Anatomy of a conscience or kill your slave

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Are you sure that everything that is called good is definitely good for you?

There are only 5% of people in society. In the sense of being able to think. There are even fewer people willing to do this. Think. In the sense of accepting and processing NEW information! And not to reject her flight. And also to find it in unexpected places and think in categories, in the sense of determining what is useful and what is not. The remaining 95% are just an evaluative-minded electorate. That is, what he will be told "good" he perceives so without hesitation, but does he need it? Here I am not discovering America - a well-known fact. I am hinting at public opinion. For those who still do not know how it is created, as well as who are satisfied with everything in life, it is better not to read further, in view of the danger of a rupture of reality and subsequent possible neuropsychiatric disorders with attacks of rabies on the author, hitting the keyboard and monitors. So, in order.

An Olympic sportswoman is publicly insulted and punched in the face by, let's say, the head coach. Directly at the Olympic Games. Immediately after the competition, not yet rested. For the fact that she did not bother to win a medal, well, clearly, I left him without a bonus. That is, he has a motive. And she? She smeared snot on the beaten face and promised to write a complaint to the prosecutor's office. Later. Upon my return. Complaint. What is her motive? But it is not there. Just CONSCIOUS. And the boss is shameless. That's why it beats.

Or here. The prime minister, the second person in the state, offers teachers to go into business for the sake of earning money. Therefore, work at school is not really work, but rather entertainment, since you have to work in it for almost nothing. Well, shameless? All agree? And the teachers? They are CONSCIOUS, because after this statement, there was not only a strike demanding the resignation of such a prime minister, but there were no particularly formidable and official complaints about such an attitude towards education. We collected signatures over the roof on the Internet and that's it, silence.

And one more striking example. On the Internet, there was a video about how Russians fought with Caucasians for the now trivial and banal reason: an attempt to take revenge on the girl who stood up for the girl, and there one aunt told how she ran among the fighters and called Caucasians to conscience, they say, they also have children ! Because she has a CONSCIENCE! That is why she called. To her. Those who have no conscience. Not at all. That's why they stick to our girls.

Now the question. Would an athlete go against her conscience if she did not endure insults and humiliation, and would slap the boor in the back, or did she immediately send it to the destination? Would the teachers sent in almost plain text to the panel, menacingly with partiality, have demanded the same from the government? And if this lady, rushing between the fighting, took a drin and helped her peasants? And, most relish, a test for "lice" and the ability to think - and the fighting men who stood up for their own, HAVE CONSCIENCE?

The shrewd ones, I hope, have already understood what I mean, and they know the correct answers. To seed the intrigue, I will give the correct answer to the last question: the fighting men who stood up for their own have NO CONSCIENCE! How unexpected and ridiculous, right? Difficult, I understand …

So why exactly conscience?

When I drew attention to the fact that the people in their entire mass are being rigidly manipulated, and at the same time the people themselves behave quite "worthy" of the herd, then by itself I began to look for the reason for what was happening. Oddly enough, but the answer, in general, was found pretty quickly. And I was not just surprised, I was shocked that the roots and methods of manipulators lie on the surface and everyone is hearing! It's just so natural and familiar to everyone that no one pays attention to it. This is what is called a euphemism - the substitution of concepts from negative to acceptable, and at best - to positive and respectable. Tolerance alone is worth it! But this is a remake, although it is directly related to the topic, the devil is hidden in the more "ancient" and already sewn into the "folk" culture details. First of all, of course, I compared the worldview and mentality of the ordinary people with their antagonists, "exploiters and exploited", according to the established popular value scale, the authorities and all those who put themselves above the people with the people themselves, and literally immediately, against the background of generally accepted moral -moral qualities, buried in the isolation and overvalue of such a thing as conscience. For some reason, among the people, it is considered the basis of an exclusively Russian mentality and its distinctive feature. And at the same time, in any case, at this stage of history, the exceptional obedience of the people is striking - the Russians are the most exploited and patient of violence and power, which has led to their present deplorable situation. Further, if I may say so, research, led to the conclusion that it is the basis of this behavioral pattern, but not alone, but in conjunction with shame, which enhances the effect. Reference books give him some kind of vague description, which is understandable - psychology, like all other sciences, is put at the service of puppeteers, and they describe it, which is positioned as a positive quality. However, it is enough to think a little and try to experience it "in nature", how its content becomes clear - this is just wounded pride. It goes without saying by public opinion. In the sense of the society to which you belong. For example, don't the same shameless oligarchs feel ashamed? It happens, how! They are ashamed to live … without luxury! Naturally in front of their own. Agree, a rather dubious basis for a noble feeling!

However, this couple did not explain the full depth of the tragedy, there was some other factor keeping it among the masses. I searched for a long time, it turned out to be modesty, demotivating separation from the masses and leaving the framework of public opinion. That is, blocking the path of individuality. “What do you want most of all? Be more modest! " The weight on the lid of the pot of consciousness, holding all the mental "brew" in it.

If for someone this connection between a set of "highly moral" qualities with the social position of the bulk of the Russian people is not obvious, then for me they exist only in this causal pair. And if someone can logically describe the existing situation by the action of other internal factors, then for God's sake. Personally, I have not found any!

We will not go into the etymology of the word conscience, this is another topic. The message is still an informational concept, if it is related to morality, then it is mediated, I will only note that it clearly does not correspond to the meaning that our contemporaries put into it. And in the process of working on the topic, I found as many as THREE. Academic, pseudo-scientific, given in explanatory dictionaries. Overvalued, paranoid, rushing to the masses by her apologists. And its basis, background, function in society, invisible to the naked eye. And speaking of conscience, I will keep in mind its last two meanings. The first is needed as an argument.

Conscience. Everyone around only speaks of her as a noble and necessary quality of a person. They call upon her, call upon, remind all and sundry, positioning it as a panacea for all ills. Is this really so and is there a “Trojan horse” hiding in it, because those who possess it, for some reason or other, cannot influence reality and always find themselves in life, at best, on the sidelines, at worst - eternally exploited ? This definition has been jarring to me since childhood! It all started with the fact that I drew attention to the fact that appeals to her and, accordingly, the imposed feelings on the part of adults were usually inappropriate and inadequate to events. Instead of simply assessing and explaining what the harm and negative result of any action is, with the requirement to make a promise to improve, or just punish right there, they usually begin to stupidly put pressure on the psyche, who has already quite often realized the wrongness of his actions! The obvious situational manifestation of the relationship is not "teacher-student", since we are talking about the education of correct behavior, but "the judge is a criminal" and building a hierarchy. By the way, I wouldn't be surprised if in my first "Olympic" example, insulting an athlete, the boss appealed to her conscience !!! I know why and why. Soon you will find out. And the message of the Prime Minister of teachers to business is also in its essence an appeal: "We have no money, have a conscience, get out yourself!" Attention is also drawn to a very sharp, rather widespread expression in response to appeals to conscience: "Where it was - a member has grown!" And on an intuitive level - these persons clearly did not look into dictionaries in search of a definition of conscience, as, incidentally, no one explained it to them! For some reason, in relation to other moral concepts, such an attitude is not observed. And moreover, most often it is mentioned by persons who are clearly not friendly with the law. Suspicion creeps in … However, this just confirms the lack of conscience of various scoundrels and criminals. But this is just one side of the coin, and not even a counterargument, but just a hint. I make a reservation in advance because almost every apologist of classical public opinion will try to cite this as his argument! Yes, every criminal is shameless, but it is conscience that creates the conditions for their comfortable existence! As for the unscrupulous victims of scoundrels, then this is generally the end - she will not want to behave like a victim, and at any moment, without batting an eye, she can make the criminal a victim - a preemptive and stopping action of the conscience will not function! A conscientious victim usually begs the rapist “please, don’t,” without realizing that this only turns him on, amazedly discovering in the process that the “magic” word is not so magic and doesn’t “work”! The thought that she must defend her honor (or even life!) By all means and by any means, showing the instinct of self-preservation, does not even arise in her mind!

The funny thing is that those who appeal to conscience do not bother to explain its meaning. However, unknown to them, ask anyone and the overwhelming majority of "conscientious" will "hang" on the answer! But at the same time, for some reason, the same thing reaches everyone! How?! Yes, everything is very simple - the meaning is not in the sense of the word, but in the form of presenting the "material"! I am not an expert in NLP, but here its elements are clearly present. And in moral pressure. Tell me, is it possible to hammer something noble into your head with reproaches like: “Aren't you ashamed? We try, we plow like slaves in galleys, for your welfare, and you don’t appreciate the ungrateful! Do you have a conscience ?! " And how do you answer that?

Let's see what we should have according to official science:

Conscience in the Collegiate Dictionary

Conscience is a concept of moral consciousness, inner conviction of what is good and evil, consciousness of moral responsibility for one's behavior. Conscience is an expression of a person's ability to exercise moral self-control, independently formulate moral obligations for oneself, demand from oneself to fulfill them and make a self-assessment of the actions performed.

Directly political slogans! "Catch up and overtake …", "START and DEEP..". Beautiful in form, meaningless in meaning. What is such a morality? To whom is the responsibility?

I'll try to decipher it myself. Well, what a life - all myself and myself … Key phrase (some kind of schizophrenic) " require yourself to fulfill them", Clearly indicates the FUNCTION of our conscience. References to the independence of the formulation of moral and ethical criteria are either not consistent - they are determined by public opinion, or the individual will select a suitable community for them, which he will consider his own. Fortunately, variety allows. " Consciousness of moral responsibility for their behavior"- this is where one of our" dogs "is buried: responsibility is an act of CONSCIOUSNESS! That is, the responsibility is always realized and therefore the individual will bear responsibility only to that community or its members who are adequately responsible to itself. Otherwise, there is no point in it. And vice versa - a society that is irresponsible to the individual has no right to demand responsibility from her towards herself! Fair? Yes. This is what I understand - the conscience should be MUTUAL! Real conscience.

The meaning of the word Conscience according to Efremova

Conscience - A sense of moral responsibility for your behavior and your actions in front of yourself, people around you and society.

The meaning of the word Conscience according to Ozhegov

Conscience - A sense of moral responsibility for their behavior before the people around them, society.

Talented compilers! In the sense of brevity. Here it is closer to the true meaning: our conscience is recorded in FEELING.

And what, is that all ?! So simple and corny? It feels like something's missing, right? Well, yes: where is this most “highly spiritual” and “highly moral” grain, so amicably sung by the preachers of the “most humane concept”? And why should it be THERE?

Do ordinary Islamic terrorists feel no responsibility before their society and are not convinced of what is good and evil? Vaughn how enthusiastically they are fighting "evil"! Or are members of criminal gangs not aware of their responsibility to the gang? And how! Because the price is life! If the members did not feel and did not bear responsibility, then the communities themselves would crumble instantly. It turns out that members of any society are conscientious ?!

Another definition, more revealing the meaning:

Conscience - the ability of a person to independently formulate moral obligations and implement moral self-control, demand from himself their fulfillment and evaluate the actions he performs; one of the expressions of the moral self-awareness of the individual. It manifests itself both in the form of a rational awareness of the moral significance of the actions performed, and in the form of emotional experiences - feelings of guilt or "remorse", that is, it links mind and emotions together.

There is already a specific clue here: "remorse" in the form of a sense of guilt.

And again there are references to independent formulations and assessments. Moreover, the source of moral and ethical criteria is again not specified. An obvious loophole for manipulators. Oh, the compilers of the meaning are cunning, they are cunning! What prevents a conscious individual from adjusting the understanding of morality and evaluating actions in order to avoid remorse? The described conscience allows. Ask anyone who appeals to conscience and what will he say? It is a duty to follow GENERAL moral and ethical guidelines! Only this way and not otherwise! In general, manipulators have “universal human values” - but we know their value! If independence was allowed, then there would be no point in appealing to it - everyone would easily and naturally justify themselves by the presence of OWN views on society. Pluralism, his mother.

Appeals to conscience for conscious people are untenable, since responsibility is a concept of consciousness, while guilt is just a feeling. The feeling of guilt arises due to the recognition of the RANDOMITY or UNCONSCIOUSNESS of an act that has entailed the consequences, that is, their UNPredictability. What kind of guilt (in the sense of feeling) can arise in the case of a deliberate and deliberate action ?! In this case, there is only RESPONSIBILITY..

And finally, the most unexpected definition is from Kabbalah (who said that conscience is only in Russian?):

Conscience in Kabbalah - this is a shame in front of people and oneself for one's selfishness. The sense of conscience, according to Kabbalah, characterizes the highest stage in the development of human egoism.… At this highest stage, according to the teachings of Kabbalah, egoism begins to feel the difference between itself and the property of absolute altruism, the so-called. Creator. Not feeling the Creator directly, a person compares himself with other people and with his moral criteria, which he received through education. There is an opinion that separation from the Creator is the root of all suffering in the world, therefore conscience is the most nightmarish and painful experience of a person. And that is why we tend to obey those moral values that the environment dictates to us, to live in accordance with the order of priorities established by it. Thus, conscience is inherent only in the "human level", the development of egoism, when the creation is able to feel the properties and qualities of another, to analyze and give a qualitative assessment of the difference in properties. If a person's altruistic behavior is dictated only by his conscience, that is, determined by other people, and not by the conscious desire of a person to achieve similarity with the property of bestowal - the Creator, then, according to the adepts of Kabbalah, his behavior is social, but not yet spiritual.

Moreover, it is quite true if we merge the religious dregs that describe what we are considering. Even the motive "drew" - altruistic behavior. But, here's an incident for the conscientious - the meaning of conscience here is just belittled in relation to the spiritual! And social behavior is also characteristic of animals. And even cats feel guilt (remorse). I declare as a direct witness.

And what do we get from all this? And we get this: the so-called. conscience is just a set of socially adaptive qualities necessary for an individual to live in society. And since there are societies with different moral and ethical attitudes, then the adaptive sets are different. Consequently, the concept of conscience is either universal, not absolute "highly spiritual", and in this case it does not differ from other moral and ethical criteria. Or, in what form its necessity is declared by its apologists, this is something else.

And here, fanfare and drum roll, where are the words OBLIGATION or NECESSITY in the wording? !!! It turns out that society does not need conscience? Well, at least the absence is not critical ?! So why this breaking of copies around her presence in the individual ?! The point is that the described mechanisms are NATURALLY FORMED and constructively incorporated into society. In contrast to the generally accepted essence of conscience. It will not arise by itself without training.

So, if remorse is already a fault, it means that conscience is something that prevents or prevents it from appearing. So? We have thrown away consciousness, feelings remain. And what is our strongest forbidding and stopping feeling? FEAR! And if remorse is a feeling of guilt, then conscience itself is a fear of it!

And fear and guilt are two of the most effective feelings for manipulation! And when paired, they are just a hellish mixture!

Let's continue our search for the "highly spiritual" in our conscience. If she herself does not have such, then it means there is in what she appeals to. And she "refers" to the folk, well, yes - generally accepted, "highly spiritual", moral and ethical foundations. And how are they expressed? The latest poll showed that 80% of the population adhere to Christian values! This is where humility and suffering are elevated to the rank of godly and pious deeds and slavery and poverty are postulated as a "spiritual path"! And again we see a familiar pair at the foundation of faith: the fear of eternal torment in hell through "sinfulness" and innate guilt through "original sin" before God! And what Christians are conscientious preachers of shame and conscience, they have no equal!

Noticed another feature in the descriptions? There is not a word about the rights of an individual, one duty! And in appeals to it, conscience is opposed to the rights of the individual and is replaced by it! And who is wrong with us? It's the same story in Christianity, that's why “God's servants” are there!

So it turns out that the conscience, which is entrusted with the obligation to bear fear and guilt in an atheistic society, is the same religion for atheists! Calls to it are a desire to suppress someone else's and an attempt to impose one's will under the guise of "divine" and absolute truth, to replace responsibility for oneself with guilt and fear of "objective" laws, using one unpleasant property of consciousness: with a long and constant fixation of attention on something first addiction, and then addiction arises! How simple and convenient: a working mechanism is taken and brought to the point of absurdity, causing paranoia. As in other "sciences" - economics, law, history …

So, constant and frequent, appropriate and not, a reminder of the need to have a conscience is caused only by a feeling of guilt, moreover, guilt is abstract, global, all-encompassing, and not concrete, situational. Otherwise, there would be no reproaches, but specific accusations. This is how the manipulation lever was wrapped in a beautiful and romantic wrapper of "remorse". Hence the lack of explanations of the essence of conscience - they are not only unnecessary, but also contraindicated - the zombie program should take root in the subconscious on emotions, bypassing consciousness. The word itself is only a key, a command to launch the feeling of guilt necessary for the manipulator, "sewn" into the mind by "education" by reproaches. Guilt is a feeling of emotional, psychological discomfort against the background of fear of rejection by one's society. As a rule, before foreign societies, and especially hostile ones, there is no feeling of guilt. The feeling of global guilt, imposed by conscience, makes its bearer feel guilty and be responsible to ANY society! I still remember the starving children of Africa!:) And together with sacralization and elevation to the rank of virtue of Christian sacrifice, gives rise and cultivates in the people a mentality of sacrifice, which allows everyone to use in their own interests the Russians, without ceremony with them, but calling for justice. How, too, part of the conscience! Only some kind of one-sided - everything turns out in favor of strangers, so the main thing is to pretend to be victims in a natural way, and the victim will always support the victim.

Here's a real-world example from the internet:

“On April 17, 2016 in the city of Yakutsk there was a conflict between Aslan Balaev and Viktor Dodon.

Viktor was beaten near a bar when he was trying to protect a girl from Aslan Balayev.

As a result of the beating, Viktor received a severe brain injury, fractures of the skull bones, fell into a coma and actually became disabled. Suspect Aslan is still at large, and the victim's family has reasonable suspicions that he may get away with it.

The victim's mother contacted the local media due to the inaction of the authorities. “Everything has been bought, the Balayevs have brothers working in the Ministry of Internal Affairs and law enforcement agencies. They say that his relatives have connections at the top, in the government of Yakutia. They have a strong lawyer who defended the entire criminal world”.

The Head of the Chechen Diaspora RUSLAN Mutaev spoke about the conflict:

“Mary, you are the same as your son, shameless, if it's scary to live in Yakutia, go back to where your roots come from. Your athlete lost, now everyone owes you a bow? You are trying to wage turmoil in Yakutsk, to raise an anti-Vainakh revolt, your paratrooper fell out of the place »….

What is the passage with which the "shepherd" puts the "flock" in its place, eh ?! A good example, almost a classic of the genre …

So maybe that is why there is no such area in international relations where, for what, Russia and the Russians are not accused? Maybe it’s just those who are conscientious and are guilty of the situation, feeding it with their excessive attention and just the same pride and joy for it - the victim complex seeks and finds confirmation for itself? What kind of counter claims or ignorance are there - there is such relish, come on again !!! Their sympathy is even reduced to compassion, because rejoicing is either a sin or shamelessly … By the way, it is very likely that it is the lack of the ability to rejoice, coupled with shame and greed, that underlies envy.

It seems, indeed, in this way, someone is pouring their karma on us, taking advantage of this.

As a zombie program, it has a characteristic property - to negate it, it evokes the reflexive aggression of its carrier towards the opponent. The very fierceness with which conscientious people defend their views, shamelessly trying to impose them on their opponents, should arouse suspicion! It is strange that no one notices this incident, even the shameless ones! However, this is a clear indicator of the intellectual level of our society. As well as moral - a conscientious boor is perceived quite naturally!

For example, "opuses", only one of the many "dialogues" with similar ones under the nickname YAROKOD on Midgard-info. And some of the most harmless:

“…. The creature has no idea even… -… The animal really thinks…. -… this is when the son of a bitch, being an animal, mows under the type of patron…. -… it is known here even without the spiteful priests…. - … spiteful bastard …"

And as the apotheosis of a monologue (I have a funny doggie on my avatar):

…. In front of a dodger degenerated to a dog, who has lost the slightest idea of conscience …»

What a temperamental advocate of public opinion! Looks like his conscience is helluva lot of evil - if he does not stand up for her like that, then he will bite to death!:)

Do you know what the responsibility of the conscientious before society is expressed in? In compliance with the laws that exist in it. In the sense of legal. And calls for the obligation to comply. Because guilt and responsibility have been brought into the legal field by manipulators. From the culture of the people. In order to be held accountable not before the people, but before the law. Read to yourself. That is why such "conscientious" boors appear, that in principle they do not violate laws, but at the same time rely on public opinion.

Hence the lack of independence of the conscientious, their dependence on the officialdom. They are forced to compare any own thought with public opinion and evaluate from the point of view of law, and even not finding anything seditious in it, they still keep it in themselves - you never know, what if they suddenly get it wrong ?! He is such a prudent fear. The fear of condemnation, public guilt, of being "bad", that is, we again return to shame - wounded pride. Moreover, it is in the eyes of others, in the depths of consciousness, realizing that it would be more correct to show your will, but this will already be “arrogance”, and “public opinion” requires you to be modest! Thus, conscience suppresses any initiative! Here it is, herd socialization in all its glory!

One of the most common tricks of the conscientious, making various concessions in a situation when something is unfairly demanded of them, is the message “I don’t want to spoil the relationship”. Well, yes, the relationship in which you are already, as a rule, for the other side a victim, "sheep", "loshara" (ie, there are no normal ones anymore), the conscientious don't want to spoil them in any way! For them, the image of "honesty" (of course, only in their own understanding, the opposing side does not care about him - she longs for something else) in the eyes of others is much more important than the quality of life of their own and those of their loved ones! Here it is, the "Klondike" of altruism and self-sacrifice to the delight of social parasites!

Another example from life. One granny offered her niece to take care of her elderly, recumbent sister in exchange for her one-room apartment after her death. The niece agreed and for five months, before the death of the ward, she regularly and conscientiously looked after her, by the way, at the time of “taking office” she had not been washed for about a year! And then a rather unexpected story happened: instead of keeping the apartment for herself, as agreed, the niece sold it and divided the money in half, giving half to her aunt! Moreover, according to her own admission, no one objected to the implementation of the agreement. It just seemed that the relationship with her aunt became more strained (?!). Everything would be fine and this story would have passed my attention if it were not for the phrase of our heroine, told by my friend, who told this story, justifying her act: “We are all CONSCIOUS!”. It's funny, isn't it - it turns out that violating the contract is conscientious !!! Moreover, she has a 16-year-old daughter, whom a separate apartment would not be in any way in the near future and with whom, apparently, the mother is not afraid of strained relations …

Any moral concept is easily and simply described from the point of view of not only rationality, but also in fact physics, and, in principle, for a reasonable person, an emotional guard in the form of conscience is not needed. As a rule, conscience arises in those who are afraid of condemnation, both external and internal, fearing to lose their spiritual comfort, the one that society has brought up and imposed on them, that is, those who are "head over heels" in society and cannot see without it personal life. It goes without saying that a conscientious person does not even think about personal right in this case. And, of course, it goes without saying that it is necessary to apply various qualities in life in accordance with circumstances and rationality, and not stupidly follow mental attitudes, no matter how “valuable” and “highly spiritual” they may seem to their carriers! She has a good conscience only among her own people, over a cup of tea in a peaceful atmosphere. In relation to opponents and enemies, it should not exist in principle - they are not going to bear responsibility to you, therefore they are! The enemy imposed his will on us because he slipped into the conscientious mentality "humanity" in relation to the enemy, thereby protecting HIMSELF in case of defeat, and taking full advantage of this, he himself did not suffer from humanity or conscience for us!

Hence the conclusion follows - conscience, such as it was imposed on us, is not something from the field of morality and ethics. This is an unconscious, reflexive law-abidingness, elevated into a cult, based on fear and a constant feeling of possible guilt for violations of generally accepted norms of behavior. And building on this basis their responsibility to those higher in the hierarchy. A good slave is a responsible slave. And independent in self-regulation. It is inherent even in animals to the required extent. That is, the basis of herd behavior. A good basis for "high spirituality"! However, even a compliment for church lambs! In contrast to responsibility, when the subject can consciously make decisions regarding both members of society and its whole, and justify his actions and motives. And in HUMAN society, it is rationally required only to maintain a social order (hierarchy) within the existing framework for unconscious individuals at the animal level. Moreover, these should include not only explicit asocial types, but also infantile ones, those who simply do not want to independently take responsibility for their lives and CONSCIOUSLY trust her power, delegating their rights to her and, in principle, voluntarily becoming her slave. In this case, society simply needs to take responsibility for their lives - we already know that true conscience is MUTUAL! For managers, it, at times of emerging need, is essentially a shackle shackle making decisions that do not meet generally accepted norms but require implementation for the good of the same society. They need such a quality as responsibility. They are called that - the responsible persons. But the modern society cannot call them to account - it is conscientious. … In general, conscience is a property of the OBJECT of society and society. The subject, on the other hand, in a viable and stable social order, must have such a quality as responsibility.

It's time to give answers to the questions on examples at the beginning of the article. Yes, all other actions and deeds of our "heroes" will be outside the framework of conscience! That is, shameless! Because they are illegal. That is why the peasants who JUST stood up for their own people are also UNCONSCIOUS! And to understand the obvious truth: the children of those with whom they had to fight will grow up to be the same "clinging" and revengeful, conscientious ones are not able to!

And you thought why irresponsibility flourishes around? Because everyone around whom it affects is CONSCIOUS! So the next time, when you are reminded not of responsibility but of conscience, know that they are stupidly trying to manipulate you and you can safely answer what you think about the place where it should be!

To get out of this situation, it is necessary to give a new, concrete formulation of a meaningful conscience, with the sounding of the RIGHTS of a person who leaves no room for speculation, which can be considered “highly spiritual”. And convey to everyone! Something like:

Awareness of the need in society for complementary moral and ethical foundations to loyal individuals and the formation on this basis of an adequate attitude towards others …

Or more simply:

An adequate attitude towards an adequate society. sapienti sat.

And designate the old definitions according to the content: the socially adaptive reflex. Sotsadref is a "harmonious" name! Let them call out to him as much as they like!:)