently had a completely different name. Which? Now one can only guess. What did the ear of Latin cartographers hear? How has the spelling of names been transformed? Now it is difficult to answer these questions. Sadness-GradChina? Graciona the Grand? Or is it really Sadness-Tosca? Longing for what former greatness? To the greatness of the country, the capital of which was Sadina? Which country? Great Tartary? And Sadina, which became Tomsk, is it really the last city of Tartary?

And here a certain contradiction arises. The contradiction is that only on the basis of building up Tomsk with houses with solar symbols, can it be considered the last city of Tartary? Is it actually Tartaria? If the maps were made by the Latins and so cleverly thrown into the media space quite recently, then how can you say that our destroyed country was called Tartaria? First, about the Tomsk development. Indeed, the fact of the development of Tomsk does not mean anything yet. He does not say, unless you take into account a number of circumstances directly, and not indirectly, shedding light on this issue. The greatness of the territories and the greatness of the capital city was destroyed, I think, somewhere in the 15-16 century. I would tie this historical event to the destruction of Omsk Asgard (again, it is difficult to argue about the reliability of the name), when the Dzungar hordes broke through the Irtysh into Western Siberia. Was one task assigned to them? Apparently not. I suppose that it was then that they walked like a roller all the way to the Yenisei, destroying everything in their path. Omsk did not recover from this, and Sadina did not recover from this either. That is why it became possible, I think, the construction of the Tomsk Ostrog in 1604. The territories were pretty shabby and weakened, and Romanov Russia began to crawl into Siberia as a spider. Comes to Siberian land and the Christian religion. In 1666, a Christian see was opened on the Tomsk land. A significant year must be said. There are three sixes and the Nikon reform here. And the Vedic faith, it was still present, was preserved by the ancestors in Siberia? Undoubtedly. After all, the Tomsk Diocese appears only in 1834. Almost 200 years after the department was founded.

Well, here you have to understand that the war of 1812 already happened, the unknown catastrophe of 1812-16, three years without summer, and other events. The emergence of the diocese speaks of the demolition of the last resistance of the last city of Tartary. Somewhere in this historical period, the last crushing blow to Tartary was dealt. Why can you say this? Yes, everything is really simple. The tsar's servants laid the foundation for the Tomsk prison in 1604 on the practically deserted land. Lay in the place of Sadness. It is noted in the records that this place was apparently once inhabited, judging by the landscape and such plants as nettles and hemp, usually growing on the sites of former settlements and buildings. Whether there were any remains of some buildings, the chronicles are modestly silent. Further there is a constant expansion from the "local" population, Kyrgyz, Khakass, etc. Both the prison and the village around the prison are repeatedly burning. Yes, they burn so that not a single titled historian of Tomsk still knows where the prison was located. In all historical documents and archaeological works, under the line it reads: - "We do not know where the Tomsk prison was." In fact, there really are only assumptions, and the matter does not go further than assumptions. And suddenly, at the end of the 19th century, the city is being built up as if by magic, and it is being built up all at once, so to speak from scratch. I suppose that it was a little different from how the official history of Tomsk interprets us. The jail was built, but it did not work out on the Tomsk land, as the Romanovs wanted. Having recovered a little from the disaster, the local population began to violently resist. The prison is also burning, the posad is also burning, which has also formed near the prison. And this confrontation, and the fires continue until the beginning of the 19th century. They give it out to us as the raids of the Kirghiz and Khakass. That is, not of the Russian peoples. And what surprising can you read in some, so to speak, not yet erased sources? Oh, here's what:

This is a page from the document: "Lists of settlements - Historical overview of the Tomsk province". And what are we reading here? And we read that fair-haired and light-eyed people, that is, indigenous and pure-blooded Russians, are called Khakass, Kirghiz! There was no smell of Turks here. I will not describe the opposition, so to speak, of the "discoverers" of Siberia and how they are stubbornly trying to introduce us into the consciousness of the Turkic tribes on the Tomsk land. Everything is on the Internet. Here a different picture emerges, the slightly stronger people of the Tomsk land immediately begin the liberation struggle. Therefore, the city as such does not exist until the middle of the 19th century. And the military tents of the "Kirghiz" are up to the Yenisei. Well, and there the Chinese Metropolitanate is not far away. The Siberian tract, in any case, from Tomsk to China is controlled by the indigenous population of the Rus, which can no longer be said about the tract in the direction of Tobolsk. I suppose that by 1604 already partially or completely the Siberian tract, towards the Urals, was taken under the control of the Romanovs. Otherwise, how could the Romanov Cossacks have been able to hold out on the Tomsk land for more than two centuries? And, not only to hold out, but also to build some kind of infrastructure? Somewhere around 1853-56. the Krasnoyarsk Territory was also taken under control. In any case, even now there are legends about the total extermination of Old Believers in those years. Sovereign Cossacks (or rather, the entire criminal rabble, which has nothing to do with real Cossacks) massacred the population of the region. In the region of Irkutsk in Ust-Orda, a generally terrible battle of the last divisions of Tartary with the irregular troops of the Romanovs was going on.

I described some of these events in the article "Under the Shadow of China". It was then that the Siberian tract came under the control of the Romanovs up to the Amur. And when the territories became controlled, then the future Nicholas the Bloody went on his "journey to the East." He stopped in Tomsk in 1891. Whether Tomsk began to be massively built up after his departure, or whether it was built up earlier than 1891, it is impossible to say for certain. There are not enough sources and old photos. Old photographs of his visit show the existing stone buildings in the center, which still stand today. But it is not known for certain whether the building was made of wood at that time. I think that Tomsk began to be built up after 1862. Why? Because the territories were finally conquered at that time, and not only new infrastructure and statehood, but also legislation came to Siberia. And along with this, and standard construction.

The fact is that in the Russian Empire the construction of two-storey wooden houses was allowed only in 1862. We'll give a couple of years to create standard projects, another couple of years for approval and bureaucracy, and by about 1870 the city begins to be massively built up. According to many historical sources, it is known that the city was built up mainly on merchant money. Moreover, it was built up so quickly (up to 300 houses a year) that this must be understood, a lot of money. The State does not always have them (well, or it does not want to invest as usual and is looking for co-investors) in such an amount. In the same way, capital is being raised in Tomsk. Just what kind of capital? More than a third of the houses have solar symbols. Apparently the capital of all large merchants who were in the Tomsk region at that time. And they decided a lot, despite the new administrative and legislative policies. Only now I myself have become aware of such a different architecture in the details of the exterior decoration. Carvings and elements differ on seemingly identical houses. And then the understanding came to mind that this is indeed a typical construction. The houses are of the same type and are built according to standard designs. There are no ancient wooden native Russian chambers, chambers and rooms in Tomsk. There are two-storey wooden houses with Vedic ornaments and pronounced imperial symbols. Alone at home. The shirt is different. What kind of merchant, with what outlook, invested money, this is how it turned out at home. In addition, all the houses are built, so to speak, according to the communal type, that is, "according to the apartment." Apartments were rented, sold, etc. This is all described in the Tomsk Chronicles. Again, the same notorious as in modern times, the principle of "making a profit". And why the history is silent on many houses of Vedic ornaments. Or because the merchants really were of the Vedic faith (at least some of them) and the Russian Empire turned a blind eye to attracting capital, or because part of the population retained Vedic roots and simply would not live in other houses? It is difficult to say about this now. In any case, only the external solar decoration and carvings of platbands can be attributed to the Vedic heritage, but not the houses themselves. There is nothing old Russian in these typical houses. But what still moved people when they left us the Vedic heritage in the form of carvings and solar symbols, now we can only guess. Again, the thought arises that the efforts are so enormous (one thread takes, probably, a third of the cost of the house itself) that the ancestors probably knew that these efforts would be justified. I have had the idea for a long time that there are encrypted direct messages in the carving. I will think about it. Think and try to decipher. To which I urge my readers.

Is Tomsk the last city of Tartary? Well no. The only one of its kind with surviving Vedic ornaments in such an amount is undeniable. But not the last, and is it Tartary? We now understand that at the time of the construction of the city, he no longer had anything to do with Tartary. Rather, to that Power, which has existed on these lands for more than a dozen millennia. To the Power of Scythia, Artania, Russia of Mary? Recently, I am more and more inclined that "Tartary" should be read in the context of "TERRITORY". The name is Western, the name is Latin. And it is written on Western maps. And then there are no Russian maps at all! And Tartary is a dime a dozen on these maps. There are so many. Tartary such and such, such Tartary. Right there you can find Scythia and Russia, and Ruskolan, and a lot of other interesting things. Actually the Great (grand) Tartary, this is only in the context of the "Great Territory". Or a directory, whichever you prefer. Both are so consonant with the Russian language. Sadness was striking in its magnificence. It was in it that multi-level towers with magnificent openwork finishing and ligature could be built. A faint glimpse of this ligature, and only, is the carving on Tomsk houses. Although it amazes and bewitches with its splendor. And Grustina, the magnificent Sadina, built by the people of Chudi, who were met by local residents at the end of the 19th century, was burned by the hordes of Dzungars, or destroyed through some other influence, or here both one and the other played in the complex, is unknown. In any case, this is a topic for a completely different conversation.