Video: They say the toponyms: Paganism is the truth, the official izTORIA is a fake
2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55
Perhaps the only thing that is most reliably recorded in the memory of a person is the name of his ancestors - father and mother, grandparents, great-grandfathers and great-grandmothers. Only a few, mostly criminals, change their names and the names of their ancestors.
The overwhelming majority of normal people strive to preserve this memory and thus transfer the names of real people from the past to the future.
As a result, it can be assumed that the names of the people form the REAL story. In this case, toponymy can become a supplier of reliable information for reconstructing real history. This method works very clearly on the material of birch bark letters of the XI-XII centuries. The 300 Old Russian names indicated in them - ALL found confirmation in today's toponyms.
Thus, based on the materials of birch bark letters, it can be stated that Russian toponyms were historically formed from their own names - the names and nicknames of people who were related to the designated geographical concept. I showed this in my book “Andrey Tyunyaev. Ancient Russia in the words of eyewitnesses of the XI-XII centuries. - M.: White Alves, 2016.
This custom has survived to this day. World practice establishes the right to a discoverer to give his name to a geographical place discovered by him. Let us recall at least the origin of the name America - from the name of Amerigo Vespucci, Colombia - from Christopher Columbus, the Laptev Sea - from the Laptev brothers, etc.
Moreover, if we take Slavic mythology, then the hereditary connection is clearly traced in it, at the end of which the mythical-historical character gives his name to the corresponding toponym. For example, the Czech gave the name to the Czech Republic and the Czechs, Vyatko to Vyatka and Vyatichi, Kiy to the Kievites and Kiev, Rus to the Russian people, the mermaid Ros to Rus, etc.
There are other correspondences: the goddess Tarusa gave the name to the city of Tarusa, her husband Barma - the village of Barma, the mermaid Oka gave the name to the Oka, the snake Lamia - to the Lama river (in the vicinity of Volokolamsk), the serpent Ra - to the Ra-river (now the Volga), the god Veles - the city of Veles and the state of Veles (Wales), the god Don - the Don River, the god Koschei - Kasimov, Kashira, Kazan and the numerous villages of Koscheevo, etc.
Without exception, all the deities of Old Russian and Old Slavic mythology are fixed in the national memory by the corresponding toponyms. This tradition continues in the "Tale of Slovenia and Ruse", which tells that Sloven established the city of Slovensk, and Rus - the city of Rus. From their descendants, the Volkhov River and others. In the Veles Book, the technology of toponyms formation is the same: a city, a village, a river receive the name of a hero.
If we take the recent time, it is clearly seen that traditions are being preserved. The greatest leader of the revolution, Lenin, is immortalized in the names of many villages and cities (Leninsk-Kuznetsky, Leninogorsk, Lenino, etc.), districts, etc., Stalin is also (Stalingrad, Stalino), Sverdlov (Sverdlovsk), Kirov (Kirov), Gagarin, Lomonosov, Korolev, Zhukov (Zhukovsk), Engels, etc. Many of these place names were erased by subsequent generations of vandals, but some remained. And most importantly, they existed.
In this regard, it is interesting to note the following. In European countries, especially among the people of the royal layer, for some inexplicable reason, the opposite approach is common. For some reason, the local rulers do not give their names to geographical areas, but, on the contrary, they themselves take "surnames" from local toponyms, which received the name in the most incomprehensible way for them.
For example, according to the official version, the same Windsors took their "surname" from the name of their own castle. There are no cities with the names of "great" figures - Voltaire, Rousseau, Volta, Newton, etc. Even the emperor Napoleon got his "surname" in its origin from Naples. Alexander the Great received a "surname" by origin from Macedonia, etc.
In addition, in the history of the Middle Ages of Russia, the same misunderstandings occur. Only Prince Yaroslav gave the name to Yaroslavl, and the rest of the princes could not fix their names in the names of cities, rivers, lakes, villages. And this is very strange. On the one hand, unremarkable people from the XI-XII centuries managed to give their names to villages or cities, and on the other, whole heroic princes, from the description of whose activities the chronicles literally burst, could not repeat the same. All these "Alexandra Nevsky", named for the rivers, run counter to the general tradition and the general rule. And the city of Aleksandronevsk was not left of them …
If we take kings, kings and emperors, then the situation with names is very, very strange. For some reason, these persons deliberately take for themselves the same names with an indication of an unnecessary serial number (indicating, perhaps, about the scarcity of imagination of the falsifiers of history). And not one of them left any trace in the toponymy of Russia, or in the toponymy of Europe. As, however, neither from Robespierre, nor from Martin Luther … Even from Peter I there was no city or village (St. Petersburg - "City of the Sacred Stone" is named after the sacred stone installed on the Hare Island).
A similar picture is emerging in the mainstream of Judaism. There are no historical place names that would have received their names from the characters in the Old Testament. But the opposite is "obvious" to some scientists. In their "scientific" works, they habitually report the names of ancient characters - such as "Andronicus from Giza", "Semyon from Zion" - clearly showing that these "people" got their names from toponyms, and not as it was historically.
We observe the same oddity in the history of late medieval Russia - when it was allegedly ruled by the German emperors of the Romanovs. "Scientists" report that the Russian people of this period allegedly did not have surnames (although surnames are already in the birch bark letters of the 11th-12th centuries). By purchasing them, they received surnames after the names of the slave-owners-landlords, to whom these people were allegedly assigned.
However, with such a total naming, for some reason, not a single toponym from those very landowners took root. There are no place names "Rostopchin", "Obolensky", "Muravyov-Apostol", etc.
The same strange situation has developed with Christian place names. With the total greatness of Jesus Christ, there is not a single toponym formed in his name "Jesus". There are also no toponyms from his nickname "Christ", not counting, perhaps, the late name of the village of Hristovo in Belarus. There are no place names from "Virgin Mary", "Yahweh", "Joshua", etc. That is, neither Judaism nor Christianity was honored to gain a foothold in toponyms.
The conclusion from what has been said about toponymy suggests the following. In the overwhelming majority of cases, toponyms are formed from the names of real discoverers, heroes and prominent personalities. According to this scenario, numerous toponyms of Russia got their names from real people mentioned in the birch bark letters of the 11th - 12th centuries. Towns, villages, rivers and lakes also received the names of the ancient Russian pagan gods - ALL!
Here's an example. Place names on behalf of the god Perun: Lake Pirunjarvi (Russia), Perunova (Russia), Perunovskiy lane (Moscow), Perunovo (Belarus), Perun (France), Perunen (France), Perunel (France), Perunu (France), Perundurai (India) and many others. Is it possible to say on this texture that the god Perun is fiction? Compared to the same Christ …
Toponyms were formed in the same way in the XX century and they are formed in our time. Such an algorithm for the formation of toponyms corresponds to the course of real history.
If this order is violated, then this fact suggests that we are faced with a falsification, and the "story" built on the mention of the names of HOMELESS and HOMELESS heroes is nothing more than an anecdote - a novel invented by the "emperors" of the Romanovs. Which themselves got their name literally "through the ass" - only after 300 years of "existence" of the imperial dynasty.
This means that the history of the European nobility, who received names from their estates, is falsified.“Thousands of years” history of Judaism and Christianity, whose gods and deities did not leave behind a single toponym, is fictitious. The annalistic history of Ancient Russia, which also did not appear in 1000 years by any toponym, is fictional.
And somehow this picture is perceived in a completely different way….
Recommended:
In search of Truth, people have already expressed many guesses, let me say something too
Many people believe that the words "mind" and "mind" are synonyms. But this is fundamentally wrong! There is the same huge difference between the mind and the mind of a person, which in mythology there is between God and the devil
They say that there were bunglers in the Soviet Union?
Well, what can you do - our family loves frothy coffee! Cappuccino - in their language. For this occasion I bought such a special device in Technopark.ru - a milk frother. For this very foam. Honestly worked for exactly one week. Then suddenly died
If we still have descendants, then this is what they will say
They lived in identical cramped concrete boxes, valued things and means of exchange above the lives of those around them, and systematically engaged in thoughtless activities in order to accumulate these funds. The work of many of them was completely useless, and even harmful - they polluted their world every day, killing themselves
Fuel-free energy of a person, as the essence of the Savior's teachings !!! Many hours of sermons of the Son of God .. why are they not in the official Gospels?
Many hours of sermons of the Son of God .. Where are the texts? Why are they not in the official Gospels? Teaching of the Savior in the Apocrypha / Communion with God without intermediaries
Questions to official confidants Masterk and Ikuv about their delight with absurd and contradictory pictures of alleged witnesses of the official version
Officials again admire a new portion of controversy and idiocy about the rise of the Alexander Column. Maybe this time they will answer new questions about their admiration?