Table of contents:

What's Wrong with Einstein's Theory of Relativity
What's Wrong with Einstein's Theory of Relativity

Video: What's Wrong with Einstein's Theory of Relativity

Video: What's Wrong with Einstein's Theory of Relativity
Video: 19 Cool Things That You Will See for the First Time 2024, November
Anonim

The foundation of the special and general theory of relativity consists of only two postulates. "The universe is homogeneous" and "the speed of light is constant." But, before moving on to the postulates themselves, let's turn to history.

Einstein's plagiarism

The whole world knows that Albert Einstein is a Nobel laureate and there is little doubt that he received this prize for the creation of the special and general theory of relativity.

The French mathematicians and physicist Jules - Henri Poincaré and the Dutch physicist Hendrik Anton Lorentz have worked together for several years to create the general theory of relativity, it was Poincaré who put forward the postulate of the homogeneity of the universe and the postulate of the speed of light. And Lorenz derived the famous formulas.

A German physicist of Jewish origin, working in the patent office, had access to their scientific works and decided to call the new theory by his own name. He even retained the name of Lorentz in his theories of relativity - the basic mathematical formulas in his theory are called the Lorentz transformation. But Einstein does not specify how he himself relates to these formulas. And the name Poincaré, who put forward the postulates, does not use at all.

Plagiarism, or in other words, the theft of Einstein and the scandal that erupted around this theory, did not allow the Nobel committee to issue him the prize. The solution was found very simple. Einstein was awarded the Nobel Prize for his discovery of the second law of the photoelectric effect. Despite the fact that the photoelectric effect itself was discovered by the Russian physicist Alexander Grigorievich Stoletov.

Thus, the image of a genius of all times and peoples was created. And now almost everyone is sure that Albert Einstein received the Nobel Prize for his great special and general theories of relativity.

Well, now is the time to move on to the postulates themselves. What is wrong with these ingenious advanced ideas, which with the help of the Einstein trademark reveal the secrets of the universe to all mankind?

Light speed postulate

The speed of light, it is the maximum speed of movement of matter in the universe, is constant, is constant and equal to three hundred thousand km / sec.

Without this, the Lorentz transformation conditions turn into nonsense, since at a speed of motion with a speed of more than 300,000 km / second, according to these equations, even the mass of a photon becomes infinite.

By the way, even during his lifetime, Einstein was informed that the speed of light is not constant. By experimentally registering the so-called etheric wind of light waves, the American physicist Dayton Miller, back in the 30s, proved the inconsistency of the Michelson-Morley experiments, which allegedly confirmed the constancy of the speed of light.

Miller wrote letters to Einstein. In one of his letters, he reported on the results of his twenty-four years of work, confirming the presence of the etheric wind. However, this information was simply ignored. And after the death of Miller, the greatest physicist of that time, his work was never published anywhere else.

Image
Image

In 2000, the following experiment was carried out by Ludjin Wang, Ph. D. at the Princeton Research Institute. Light pulses were passed through a container specially treated with cerium gas. The speed of light impulses turned out to be 300 times higher than the permissible speed from the Lorentz transformations, that is, it reached 90,000,000 km / s. In the same year in Italy, another group of physicists in their experiments with microwaves obtained a speed of their propagation 25% higher, almost 400,000 km / s, than the permissible speed according to Albert Einstein.

It follows from the Lorentz transformations that if the speed of light or other material object, even by one millimeter per second, exceeds the speed of 300,000 km / s, the mass will become infinite. In other words, in the above experiments, the mass of photons and microwaves should be greater than the mass of any black hole. And despite this, all over the world they continue to study, both in schools and in institutes with universities, the theory of Albert Einstein, as a reflection of objective reality.

Here's how the news was presented by the media:

Now let's look at the second postulate.

Uniformity of the universe

Astronomers and astrophysicists know the fact that during a total solar eclipse it is possible to observe objects that our Sun covers with itself. Based on the position of a homogeneous space, this is simply impossible. Since electromagnetic waves in a homogeneous space must propagate in a straight line. The explanation for this phenomenon was given as follows: A massive space object, which is the sun, affects the rectilinear propagation of light waves, bending their trajectory, as a result of which we are able to observe what is behind it.

But if we assume that space is homogeneous, its properties and qualities are unchanged, then such an observation becomes impossible.

Here is a study that leaves no stone unturned on the foundation of space homogeneity.

Astrophysicists George Nodland and John Ralston published unique data in the scientific journal Review of Word Physics in 1997. After analyzing radio waves from 160 distant galaxies, they concluded that the radiation rotates as it travels through space, in the form of a subtle pattern resembling a corkscrew. According to observation from the Earth, the axis of rotation runs in one direction, towards the constellation Sextans, and in the other direction - towards the constellation Acuilla. In fact, this is experimental confirmation that the universe has an up and down.

Was it by chance that false ideas about the nature of the universe were imposed on all mankind?

Recommended: