Vaccination genocide on the example of BCG

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2024-01-07 16:23

In the photo - complications after BCG vaccination.

Tuberculosis is primarily a social disease, especially in "dark, damp rooms." BCG advertising likes to cite as an example the literature of the 19th century, where all the heroes died together from consumption, and the terrible statistics of this mortality, and in the 20th century, mortality fell, allegedly with the advent of vaccinations. However, in such popular propaganda campaigns they forget to mention that, in addition to vaccinations, over a hundred years there has been a dramatic improvement in the standard of living, people have come out of cramped basements, electricity and hot water have appeared, nutrition has improved, medicines (streptomycin) have appeared. Let's see in what proportions change in living standards and mass vaccinations can change mortality and morbidity.

• Mortality in England from 1855 to 1947 decreased 7, 7 times, and by 1953 (the beginning of the use of BCG) - 14, 3 times (this is WITHOUT vaccines).

• New York. Mortality per 10,000 in 1812 - 700, 1882 - 370 (this is BEFORE the discovery of Koch's wand), after the first sanatoriums - 180, after the 2nd World War (but BEFORE vaccines and even BEFORE antibiotics) - 48. Total - 14, 6 times.

• Poland. BCG has been mandatory since 1955. Vaccinated FOUR times - at 0, 7, 12 and 18 years old. It would seem that tuberculosis should disappear! However, in 1995, the incidence was 42 per 100 thousand, with the WHO epidemic threshold of 50. Compare with the neighboring Czech Republic, where BCG was abandoned in 1986. In the same 1995, the incidence was 18 per 100 thousand, and in Slovakia - less than one case (!).
• In the Netherlands and the USA, BCG has never been on the vaccination calendar. Moreover, the incidence of tuberculosis is the lowest in the world. Coincidence?

• 1989 year. The USSR is still alive and is in the MINIMUM of its morbidity (impoverishment and homeless people are yet to come). BCG is done as planned, as in the entire socialist camp, including China, where the coverage of BCG children is 97% (!). So, let's look at the statistics of tuberculosis mortality per 100 thousand. USSR - 8, 15; China - 14, 65; Holland - 0, 2; Australia - 0.35; Canada and the USA - 0, 4. Needless to say, the last four countries do not do BCG? Coincidence? Are they not afraid of tuberculosis? They are afraid, even how, they constantly test everyone, plus they examine all immigrants, in Australia they can even officially prohibit entry at the slightest suspicion of being a carrier. Even AIDS is not on this list, but there is tuberculosis.

"Vaccinators" of course argue that BCG in "prosperous" countries do not do BECAUSE of low incidence. I will not insist on the opposite (high mortality as a result of doing BCG), although such hypotheses are quite scientifically substantiated (with mass vaccinations, a huge number of live viruses are constantly injected into the population, diagnostics is complicated (the Mantoux test actually does not work), general immunity is weakened, and so on. and practicing phthisiatricians for 30-40 years, in particular Noreyko B. V. and V. P. Sukhanovsky, note significantly more severe forms of the disease in the VACCATED). Let's pay attention to something else - the mortality rate of the BCG camp is 20-70 times higher than in the Netherlands-Canada (!), I.e. the difference is much larger than the decline in mortality in the same USA over 150 years (see above). Is the standard of living in socialist countries so much worse than in the USA in the 19th century ??? And even if you accept that he is the same, it will mean that the vaccine DOES NOT WORK AT ALL. And if we accept it as a little better (which is more plausible, after all, the slums of New York in the 19th century and Moscow “khrushchev” and even communal apartments are a huge difference), it turns out that the vaccine works IN MINUS, INCREASING mortality.

In any case, there is not a single example of neighboring countries with similar living standards where a country with a mandatory vaccine would noticeably lag behind a country without one in mortality. There are as many reverse examples as you like (the same Poland-Czech Republic).

BCG vaccination is ineffective. Direct experimental evidence

Numerically, efficiency is usually expressed as a percentage. After a 100% effective vaccine, there is no chance of getting sick. After 99%, the probability of getting sick is a hundred times less than that of an unvaccinated person. After 80% - five times. After 0%, it is the same with the unvaccinated. Correct measurements assume the correct selection of two IDENTICAL health groups, one receiving the vaccine and the other receiving a placebo (for example, saline). The largest "correct" test was done in India, more about it below. In the propaganda literature, it is not direct tests that are popular, but retroactive statistical tests. They just look at the percentage of sick or dead among the vaccinated and unvaccinated. This makes some statistical sense only with LOW population coverage and optional vaccinations. With a coverage of 95-97% and universal vaccination in maternity hospitals, only clearly premature, weakened, pathological children remain unvaccinated, the pathology of which is so obvious that it allows immediately in the maternity hospital, practically without diagnostics, to save the weak one from the obligatory injecting of the dose. It is not surprising that the percentage of sick with ANY disease among such children is disproportionately high, and the effectiveness of ANY vaccine using this method reaches 80-90% almost always, even if you replace it with salted water. But back to the BCG efficacy numbers and a few direct tests.

• Direct comparative studies of the London Faculty of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (Fine P. E. M. et al, 1995) give a figure of "no more than 20%"
• Research in the Colombian American team (Arbelaez M. et al, 2000) - 22-26%
• The largest, the first and the last to be conducted according to all scientific rules with the participation of WHO, the US Public Health Service and the Medical Research Council of India (India, 1968-1970) - 0%. ZERO efficiency of the most famous strains Paris / Pasteur and Denmark / Copenhagen. Moreover, among the vaccinated, the incidence of tuberculosis was HIGHER. The urgently created WHO working group found NO methodological errors.
• The Moscow group (Aksenova V. A. et al, 1997) conducted a study of 1,200,000 children and adolescents. It was found that the number of complications after BCG ("refugee") was several times higher than the incidence of tuberculosis in the unvaccinated. At the same time, the incidence rates of tuberculosis itself did not differ.

BCG vaccination is dangerous

• Direct complications. Most often - lymphadenitis (1% of all vaccinated, according to Mori T et al, 1996), purulent adenitis - 0.02%, etc. Allergic reactions also occur.
• Weakened immunity in the post-vaccination period to OTHER diseases, up to the banal flu, the likelihood of catching which for the majority of those reading this page is incomparably higher than meeting with a tuberculosis patient in an open form …
• The aggravation (!) Of the course of the disease (Noreiko B. V., 2003), the predominance of cavernous forms, in contrast to the classic "primary" tuberculosis, known 30-50 years ago and quite amenable to treatment with modern methods.
• Random overlays. Either the vaccine is injected, or the dose is confused. The city of Pernik (Bulgaria) - out of 280 children vaccinated with the infected vaccine, 111 died, 75 - severe tuberculosis. Zhanatas (Kazakhstan, 1997) - 153 were infected, two died (the dose was mixed). 215 serious lymphodenitis with surgery and months of chemotherapy (Kazakhstan, 2004) from low-quality cheap vaccine from Serbia … Who is next? Knowing the salaries of our doctors and the qualifications of the medical staff who remained on such salaries, are you sure that they will not confuse anything with your child again and will not save on anything?

At the dawn of the scientific and technological revolution, one clever fraudster, who is not a doctor or even a veterinarian, skillfully fabricated the results of an experiment, founded one of the most successful financial enterprises in history, which is developing, multiplying a network of branches around the world, raking in billions to this day (now, however, in collaboration with several transnational competitors). A dodger named Pasteur went down in history as a benefactor of mankind. His brainchild, Louis Pasteur Institute of Microbiology, still has unshakable authority in the "academic science" of most countries where this science exists. And the business he started, the immunization of the population, continues to undermine the immunity of the population.

All discoveries proving the uselessness or harmfulness of vaccines (at least those that are used en masse in most countries of the world), we repeat, were made a long time ago. The forgeries that accompanied Pasteur's "original", "fundamental", "basic" experiments were uncovered during the life of the great swindler. Over the century, a lot of both indirect and direct evidence of the wrecking nature of the activities of Pasteur, his associates and followers, has accumulated.

Facts of the first kind include, for example, the situation with smallpox, which is mandatory inoculated almost all over the world (including today's RF) and was allegedly completely destroyed several times over the past half century. "Almost" is an example of Great Britain. Back in the 19th century, when vaccines from the Pasteur Institute began their triumphant march across the planet, most countries legislated universal vaccination. And only the British, who traditionally distrust the French for the last thousand years, did not believe Pasteur, and back in 1898, in spite of France and the whole of Europe, they passed a law against compulsory smallpox vaccination. As a result, for all subsequent years, the number of deaths from smallpox in Great Britain was 5 times less than in France, Holland and other countries.

An interesting example of diphtheria vaccination was shown to the world by the French themselves. Vaccination began to be practiced in Pasteur's homeland in 1923, and by 1933 the number of cases of diphtheria had increased from 11 to 21 thousand, after which the statistics were "closed". There have been much cleaner, scientifically correct "involuntary experiments" with people in the recent history of vaccination (more on this below).

Let's get to know some of the vaccines that are widely used today - for a fee or as part of a national program - in a little more detail.

BCZ vaccine as a senseless gift from a couple of crooks to humanity

A rare person in Russia has escaped the most obligatory, mass vaccination of BCG (BCG) - short for Bacille de Calmette et de Guerin. The vaccine is a live tuberculosis bacillus dried in 1.5% sodium glutamate solution.

What for?

Due to the "special importance in the prevention of tuberculosis, in order to create anti-tuberculosis immunity" - all as one approve of textbooks, brochures, encyclopedias, popular books, electronic reference books and all other sources of knowledge produced in Russia.

Life does not support these bold claims. And she never confirmed it. In the Altai Territory, for example, with an exceptionally conscientious, total, advanced in the Russian Federation coverage of children with BCG vaccination, the incidence of tuberculosis among minors is twice as high as in Russia (62 patients per 100 thousand of the population against 33 patients in the Russian Federation). And the Russian Federation, in turn (like the USSR at one time), occupies one of the leading places in the world.

A brief history of BCG

The name of the vaccine comes, as it is written in encyclopedias, "after the French scientists A. Calmette and C. Guerin, who proposed in 1921 a vaccine against tuberculosis from live weakened tuberculous mycobacteria."

The "scientists" were still those. A couple of friends (history is silent about orientation), vegetating due to their incompetence without means of subsistence, one - a veterinarian with no practice, the other - a doctor without a clientele, decided to earn extra money. And in a wonderful way they found themselves at the Pasteur Institute, the brainchild of the most famous swindler from medicine (who was not a doctor or even a veterinarian at all).

The war left devastation and famine in Europe, and the Pasteur Institute (as befits institutions of this kind, financially prosperous in times of disaster) was in a hurry to take advantage of this.

The institute, when launching the vaccine in a series, accompanied this step with a wonderful advertising campaign, enlisted the support of influential people taken in the share and began to cut profits. Parallel studies of "weakened mycobacteria" in no other country in the world have shown anything similar to the results obtained by the Pasteur Institute, as usual.

The crooks who became "benefactors of mankind" were exposed the very next year after the "discovery" of falsifying laboratory experiments and distorting statistical data. But it was too late. The machine of falsifications, "vaccinated" by the first profits, started working at full speed, and soon Europe was not up to medical falsifications.

And yet BCG, unlike other vaccines, did not have such a brilliant fate - the falsifications were too obvious and the arguments about its effectiveness were difficult to prove. So, in the United States, BCG vaccination has never been carried out at all. In France, Germany in the 1980s, the vaccination of children in maternity hospitals was stopped. In Great Britain, mass surveys of schoolchildren, which showed the uselessness of the vaccine, were carried out in the 1950s. Not without a scandal and attempts at lawsuits, when it turned out that most of the schoolchildren with open tuberculosis in the city of Leicester had been vaccinated. There was a scandal in the homeland of Pasteur and the two authors of the BCG vaccine - in France. When the entire staff of one hospital, 62 people, fell ill with tuberculosis, it turned out that every one of them had been vaccinated. Today, the BCG vaccine is not used in most Western countries.

The story of the cancellation of BCG vaccination in New Zealand is curious. After World War II, New Zealand prisoners of war returned from the camps, weighing half their normal weight, eaten away by tuberculosis. The state launched research and rehabilitation programs, and already in 1946, doctors knew: if the prisoners received an additional 30 g of protein per day, then only 1.2% fell ill with tuberculosis, and not 15-19%. Scientists then confirmed what was known long before Pasteur and the couple of crooks who invented BCG: poverty and poor nutrition are the causes of tuberculosis. The story of Ray Lomas and Charles Crowl, two war heroes, former prisoners of a Nazi concentration camp, finally turned public opinion towards real methods of combating the disease.

They returned from the war exhausted and sick with tuberculosis. Subsequently, Lomasa had a tuberculosis-affected lung removed, and in 1947, when he left the Waikato hospital, he was given 3 months to live. “… I said:“What the hell! I don't care what the doctors say,”Lomas recalled. - I took 12 months of leave and went to the UK with my English wife on "labor rest …" Thanks to work on the land and good nutrition, war veterans overcame tuberculosis. The article said that until recently (1988) he smoked 120 cigarettes a day, and then switched to a pipe. While giving interviews, he swore terribly because of the recent loss of mobility - at 70 he was riding a motorcycle, fell and pierced the remaining lung …

These days, the lowest incidence rates are found where the vaccine was abandoned decades ago, or never used at all. Conversely, the highest rates of tuberculosis incidence are found in countries where mass vaccination is practiced. Here Russia got into the company of such countries as Brazil, India, the Philippines …

The World Health Organization, unlike the Russian and some other ministries of health, has actually put an end to BCG. Today, WHO representatives, participating in scientific conferences on tuberculosis, do not mention the BCG vaccine at all as a method of prevention and treatment, focusing on the need to improve living conditions and good nutrition. The process of debunking the BCG myth on a global scale began in the 1960s, when the Indian Research Council and WHO conducted an epic double-blind study involving 360,000 people in Madras. It was reliably established that more of those who were vaccinated fell ill than those who were not.

Similar results were obtained from a large-scale study in the African country of Malawi. After that, a lot of studies were carried out, a lot of damning results of the vaccine were published, and only in some countries, including the USSR, for some reason, the authorities decided that the population did not need to know about this.

By the way, on his deathbed, the great swindler Pasteur, who even without research knew the true value of his "discoveries", publicly repented, but this fact of the biography of the founder of vaccination is all the more not supposed to be known.

A brief history of tuberculosis

Tuberculosis was known in the densely populated cities of Greece and Rome. In the 19th century, out of 10 inhabitants of Europe, 7 were infected, 1 died. Today, in large cities with a high population density, the causative agent of the disease can be found in the body of almost every adult, but the infection is "dormant", activating only with a decrease in immune defense due to deterioration of living conditions or stress.

Almost all countries have gone through the massive incidence of tuberculosis.

For the first time, tuberculosis was defeated in England in the 1850s, when the chaotic growth of cities with their slums and workers' barracks was brought to an end. Public health laws provided the foundation for improved sanitation, new building standards, and slum liquidation. The streets were widened, sewers were isolated, and the dead were buried outside the city limits. The railroad helped bring fresh vegetables and fruits to the cities. Ventilation in prisons and hospitals has been improved. The death knell for tuberculosis has been the increasing use of glass in windows. Mycobacteria are highly sensitive to ultraviolet radiation and transmission very rarely occurs outdoors in daylight. Deaths from tuberculosis fell as migrants from rural areas got used to the new conditions. Factory legislation dramatically improved the lives of children and workers. She still remained high among the new emigrants, mainly from India. From the 1850s to the 1980s, TB deaths in England fell from 270 to less than 1 per 100,000 population. There were two outbreaks during the world wars, which is understandable. The introduction of anti-tuberculosis drugs in the 1940s, like the brief introduction of the BCG vaccine in the 1950s, had no effect on the rate of decline in mortality. In countries that have never used BCG in their vaccination programs (in the United States, for example), the same rate of decline in mortality from tuberculosis has been observed.

Occasionally, there are spikes in the incidence in Europe. As a rule, they are associated with an influx of migrants and their compact residence in ethnically homogeneous neighborhoods, which are characterized by poverty, overcrowding, poor housing conditions, poor nutrition, unemployment and poverty.

It is these circumstances that suggest that in the Russian Federation the worst rates of tuberculosis incidence are still ahead.