The vertical of the world behind the scenes

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

On August 24-25, in the American town of Jackson Hole, a meeting of heads of central banks from different countries was held. Of course, a closed meeting. Journalists were not allowed on it. Doctor of Economics, Professor of MGIMO Valentin KATASONOV is known for exposing international bankers.

How do they control us? What is their purpose? Which leader is the main opponent of the planetary behind-the-scenes - Russian, Chinese or American? Is there a behind-the-scenes hand in the events in Ukraine and Muslim terrorism? Why is Chubais inviolable?

Masters of money

- Do the world's bankers have the influence that the kitchen rumor attributes to them?

- It is obvious. Axiom, medical fact, twice two is four. The main shareholders of the US Federal Reserve, in fact the country's central bank, are the owners of the money. They cannot yet be called the masters of the whole world, but this is their ultimate goal - power. Rothschild also said: give me the opportunity to print money, and then I don't care who writes what laws. The bankers themselves have repeatedly cynically declared that they have a unique opportunity to rise above society and control it.

Can you name these people by surname?

- Many experts are trying to determine the composition of the Fed's shareholders, but this is extremely difficult: its structure includes about 10 thousand banks. Among the owners of these banks there are not only individuals, but also legal entities - it turns out, you need to dig them, and so on. Theoretically, the task is feasible, but practically no one has coped with it yet.

At the beginning of this decade, the Zurich Institute of Technology conducted a study aimed at identifying the financial core of the world economy, and identified the core of 147 institutions. And then it turned out that they were controlled by only 20 world clans.… These names, as a rule, do not appear in the ratings of Forbes magazine. The same Rothschilds, for example, do not shine. There are many ways to do this. The most understandable for our citizen is to divert money into undeclared trusts, in fact - internal offshore companies or charitable foundations.

At the time of the creation of the FRS in 1913, its owners were known: the main ones were the Rothschilds, then the Morgan, Rockefellers, Schiffs and others. Americans have been taught that the Fed is a national institution, but in reality it is private. I'll tell you a funny story. When, in 1990, giving a lecture at the University of California at Berkeley, I drew the students' attention to the fact that the Central Bank in the USSR is state-owned, and in the USA it is private, the audience answered me with a slight hum, bewilderment. It turned out that the students of the Faculty of Economics at the University of Berkeley, which has always been in the top five or ten, for the most part did not know this. Some of the students suggested using the telephone directory, and the Fed was found in it in the section of private organizations, not public ones (laughs). The audience was shocked. And she's unhappy.

Do bankers own most of the world's property?

- Yes, even if not directly. Bankers own the entire globe, and in addition, interest, which is nowhere to take (laughs). The guarantees that the lender will repay the loan are collateral and assets. The entire real economy, the entire planet is the very collateral that underlies the debt pyramid. Please note: banking crises occur at regular intervals, and this is not mysticism, this is mathematics. Bankers give loans as long as there is collateral. When people have nothing to mortgage, usurers stop lending and demand money back. Since clients cannot return the money, the bankers take the collateral, that is, the property. The collateral is always valued at a good discount (the difference between the real and the nominal value. - editor's note), therefore, creditors by and large are not even interested in the accurate repayment of obligations by clients - it is much more interesting to eat the collateral.

This is approximately how the famous mortgage crisis of 2008 happened in the United States, which spilled over into the world…

“That was a special case. Even the withdrawal of real estate from clients did not cover their obligations to the banks, and instead of them it was done by the American budget, that is, taxpayers, having paid trillions of state dollars to the banks. Then there was a story that was taboo. Some kind of sensation will happen in the modern world, it is vigorously discussed for a month, a year - and they forget. But I haven’t forgotten, and I’m still waiting for the Fed leadership to give an articulate answer to the question: for what reasons did it issue loans to bankers in the period from 2008 to 2010 at a rate of 0.1% in the amount of more than $ 16 trillion (more than annual GDP of the United States)? The representatives of the people in Congress were outraged and for the first time in a hundred years made a decision on a partial audit of the FRS, but just a partial one - only to find out to whom and why such astronomical sums of money were issued. The audit results published are a list of 25 Principal Recipients. There are Goldman Sachs, GP Morgan Chase, Royal Scotland Bank, German Deutsche Bank, and French Societe General. The presence of foreign, non-American banks on this list, of course, angered the people's deputies the most. There were calls in Congress to arrest and try the chairman of the Fed, but, as you yourself understand, no one was punished. The story was hushed up. Actually, this list gives an indirect answer to your question about who owns the Fed. The main shareholders gave money to their loved ones.

By the way, an extraordinary plenum of the Bilderberg Club was held recently (a closed annual conference of 130 influential businessmen and politicians, mainly from the USA and Western Europe, some of the delegates vary. - editor's note). It's no coincidence that I'm joking, the meeting was very reminiscent of the plenum of the Central Committee of the CPSU, a question was heard with the wording "a report on the work of the Trump administration" (laughs). This is where the masters of the world gather.

They write that Russians also took part in the meetings of the Bilderberg Club: G. Yavlinsky, S. Guriev (chief economist of the London EBRD bank, which is engaged in "supporting the market economy and democracy" in different countries), L. Shevtsova (political scientist, researcher of Western institutions, who called Russia the aggressor in Ukraine), A. Mordashov (the main shareholder of the international gold mining company "Nordgold" with one of the Morgan at the head) and twice - the people's favorite A. Chubais

- Yes, a visible confirmation of the fact that Chubais is the "overseer" of world usury. He also visited the management of the American bank GP Morgan Chase (in 2013 he was replaced by G. Gref. - editor's note). Of course, this is a typical agent of influence, openly conducting subversive activities. Therefore, they cannot touch him - he has immunity, immunity.

Spirit, not blood

- I think many readers are anticipating or indignantly expecting when I ask you: when we speak of world usury, are we talking about Jews?

- Including about Jews, but not only. Everything is simple here. In medieval Europe, the words "Jew" and "usurer" sounded like synonyms. Europe was Christian, and for Christians there was a ban on usury, just as Muslims are not allowed by their faith. Accordingly, the Jews living in Europe acquired good skills in this matter. (By the way, it was the usurers who wanted to get out of the underground who prepared those transformations that we call bourgeois revolutions. For some reason, most historians lose sight of this fact: after the bourgeois revolutions, central banks were immediately created.) But it was not the Jews who invented usury. The inhabitants of Judea were engaged in agriculture, crafts, trade. Then a significant part of them ended up in Babylonian captivity, and it was there, in Babylon, in this embodiment of all evil, and learned usury. When the Persian king Cyrus the Great freed the Jews from the rule of the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar II, many of them did not return to their homeland, but remained in Babylon or spread along the entire Mediterranean coast - throughout the then civilization.

That is, they are cosmopolitans who have become divorced from their people. It is clear that they personally benefit from the financial world order, not a Birobidzhan plumber or a Tel Aviv janitor

- They are really cosmopolitans, and there is almost no Jewish blood left in them (laughs). After all, there is another branch of usury - the Protestant one. The German philosopher and economist Max Weber wrote the book "Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism" at the beginning of the 20th century. He argued that capitalism, including usury, is the result of the Protestant religion. Another German philosopher and economist, Werner Sombart, who lived at the same time, wrote a book on the same topic - "Jews and Economic Life", where he argued that the leaven of capitalism was still Jews. But I see no contradiction here. I liked the witty formula of one author: Protestantism emerged from the fornication of Catholicism and Judaism. The New Testament often mentions the Pharisees and Sadducees (opponents of Christ. - editor's note), and so the Jews of the Rothschilds are the pharisaic branch of usurers, and the Anglo-Saxons Rockefellers are the Sadducees. It is the spirit that counts here, not the blood.

Total power

- Do you also see the hand of world usury in what happened to Ukraine?

- Of course, of course! The processes taking place in Ukraine are controlled by Washington. Formally, the decisions are made by the American president, but it was noticeable that Obama was following the instructions of the owners of the money. The new President Trump is trying to implement his own decisions, and we see what comes of it. Trump's example shows that the President of the United States is a nominal figure. The only one who tried to carry out an independent line in the XX century was John F. Kennedy, and, as you know, he was killed. In the 19th century, of course, it was easier - I would single out President Andrew Jackson, who went to the polls with a laconic slogan: "Andrew Jackson, and no Central Bank!" His life was attempted several times, but in vain. He managed to defeat the bankers in that period of time. No wonder they really dislike Jackson. Under Obama, it was decided to redesign banknotes. Jackson, placed on a twenty-dollar bill at the beginning of the last century, wants to be replaced by a certain black woman who fought for the rights of the black population during the Civil War and is known only to a narrow circle of historians.

Valentin Yuryevich, don't you consider yourself a conspiracy theorist? The evidence of the influence of bankers on the entire world politics is more indirect than direct, right? Is everything done behind the scenes, secretly?

- Of course, secretly. I must tell you, the owners of money either keep silent about their opponents or ridicule them. One way to ridicule and laugh is to accuse of conspiracy. Let's remember the first meaning of the word conspiracy - "secrecy". I would like to ask: do banks have unclassified operations? (Laughs.)

How do world bankers affect you or me specifically?

- In every way, comprehensively. Everything is under their control. And the largest media, and the education system. I do not belong to those who sound the alarm, because the all-encompassing monopoly of usurers will collapse in due time, but this is a separate big conversation. Many people do not use loans and proudly say that they do not feed bankers. This is an illusion. As taxpayers, we all cover the costs of the moneylenders. Take, for example, the much-publicized Russian anti-crisis program in 2015: of the amount over two trillion rubles, the lion's share - 1.6 trillion - went to support our banks. Or rather, not ours (laughs). This money flowed out of Russia. Or a simpler example, true, from Moscow: the tariffs for housing and communal services included the cost of loans taken by utilities. By the way, I interviewed about a dozen business acquaintances, and three of them confessed to me that the main costs for them are not salaries, not lease of land or premises, but servicing loans. They primarily feed the bankers, not their employees.

You said “not our banks”. But they are controlled by the Central Bank of Russia

- Yes, the Central Bank of Russia, which, like the Fed, like the central banks of most countries, is not a government agency. For ten years I worked at the Central Bank, indirectly dealing with the issue of the refinancing rate (the percentage at which the Central Bank issues loans to other banks, thereby affecting the cost of their loans for the population. - editor's note), I continue to monitor the situation. And I must say that there have been no attempts to influence the refinancing rate on the part of the state and there are still no attempts. I think there is no need to explain in more detail. There is a rigid vertical of power: the Russian Central Bank is under the control of the Fed and the US Treasury.

The central bank is a pest

Are our banks indebted to Western ones?

- Generally speaking, all banks are primarily debtors of their clients. What is a bank? In economic terms, this is an institution with incomplete coverage of obligations. Simply put, he cannot fulfill his obligations - there will not be enough money. If, for example, a construction or, say, an agro-industrial company has obligations that are at least one and a half times higher than the cost of its liquid resources, such a company can be declared bankrupt. And for banks, the degree of coverage of liabilities is only … a few percent! Each bank is, by definition, bankrupt, from the very beginning. What kind of institutions are these? How do they manage to exist? It's very simple: they make money out of thin air. Universities teach that a bank is a financial intermediary, and the following picture is born in a student's head: a person gives the banker 10 rubles for safekeeping, and he gives them to another person at interest. In fact, this is not the case. Under these 10 rubles, he can issue loans for at least 100 rubles. It turns out that any bank acts as an issuing institution (emission is the release of new money into circulation. - editor's note). In textbooks about banks, this is called the "money multiplier". A student can listen to a course for six months and not understand anything, because all this is gibberish, behind which lies a simple essence: counterfeiting. Only a quarter of Russia's money supply falls on real means of payment issued by the Central Bank, and the remaining three quarters is air money "produced" by commercial banks.

Without waiting for the formal recognition of their bankruptcy, bankers withdraw money given to them by people for safekeeping, that is, in fact, they carry out theft on a large scale. Now Nabiullina is revoking licenses from banks. I have already revoked three hundred licenses. This is a terrible process! As a rule, at the time of the recall, everything was already swept out there. Dozens and hundreds of companies in the real sector of the economy, which are clients of these usurers, are collapsing. Our country is mined by the banking system. Pulling bank after bank, Nabiullina destroys our economy. Individuals receive at least some part of the money at the expense of the Deposit Insurance Agency, and legal entities lose everything cleanly.

What is it guided by?

- Hard to say. She has in her head the dogmas of economic liberalism from Western textbooks, she is a girl in a currency exchanger who acts strictly according to instructions and is not obliged to know what the emission mechanisms are and who the world bankers are. In recent years, the expert international community of financiers has recognized her as the best among the leaders of the central banks in the world - it is clear that she works for the owners of money. She's the best for them. For us, her activities are very similar to a crime. Consider the 2014 collapse of the ruble. Article 75 of the Constitution reads: "Protecting and ensuring the stability of the ruble is the main function of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation." Nabiullina did not fulfill this task. The owners from overseas came up with another task for her - controlling inflation. If you, running the Central Bank, utter the words "free floating of the ruble exchange rate" - investigators should come and handcuff you. When I heard about "free floating", I understood: the laws do not work in the country, we live "according to concepts."

The rudiments of resistance

- Doesn't the independent foreign policy of Russia indicate that it is being freed from the influence of the world usurers?

- No, these are not related things. I don't hear any government announcements about its intention to rebuild the economy. Our foreign policy initiatives are not backed up by the economic rear, it is not protected. We are still in a coma. The rhetoric is anti-American, but the deeds are pro-American.

It is believed that the main object of hatred of world bankers is China

- Suffice it to say that in China, the central bank state, absolutely state. And foreign capital in the Chinese banking sector is 1.7%. In our country, it is formally 17%, in reality - about half. A very serious dominance. I am not idealizing China, there are many problems, but their banking system, created on the model of the Soviet one, is more in line with national interests. When China was not yet competitive enough, it used a fixed rate for its currency. The US State Department was foaming, banging with its fist, and the Chinese wanted to spit on him. Only at the beginning of the 2000s, firmly on their feet, they replaced the fixed rate with an adjustable one.

In our minds, world bankers are intertwined with America, since they have their main “headquarters” there, but the 2008 crisis showed that the interests of bankers and ordinary Americans diverge

- Of course they do. Adjusting to the Fed, America began to lose its economic positions. After the dollar was untied from the gold standard and thereby allowed the Fed to print unlimited green paper, the bankers no longer needed a real economy. Their task is to shove this paper around the world as much as possible. And in order to maximize the spread of the national currency outside the country, it is necessary that the country has a negative balance of payments (the difference between receipts and expenditures. - editor's note). America itself has abandoned its position in the real world economy. Trump wants to revive good old America, but bankers do not need it, because with a positive balance there will be nowhere to put green paper.

It turns out that today the main opponent of world usury is Trump?

- It turns out so. It is difficult to say about China, because the Chinese found themselves in an ambiguous situation: on the one hand, they are dissatisfied with the hegemony of the dollar, on the other hand, they have accumulated these dollars in the amount of 1.2 trillion and are not interested in this amount being burned out.

Let me say a word in defense of the dollar. It is not backed by the real economy, but backed by the trust of people around the world. They buy it insofar as they see the achievements of America: iPhones, Hollywood …

- This is a manipulation of consciousness. There is no economy in America - continuous financial bubbles (this is how they call trading in large volumes of goods or, more often, securities at inflated prices; sooner or later the market corrects to an adequate price, the panic of investors causes an avalanche of sales with a further reduction in price, and the "bubble" collapses. - editor's note). The American dollar is backed by the American Sixth Fleet and bombers, thousands of military bases around the world and nothing else. The digital economy is a zombie product. Moreover, a dangerous product, because an electronic banking concentration camp is being built.

Is Muslim terrorism also their work?

- Undoubtedly. Terror is an instrument for destabilizing the world order. The path to world power lies through controlled chaos.

Arguments of the Week, No. 35 (577) from 07.09.2017